Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Research article

Drivers of differential views of health equity in the U.S.: is the U.S. ready to make progress? Results from the 2018 National Survey of Health Attitudes

Authors: Vivian L. Towe, Linnea Warren May, Wenjing Huang, Laurie T. Martin, Katherine Carman, Carolyn E. Miller, Anita Chandra

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

The public health sector has long recognized the role of the social determinants of health in health disparities and the importance of achieving health equity. We now appear to be at an inflection point, as we hear increasing demands to dismantle structures that have perpetuated inequalities. Assessing prevailing mindsets about what causes health inequalities and the value of health equity is critical to addressing larger issues of inequity, including racial inequity and other dimensions. Using data from a nationally representative sample of adults in the United States, we examined the factors that Americans think drive health outcomes and their beliefs about the importance of health equity.

Methods

Using data from the 2018 National Survey of Health Attitudes, we conducted factor analyses of 21 survey items and identified three factors from items relating to health drivers—traditional health influencers (THI), social determinants of health (SDoH), and sense of community health (SoC). Health equity beliefs were measured with three questions about opportunities to be healthy. Latent class analysis identified four groups with similar patterns of response. Factor mixture modeling combined factor structure and latent class analysis into one model. We conducted three logistic regressions using latent classes and demographics as predictors and the three equity beliefs as dependent variables.

Results

Nearly 90% of respondents comprised one class that was characterized by high endorsement (i.e., rating the driver as having strong effect on health) of THI, but lower endorsement of SDoH and SoC. Logistic regressions showed that respondents endorsing (i.e., rated it as a top priority) all three health equity beliefs tended to be female, older, Black or Hispanic, more educated, and have lower incomes. The class of respondents that endorsed SDoH the most was more likely to endorse all three equity beliefs.

Conclusions

Results suggested that people historically impacted by inequity, e.g., people of color and people with low incomes, had the most comprehensive understanding of the drivers of health and the value of equity. However, dominant beliefs about SDoH and health equity are still generally not aligned with scientific consensus and the prevailing narrative in the public health community.
Literature
1.
go back to reference WHO Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health: Commission on Social Determinants of Health final report. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008. WHO Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health: Commission on Social Determinants of Health final report. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.
3.
go back to reference Bailey ZD, Krieger N, Agénor M, Graves J, Linos N, Bassett MT. Structural racism and health inequities in the USA: evidence and interventions. Lancet. 2017;389(10077):1453–63.CrossRef Bailey ZD, Krieger N, Agénor M, Graves J, Linos N, Bassett MT. Structural racism and health inequities in the USA: evidence and interventions. Lancet. 2017;389(10077):1453–63.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Anand S. The concern for equity in health. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002;56(7):485.CrossRef Anand S. The concern for equity in health. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002;56(7):485.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Dubay LC, Lebrun LA. Health, behavior, and health care disparities: disentangling the effects of income and race in the United States. Int J Health Serv. 2012;42(4):607–25.CrossRef Dubay LC, Lebrun LA. Health, behavior, and health care disparities: disentangling the effects of income and race in the United States. Int J Health Serv. 2012;42(4):607–25.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bond MJ, Herman AA. Lagging life expectancy for black men: a public health imperative. Am J Public Health. 2016;106(7):1167–9.CrossRef Bond MJ, Herman AA. Lagging life expectancy for black men: a public health imperative. Am J Public Health. 2016;106(7):1167–9.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Remington PL, Catlin BB, Gennuso KP. The county health rankings: rationale and methods. Popul Health Metrics. 2015;13(1):11.CrossRef Remington PL, Catlin BB, Gennuso KP. The county health rankings: rationale and methods. Popul Health Metrics. 2015;13(1):11.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Nellis A. The color of justice: racial and ethnic disparity in state prisons. Sentencing Project; 2016. Nellis A. The color of justice: racial and ethnic disparity in state prisons. Sentencing Project; 2016.
10.
go back to reference Marmot M, Allen JJ. Social determinants of health equity. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(Suppl 4):S517–9.CrossRef Marmot M, Allen JJ. Social determinants of health equity. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(Suppl 4):S517–9.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Townsend B, Friel S, Freeman T, Schram A, Strazdins L, Labonte R, et al. Advancing a health equity agenda across multiple policy domains: a qualitative policy analysis of social, trade and welfare policy. BMJ Open. 2020;10(11):e040180-e.CrossRef Townsend B, Friel S, Freeman T, Schram A, Strazdins L, Labonte R, et al. Advancing a health equity agenda across multiple policy domains: a qualitative policy analysis of social, trade and welfare policy. BMJ Open. 2020;10(11):e040180-e.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Penman-Aguilar A, Talih M, Huang D, Moonesinghe R, Bouye K, Beckles G. Measurement of Health Disparities, Health Inequities, and Social Determinants of Health to Support the Advancement of Health Equity. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2016;22 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S33–42.CrossRef Penman-Aguilar A, Talih M, Huang D, Moonesinghe R, Bouye K, Beckles G. Measurement of Health Disparities, Health Inequities, and Social Determinants of Health to Support the Advancement of Health Equity. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2016;22 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S33–42.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Baum FE, Bégin M, Houweling TA, Taylor S. Changes not for the fainthearted: reorienting health care systems toward health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(11):1967–74.CrossRef Baum FE, Bégin M, Houweling TA, Taylor S. Changes not for the fainthearted: reorienting health care systems toward health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(11):1967–74.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Barten F, Mitlin D, Mulholland C, Hardoy A, Stern R. Integrated approaches to address the social determinants of health for reducing health inequity. J Urban Health. 2007;84(1):164–73.CrossRef Barten F, Mitlin D, Mulholland C, Hardoy A, Stern R. Integrated approaches to address the social determinants of health for reducing health inequity. J Urban Health. 2007;84(1):164–73.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Booske BC, Robert SA, Rohan AM. Awareness of racial and socioeconomic health disparities in the United States: the national opinion survey on health and health disparities, 2008-2009. Prev Chronic Dis. 2011;8(4):A73.PubMedPubMedCentral Booske BC, Robert SA, Rohan AM. Awareness of racial and socioeconomic health disparities in the United States: the national opinion survey on health and health disparities, 2008-2009. Prev Chronic Dis. 2011;8(4):A73.PubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Bye L, Ghirardelli A, Fontes A. Promoting health equity and population health: how Americans’ views differ. Health Aff. 2016;35(11):1982–90.CrossRef Bye L, Ghirardelli A, Fontes A. Promoting health equity and population health: how Americans’ views differ. Health Aff. 2016;35(11):1982–90.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Niederdeppe J, Bu QL, Borah P, Kindig DA, Robert SA. Message design strategies to raise public awareness of social determinants of health and population health disparities. Milbank Q. 2008;86(3):481–513.CrossRef Niederdeppe J, Bu QL, Borah P, Kindig DA, Robert SA. Message design strategies to raise public awareness of social determinants of health and population health disparities. Milbank Q. 2008;86(3):481–513.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Robert SA, Booske BC, Rigby E, Rohan AM. Public views on determinants of health, interventions to improve health, and priorities for government. Wis Med J. 2008;107(3):124. Robert SA, Booske BC, Rigby E, Rohan AM. Public views on determinants of health, interventions to improve health, and priorities for government. Wis Med J. 2008;107(3):124.
19.
go back to reference Rigby E, Soss J, Booske BC, Rohan AMK, Robert SA. Public responses to health disparities: how group cues influence support for government intervention*. Soc Sci Q. 2009;90(5):1321–40.CrossRef Rigby E, Soss J, Booske BC, Rohan AMK, Robert SA. Public responses to health disparities: how group cues influence support for government intervention*. Soc Sci Q. 2009;90(5):1321–40.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Baum F. Cracking the nut of health equity: top down and bottom up pressure for action on the social determinants of health. Promot Educ. 2007;14(2):90–5.CrossRef Baum F. Cracking the nut of health equity: top down and bottom up pressure for action on the social determinants of health. Promot Educ. 2007;14(2):90–5.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Hero JO, Zaslavsky AM, Blendon RJ. The United States leads other nations in differences by income in perceptions of health and health care. Health Aff. 2017;36(6):1032–40.CrossRef Hero JO, Zaslavsky AM, Blendon RJ. The United States leads other nations in differences by income in perceptions of health and health care. Health Aff. 2017;36(6):1032–40.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Lynch J, Gollust SE. Playing fair: fairness beliefs and health policy preferences in the United States. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2010;35(6):849–87.CrossRef Lynch J, Gollust SE. Playing fair: fairness beliefs and health policy preferences in the United States. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2010;35(6):849–87.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Carman KG, Chandra A, Weilant S, Miller C, Tait M. 2018 National Survey of Health Attitudes; 2019. Carman KG, Chandra A, Weilant S, Miller C, Tait M. 2018 National Survey of Health Attitudes; 2019.
25.
go back to reference Carman KG, Chandra A, Miller C, Trujillo M, Yeung D, Weilant S, et al. Development of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation National Survey of Health Attitudes: Description and Top-Line Summary Data. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation; 2016. Contract No.: RR-1391-RWJCrossRef Carman KG, Chandra A, Miller C, Trujillo M, Yeung D, Weilant S, et al. Development of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation National Survey of Health Attitudes: Description and Top-Line Summary Data. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation; 2016. Contract No.: RR-1391-RWJCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Pollard MS, Baird MD. The RAND American Life Panel: Technical description. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation; 2017.CrossRef Pollard MS, Baird MD. The RAND American Life Panel: Technical description. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation; 2017.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Carman KG, Eibner C, Paddock SM. Trends in health insurance enrollment, 2013–15. Health Aff. 2015;34(6):1044–8.CrossRef Carman KG, Eibner C, Paddock SM. Trends in health insurance enrollment, 2013–15. Health Aff. 2015;34(6):1044–8.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Robert SA, Booske BC. US opinions on health determinants and social policy as health policy. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(9):1655–63.CrossRef Robert SA, Booske BC. US opinions on health determinants and social policy as health policy. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(9):1655–63.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Chavis DM, Lee KS, Acosta JD. The Sense of Community (SCI) Revised: The Reliability and Validity of the SCI-2. In: 2nd International Community Psychology Conference; Lisbon, Portugal; 2008. Chavis DM, Lee KS, Acosta JD. The Sense of Community (SCI) Revised: The Reliability and Validity of the SCI-2. In: 2nd International Community Psychology Conference; Lisbon, Portugal; 2008.
30.
go back to reference Cope MR, Ward C, Jackson JE, Muirbrook KA, Andre AN. Taking another look at the sense of community index: six confirmatory factor analyses. J Commun Psychol. 2020;48(5):1410–23.CrossRef Cope MR, Ward C, Jackson JE, Muirbrook KA, Andre AN. Taking another look at the sense of community index: six confirmatory factor analyses. J Commun Psychol. 2020;48(5):1410–23.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Feldman S. Structure and consistency in public opinion: the role of core beliefs and values. Am J Polit Sci. 1988;32(2):416–40.CrossRef Feldman S. Structure and consistency in public opinion: the role of core beliefs and values. Am J Polit Sci. 1988;32(2):416–40.CrossRef
32.
33.
34.
go back to reference Yang C-C. Evaluating latent class analysis models in qualitative phenotype identification. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2006;50(4):1090–104.CrossRef Yang C-C. Evaluating latent class analysis models in qualitative phenotype identification. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2006;50(4):1090–104.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Sclove SL. Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate-analysis. Psychometrika. 1987;52(3):333–43.CrossRef Sclove SL. Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate-analysis. Psychometrika. 1987;52(3):333–43.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Muthén B. Should substance use disorders be considered as categorical or dimensional? Addiction. 2006;101(Suppl 1):6–16.CrossRef Muthén B. Should substance use disorders be considered as categorical or dimensional? Addiction. 2006;101(Suppl 1):6–16.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Bauer DJ, Curran PJ. The integration of continuous and discrete latent variable models: potential problems and promising opportunities. Psychol Methods. 2004;9(1):3–29.CrossRef Bauer DJ, Curran PJ. The integration of continuous and discrete latent variable models: potential problems and promising opportunities. Psychol Methods. 2004;9(1):3–29.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Clark SL, Muthén B, Kaprio J, D'Onofrio BM, Viken R, Rose RJ. Models and strategies for factor mixture analysis: an example concerning the structure underlying psychological disorders. Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J. 2013;20(4):681–703.CrossRef Clark SL, Muthén B, Kaprio J, D'Onofrio BM, Viken R, Rose RJ. Models and strategies for factor mixture analysis: an example concerning the structure underlying psychological disorders. Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J. 2013;20(4):681–703.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus Software: Version 8. Los Angeles; 2017. Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus Software: Version 8. Los Angeles; 2017.
40.
go back to reference StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 16. College Station: StataCorp LLC; 2019. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 16. College Station: StataCorp LLC; 2019.
41.
go back to reference Cogburn CD. Culture, race, and health: implications for racial inequities and population health. Milbank Q. 2019;97(3):736–61.CrossRef Cogburn CD. Culture, race, and health: implications for racial inequities and population health. Milbank Q. 2019;97(3):736–61.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Kinder DR, Sears DO. Prejudice and politics: symbolic racism versus racial threats to the good life. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1981;40(3):414.CrossRef Kinder DR, Sears DO. Prejudice and politics: symbolic racism versus racial threats to the good life. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1981;40(3):414.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Rosenfeld MJ. Moving a mountain: the extraordinary trajectory of same-sex marriage approval in the United States. Socius. 2017;3:2378023117727658.CrossRef Rosenfeld MJ. Moving a mountain: the extraordinary trajectory of same-sex marriage approval in the United States. Socius. 2017;3:2378023117727658.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Drivers of differential views of health equity in the U.S.: is the U.S. ready to make progress? Results from the 2018 National Survey of Health Attitudes
Authors
Vivian L. Towe
Linnea Warren May
Wenjing Huang
Laurie T. Martin
Katherine Carman
Carolyn E. Miller
Anita Chandra
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10179-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Public Health 1/2021 Go to the issue