Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 12/2007

01-12-2007 | Breast

Dynamic breast MR imaging: is parametric mapping superior to image subtraction in lesion detection?

Authors: Kathinka D. Kurz, Hans-Jörg Wittsack, Reinhart Willers, Dirk Blondin, Ulrich Mödder, Andreas Saleh

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 12/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

We compared the detection of malignant lesions in two different methods of parametric-guided analysis to the widely used early subtraction images. The parametric colour-coded overlays were defined by the increase of signal intensity after contrast injection and the course of the time signal intensity curve. Exams of 30 patients with histopathological evidence of 32 invasive breast carcinomas were evaluated. Five hundred five areas of additional enhancing tissue were found in the early subtraction images. The sensitivity was 100 in the subtraction images and 100 and 93.8 in the parametric images, respectively, the specificity 67.5, 84.2 and 88.7, respectively. On average 4.4 ROI-measurements were needed to find the highest increase of signal intensity in the subtraction series compared to 1.9 in the parametric images. Properly selected thresholds in parametric imaging may be helpful in the differentiation of enhancing tissue. Furthermore the parametric image-guided ROI selection significantly speeds up the analysis and makes it safer as a lower rate of ROI-measurements is needed to find the strongest enhancement.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sardanelli F, Iozzelli A, Fausto A (2003) MR imaging of the breast: indications, established technique, and new directions. Eur Radiol 13(Suppl 3):N28–N36PubMedCrossRef Sardanelli F, Iozzelli A, Fausto A (2003) MR imaging of the breast: indications, established technique, and new directions. Eur Radiol 13(Suppl 3):N28–N36PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, Leutner C, Wardelmann E, Gieseke J, Schild HH (1999) Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology 211:101–110PubMed Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, Leutner C, Wardelmann E, Gieseke J, Schild HH (1999) Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology 211:101–110PubMed
3.
go back to reference Helbich TH (2000) Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. Eur J Radiol 34:208–219PubMedCrossRef Helbich TH (2000) Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. Eur J Radiol 34:208–219PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Szabo BK, Aspelin P, Kristoffersen Wiberg M, Tot T, Bone B (2003) Invasive breast cancer: correlation of dynamic MR features with prognostic factors. Eur Radiol 13:2425–2435PubMedCrossRef Szabo BK, Aspelin P, Kristoffersen Wiberg M, Tot T, Bone B (2003) Invasive breast cancer: correlation of dynamic MR features with prognostic factors. Eur Radiol 13:2425–2435PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Schnall MD, Blume J, Bluemke DA, DeAngelis GA, DeBruhl N, Harms S, Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Hylton N, Kuhl CK, Pisano ED, Causer P, Schnitt SJ, Thickman D, Stelling CB, Weatherall PT, Lehman C, Gatsonis CA (2006) Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study. Radiology 238:42–53PubMedCrossRef Schnall MD, Blume J, Bluemke DA, DeAngelis GA, DeBruhl N, Harms S, Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Hylton N, Kuhl CK, Pisano ED, Causer P, Schnitt SJ, Thickman D, Stelling CB, Weatherall PT, Lehman C, Gatsonis CA (2006) Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study. Radiology 238:42–53PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Agoston AT, Daniel BL, Herfkens RJ, Ikeda DM, Birdwell RL, Heiss SG, Sawyer-Glover AM (2001) Intensity-modulated parametric mapping for simultaneous display of rapid dynamic and high-spatial-resolution breast MR imaging data. Radiographics 21:217–226PubMed Agoston AT, Daniel BL, Herfkens RJ, Ikeda DM, Birdwell RL, Heiss SG, Sawyer-Glover AM (2001) Intensity-modulated parametric mapping for simultaneous display of rapid dynamic and high-spatial-resolution breast MR imaging data. Radiographics 21:217–226PubMed
7.
go back to reference Kelcz F, Furman-Haran E, Grobgeld D, Degani H (2002) Clinical testing of high-spatial-resolution parametric contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:1485–1492PubMed Kelcz F, Furman-Haran E, Grobgeld D, Degani H (2002) Clinical testing of high-spatial-resolution parametric contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:1485–1492PubMed
8.
go back to reference Hauth EA, Jaeger H, Maderwald S, Stockamp C, Muhler A, Kimmig R, Forsting M (2006) Evaluation of quantitative parametric analysis for characterization of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography. Eur Radiol 16(12):2834–2841PubMedCrossRef Hauth EA, Jaeger H, Maderwald S, Stockamp C, Muhler A, Kimmig R, Forsting M (2006) Evaluation of quantitative parametric analysis for characterization of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography. Eur Radiol 16(12):2834–2841PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hoffmann U, Brix G, Knopp MV, Hess T, Lorenz WJ (1995) Pharmacokinetic mapping of the breast: a new method for dynamic MR mammography. Magn Reson Med 33:506–514PubMedCrossRef Hoffmann U, Brix G, Knopp MV, Hess T, Lorenz WJ (1995) Pharmacokinetic mapping of the breast: a new method for dynamic MR mammography. Magn Reson Med 33:506–514PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Parker GJ, Suckling J, Tanner SF, Padhani AR, Revell PB, Husband JE, Leach MO (1997) Probing tumor microvascularity by measurement, analysis and display of contrast agent uptake kinetics. J Magn Reson Imaging 7:564–574PubMedCrossRef Parker GJ, Suckling J, Tanner SF, Padhani AR, Revell PB, Husband JE, Leach MO (1997) Probing tumor microvascularity by measurement, analysis and display of contrast agent uptake kinetics. J Magn Reson Imaging 7:564–574PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Jacobs MA, Barker PB, Bluemke DA, Maranto C, Arnold C, Herskovits EH, Bhujwalla Z (2003) Benign and malignant breast lesions: diagnosis with multiparametric MR imaging. Radiology 229:225–232PubMedCrossRef Jacobs MA, Barker PB, Bluemke DA, Maranto C, Arnold C, Herskovits EH, Bhujwalla Z (2003) Benign and malignant breast lesions: diagnosis with multiparametric MR imaging. Radiology 229:225–232PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Degani H, Gusis V, Weinstein D, Fields S, Strano S (1997) Mapping pathophysiological features of breast tumors by MRI at high spatial resolution. Nat Med 3:780–782PubMedCrossRef Degani H, Gusis V, Weinstein D, Fields S, Strano S (1997) Mapping pathophysiological features of breast tumors by MRI at high spatial resolution. Nat Med 3:780–782PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Furman-Haran E, Schechtman E, Kelcz F, Kirshenbaum K, Degani H (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging reveals functional diversity of the vasculature in benign and malignant breast lesions. Cancer 104:708–718PubMedCrossRef Furman-Haran E, Schechtman E, Kelcz F, Kirshenbaum K, Degani H (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging reveals functional diversity of the vasculature in benign and malignant breast lesions. Cancer 104:708–718PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Turkat TJ, Klein BD, Polan RL, Richman RH (1994) Dynamic MR mammography: a technique for potentially reducing the biopsy rate for benign breast disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 4:563–568PubMedCrossRef Turkat TJ, Klein BD, Polan RL, Richman RH (1994) Dynamic MR mammography: a technique for potentially reducing the biopsy rate for benign breast disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 4:563–568PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Szabo BK, Aspelin P, Wiberg MK (2004) Neural network approach to the segmentation and classification of dynamic magnetic resonance images of the breast: comparison with empiric and quantitative kinetic parameters. Acad Radiol 11:1344–1354PubMedCrossRef Szabo BK, Aspelin P, Wiberg MK (2004) Neural network approach to the segmentation and classification of dynamic magnetic resonance images of the breast: comparison with empiric and quantitative kinetic parameters. Acad Radiol 11:1344–1354PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Baum F, Fischer U, Vosshenrich R, Grabbe E (2002) Classification of hypervascularized lesions in CE MR imaging of the breast. Eur Radiol 12:1087–1092PubMedCrossRef Baum F, Fischer U, Vosshenrich R, Grabbe E (2002) Classification of hypervascularized lesions in CE MR imaging of the breast. Eur Radiol 12:1087–1092PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Brinck U, Fischer U, Korabiowska M, Jutrowski M, Schauer A, Grabbe E (1997) The variability of fibroadenoma in contrast-enhanced dynamic MR mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168:1331–1334PubMed Brinck U, Fischer U, Korabiowska M, Jutrowski M, Schauer A, Grabbe E (1997) The variability of fibroadenoma in contrast-enhanced dynamic MR mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168:1331–1334PubMed
18.
go back to reference Heywang SH, Hahn D, Schmidt H, Krischke I, Eiermann W, Bassermann R, Lissner J (1986) MR imaging of the breast using gadolinium-DTPA. J Comput Assist Tomogr 10:199–204PubMedCrossRef Heywang SH, Hahn D, Schmidt H, Krischke I, Eiermann W, Bassermann R, Lissner J (1986) MR imaging of the breast using gadolinium-DTPA. J Comput Assist Tomogr 10:199–204PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Weinstein D, Strano S, Cohen P, Fields S, Gomori JM, Degani H (1999) Breast fibroadenoma: mapping of pathophysiologic features with three-time-point, contrast-enhanced MR imaging-pilot study. Radiology 210:233–240PubMed Weinstein D, Strano S, Cohen P, Fields S, Gomori JM, Degani H (1999) Breast fibroadenoma: mapping of pathophysiologic features with three-time-point, contrast-enhanced MR imaging-pilot study. Radiology 210:233–240PubMed
20.
go back to reference Boetes C, Barentsz JO, Mus RD, van der Sluis RF, van Erning LJ, Hendriks JH, Holland R, Ruys SH (1994) MR characterization of suspicious breast lesions with a gadolinium-enhanced TurboFLASH subtraction technique. Radiology 193:777–781PubMed Boetes C, Barentsz JO, Mus RD, van der Sluis RF, van Erning LJ, Hendriks JH, Holland R, Ruys SH (1994) MR characterization of suspicious breast lesions with a gadolinium-enhanced TurboFLASH subtraction technique. Radiology 193:777–781PubMed
21.
go back to reference Gilles R, Guinebretiere JM, Lucidarme O, Cluzel P, Janaud G, Finet JF, Tardivon A, Masselot J, Vanel D (1994) Nonpalpable breast tumors: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced subtraction dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 191:625–631PubMed Gilles R, Guinebretiere JM, Lucidarme O, Cluzel P, Janaud G, Finet JF, Tardivon A, Masselot J, Vanel D (1994) Nonpalpable breast tumors: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced subtraction dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 191:625–631PubMed
22.
go back to reference Harms SE, Flamig DP, Hesley KL, Meiches MD, Jensen RA, Evans WP, Savino DA, Wells RV (1993) MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. Radiology 187:493–501PubMed Harms SE, Flamig DP, Hesley KL, Meiches MD, Jensen RA, Evans WP, Savino DA, Wells RV (1993) MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. Radiology 187:493–501PubMed
23.
go back to reference Heiberg EV, Perman WH, Herrmann VM, Janney CG (1996) Dynamic sequential 3D gadolinium-enhanced MRI of the whole breast. Magn Reson Imaging 14:337–348PubMedCrossRef Heiberg EV, Perman WH, Herrmann VM, Janney CG (1996) Dynamic sequential 3D gadolinium-enhanced MRI of the whole breast. Magn Reson Imaging 14:337–348PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Ercolani P, Valeri G, Amici F (1998) Dynamic MRI of the breast. Eur J Radiol 27(Suppl 2):S265–S271PubMedCrossRef Ercolani P, Valeri G, Amici F (1998) Dynamic MRI of the breast. Eur J Radiol 27(Suppl 2):S265–S271PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Hauth EA, Stockamp C, Maderwald S, Muhler A, Kimmig R, Jaeger H, Barkhausen J, Forsting M (2006) Evaluation of the three-time-point method for diagnosis of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography. Clin Imaging 30:160–165PubMedCrossRef Hauth EA, Stockamp C, Maderwald S, Muhler A, Kimmig R, Jaeger H, Barkhausen J, Forsting M (2006) Evaluation of the three-time-point method for diagnosis of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography. Clin Imaging 30:160–165PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Kuhl CK, Schild HH, Morakkabati N (2005) Dynamic bilateral contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution. Radiology 236:789–800PubMedCrossRef Kuhl CK, Schild HH, Morakkabati N (2005) Dynamic bilateral contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution. Radiology 236:789–800PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Mussurakis S, Buckley DL, Horsman A (1997) Dynamic MRI of invasive breast cancer: assessment of three region-of-interest analysis methods. J Comput Assist Tomogr 21:431–438PubMedCrossRef Mussurakis S, Buckley DL, Horsman A (1997) Dynamic MRI of invasive breast cancer: assessment of three region-of-interest analysis methods. J Comput Assist Tomogr 21:431–438PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Mussurakis S, Gibbs P, Horsman A (1998) Primary breast abnormalities: selective pixel sampling on dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR images. Radiology 206:465–473PubMed Mussurakis S, Gibbs P, Horsman A (1998) Primary breast abnormalities: selective pixel sampling on dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR images. Radiology 206:465–473PubMed
29.
go back to reference Lehman CD, Peacock S, DeMartini WB, Chen X (2006) A new automated software system to evaluate breast MR examinations: improved specificity without decreased sensitivity. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:51–56PubMedCrossRef Lehman CD, Peacock S, DeMartini WB, Chen X (2006) A new automated software system to evaluate breast MR examinations: improved specificity without decreased sensitivity. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:51–56PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Safir J (2005) 3TP and magnetic resonance breast imaging: interview with Dr. Julian Safir. Integr Cancer Ther 4:45–47PubMedCrossRef Safir J (2005) 3TP and magnetic resonance breast imaging: interview with Dr. Julian Safir. Integr Cancer Ther 4:45–47PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Mariano MN, van den Bosch MA, Daniel BL, Nowels KW, Birdwell RL, Fong KJ, Desmond PS, Plevritis S, Stables LA, Zakhour M, Herfkens RJ, Ikeda DM (2005) Contrast-enhanced MRI of ductal carcinoma in situ: characteristics of a new intensity-modulated parametric mapping technique correlated with histopathologic findings. J Magn Reson Imaging 22:520–526PubMedCrossRef Mariano MN, van den Bosch MA, Daniel BL, Nowels KW, Birdwell RL, Fong KJ, Desmond PS, Plevritis S, Stables LA, Zakhour M, Herfkens RJ, Ikeda DM (2005) Contrast-enhanced MRI of ductal carcinoma in situ: characteristics of a new intensity-modulated parametric mapping technique correlated with histopathologic findings. J Magn Reson Imaging 22:520–526PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Vomweg TW, Teifke A, Kunz RP, Hintze C, Hlawatsch A, Kern A, Kreitner KF, Thelen M (2004) Combination of low and high resolution sequences in two orientations for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: more than a compromise. Eur Radiol 14:1732–1742PubMedCrossRef Vomweg TW, Teifke A, Kunz RP, Hintze C, Hlawatsch A, Kern A, Kreitner KF, Thelen M (2004) Combination of low and high resolution sequences in two orientations for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: more than a compromise. Eur Radiol 14:1732–1742PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Wedegartner U, Bick U, Wortler K, Rummeny E, Bongartz G (2001) Differentiation between benign and malignant findings on MR-mammography: usefulness of morphological criteria. Eur Radiol 11:1645–1650PubMedCrossRef Wedegartner U, Bick U, Wortler K, Rummeny E, Bongartz G (2001) Differentiation between benign and malignant findings on MR-mammography: usefulness of morphological criteria. Eur Radiol 11:1645–1650PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Obenauer S, Schorn C, Stelter B, Fischer U, Grabbe E (2002) Contrast-enhanced high in-plane resolution dynamic MRI of the breast. Are there advantages in comparison to standard dynamic MRI? Clin Imaging 26:161–165PubMedCrossRef Obenauer S, Schorn C, Stelter B, Fischer U, Grabbe E (2002) Contrast-enhanced high in-plane resolution dynamic MRI of the breast. Are there advantages in comparison to standard dynamic MRI? Clin Imaging 26:161–165PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C, Muller SH, Zonderland HM, Obdeijn IM, Manoliu RA, Kok T, Rutgers EJ, de Koning HJ, Klijn JG (2006) Differences between first and subsequent rounds of the MRISC breast cancer screening program for women with a familial or genetic predisposition. Cancer 106:2318–2326PubMedCrossRef Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C, Muller SH, Zonderland HM, Obdeijn IM, Manoliu RA, Kok T, Rutgers EJ, de Koning HJ, Klijn JG (2006) Differences between first and subsequent rounds of the MRISC breast cancer screening program for women with a familial or genetic predisposition. Cancer 106:2318–2326PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Bazzocchi M, Zuiani C, Panizza P, Del Frate C, Soldano F, Isola M, Sardanelli F, Giuseppetti GM, Simonetti G, Lattanzio V, Del Maschio A (2006) Contrast-enhanced breast MRI in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography: results of a multicenter trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:1723–1732PubMedCrossRef Bazzocchi M, Zuiani C, Panizza P, Del Frate C, Soldano F, Isola M, Sardanelli F, Giuseppetti GM, Simonetti G, Lattanzio V, Del Maschio A (2006) Contrast-enhanced breast MRI in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography: results of a multicenter trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:1723–1732PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Dynamic breast MR imaging: is parametric mapping superior to image subtraction in lesion detection?
Authors
Kathinka D. Kurz
Hans-Jörg Wittsack
Reinhart Willers
Dirk Blondin
Ulrich Mödder
Andreas Saleh
Publication date
01-12-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 12/2007
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0652-8

Other articles of this Issue 12/2007

European Radiology 12/2007 Go to the issue

Book Reviews

Recent literature