Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Dysphagia 4/2022

28-06-2021 | Dysphagia | Original Article

Cultural Adaptation and Validation of Questionnaires for Evaluation of Health-Related Quality of Life with Dysphagia in Different Countries: A Systematic Review

Authors: Lin Yang, Zhigang Zhang, Huiya Gao, Yuchen Wu, Huaping Wei, Jiajia Kong, Rui Wang, Jie Cheng, Jinhui Tian

Published in: Dysphagia | Issue 4/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Dysphagia can have devastating and long-lasting effects on the patient’s health-related quality of life (HRQoL). In recent years, a number of questionnaires for the evaluation of the HRQoL of patients with dysphagia have been developed and have been adapted for use in different countries and cultures. However, problems may arise in the process of cultural adaptation and validation, which can affect the quality of the questionnaires and their measurements. This study was conducted to systematically summarize the cultural adaptation and validation of questionnaires for the evaluation of dysphagia-related HRQoL in different countries, assessing the varieties, measurement properties, and qualities of these questionnaires, with the aim of identifying the status of their adaptation and validation and ways in which they might be improved. Four databases were searched, and relevant articles were screened, with data from eligible reports extracted and reviewed. The methodological quality of the included articles was evaluated using the QualSyst critical appraisal tool. The HRQoL questionnaires for patients with dysphagia were assessed using the quality criteria for the measurement properties of health status questionnaires proposed by Terwee et al. and Timmerman et al. 29 studies published between 2008 and 2020 were included. The questionnaires described in these 29 studies were translated into 19 languages and culturally adapted to 21 countries. The adapted questionnaires were based on the Swallowing quality of life questionnaire (SWAL-QOL) by Mchorney et al., the Dysphagia Handicap Index (DHI) by Silbergleit et al., the M.D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) by Chen et al., and the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) by Belafsky et al. It was found that the questionnaires were reliable and valid instruments for the assessment of dysphagia-related HRQoL, but the quality criteria for cultural adaptation and validation were not strictly followed, especially in the categories of criterion validity, agreement, responsiveness, and interpretability. In conclusion, although the questionnaires were found to be both reliable and valid, the quality criteria should be considered and strictly followed in the cultural adaptation and validation process in the future.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Prosiegel M, Schelling A, Wagner-Sonntag E. Dysphagia and multiple sclerosis. Int MS J. 2004;11(1):22–31.PubMed Prosiegel M, Schelling A, Wagner-Sonntag E. Dysphagia and multiple sclerosis. Int MS J. 2004;11(1):22–31.PubMed
2.
3.
go back to reference Groher ME, Crary MA. Clinical management in adults and children. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Elsevier Inc.; 2016. Groher ME, Crary MA. Clinical management in adults and children. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Elsevier Inc.; 2016.
6.
go back to reference Dwivedi RC, Chisholm EJ, Khan AS, Harris NJ, Bhide SA, Rose SS, Kerawala CJ, Clarke PM, Nutting CM, Rhys-Evans PH, Harrington KJ, Kazi R. An exploratory study of the influence of clinico-demographic variables on swallowing and swallowing-related quality of life in a cohort of oral and oropharyngeal cancer patients treated with primary surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;269(4):1233–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-011-1756-y.CrossRefPubMed Dwivedi RC, Chisholm EJ, Khan AS, Harris NJ, Bhide SA, Rose SS, Kerawala CJ, Clarke PM, Nutting CM, Rhys-Evans PH, Harrington KJ, Kazi R. An exploratory study of the influence of clinico-demographic variables on swallowing and swallowing-related quality of life in a cohort of oral and oropharyngeal cancer patients treated with primary surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;269(4):1233–9. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00405-011-1756-y.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Calman KC. Definitions and dimensions of quality of life. In: Aaronson N, Bekman JS, editors. The quality of life of cancer patients. New York: Raven Press; 1987. p. 1987. Calman KC. Definitions and dimensions of quality of life. In: Aaronson N, Bekman JS, editors. The quality of life of cancer patients. New York: Raven Press; 1987. p. 1987.
11.
go back to reference Crary MA, Mann GD, Groher ME. Initial psychometric assessment of a functional oral intake scale for dysphagia in stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(8):1516–20.CrossRef Crary MA, Mann GD, Groher ME. Initial psychometric assessment of a functional oral intake scale for dysphagia in stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(8):1516–20.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Mann G. MASA: the Mann assessment of swallowing ability. New York: Singular; 2002. Mann G. MASA: the Mann assessment of swallowing ability. New York: Singular; 2002.
13.
go back to reference Logemann JA, et al. Normal swallowing physiology as viewed by videofluoroscopy and videoendoscopy. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 1998;50(6):311–9.CrossRef Logemann JA, et al. Normal swallowing physiology as viewed by videofluoroscopy and videoendoscopy. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 1998;50(6):311–9.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Martino R, Beaton D, Diamant NE. Perceptions of psychological issues related to dysphagia differ in acute and chronic patients. Dysphagia. 2010;25(1):26–34.CrossRef Martino R, Beaton D, Diamant NE. Perceptions of psychological issues related to dysphagia differ in acute and chronic patients. Dysphagia. 2010;25(1):26–34.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Chen AY, Frankowski R, Bishop-Leone J, Hebert T, Leyk S, Lewin J, Goepfert H. The development and validation of a dysphagia-specific quality-of-life questionnaire for patients with head and neck cancer: The M. D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;127(7):870–6.PubMed Chen AY, Frankowski R, Bishop-Leone J, Hebert T, Leyk S, Lewin J, Goepfert H. The development and validation of a dysphagia-specific quality-of-life questionnaire for patients with head and neck cancer: The M. D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;127(7):870–6.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Burgos R, Sarto B, Segurola H, Romagosa A, Puiggros C, Vazquez C, Cardenas G, Barcons N, Araujo K, Perez-Portabella C. Translation and validation of the Spanish version of the EAT-10 (Eating Assessment Tool-10) for the screening of dysphagia. Nutr Hosp. 2012;27(6):2048–54.PubMed Burgos R, Sarto B, Segurola H, Romagosa A, Puiggros C, Vazquez C, Cardenas G, Barcons N, Araujo K, Perez-Portabella C. Translation and validation of the Spanish version of the EAT-10 (Eating Assessment Tool-10) for the screening of dysphagia. Nutr Hosp. 2012;27(6):2048–54.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Kmet LM, Lee RC, Cook LS. Standard quality assessment criteria for evaluating primary research papers from a variety of fields. Edmonton, University of Calgary, Faculty of Medicine: Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research (AHFMR), HTA (2004) Kmet LM, Lee RC, Cook LS. Standard quality assessment criteria for evaluating primary research papers from a variety of fields. Edmonton, University of Calgary, Faculty of Medicine: Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research (AHFMR), HTA (2004)
53.
go back to reference Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):1–6.CrossRef Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):1–6.CrossRef
54.
go back to reference Speyer R. Oropharyngeal dysphagia: screening and assessment. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2013;46(6):989–1008.CrossRef Speyer R. Oropharyngeal dysphagia: screening and assessment. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2013;46(6):989–1008.CrossRef
55.
go back to reference Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186–91.CrossRef Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186–91.CrossRef
56.
go back to reference Sousa VD, Rojjanasrirat W. Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011;17(2):268–74.CrossRef Sousa VD, Rojjanasrirat W. Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011;17(2):268–74.CrossRef
57.
go back to reference Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, Bouter LM, de Vet HCW. International consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes: results of the COSMIN study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:737–45.CrossRef Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, Bouter LM, de Vet HCW. International consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes: results of the COSMIN study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:737–45.CrossRef
58.
go back to reference Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46(12):1417–32.CrossRef Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46(12):1417–32.CrossRef
59.
go back to reference Hunt SM, Alonso J, Bucquet D, Niero M, Wiklund I, McKenna S. Cross-cultural adaptation of health measures. European group for health management and quality of life assessment. Health Policy. 1991;19(1):33–44.CrossRef Hunt SM, Alonso J, Bucquet D, Niero M, Wiklund I, McKenna S. Cross-cultural adaptation of health measures. European group for health management and quality of life assessment. Health Policy. 1991;19(1):33–44.CrossRef
60.
go back to reference Sartorius N, Kuyken W. Translation of health status instruments. Berlin: Springer; 1994. p. 3–18. Sartorius N, Kuyken W. Translation of health status instruments. Berlin: Springer; 1994. p. 3–18.
62.
go back to reference Lee CC, Li D, Arai S, Puntillo K. Ensuring cross-cultural equivalence in translation of research consents and clinical documents: a systematic process for translating English to Chinese. J Transcult Nurs. 2009;20(1):77–82.CrossRef Lee CC, Li D, Arai S, Puntillo K. Ensuring cross-cultural equivalence in translation of research consents and clinical documents: a systematic process for translating English to Chinese. J Transcult Nurs. 2009;20(1):77–82.CrossRef
63.
go back to reference Acquadro C, Conway K, Hareendran A, Aaronson N. European Regulatory Issues and Quality of Life Assessment (ERIQA) Group. Literature review of methods to translate health-related quality of life questionnaires for use in multinational clinical trials. Value Health. 2008;11:509–21.CrossRef Acquadro C, Conway K, Hareendran A, Aaronson N. European Regulatory Issues and Quality of Life Assessment (ERIQA) Group. Literature review of methods to translate health-related quality of life questionnaires for use in multinational clinical trials. Value Health. 2008;11:509–21.CrossRef
64.
go back to reference Peters M, Passchier J. Translating instruments for cross-cultural studies in headache research. Headache. 2006;46:82–91.CrossRef Peters M, Passchier J. Translating instruments for cross-cultural studies in headache research. Headache. 2006;46:82–91.CrossRef
68.
go back to reference Hambleton KH, Jones RW. An NCME instructional module on: comparison of classical test theory and item response theory and their applications to test development. Educ Meas. 1993;12(3):38–47.CrossRef Hambleton KH, Jones RW. An NCME instructional module on: comparison of classical test theory and item response theory and their applications to test development. Educ Meas. 1993;12(3):38–47.CrossRef
69.
go back to reference Cordier R, et al. Evaluating the psychometric properties of the eating assessment Tool (EAT-10) using rasch analysis. Dysphagia. 2017;32(2):250–60.CrossRef Cordier R, et al. Evaluating the psychometric properties of the eating assessment Tool (EAT-10) using rasch analysis. Dysphagia. 2017;32(2):250–60.CrossRef
70.
go back to reference Cordier R, et al. Using rasch analysis to evaluate the reliability and validity of the swallowing quality of life questionnaire: an item response theory approach. Dysphagia. 2018;33(4):441–56.CrossRef Cordier R, et al. Using rasch analysis to evaluate the reliability and validity of the swallowing quality of life questionnaire: an item response theory approach. Dysphagia. 2018;33(4):441–56.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Cultural Adaptation and Validation of Questionnaires for Evaluation of Health-Related Quality of Life with Dysphagia in Different Countries: A Systematic Review
Authors
Lin Yang
Zhigang Zhang
Huiya Gao
Yuchen Wu
Huaping Wei
Jiajia Kong
Rui Wang
Jie Cheng
Jinhui Tian
Publication date
28-06-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Dysphagia / Issue 4/2022
Print ISSN: 0179-051X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0460
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-021-10330-3

Other articles of this Issue 4/2022

Dysphagia 4/2022 Go to the issue