Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy 4/2011

01-08-2011 | Short Research Report

Drug allergy documentation-time for a change?

Authors: Hanan Khalil, Anne Leversha, Viviane Khalil

Published in: International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy | Issue 4/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective of the study To audit patients’ allergy documentation in a large rural hospital an to make recommendations about accurate drug allergies in hospital settings. Setting a 257 bed large hospital and fully integrated health service in Australia, providing a range of services including; medicine, surgery, aged care, cancer care, mental health, maternity and rehabilitation. Method A retrospective design was used to fulfil the aims of this study. Patient medical records were randomly selected and checked for allergy documentation over a 6 month period. Results A total of 521 patients’ medical records were reviewed. Of all the medical records examined in total, 269 (52%) had no allergy, while 252 (48%) reported some kind of allergy. Overall, only three patients (0.6%) had their allergy details fully and accurately recorded in the three places audited and they are the front cover of the patients’ notes, the admission notes and the drug chart. Conclusion Many preventable medical errors are caused by poor documentation which is often due to lack of drug allergy information. All health professional should be more pro-active in determining the manner of any drug allergy or adverse drug reactions (ADR) along with the extent of the reaction.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cantrill JA, Cottrell WN. Accuracy of drug allergy documentation. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 1997;54(14):1627–9.PubMed Cantrill JA, Cottrell WN. Accuracy of drug allergy documentation. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 1997;54(14):1627–9.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Radford A, Undre S, Alkhamesi NA, Darzi AW. Recording of drug allergies: are we doing enough? J Eval Clin Pract. 2007;13:130–7.PubMedCrossRef Radford A, Undre S, Alkhamesi NA, Darzi AW. Recording of drug allergies: are we doing enough? J Eval Clin Pract. 2007;13:130–7.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bates DW, Cullen DJ, Larid N, et al. Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events–implications for prevention. JAMA. 1995;274(1):29–34.PubMedCrossRef Bates DW, Cullen DJ, Larid N, et al. Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events–implications for prevention. JAMA. 1995;274(1):29–34.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Sim L, Barras M, Cottrell N. Patients’ understanding of drug allergy and documentation–is there a link? J Pharm Pract Res. 2005;35(4):276–8. Sim L, Barras M, Cottrell N. Patients’ understanding of drug allergy and documentation–is there a link? J Pharm Pract Res. 2005;35(4):276–8.
5.
go back to reference Lesar TS, Briceland L, Stein DS. Factors related to errors in medication prescribing. JAMA. 1997;277(4):312–7.PubMedCrossRef Lesar TS, Briceland L, Stein DS. Factors related to errors in medication prescribing. JAMA. 1997;277(4):312–7.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Farooq M, Kirke C, Foley K. Documentation of drug allergy on drug charts in patients presenting for surgery. IJMS. 2008;177(1):243–5.CrossRef Farooq M, Kirke C, Foley K. Documentation of drug allergy on drug charts in patients presenting for surgery. IJMS. 2008;177(1):243–5.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Valente S, Fisher D. Nurses improve medication safety with medication allergy and adverse drug reports. J Nurs Care Qual. 2007;22(4):322–7.PubMedCrossRef Valente S, Fisher D. Nurses improve medication safety with medication allergy and adverse drug reports. J Nurs Care Qual. 2007;22(4):322–7.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Pilzer JD, Burke TG, Mutnick AH. Drug allergy assessment at a university hospital and clinic. Am J Health-syst Pharm. 1996;53(24):2970–5.PubMed Pilzer JD, Burke TG, Mutnick AH. Drug allergy assessment at a university hospital and clinic. Am J Health-syst Pharm. 1996;53(24):2970–5.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Paparella S. Allergies: essential patient information for safe practice. J Emerg Nurs. 2009;35(3):239–41.PubMedCrossRef Paparella S. Allergies: essential patient information for safe practice. J Emerg Nurs. 2009;35(3):239–41.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Sullivan KarynM, Linda M. Spooner. Adverse-drug-reaction reporting by pharmacy students in a teaching hospital. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 2008;65(12):1177.PubMedCrossRef Sullivan KarynM, Linda M. Spooner. Adverse-drug-reaction reporting by pharmacy students in a teaching hospital. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 2008;65(12):1177.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Drug allergy documentation-time for a change?
Authors
Hanan Khalil
Anne Leversha
Viviane Khalil
Publication date
01-08-2011
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy / Issue 4/2011
Print ISSN: 2210-7703
Electronic ISSN: 2210-7711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-011-9525-y

Other articles of this Issue 4/2011

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy 4/2011 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine