Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 12/2007

01-12-2007 | Thoracic Oncology

Dosimetric Evaluation of Radiation Exposure During I-125 Vicryl Mesh Implants: Implications for ACOSOG z4032

Authors: Ryan P. Smith, MD, Matthew Schuchert, MD, Krishna Komanduri, PhD, Steven Burton, MD, Dwight E. Heron, MD, James D. Luketich, MD, Thomas d’Amato, MD, Rodney Landreneau, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 12/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Segmentectomy or wedge resection along with brachytherapy delivered via a vicryl mesh implant imbedded with 125I is a novel therapeutic modality to treat early stage lung cancer. This modality is being evaluated in a large national prospective randomized trial (ACOSOG Z4032). There has been concern that this method exposes physicians and staff to unacceptable amounts of radiation. In this prospective study, we measured the exposure to health care professionals during such a procedure.

Methods

Dosimetric readings using Special Microdosimeter thermoluminescent detectors (TLDs) (Landauer, Inc) were performed during 22 125I vicryl mesh implantations. Diodes were placed on the back of the each hand of the primary radiation oncologist and primary surgeon during the creation and implantation of the mesh. In addition, diodes were placed on the posterior shoulder of the patient to obtain a control reading.

Results

Patients had 40–60 125I seeds placed. Median activity per seed was 0.511 milli Curie (mCi), with a median total activity implanted of 23.0 mCi. Median radiation dose to the radiation oncologist was 1 milli rem (mrem), and that to the surgeon was 2 mrem. Median dose to the control diode on the patient was a median radiation dose to the outside of the patient of 5.4 mrem/h.

Conclusions

There is very little radiation exposure to physicians and staff during a segmentectomy and 125I vicryl mesh implantation. This is a safe method of lung cancer treatment with respect to health care professionals, although the ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) principle should still be followed.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ginsberg RJ, Rubinstein LV. Randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited resection for T1 N0 non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer Study Group. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 60:615–22PubMedCrossRef Ginsberg RJ, Rubinstein LV. Randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited resection for T1 N0 non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer Study Group. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 60:615–22PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Chen A, Galloway M, Landreneau R, et al. Intraoperative I125 brachytherapy for high-risk stage I non-small cell lung carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999; 44:1057–63PubMedCrossRef Chen A, Galloway M, Landreneau R, et al. Intraoperative I125 brachytherapy for high-risk stage I non-small cell lung carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999; 44:1057–63PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Santos R, Colonias A, Parda D, et al. Comparison between sublobar resection and I125 brachytherapy after sublobar resection in high-risk patients with Stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Surgery 2003; 134:691–7PubMedCrossRef Santos R, Colonias A, Parda D, et al. Comparison between sublobar resection and I125 brachytherapy after sublobar resection in high-risk patients with Stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Surgery 2003; 134:691–7PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Voynov G, Heron DE, Lin CJ, et al. Intraoperative 125I Vicryl mesh brachytherapy after sublobar resection for high-risk stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Brachytherapy 2005; 4:278–85PubMedCrossRef Voynov G, Heron DE, Lin CJ, et al. Intraoperative 125I Vicryl mesh brachytherapy after sublobar resection for high-risk stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Brachytherapy 2005; 4:278–85PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Warren WH, Faber LP. Segmentectomy versus lobectomy in patients with stage I pulmonary carcinoma. Five-year survival and patterns of intrathoracic recurrence. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994; 107:1087–93PubMed Warren WH, Faber LP. Segmentectomy versus lobectomy in patients with stage I pulmonary carcinoma. Five-year survival and patterns of intrathoracic recurrence. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994; 107:1087–93PubMed
6.
go back to reference Okada M, Yoshikawa K, Hatta T, Tsubota N. Is segmentectomy with lymph node assessment an alternative to lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer of 2 cm or smaller? Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 71:956–60PubMedCrossRef Okada M, Yoshikawa K, Hatta T, Tsubota N. Is segmentectomy with lymph node assessment an alternative to lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer of 2 cm or smaller? Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 71:956–60PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Charles M. UNSCEAR report 2000: sources and effects of ionizing radiation. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. J Radiol Prot 2001; 21:83–6PubMedCrossRef Charles M. UNSCEAR report 2000: sources and effects of ionizing radiation. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. J Radiol Prot 2001; 21:83–6PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Limitation of exposure to ionizing radiation. NCRP Report No. 116; 1993a National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Limitation of exposure to ionizing radiation. NCRP Report No. 116; 1993a
9.
go back to reference Khan FM. The physics of radiation therapy. Third Edition. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2003 Khan FM. The physics of radiation therapy. Third Edition. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2003
Metadata
Title
Dosimetric Evaluation of Radiation Exposure During I-125 Vicryl Mesh Implants: Implications for ACOSOG z4032
Authors
Ryan P. Smith, MD
Matthew Schuchert, MD
Krishna Komanduri, PhD
Steven Burton, MD
Dwight E. Heron, MD
James D. Luketich, MD
Thomas d’Amato, MD
Rodney Landreneau, MD
Publication date
01-12-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 12/2007
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-007-9624-0

Other articles of this Issue 12/2007

Annals of Surgical Oncology 12/2007 Go to the issue