Top

Published in:

01-07-2013 | Original Article

Does the cement stiffness affect fatigue fracture strength of vertebrae after cement augmentation in osteoporotic patients?

Authors: Jan Philipp Kolb, Rebecca A. Kueny, Klaus Püschel, Andreas Boger, Johannes M. Rueger, Michael M. Morlock, Gerd Huber, Wolfgang Lehmann

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 7/2013

Abstract

Purpose

Normal progression of osteoporosis or the rigid reinforcement of the fractured vertebral body with polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) cement is being discussed as a cause for adjacent-level fractures after vertebroplasty. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether augmentation with low stiffness cement can decrease the risk of adjacent-level fractures in low-quality bone.

Methods

Eighteen female osteoporotic lumbar specimens (L1–L5) were harvested and divided into three groups according to bone mineral density: (I) native; (II) PMMA; (III) modified PMMA (lower stiffness). For the PMMA and modified PMMA groups, a compression fracture was first mechanically induced in L3, and then the fracture received vertebroplasty treatment. The cement stiffness reduction of the modified PMMA group was achieved via an addition of 8 mL of serum to the typical PMMA base. All specimens were exposed to cyclic loading (4 Hz) and a stepwise increasing applied peak force. Cement stiffness was tested according to ISO 5833.

Results

A 51 % decrease in cement stiffness was achieved in the modified PMMA group (954 ± 141 vs. 1,937 ± 478 MPa, p < 0.001). Fatigue fracture force (the force level during cyclic loading at which the deformation experienced a sudden increase; FFF) was significantly affected by bone quality (r ² = 0.39, p = 0.006) and by the initial fracture force (the force necessary to create the initial fracture in L3 prior to augmentation; r ² = 0.82, p < 0.001). Using initial fracture force as a covariate, the FFF of the modified PMMA group (1,764 ± 49 N) was significantly higher than in the PMMA group (1,544 ± 55 N; p = 0.03).

Conclusions

A possible method to reduce adjacent-level fractures after vertebroplasty in patients with reduced bone quality could be the use of a lower modulus cement. Therefore, mixing cement with biocompatible fluids could prove useful to tailor cement properties in the operating theater.

FFF for the modified PMMA group was also significantly higher than the PMMA group when the FFF was normalized with the initial fracture force (FFF/IFF) rather than using the IFF as a covariate (p = 0.03). To account for differences of individual specimen geometry, an ANCOVA analysis comparing the change in apparent fatigue strength (FFF/endplate area) adjusted for apparent initial strength (IFF/endplate area) was performed. In accordance with the FFF analysis, the modified PMMA fatigue strength (1.30 ± 0.041 MPa, n = 6) was also significantly higher than in the PMMA group (1.07 ± 0.045 MPa, n = 5, F(1,8) = 11.99, η ² = 0.60, p = 0.009, Fig. 5).

Riggs BL, Melton LJ (1995) The worldwide problem of osteoporosis: insights afforded by epidemiology. Bone 17(5):505–511CrossRef

Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH et al (2007) Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States. 2005–2025. J Bone Miner Res 22(3):465–475PubMedCrossRef

Bartl R, Gradinger R (2009) Current diagnosis and therapy of osteoporosis on the basis of “European guidance 2008”. Orthopade 38(4):365–379PubMedCrossRef

Arabmotlagh M, Rauschmann M (2010) Filler materials for augmentation of osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Orthopade 39(7):687–692PubMedCrossRef

Cooper C, Atkinson EJ, Jacobsen SJ, O’Fallon WM, Melton LJ (1993) Population-based study of survival after osteoporotic fractures. Am J Epidemiol 137(9):1001–1005PubMed

Cotten A, Boutry N, Cortet B et al (1998) Percutaneous vertebroplasty: state of the art. Radiographics 18(2):311–320 discussion 320–323PubMed

Heini PF, Berlemann U, Kaufmann M et al (2001) Augmentation of mechanical properties in osteoporotic vertebral bones—a biomechanical investigation of vertebroplasty efficacy with different bone cements. Euro Spine J 10(2):164–171CrossRef

Mathis JM, Barr JD, Belkoff SM et al (2001) Percutaneous vertebroplasty: a developing standard of care for vertebral compression fractures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22(2):373–381PubMed

Hulme PA, Krebs J, Ferguson SJ, Berlemann U (2006) Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: a systematic review of 69 clinical studies. Spine 31(17):1983–2001PubMedCrossRef

10.

Klazen CAH, Venmans A, de Fies J (2010) Percutaneous vertebroplasty is not a risk factor for new osteoporotic compression fractures: results from Vertos II. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 31:1447–1450PubMedCrossRef

11.

Trout AT, Kallmes DF, Kaufmann TJ (2006) New fractures after vertebroplasty: adjacent fractures occur significantly sooner. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27(1):217–223PubMed

12.

Uppin AA, Hirsch JA, Centenera LV et al (2003) Occurrence of new vertebral body fracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with osteoporosis. Radiology 226(1):119–124PubMedCrossRef

13.

Boger A, Heini P, Windolf M, Schneider E (2007) Adjacent vertebral failure after vertebroplasty: a biomechanical study of low-modulus PMMA cement. Euro Spine J 16(12):2118–2125CrossRef

14.

Belkoff SM, Mathis JM, Erbe EM, Fenton DC (2000) Biomechanical evaluation of a new bone cement for use in vertebroplasty. Spine 25(9):1061–1064PubMedCrossRef

15.

Hadley C, Awan OA, Zoarski GH (2010) Biomechanics of vertebral bone augmentation. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 20(2):159–167PubMedCrossRef

16.

Ahn DK, Lee S, Choi DJ et al (2009) Mechanical properties of blood-mixed polymethyl metacrylate in percutaneous vertebroplasty. Asian Spine J 3(2):45–52PubMedCrossRef

17.

Banse X, Sims TJ, Bailey AJ (2002) Mechanical properties of adult vertebral cancellous bone: correlation with collagen intermolecular cross-links. J Bone Miner Res 17(9):1621–1628PubMedCrossRef

18.

Huber G, Müller-Bergen L, Sellenschloh K, et al. (2008) The influence of cement augmentation method on the fracture strength of augmented and adjacent vertebral bodies. In: 53rd Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, San Francisco

19.

Broszyk (2010) Volume matters: a review of procedural details of two randomized controlled vertebroplasty trials in 2009. Eur Spine J 19:1837–1840CrossRef

20.

Locati L (1955) Le prove di fatica come ausilio alla progettazione ed alla produzione. Matallurgia It 47(9):301–308

21.

Brinkmann P, Biggermann M, Hilweg D (1988) Fatigue fracture of human lumbar vertebrae. Clin Biomech 3:1–23

22.

Huber G, Skrzypiec DM, Klein A, Püschel K, Morlock MM (2012) High cycle fatigue behaviour of functional spinal units. Ind Health 48(5):550–556CrossRef

23.

Luo J, Skrzypiec DM, Pollintine P et al (2006) Mechanical efficacy of vertebroplasty: influence of cement type, BMD, fracture severity, and disc degeneration. Bone 40(4):1110–1119CrossRef

24.

Kayanja MM, Togawa D, Lieberman IH (2005) Biomechanical changes after the augmentation of experimental osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in the cadaveric thoracic spine. Spine J 5(1):55–63PubMedCrossRef

25.

Nouda S, Tomita S, Kin A et al (2009) Adjacent vertebral body fracture following vertebroplasty with polymethyl methacrylate or calcium phosphate cement. Spine 34(24):2613–2618PubMedCrossRef

26.

Ammann P, Rizzoli R (2003) Bone strength and its determinants. Osteoporos Int 14(3):13–18

Title: Does the cement stiffness affect fatigue fracture strength of vertebrae after cement augmentation in osteoporotic patients?
Authors: Jan Philipp Kolb
Rebecca A. Kueny
Klaus Püschel
Andreas Boger
Johannes M. Rueger
Michael M. Morlock
Gerd Huber
Wolfgang Lehmann
Publication date: 01-07-2013
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: European Spine Journal / Issue 7/2013
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2809-2

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Does the cement stiffness affect fatigue fracture strength of vertebrae after cement augmentation in osteoporotic patients?

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 7/2013

Long-term impacts of different posterior operations on curvature, neurological recovery and axial symptoms for multilevel cervical degenerative myelopathy

Differential blood contamination levels and powder–liquid ratios can affect the compressive strength of calcium phosphate cement (CPC): a study using a transpedicular vertebroplasty model

Surgical treatment for osteoporotic vertebral collapse with neurological deficits: Retrospective comparative study of three procedures—anterior surgery versus posterior spinal shorting osteotomy versus posterior spinal fusion using vertebroplasty

Modified prone position using lateral brace attachments for cervico-dorsal spine surgeries

Metabolic disturbances identified by SPECT-CT in patients with a clinical diagnosis of sacroiliac joint incompetence

Apoptosis of endplate chondrocytes in post-laminectomy cervical kyphotic deformity