Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research

Does the Finger-to-Nose Test measure upper limb coordination in chronic stroke?

Authors: Marcos R. M. Rodrigues, Matthew Slimovitch, Gevorg Chilingaryan, Mindy F. Levin

Published in: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

We aimed to kinematically validate that the time to perform the Finger-to-Nose Test (FNT) assesses coordination by determining its construct, convergent and discriminant validity.

Methods

Experimental, criterion standard study. Both clinical and experimental evaluations were done at a research facility in a rehabilitation hospital. Forty individuals (20 individuals with chronic stroke and 20 healthy, age- and gender-matched individuals) participated.. Both groups performed two blocks of 10 to-and-fro pointing movements (non-dominant/affected arm) between a sagittal target and the nose (ReachIn, ReachOut) at a self-paced speed. Time to perform the test was the main outcome. Kinematics (Optotrak, 100Hz) and clinical impairment/activity levels were evaluated. Spatiotemporal coordination was assessed with slope (IJC) and cross-correlation (LAG) between elbow and shoulder movements.

Results

Compared to controls, individuals with stroke (Fugl-Meyer Assessment, FMA-UE: 51.9 ± 13.2; Box & Blocks, BBT: 72.1 ± 26.9%) made more curved endpoint trajectories using less shoulder horizontal-abduction. For construct validity, shoulder range (β = 0.127), LAG (β = 0.855) and IJC (β = −0.191) explained 82% of FNT-time variance for ReachIn and LAG (β = 0.971) explained 94% for ReachOut in patients with stroke. In contrast, only LAG explained 62% (β = 0.790) and 79% (β = 0.889) of variance for ReachIn and ReachOut respectively in controls. For convergent validity, FNT-time correlated with FMA-UE (r = −0.67, p < 0.01), FMA-Arm (r = −0.60, p = 0.005), biceps spasticity (r = 0.39, p < 0.05) and BBT (r = −0.56, p < 0.01). A cut-off time of 10.6 s discriminated between mild and moderate-to-severe impairment (discriminant validity). Each additional second represented 42% odds increase of greater impairment.

Conclusions

For this version of the FNT, the time to perform the test showed construct, convergent and discriminant validity to measure UL coordination in stroke.
Literature
1.
go back to reference D’Avella A, Lacquaniti F. Control of reaching movements by muscle synergy combinations. Front Comput Neurosci. 2013;7(42):1–7. D’Avella A, Lacquaniti F. Control of reaching movements by muscle synergy combinations. Front Comput Neurosci. 2013;7(42):1–7.
2.
go back to reference Reinkensmeyer DJ, Cole AM, Kahn LE, Kamper DG. Directional control of reaching is preserved following mild/moderate stroke and stochastically constrained following severe stroke. Exp Brain Res. 2002;143(4):525–30. doi:10.1007/s00221-002-1055-3.CrossRefPubMed Reinkensmeyer DJ, Cole AM, Kahn LE, Kamper DG. Directional control of reaching is preserved following mild/moderate stroke and stochastically constrained following severe stroke. Exp Brain Res. 2002;143(4):525–30. doi:10.​1007/​s00221-002-1055-3.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Bernstein NA. The Co-ordination and regulation of movements. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1967. Bernstein NA. The Co-ordination and regulation of movements. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1967.
4.
go back to reference Zoltan B, Pedretti LW. Evaluation of muscle tone and coordination. In: Pedretti LW, Zoltan B, editors. Occupational therapy: practice skills for physical dysfunction. 3rd ed. St-Louis: Mosby; 1990. p. 131–40. Zoltan B, Pedretti LW. Evaluation of muscle tone and coordination. In: Pedretti LW, Zoltan B, editors. Occupational therapy: practice skills for physical dysfunction. 3rd ed. St-Louis: Mosby; 1990. p. 131–40.
5.
go back to reference Trombly CA. Occupational therapy for physical dysfunction. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1989. Trombly CA. Occupational therapy for physical dysfunction. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1989.
6.
go back to reference Jirsa VK, Kelso JAS. Coordination dynamics: issues and trends. Berlin: Springer; 2004.CrossRef Jirsa VK, Kelso JAS. Coordination dynamics: issues and trends. Berlin: Springer; 2004.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Latash ML, Scholz JP, Schöner G. Motor control strategies revealed in the structure of motor variability. Ex Sport Sci Rev. 2002;30:26–31.CrossRef Latash ML, Scholz JP, Schöner G. Motor control strategies revealed in the structure of motor variability. Ex Sport Sci Rev. 2002;30:26–31.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Scholz JP, Schöner G, Latash ML. Identifying the control structure of multijoint coordination during pistol shooting. Exp Brain Res. 2000;135(3):382–404.CrossRefPubMed Scholz JP, Schöner G, Latash ML. Identifying the control structure of multijoint coordination during pistol shooting. Exp Brain Res. 2000;135(3):382–404.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Paillard J. Motor and representational framing of space. In: Paillard J, editor. Brain and Space. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1991. p. 163–82. Paillard J. Motor and representational framing of space. In: Paillard J, editor. Brain and Space. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1991. p. 163–82.
10.
go back to reference Brunnstrom S. Movement therapy in hemiplegia. A neurophysiological approach. New York: Harper and Row; 1970. Brunnstrom S. Movement therapy in hemiplegia. A neurophysiological approach. New York: Harper and Row; 1970.
11.
go back to reference Krasovsky T, Levin MF. Toward a better understanding of coordination in healthy and poststroke gait. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24(3):213–24.CrossRefPubMed Krasovsky T, Levin MF. Toward a better understanding of coordination in healthy and poststroke gait. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24(3):213–24.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Levin MF, Kleim JA, Wolf SL. What do motor “recovery” and “compensation” mean in patients following stroke? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23:313–9.CrossRefPubMed Levin MF, Kleim JA, Wolf SL. What do motor “recovery” and “compensation” mean in patients following stroke? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23:313–9.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Siebers A, Oberg U, Skargren E. Improvement and impact of initial motor skill after intensive rehabilitation–CI-therapy in patients with chronic hemiplegia. A follow-up study. Adv Physiother. 2006;8:146–53.CrossRef Siebers A, Oberg U, Skargren E. Improvement and impact of initial motor skill after intensive rehabilitation–CI-therapy in patients with chronic hemiplegia. A follow-up study. Adv Physiother. 2006;8:146–53.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Mihaltchev P, Archambault PS, Feldman AG, Levin MF. Control of double-joint arm posture in adults with unilateral brain damage. Exp Brain Res. 2005;163:468–86.CrossRefPubMed Mihaltchev P, Archambault PS, Feldman AG, Levin MF. Control of double-joint arm posture in adults with unilateral brain damage. Exp Brain Res. 2005;163:468–86.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Feldman AG, Levin MF. The origin and use of positional frames of reference in motor control. Behav Brain Sci. 1995;18(4):723.CrossRef Feldman AG, Levin MF. The origin and use of positional frames of reference in motor control. Behav Brain Sci. 1995;18(4):723.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Swaine BR, Sullivan SJ. Reliability of the scores for the finger-to-nose test in adults with traumatic brain injury. Phys Ther. 1993;73:71–8.PubMed Swaine BR, Sullivan SJ. Reliability of the scores for the finger-to-nose test in adults with traumatic brain injury. Phys Ther. 1993;73:71–8.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient: I. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;975(7):13–31. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient: I. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;975(7):13–31.
19.
go back to reference Haerer AF. The neurological exam. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1992. Haerer AF. The neurological exam. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1992.
21.
go back to reference Rodrigues M, Slimovitch M, Blanchette A, Levin MF. The finger-to-nose test as a measure of coordination in stroke. Int J Stroke. 2015;10:4. RHB.155.CrossRef Rodrigues M, Slimovitch M, Blanchette A, Levin MF. The finger-to-nose test as a measure of coordination in stroke. Int J Stroke. 2015;10:4. RHB.155.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Moreland J, Gowland C, Van Hullenaar S, Huijbregts M. Theoretical basis of the Chedoke-McMaster stroke assessment. Physiother Can. 1993;45(4):231–8. Moreland J, Gowland C, Van Hullenaar S, Huijbregts M. Theoretical basis of the Chedoke-McMaster stroke assessment. Physiother Can. 1993;45(4):231–8.
23.
go back to reference Levin MF, Hui-Chan CW. Relief of hemiparetic spasticity by TENS is associated with improvement in reflex and voluntary motor functions. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1992;85:131–42.CrossRefPubMed Levin MF, Hui-Chan CW. Relief of hemiparetic spasticity by TENS is associated with improvement in reflex and voluntary motor functions. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1992;85:131–42.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Mathiowetz V, Volland G, Kashman N, Weber K. Adult norms for the box and block test of manual dexterity. Am J Occup Ther. 1985;39(6):386–91.CrossRefPubMed Mathiowetz V, Volland G, Kashman N, Weber K. Adult norms for the box and block test of manual dexterity. Am J Occup Ther. 1985;39(6):386–91.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Wagner JM, Rhodes JA, Patten C. Reproducibility and minimal detectable change of three-dimensional kinematic analysis of reaching tasks in people with hemiparesis after stroke. Phys Ther. 2008;88:652–63.CrossRefPubMed Wagner JM, Rhodes JA, Patten C. Reproducibility and minimal detectable change of three-dimensional kinematic analysis of reaching tasks in people with hemiparesis after stroke. Phys Ther. 2008;88:652–63.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Duncan PW, Goldstein LB, Horner RD, Landsman PB, Samsa GP, Matchar DB. Similar motor recovery of upper and lower extremities after stroke. Stroke. 1994;25:1181–8.CrossRefPubMed Duncan PW, Goldstein LB, Horner RD, Landsman PB, Samsa GP, Matchar DB. Similar motor recovery of upper and lower extremities after stroke. Stroke. 1994;25:1181–8.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Henderson AR. Assessing test accuracy and its clinical consequences: a primer for receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Ann Clin Biochem. 1993;30:521–39.CrossRefPubMed Henderson AR. Assessing test accuracy and its clinical consequences: a primer for receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Ann Clin Biochem. 1993;30:521–39.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Lashley KS. The problem of serial order in behavior. In: Jeffress LA, editor. Cerebral mechanisms in behavior. New York: Wiley; 1951. Lashley KS. The problem of serial order in behavior. In: Jeffress LA, editor. Cerebral mechanisms in behavior. New York: Wiley; 1951.
31.
go back to reference Levin MF, Liebermann DG, Parmet Y, Berman S. Compensatory versus noncompensatory shoulder movements used for reaching in stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015. doi:10.1177/1545968315613863. Levin MF, Liebermann DG, Parmet Y, Berman S. Compensatory versus noncompensatory shoulder movements used for reaching in stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015. doi:10.​1177/​1545968315613863​.
32.
go back to reference Yang J, Scholz JP, Latash ML. The role of kinematic redundancy in adaptation of reaching. Exp Brain Res. 2007;176(1):54–69.CrossRefPubMed Yang J, Scholz JP, Latash ML. The role of kinematic redundancy in adaptation of reaching. Exp Brain Res. 2007;176(1):54–69.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Gottlieb GL, Corcos DM, Agarwal GC. Strategies for the control of voluntary movements with one mechanical degree of freedom. Behav Brain Sci. 1989;12(2):189–210.CrossRef Gottlieb GL, Corcos DM, Agarwal GC. Strategies for the control of voluntary movements with one mechanical degree of freedom. Behav Brain Sci. 1989;12(2):189–210.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Levin MF, Lamarre Y, Feldman AG. Control variables and proprioceptive feedback in fast single-joint movement. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1995;73(2):316–30.CrossRefPubMed Levin MF, Lamarre Y, Feldman AG. Control variables and proprioceptive feedback in fast single-joint movement. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1995;73(2):316–30.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Ellis MD, Sukal T, DeMott T, Dewald JP. Augmenting clinical evaluation of hemiparetic arm movement with a laboratory based quantitative measurement of kinematics as a function of limb loading. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22:321–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ellis MD, Sukal T, DeMott T, Dewald JP. Augmenting clinical evaluation of hemiparetic arm movement with a laboratory based quantitative measurement of kinematics as a function of limb loading. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22:321–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
go back to reference Sukal TM, Ellis MD, Dewald JPA. Shoulder abduction-induced reductions in reaching work areas following hemiparetic stroke. Neuroscientific implications. Exp Brain Res. 2007;183:215–23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sukal TM, Ellis MD, Dewald JPA. Shoulder abduction-induced reductions in reaching work areas following hemiparetic stroke. Neuroscientific implications. Exp Brain Res. 2007;183:215–23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
39.
go back to reference Shaikh T, Goussev V, Feldman AG, Levin MF. Arm-trunk coordination for beyond-the-reach movements in adults with stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014;28(4):355–66.CrossRefPubMed Shaikh T, Goussev V, Feldman AG, Levin MF. Arm-trunk coordination for beyond-the-reach movements in adults with stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014;28(4):355–66.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Gagnon C, Mathieu J, Desrosiers J. Standardized finger nose test validity for coordination assessment in an ataxic disorder. Can J Neurol Sci. 2004;31:484–9.CrossRefPubMed Gagnon C, Mathieu J, Desrosiers J. Standardized finger nose test validity for coordination assessment in an ataxic disorder. Can J Neurol Sci. 2004;31:484–9.CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Feys PG, Davies-Smith A, Jones R, Romberg A, Ruutiainen J, Helsen WF, Ketelaer P. Intention tremor rated according to different finger-to-nose test protocols: a survey. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:79–82.CrossRefPubMed Feys PG, Davies-Smith A, Jones R, Romberg A, Ruutiainen J, Helsen WF, Ketelaer P. Intention tremor rated according to different finger-to-nose test protocols: a survey. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:79–82.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Does the Finger-to-Nose Test measure upper limb coordination in chronic stroke?
Authors
Marcos R. M. Rodrigues
Matthew Slimovitch
Gevorg Chilingaryan
Mindy F. Levin
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1743-0003
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-016-0213-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 1/2017 Go to the issue