Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 10/2016

01-10-2016 | Original Article

Does transcranial stimulation for motor evoked potentials (TcMEP) worsen seizures in epileptic patients following spinal deformity surgery?

Authors: Khalid M. I. Salem, Laura Goodger, Katherine Bowyer, Masood Shafafy, Michael P. Grevitt

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 10/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the effect of Transcranial Motor Evoked Potentials (TcMEP) in increasing the severity or frequency of post-operative seizures in patients undergoing deformity corrective spine surgery with a known history of seizures pre-operatively.

Methods

The information on all patients with history of epilepsy/seizures who underwent spinal TcMEP cord monitoring for deformity correction surgery was retrospectively collected through a review of the hospital notes. The benefits of TcMEP in the early detection of potential cord ischemia were deemed by the operating surgeon to outweigh the increased risks of seizures, tongue biting, etc. Data on age, gender, pre-operative diagnosis, curve type, intra-operative monitoring alerts, duration of hospital stay, and post-operative in-hospital seizures were collected. Additionally, the patients were contacted following discharge and data on any change in the frequency of the seizures or an alteration in seizure-related medication post-operatively was also collected.

Results

The records of 449 consecutively monitored patients were reviewed and 12 (2.7 %) patients with a history of seizures pre-operatively were identified. The mean age was 23 (9–59) years, 7 females, 11 scoliosis corrections (4 neuromuscular, 1 degenerative, 6 idiopathic adolescent), and one sagittal balance correction surgery. Intra-operatively, all patients had TcMEP monitoring, were catheterised, and had no neuromonitoring alerts or record of tongue biting or laceration. Post-operatively, the mean hospital stay was 12 (4–25) days with no recorded seizures. At a mean of 23 (12–49) months post-discharge, none of the patients reported a worsening of seizures (pattern or frequency) or required an alteration in the seizure-related medications.

Conclusion

TcMEP does not appear to trigger intra-operative or post-operative seizures and is not associated with deterioration in the seizure control of patients suffering seizures pre-operatively.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Burke D, Hicks RG (1998) Surgical monitoring of motor pathways. J Clin Neurophysiol Off Publ Am Electroencephalogr Soc 15:194–205 Burke D, Hicks RG (1998) Surgical monitoring of motor pathways. J Clin Neurophysiol Off Publ Am Electroencephalogr Soc 15:194–205
2.
go back to reference Schwartz DM, Auerbach JD, Dormans JP, Flynn J, Drummond DS, Bowe JA, Laufer S, Shah SA, Bowen JR, Pizzutillo PD, Jones KJ, Drummond DS (2007) Neurophysiological detection of impending spinal cord injury during scoliosis surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:2440–2449. doi:10.2106/JBJS.F.01476 CrossRefPubMed Schwartz DM, Auerbach JD, Dormans JP, Flynn J, Drummond DS, Bowe JA, Laufer S, Shah SA, Bowen JR, Pizzutillo PD, Jones KJ, Drummond DS (2007) Neurophysiological detection of impending spinal cord injury during scoliosis surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:2440–2449. doi:10.​2106/​JBJS.​F.​01476 CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Pajewski TN, Arlet V, Phillips LH (2007) Current approach on spinal cord monitoring: the point of view of the neurologist, the anesthesiologist and the spine surgeon. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 16(Suppl 2):S115–S129. doi:10.1007/s00586-007-0419-6 CrossRef Pajewski TN, Arlet V, Phillips LH (2007) Current approach on spinal cord monitoring: the point of view of the neurologist, the anesthesiologist and the spine surgeon. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 16(Suppl 2):S115–S129. doi:10.​1007/​s00586-007-0419-6 CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kelm GH, LuÈders HO, Jasper HH, Elger C (1999) The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 52:3–6 Kelm GH, LuÈders HO, Jasper HH, Elger C (1999) The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 52:3–6
5.
go back to reference Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J, Bridwell KH, Clements DH, Lowe TG, Blanke K (2001) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-a:1169–1181PubMed Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J, Bridwell KH, Clements DH, Lowe TG, Blanke K (2001) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-a:1169–1181PubMed
6.
go back to reference Vauzelle C, Stagnara P, Jouvinroux P (1973) Functional monitoring of spinal cord activity during spinal surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 93:173–178CrossRefPubMed Vauzelle C, Stagnara P, Jouvinroux P (1973) Functional monitoring of spinal cord activity during spinal surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 93:173–178CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Padberg AM, Raynor BL, Thuet ED, Bolon SM (2012) Spinal cord and nerve root monitoring. In: Bridwell KH, Dewald RL (eds) The textbook of spinal surgery. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 7–40 Padberg AM, Raynor BL, Thuet ED, Bolon SM (2012) Spinal cord and nerve root monitoring. In: Bridwell KH, Dewald RL (eds) The textbook of spinal surgery. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 7–40
8.
go back to reference Nash CL, Jr., Lorig RA, Schatzinger LA, Brown RH (1977) Spinal cord monitoring during operative treatment of the spine. Clini Orthop Relat Res 126:100–105 Nash CL, Jr., Lorig RA, Schatzinger LA, Brown RH (1977) Spinal cord monitoring during operative treatment of the spine. Clini Orthop Relat Res 126:100–105
10.
go back to reference Hilibrand AS, Schwartz DM, Sethuraman V, Vaccaro AR, Albert TJ (2004) Comparison of transcranial electric motor and somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during cervical spine surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-a:1248–1253PubMed Hilibrand AS, Schwartz DM, Sethuraman V, Vaccaro AR, Albert TJ (2004) Comparison of transcranial electric motor and somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during cervical spine surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-a:1248–1253PubMed
11.
go back to reference Calancie B, Harris W, Broton JG, Alexeeva N, Green BA (1998) “Threshold-level” multipulse transcranial electrical stimulation of motor cortex for intraoperative monitoring of spinal motor tracts: description of method and comparison to somatosensory evoked potential monitoring. J Neurosurg 88:457–470. doi:10.3171/jns.1998.88.3.0457 CrossRefPubMed Calancie B, Harris W, Broton JG, Alexeeva N, Green BA (1998) “Threshold-level” multipulse transcranial electrical stimulation of motor cortex for intraoperative monitoring of spinal motor tracts: description of method and comparison to somatosensory evoked potential monitoring. J Neurosurg 88:457–470. doi:10.​3171/​jns.​1998.​88.​3.​0457 CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Langeloo DD, Journee HL, Polak B, de Kleuver M (2001) A new application of TCE-MEP: spinal cord monitoring in patients with severe neuromuscular weakness undergoing corrective spine surgery. J Spinal Disord 14:445–448CrossRefPubMed Langeloo DD, Journee HL, Polak B, de Kleuver M (2001) A new application of TCE-MEP: spinal cord monitoring in patients with severe neuromuscular weakness undergoing corrective spine surgery. J Spinal Disord 14:445–448CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Quraishi NA, Lewis SJ, Kelleher MO, Sarjeant R, Rampersaud YR, Fehlings MG (2009) Intraoperative multimodality monitoring in adult spinal deformity: analysis of a prospective series of one hundred two cases with independent evaluation. Spine 34:1504–1512. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a87b66 CrossRefPubMed Quraishi NA, Lewis SJ, Kelleher MO, Sarjeant R, Rampersaud YR, Fehlings MG (2009) Intraoperative multimodality monitoring in adult spinal deformity: analysis of a prospective series of one hundred two cases with independent evaluation. Spine 34:1504–1512. doi:10.​1097/​BRS.​0b013e3181a87b66​ CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference (2009) Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of spinal cord function during spinal deformity surgery. In: SRS Information Statement. Scoliosis Research Society, p 6 (2009) Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of spinal cord function during spinal deformity surgery. In: SRS Information Statement. Scoliosis Research Society, p 6
16.
go back to reference MacDonald DB (2002) Safety of intraoperative transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potential monitoring. J Clin Neurophysiol Off Publ Am Electroencephalogr Soc 19:416–429 MacDonald DB (2002) Safety of intraoperative transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potential monitoring. J Clin Neurophysiol Off Publ Am Electroencephalogr Soc 19:416–429
17.
go back to reference Sackeim HA, Devanand DP, Prudic J (1991) Stimulus intensity, seizure threshold, and seizure duration: impact on the efficacy and safety of electroconvulsive therapy. Psychiatr Clin N Am 14:803–843 Sackeim HA, Devanand DP, Prudic J (1991) Stimulus intensity, seizure threshold, and seizure duration: impact on the efficacy and safety of electroconvulsive therapy. Psychiatr Clin N Am 14:803–843
18.
go back to reference Modica PA, Tempelhoff R, White PF (1990) Pro- and anticonvulsant effects of anesthetics (Part I). Anesth Analg 70:303–315CrossRefPubMed Modica PA, Tempelhoff R, White PF (1990) Pro- and anticonvulsant effects of anesthetics (Part I). Anesth Analg 70:303–315CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Modica PA, Tempelhoff R, White PF (1990) Pro- and anticonvulsant effects of anesthetics (Part II). Anesth Analg 70:433–444CrossRefPubMed Modica PA, Tempelhoff R, White PF (1990) Pro- and anticonvulsant effects of anesthetics (Part II). Anesth Analg 70:433–444CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Legatt AD (2002) Current practice of motor evoked potential monitoring: results of a survey. J Clin Neurophysiol Off Publ Am Electroencephalogr Soc 19:454–460 Legatt AD (2002) Current practice of motor evoked potential monitoring: results of a survey. J Clin Neurophysiol Off Publ Am Electroencephalogr Soc 19:454–460
Metadata
Title
Does transcranial stimulation for motor evoked potentials (TcMEP) worsen seizures in epileptic patients following spinal deformity surgery?
Authors
Khalid M. I. Salem
Laura Goodger
Katherine Bowyer
Masood Shafafy
Michael P. Grevitt
Publication date
01-10-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 10/2016
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3993-z

Other articles of this Issue 10/2016

European Spine Journal 10/2016 Go to the issue