Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 7/2013

01-07-2013 | Breast Oncology

Early Assessment of Axillary Response with 18F-FDG PET/CT during Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage II–III Breast Cancer: Implications for Surgical Management of the Axilla

Authors: Bas B. Koolen, MD, Renato A. Valdés Olmos, MD, PhD, Jelle Wesseling, MD, PhD, Wouter V. Vogel, MD, PhD, Andrew D. Vincent, PhD, Kenneth G. A. Gilhuijs, PhD, Sjoerd Rodenhuis, MD, PhD, Emiel J. Th. Rutgers, MD, PhD, Marie-Jeanne T. F. D. Vrancken Peeters, MD, PhD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 7/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

If all initially node-positive patients undergo axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), overtreatment may occur in patients with complete response. Positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET/CT) during NAC may predict axillary response and select patients appropriate for less invasive treatment after NAC. We evaluated the value of sequential 18F fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CTs during NAC for axillary response monitoring in stage II–III breast cancer.

Methods

A total of 219 PET/CTs were performed in 80 patients with cytology-proven, node-positive disease at baseline (PET/CT1, n = 80) and twice during NAC (PET/CT2 n = 62, PET/CT3, n = 77). The relative changes in maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of axillary nodes were examined for their ability to assess pathological response. All patients underwent ALND after chemotherapy, and complete axillary response (pCR), defined as absence of isolated tumor cells and of micro- and macrometastases, served as the reference standard.

Results

A total of 32 (40 %) patients experienced axillary pCR. The relative decrease in SUVmax was significantly higher in patients with pCR than in those without, both on PET/CT2 (p < 0.001) and PET/CT3 (p = 0.025). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values for PET/CT2 and PET/CT3 were 0.80 (95 % confidence interval 0.68–0.92) and 0.65 (95 % confidence interval 0.52–0.79), respectively. A relative decrease of ≥60 % on PET/CT2 had an excellent specificity (35 of 37, 95 %), a high positive predictive value (12 of 14, 86 %), and a sensitivity of 48 %—that is, it accurately identified histologic pCR in 12 of 25 patients with disease that responded to therapy.

Conclusions

18F-FDG PET/CT early during NAC is useful for axillary response monitoring in cytology-proven node-positive breast cancer because it identifies pathological response, thus permitting ALND to be spared.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kaufmann M, von Minckwitz G, Mamounas EP, et al. Recommendations from an international consensus conference on the current status and future of neoadjuvant systemic therapy in primary breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:1508–16.PubMedCrossRef Kaufmann M, von Minckwitz G, Mamounas EP, et al. Recommendations from an international consensus conference on the current status and future of neoadjuvant systemic therapy in primary breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:1508–16.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Mieog JS, van der Hage JA, van de Velde CJ. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2007;94:1189–200.PubMedCrossRef Mieog JS, van der Hage JA, van de Velde CJ. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2007;94:1189–200.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Rastogi P, Anderson SJ, Bear HD, et al. Preoperative chemotherapy: updates of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project protocols B-18 and B-27. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:778–85.PubMedCrossRef Rastogi P, Anderson SJ, Bear HD, et al. Preoperative chemotherapy: updates of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project protocols B-18 and B-27. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:778–85.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference von Minckwitz G, Untch M, Blohmer JU, et al. Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:1796–804.CrossRef von Minckwitz G, Untch M, Blohmer JU, et al. Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:1796–804.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference von Minckwitz G, Blohmer JU, Costa S, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy adapted by interim response improves overall survival of primary breast cancer patients—results of the GeparTrio trial (abstract). Presented at: San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, San Antonio, TX, December 2011. von Minckwitz G, Blohmer JU, Costa S, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy adapted by interim response improves overall survival of primary breast cancer patients—results of the GeparTrio trial (abstract). Presented at: San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, San Antonio, TX, December 2011.
6.
go back to reference Schwarz-Dose J, Untch M, Tiling R, et al. Monitoring primary systemic therapy of large and locally advanced breast cancer by using sequential positron emission tomography imaging with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:535–41.PubMedCrossRef Schwarz-Dose J, Untch M, Tiling R, et al. Monitoring primary systemic therapy of large and locally advanced breast cancer by using sequential positron emission tomography imaging with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:535–41.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Loo CE, Straver ME, Rodenhuis S, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging response monitoring of breast cancer during neoadjuvant chemotherapy: relevance of breast cancer subtype. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:660–6.PubMedCrossRef Loo CE, Straver ME, Rodenhuis S, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging response monitoring of breast cancer during neoadjuvant chemotherapy: relevance of breast cancer subtype. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:660–6.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kaufmann M, Karn T, Ruckhäberle E. Controversies concerning the use of neoadjuvant systemic therapy for primary breast cancer. World J Surg. 2012;36:1480–5.PubMedCrossRef Kaufmann M, Karn T, Ruckhäberle E. Controversies concerning the use of neoadjuvant systemic therapy for primary breast cancer. World J Surg. 2012;36:1480–5.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Straver ME, Rutgers EJ, Russell NS, et al. Towards rational axillary treatment in relation to neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:2284–92.PubMedCrossRef Straver ME, Rutgers EJ, Russell NS, et al. Towards rational axillary treatment in relation to neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:2284–92.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Gimbergues P, Abrial C, Durando X, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is accurate in breast cancer patients with a clinically negative axillary nodal status at presentation. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:1316–21.PubMedCrossRef Gimbergues P, Abrial C, Durando X, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is accurate in breast cancer patients with a clinically negative axillary nodal status at presentation. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:1316–21.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Pecha V, Kolarik D, Kozevnikova R, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer. 2011;117:4606–16.PubMedCrossRef Pecha V, Kolarik D, Kozevnikova R, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer. 2011;117:4606–16.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Pritchard KI, Julian JA, Holloway CM, et al. Prospective study of 2-[18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the assessment of regional nodal spread of disease in patients with breast cancer: an Ontario clinical oncology group study. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:1274–9.PubMedCrossRef Pritchard KI, Julian JA, Holloway CM, et al. Prospective study of 2-[18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the assessment of regional nodal spread of disease in patients with breast cancer: an Ontario clinical oncology group study. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:1274–9.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Koolen BB, Valdés Olmos RA, Elkhuizen PH, et al. Locoregional lymph node involvement on 18F-FDG PET/CT in breast cancer patients scheduled for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;135:231–40.PubMedCrossRef Koolen BB, Valdés Olmos RA, Elkhuizen PH, et al. Locoregional lymph node involvement on 18F-FDG PET/CT in breast cancer patients scheduled for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;135:231–40.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Straver ME, Loo CE, Alderliesten T, Rutgers EJ, Vrancken Peeters MJ. Marking the axilla with radioactive iodine seeds (MARI procedure) may reduce the need for axillary dissection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2010;97:1226–31.PubMedCrossRef Straver ME, Loo CE, Alderliesten T, Rutgers EJ, Vrancken Peeters MJ. Marking the axilla with radioactive iodine seeds (MARI procedure) may reduce the need for axillary dissection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2010;97:1226–31.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Jung SY, Kim SK, Nam BH, et al. Prognostic Impact of [18F] FDG-PET in operable breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:247–53.PubMedCrossRef Jung SY, Kim SK, Nam BH, et al. Prognostic Impact of [18F] FDG-PET in operable breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:247–53.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Rousseau C, Devillers A, Campone M, et al. FDG PET evaluation of early axillary lymph node response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage II and III breast cancer patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38:1029–36.PubMedCrossRef Rousseau C, Devillers A, Campone M, et al. FDG PET evaluation of early axillary lymph node response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage II and III breast cancer patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38:1029–36.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Koolen BB, Pengel KE, Wesseling J, et al. FDG PET/CT during neoadjuvant chemotherapy may predict response in ER-positive/HER2-negative and triple negative, but not in HER2-positive breast cancer. Breast. 2013. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2012.12.020. Koolen BB, Pengel KE, Wesseling J, et al. FDG PET/CT during neoadjuvant chemotherapy may predict response in ER-positive/HER2-negative and triple negative, but not in HER2-positive breast cancer. Breast. 2013. doi:10.​1016/​j.​breast.​2012.​12.​020.
18.
go back to reference Loo CE, Teertstra HJ, Rodenhuis S, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for prediction of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: initial results. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191:1331–8.PubMedCrossRef Loo CE, Teertstra HJ, Rodenhuis S, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for prediction of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: initial results. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191:1331–8.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Vidal-Sicart S, Aukema TS, Vogel WV, Hoefnagel CA, Valdes Olmos RA. Added value of prone position technique for PET-TAC in breast cancer patients. Rev Esp Med Nucl. 2010;29:230–5.PubMedCrossRef Vidal-Sicart S, Aukema TS, Vogel WV, Hoefnagel CA, Valdes Olmos RA. Added value of prone position technique for PET-TAC in breast cancer patients. Rev Esp Med Nucl. 2010;29:230–5.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Koolen BB, Vrancken Peeters MJ, Aukema TS, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT as a staging procedure in primary stage II and III breast cancer: comparison with conventional imaging techniques. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;131:117–26.PubMedCrossRef Koolen BB, Vrancken Peeters MJ, Aukema TS, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT as a staging procedure in primary stage II and III breast cancer: comparison with conventional imaging techniques. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;131:117–26.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Boellaard R, Oyen WJ, Hoekstra CJ, et al. The Netherlands protocol for standardisation and quantification of FDG whole body PET studies in multi-centre trials. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35:2320–33.PubMedCrossRef Boellaard R, Oyen WJ, Hoekstra CJ, et al. The Netherlands protocol for standardisation and quantification of FDG whole body PET studies in multi-centre trials. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35:2320–33.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Gianni L, Eiermann W, Semiglazov V, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with trastuzumab followed by adjuvant trastuzumab versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, in patients with HER2-positive locally advanced breast cancer (the NOAH trial): a randomised controlled superiority trial with a parallel HER2-negative cohort. Lancet. 2010;375:377–84.PubMedCrossRef Gianni L, Eiermann W, Semiglazov V, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with trastuzumab followed by adjuvant trastuzumab versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, in patients with HER2-positive locally advanced breast cancer (the NOAH trial): a randomised controlled superiority trial with a parallel HER2-negative cohort. Lancet. 2010;375:377–84.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Gil-Rendo A, Martínez-Regueira F, Zornoza G, García-Velloso MJ, Beorlegui C, Rodriguez-Spiteri N. Association between [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake and prognostic parameters in breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2009;96:166–70.PubMedCrossRef Gil-Rendo A, Martínez-Regueira F, Zornoza G, García-Velloso MJ, Beorlegui C, Rodriguez-Spiteri N. Association between [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake and prognostic parameters in breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2009;96:166–70.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Groheux D, Giacchetti S, Moretti JL, et al. Correlation of high 18F-FDG uptake to clinical, pathological and biological prognostic factors in breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38:426–35.PubMedCrossRef Groheux D, Giacchetti S, Moretti JL, et al. Correlation of high 18F-FDG uptake to clinical, pathological and biological prognostic factors in breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38:426–35.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Humbert O, Berriolo-Riedinger A, Riedinger JM, et al. Changes in 18F-FDG tumor metabolism after a first course of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: influence of tumor subtypes. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:2572–7.PubMedCrossRef Humbert O, Berriolo-Riedinger A, Riedinger JM, et al. Changes in 18F-FDG tumor metabolism after a first course of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: influence of tumor subtypes. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:2572–7.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Quarles van Ufford HM, van Tinteren H, Stroobants SG, Riphagen II, Hoekstra OS. Added value of baseline 18F-FDG uptake in serial 18F-FDG PET for evaluation of response of solid extracerebral tumors to systemic cytotoxic neoadjuvant treatment: a meta-analysis. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:1507–16.CrossRef Quarles van Ufford HM, van Tinteren H, Stroobants SG, Riphagen II, Hoekstra OS. Added value of baseline 18F-FDG uptake in serial 18F-FDG PET for evaluation of response of solid extracerebral tumors to systemic cytotoxic neoadjuvant treatment: a meta-analysis. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:1507–16.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Prati R, Minami CA, Gornbein JA, Debruhl N, Chung D, Chang HR. Accuracy of clinical evaluation of locally advanced breast cancer in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer. 2009;115:1194–202.PubMedCrossRef Prati R, Minami CA, Gornbein JA, Debruhl N, Chung D, Chang HR. Accuracy of clinical evaluation of locally advanced breast cancer in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer. 2009;115:1194–202.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Rouzier R, Extra JM, Klijanienko J, et al. Incidence and prognostic significance of complete axillary downstaging after primary chemotherapy in breast cancer patients with T1 to T3 tumors and cytologically proven axillary metastatic lymph nodes. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1304–10.PubMedCrossRef Rouzier R, Extra JM, Klijanienko J, et al. Incidence and prognostic significance of complete axillary downstaging after primary chemotherapy in breast cancer patients with T1 to T3 tumors and cytologically proven axillary metastatic lymph nodes. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1304–10.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Smith IC, Heys SD, Hutcheon AW, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: significantly enhanced response with docetaxel. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1456–66.PubMedCrossRef Smith IC, Heys SD, Hutcheon AW, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: significantly enhanced response with docetaxel. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1456–66.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference von Minckwitz G, Kümmel S, Vogel P, et al. Neoadjuvant vinorelbine-capecitabine versus docetaxel-doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide in early nonresponsive breast cancer: phase III randomized GeparTrio trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:542–51.CrossRef von Minckwitz G, Kümmel S, Vogel P, et al. Neoadjuvant vinorelbine-capecitabine versus docetaxel-doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide in early nonresponsive breast cancer: phase III randomized GeparTrio trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:542–51.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Juweid ME, Stroobants S, Hoekstra OS, et al. Use of positron emission tomography for response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the Imaging Subcommittee of International Harmonization Project in Lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:571–8.PubMedCrossRef Juweid ME, Stroobants S, Hoekstra OS, et al. Use of positron emission tomography for response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the Imaging Subcommittee of International Harmonization Project in Lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:571–8.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Early Assessment of Axillary Response with 18F-FDG PET/CT during Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage II–III Breast Cancer: Implications for Surgical Management of the Axilla
Authors
Bas B. Koolen, MD
Renato A. Valdés Olmos, MD, PhD
Jelle Wesseling, MD, PhD
Wouter V. Vogel, MD, PhD
Andrew D. Vincent, PhD
Kenneth G. A. Gilhuijs, PhD
Sjoerd Rodenhuis, MD, PhD
Emiel J. Th. Rutgers, MD, PhD
Marie-Jeanne T. F. D. Vrancken Peeters, MD, PhD
Publication date
01-07-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 7/2013
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-2902-0

Other articles of this Issue 7/2013

Annals of Surgical Oncology 7/2013 Go to the issue