Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Surgery International 2/2017

01-02-2017 | Original Article

Duodeno-duodenostomy or duodeno-jejunostomy for duodenal atresia: is one repair better than the other?

Authors: Augusto Zani, Jung-Pin Benjamin Yeh, Sebastian K. King, Priscilla P. L. Chiu, Paul W. Wales

Published in: Pediatric Surgery International | Issue 2/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The surgical management of neonates with duodenal atresia (DA) involves re-establishment of intestinal continuity, either by duodeno-duodenostomy (DD) or by duodeno-jejunostomy (DJ). Although the majority of pediatric surgeons perform DD repair preferentially, we aimed to analyze the outcome of DA neonates treated with either surgical technique.

Methods

Following ethical approval (REB:1000047737), we retrospectively reviewed the charts of all patients who underwent DA repair between 2004 and 2014. Patients with associated esophageal/intestinal atresias and/or anorectal malformations were excluded. Outcome measures included demographics (gender, gestational age, and birth weight), length of mechanical ventilation, time to first and full feed, length of hospital admission, weight at discharge (z-scores), and postoperative complications (anastomotic stricture/leak, adhesive obstruction, and need for re-laparotomy). Both DD and DJ groups were compared using parametric or non-parametric tests, with data presented as mean ± SD or median (interquartile range).

Results

During the study period, 92 neonates met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 47 (51%) had DD and 45 (49%) DJ repair. All procedures were performed open, apart from one laparoscopic DJ. Overall, DD and DJ groups had similar demographics. Likewise, we found no differences between the two groups for length of ventilation (p = 0.6), time to first feed (p = 0.5), time to full feed (p = 0.4), length of admission (p = 0.6), prokinetic use (p = 0.5), nor weight at discharge (p = 0.1). When the 30/92 (33%) patients with trisomy-21 (DD = 16, DJ = 14) were excluded from analysis, the groups still had similar weight at discharge (p = 0.2). Postoperative complication rate was not different between the two groups. One patient per group died, due to respiratory failure (DD) and sepsis (DJ).

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that in neonates with duodenal atresia, duodeno-duodenostomy and duodeno-jejunostomy have similar outcomes. These findings are relevant for surgeons who repair duodenal atresia laparoscopically, as duodeno-jejunostomy had equal clinical outcomes and may be easier to perform.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Applebaum H, Sydorak R (2013) Duodenal atresia and stenosis—annular pancreas. In: Coran A, Adzick NS, Krummel T, Laberge JM, Shamberger R, Caldamone A (eds) Pediatric surgery, 7th edn. Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 1051–1057 Applebaum H, Sydorak R (2013) Duodenal atresia and stenosis—annular pancreas. In: Coran A, Adzick NS, Krummel T, Laberge JM, Shamberger R, Caldamone A (eds) Pediatric surgery, 7th edn. Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 1051–1057
2.
go back to reference Gray SW, Skandalakis JE (1986) Embryology for surgeons: the embryological basis for treatment of congenital defects. WB Saunders, Philadelphia Gray SW, Skandalakis JE (1986) Embryology for surgeons: the embryological basis for treatment of congenital defects. WB Saunders, Philadelphia
4.
go back to reference Loitman C (1927) Congenital occlusion of the intestine. Boston Med Surg J 197:21–24CrossRef Loitman C (1927) Congenital occlusion of the intestine. Boston Med Surg J 197:21–24CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Gross RE (1953) The surgery of infancy and childhood; its principles and techniques. WB Saunders, Philadelphia Gross RE (1953) The surgery of infancy and childhood; its principles and techniques. WB Saunders, Philadelphia
7.
go back to reference Kimura K, Tsugawa C, Ogawa K et al (1977) Diamond-shaped anastomosis for congenital duodenal obstruction. Arch Surg 112:1262–1263CrossRefPubMed Kimura K, Tsugawa C, Ogawa K et al (1977) Diamond-shaped anastomosis for congenital duodenal obstruction. Arch Surg 112:1262–1263CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Stauffer UG, Irving I (1977) Duodenal atresia and stenosis—long term results. Prog Pediatr Surg 10:49–60PubMed Stauffer UG, Irving I (1977) Duodenal atresia and stenosis—long term results. Prog Pediatr Surg 10:49–60PubMed
9.
go back to reference Spigland N, Yazbeck S (1990) Complications associated with surgical treatment of congenital intrinsic duodenal obstruction. J Pediatr Surg 25:1127–1130CrossRefPubMed Spigland N, Yazbeck S (1990) Complications associated with surgical treatment of congenital intrinsic duodenal obstruction. J Pediatr Surg 25:1127–1130CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Grosfeld JL, Rescorla FJ (1993) Duodenal atresia and stenosis: reassessment of treatment and outcome based on antenatal diagnosis, pathologic variance, and long-term follow-up. World J Surg 17:301–309CrossRefPubMed Grosfeld JL, Rescorla FJ (1993) Duodenal atresia and stenosis: reassessment of treatment and outcome based on antenatal diagnosis, pathologic variance, and long-term follow-up. World J Surg 17:301–309CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Bax NM, Ure BM, van der Zee DC et al (2001) Laparoscopic duodenoduodenostomy for duodenal atresia. Surg Endosc 15:217CrossRefPubMed Bax NM, Ure BM, van der Zee DC et al (2001) Laparoscopic duodenoduodenostomy for duodenal atresia. Surg Endosc 15:217CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Parmentier B, Peycelon M, Muller C et al (2015) Laparoscopic management of congenital duodenal atresia or stenosis: a single-center early experience. J Pediatr Surg 50:1833–1836CrossRefPubMed Parmentier B, Peycelon M, Muller C et al (2015) Laparoscopic management of congenital duodenal atresia or stenosis: a single-center early experience. J Pediatr Surg 50:1833–1836CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Duodeno-duodenostomy or duodeno-jejunostomy for duodenal atresia: is one repair better than the other?
Authors
Augusto Zani
Jung-Pin Benjamin Yeh
Sebastian K. King
Priscilla P. L. Chiu
Paul W. Wales
Publication date
01-02-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Pediatric Surgery International / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 0179-0358
Electronic ISSN: 1437-9813
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-016-4016-9

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

Pediatric Surgery International 2/2017 Go to the issue