Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 3/2004

01-03-2004 | Original article

Dual endoscopic-assisted endoluminal colostomy reversal: A feasibility study

Authors: B. P. Jacob, M. Gagner, T. I. Hung, S. Fukuyama, A. Waage, L. Biertho, W. W. Kim, N. Sekhar

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 3/2004

Login to get access

Abstract

Background: Emergent colostomies are associated with increased morbidity related to second closure operations. The purpose of this canine pilot study was to create a minimally invasive procedure that would reduce the time interval and morbidity involved with colostomy reversals after left colon end colostomies. Methods: Six mongrel dogs underwent modified laparoscopic Hartmann’s procedures in which the stapled end of the rectal stump was approximated to the left colon proximal to the stoma. After 1 week, they underwent an endoluminal colostomy reversal with a computer-mediated, circular stapling device and varying anvil insertion methods. Variables recorded included anvil insertion technique and feasibility, OR time, complications, and number of days to first meal and bowel movement. A contrast enema performed 1 week post colostomy reversal ruled out anastomosis leaks and stenosis. The dogs were euthanized and subjected to necropsy. Results: Of four anvil insertion techniques tested, the most feasible employed a large-bore needle to perforate through the stapled end of the Hartmann pouch into the lumen of the left colon. Simultaneous endoluminal views of the rectal stump with a sigmoidoscope and the left colon lumen with an endoscope permitted a controlled and safe needle puncture. Through the needle, a guide wire was inserted to withdraw the anvil via the colostomy into place. A transanally inserted stapler was then married to the anvil under fluoroscopic guidance, thus completing the anastomosis. The colostomy was then taken down and transected at the level of the colocolostomy. Average operating time was 126 min (range 90–180), diet was tolerated within 1.5 days, and average number of days to first bowel movement was 2.5. The absence of stenosis, leaks, and inadvertent visceral injuries confirmed feasibility. Conclusions: In this canine model, a dual endoscopic-assisted colostomy reversal with a computer-mediated, circular stapling device is feasible. Using this technique, colostomy reversals can possibly be performed 1 week post-colostomy without entering the peritoneal cavity, thus reducing the number of invasive operations and subsequent morbidity required to manage emergent colon perforations.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Anderson, CA, Fowler, DL, White, S, Wintz, N 1993Laparoscopic colostomy closure.Surg Laparosc Endosc36972CrossRefPubMed Anderson, CA, Fowler, DL, White, S, Wintz, N 1993Laparoscopic colostomy closure.Surg Laparosc Endosc36972CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Berne, JD, Velmahos, GC, Chan, LS, Asensio, JA, Demetriades, D 1998The high morbidity of colostomy closure after trauma: Further support for the primary repair of colon injuries.Surgery123157164CrossRefPubMed Berne, JD, Velmahos, GC, Chan, LS, Asensio, JA, Demetriades, D 1998The high morbidity of colostomy closure after trauma: Further support for the primary repair of colon injuries.Surgery123157164CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Cantele, H, Mendez, A, Leyba, J 2001Colostomy closure using local anesthesia.Surg Today31678680CrossRefPubMed Cantele, H, Mendez, A, Leyba, J 2001Colostomy closure using local anesthesia.Surg Today31678680CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Criado, FJ, Wilson, TH 1981Technique for re-establishing continuity after the Hartmann procedure.Ann Surg47366367 Criado, FJ, Wilson, TH 1981Technique for re-establishing continuity after the Hartmann procedure.Ann Surg47366367
5.
go back to reference Demetriades, D, Pezikis, A, Melissas, J, Parekh, D, Pickles, G 1988Factors influencing the morbidity of colostomy closure.Am J Surg155594596PubMed Demetriades, D, Pezikis, A, Melissas, J, Parekh, D, Pickles, G 1988Factors influencing the morbidity of colostomy closure.Am J Surg155594596PubMed
6.
go back to reference Desai, DC, Brennan, EJ, Reilly, JF, Smink, RD 1998Utility of the Hartmann procedure.Am J Surg175152154CrossRefPubMed Desai, DC, Brennan, EJ, Reilly, JF, Smink, RD 1998Utility of the Hartmann procedure.Am J Surg175152154CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Detry, RJ, Kestens, PJ 1981Colorectal anastomoses with the EEA stapler.World J Surg5739742PubMed Detry, RJ, Kestens, PJ 1981Colorectal anastomoses with the EEA stapler.World J Surg5739742PubMed
8.
go back to reference Ghorra, SG, Rzeczycki, TP, Natarajan, R, Pricolo, VE 1991Colostomy closure: impact of preoperative risk factors on morbidity.Am Surg65266269 Ghorra, SG, Rzeczycki, TP, Natarajan, R, Pricolo, VE 1991Colostomy closure: impact of preoperative risk factors on morbidity.Am Surg65266269
9.
go back to reference Goligher, JC 1979Use of circular stapling gun with peranal insertion of ano-rectal purse-string suture for construction of very low colorectal or colo-anal anastomosis.Br J Surg66501PubMed Goligher, JC 1979Use of circular stapling gun with peranal insertion of ano-rectal purse-string suture for construction of very low colorectal or colo-anal anastomosis.Br J Surg66501PubMed
10.
go back to reference Hartmann, H 1923.Congres Francais de Chir30411414 Hartmann, H 1923.Congres Francais de Chir30411414
11.
go back to reference Holland, JC, Winter, DC, Richardson, D 2002Laparoscopically assisted reversal of Hartmann’s procedure revisited.Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech12291294CrossRefPubMed Holland, JC, Winter, DC, Richardson, D 2002Laparoscopically assisted reversal of Hartmann’s procedure revisited.Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech12291294CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Khoury, DA, Beck, DE, Opelka, FG, Hicks, TC, Timmcke, AE, Gathright, JB 1996Colostomy closure: Ochsner clinic experience.Dis Colon Rectum39605609PubMed Khoury, DA, Beck, DE, Opelka, FG, Hicks, TC, Timmcke, AE, Gathright, JB 1996Colostomy closure: Ochsner clinic experience.Dis Colon Rectum39605609PubMed
13.
go back to reference Lee, EC, Murray, JJ, Coller, JA, Roberts, PL, Schoetz, DJ Jr 1997Intraoperative colonic lavage in nonelective surgery for diverticular disease.Dis Colon Rectum40669674 Lee, EC, Murray, JJ, Coller, JA, Roberts, PL, Schoetz, DJ Jr 1997Intraoperative colonic lavage in nonelective surgery for diverticular disease.Dis Colon Rectum40669674
14.
go back to reference Nance, FC 1979New techniques of gastro-intestinal anastomosis with the EEA stapler.Ann Surg189587PubMed Nance, FC 1979New techniques of gastro-intestinal anastomosis with the EEA stapler.Ann Surg189587PubMed
15.
go back to reference Pittman, DM, Smith, LE 1985Complications of colostomy closure.Dis Colon Rectum28836843PubMed Pittman, DM, Smith, LE 1985Complications of colostomy closure.Dis Colon Rectum28836843PubMed
16.
go back to reference Prasad, ML, Pearl, RK, Abcarian, H 1984“End-loop” colostomy.Surg Gynecol Obstet158380382PubMed Prasad, ML, Pearl, RK, Abcarian, H 1984“End-loop” colostomy.Surg Gynecol Obstet158380382PubMed
17.
go back to reference Ravitch, MM, Steichen, FM 1979A stapling instrument for end-to-end inverting anastomosis in the gastrointestinal tract.Ann Surg189791PubMed Ravitch, MM, Steichen, FM 1979A stapling instrument for end-to-end inverting anastomosis in the gastrointestinal tract.Ann Surg189791PubMed
18.
go back to reference Roe, AM, Prabhu, S, Ali, A, Brown, C, Brodribb, AJM 1991Reversal of Hartmann’s procedure: timing and operative technique.Br J Surg7811671170PubMed Roe, AM, Prabhu, S, Ali, A, Brown, C, Brodribb, AJM 1991Reversal of Hartmann’s procedure: timing and operative technique.Br J Surg7811671170PubMed
19.
go back to reference Schilling, MK, Maurer, CA, Kollmar, O, Buchler, MW 2001Primary vs secondary anastomosis after sigmoid colon resection for perforated diverticulitis (Hinchey stage III and IV): a prospective outcome and cost analysis.Dis Colon Rectum44699705PubMed Schilling, MK, Maurer, CA, Kollmar, O, Buchler, MW 2001Primary vs secondary anastomosis after sigmoid colon resection for perforated diverticulitis (Hinchey stage III and IV): a prospective outcome and cost analysis.Dis Colon Rectum44699705PubMed
20.
go back to reference Varnell, J, Pemberton, LB 1981Risk factors in colostomy closure.Surgery89683686PubMed Varnell, J, Pemberton, LB 1981Risk factors in colostomy closure.Surgery89683686PubMed
Metadata
Title
Dual endoscopic-assisted endoluminal colostomy reversal: A feasibility study
Authors
B. P. Jacob
M. Gagner
T. I. Hung
S. Fukuyama
A. Waage
L. Biertho
W. W. Kim
N. Sekhar
Publication date
01-03-2004
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 3/2004
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-8914-2

Other articles of this Issue 3/2004

Surgical Endoscopy 3/2004 Go to the issue