Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Journal of Family Violence
Published in: Journal of Family Violence 1/2012

01-01-2012 | Original Article

Does Separation or Divorce Make any Difference? An Interactional Perspective on Intimate Partner Violence with Focus on Marital Status

Authors: Solveig Karin Bø Vatnar, Stål Bjørkly

Published in: Journal of Family Violence | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

This article reports a study of the impact of marital status on interactional aspects of intimate partner violence (IPV) among help-seeking women. Are there differences among marital status groups concerning (a) other sociodemographic variables, (b) IPV categories, (c) interactional IPV variables, and (d) perception and interpretation of IPV? A representative sample of 157 women recruited from family counseling, the police, and shelters were interviewed. There was no significant sociodemographic difference among the marital status groups. There were no significant differences pertaining to IPV categories, neither for IPV severity, injury, duration, frequency, mortal danger, and regularity, nor for physical, psychological, or sexual IPV. However, multivariate logistic regression showed that post-separation women were significantly more likely to have (a) had longer duration since the last psychological and sexual IPV episode, (2) reported the physical IPV to be more predictable, and (3) used more active coping strategies against physical IPV. However, our research was not able to determine if perception and interpretation predict actual leaving behavior, or vice versa, or how the victim’s subjective perception and interpretation of the IPV changes over time.
Literature
Altman, D. G. (1991). Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman & Hall CRC.
Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: a meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 651–680.PubMedCrossRef
Arriaga, W. B., & Capezza, N. M. (2005). Targets of partner violence. The importance of understanding coping trajectories. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 89–99.PubMedCrossRef
Bell, K. M., & Naugle, A. E. (2008). Intimate partner violence theoretical considerations: moving towards a contextual framework. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 1096–1107.PubMedCrossRef
Bjørkly, S. (1993). Scale for the prediction of aggression and dangerousness in psychotic patients, an introduction. Psychological Reports, 73, 1363–1377.PubMedCrossRef
Briere, J., & Jordan, C. E. (2004). Violence against women. Outcome complexity and implications for assessment and treatment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 1252–1276.PubMedCrossRef
Brownridge, D. A. (2006). Violence against women post-separation. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11, 514–530.CrossRef
Brownridge, D. A., Chan, K. L., Hiebert-Murphy, D., Ristock, J., Tiwari, A., Leung, W. C., et al. (2008). The elevated risk for non-lethal post-separation violence in Canada. A comparison of separated, divorced, and married women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23, 117–135.PubMedCrossRef
Cano, A., & Vivian, D. (2001). Life stressors and husband-to-wife violence. Aggression & Violent Behavior, 6, 459–480.CrossRef
Dixon, L., & Browne, K. (2003). The heterogeneity of spouse abuse: a review. Aggression & Violent Behavior, 8, 107–130.CrossRef
Fottrell, E. (1980). A study of violent behaviour among patients in psychiatric hospitals. British Journal of Psychiatry, 136, 216–221.PubMedCrossRef
Funder, D. C. (2006). Towards a resolution of the personality triad: persons, situations, and behaviors. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 21–34.CrossRef
Haaland, T., Clausen, S. E., & Schei, B. (2005). Couple violence—different perspectives. Results from the first national survey in Norway. (Rep. No. NIBR- rapport 2005:3).
Harding, H. G., & Helweg-Larsen, M. (2009). Perceived risk for future intimate partner violence among women in a domestic violence shelter. Journal of Family Violence, 24, 75–85.CrossRef
Heckert, D. A., & Gondolf, E. W. (2004). Battered women’s perceptions of risk versus risk factors and instruments in predicting repeat reassault. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 778–800.PubMedCrossRef
Hicks, M. H. R. (2006). The prevalence and characteristics of intimate partner violence in a community study of Chinese American women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21, 1249–1269.PubMedCrossRef
Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Smultzler, N., & Bates, L. (1997). A brief review of the research on husband violence: Part III: sociodemographic factors, relationship factors, and differing consequences of husband and wife violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 2, 285–307.CrossRef
Johnson, H., & Hotton, T. (2003). Losing control: homicide risk in estranged and intact intimate relationships. Homicide Studies, 7, 58–84.CrossRef
Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (2005). Top greatest “hits”. The important findings and future directions for intimate partner violence research. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 108–118.PubMedCrossRef
Magnusson, D. (1981). Towards a psychology of situations: An interactional perspective. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Mears, D. P., & Visher, C. A. (2005). Trends in understanding and addressing domestic violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 204–211.PubMedCrossRef
Messman-Moore, T. L., & Long, P. J. (2003). The role of childhood sexual abuse sequelae in sexual revictimization of women. An empirical review and theoretical reformulation. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 537–571.PubMedCrossRef
Mirlees-Black, C. (1999). Domestic violence: Findings from a new British crime survey self-completion questionnaire. Home Office Research Study 191.London: Home Office., 191.
Moore, T. M., Stuart, G. L., Meehan, J. C., Rhatigan, D. L., Hellmuth, J. C., & Keen, S. M. (2008). Drug abuse and aggression between intimate partners: a meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 247–274.PubMedCrossRef
Rhatigan, D. L., Moore, T. M., & Street, A. E. (2005). Reflections on partner violence. Twenty years of research and beyond. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 82–88.PubMedCrossRef
Rhatigan, D. L., Street, A. E., & Axsom, D. K. (2006). A critical review of theories to explain violent relationship termination: implications for research and intervention. Clinical Psychology Review, 26, 321–345.PubMedCrossRef
Sartin, R. M., Hansen, D. J., & Huss, M. T. (2006). Domestic violence treatment response and recidivism: a review and implications for the study of family violence. Aggression & Violent Behavior, 11, 425–440.CrossRef
Schwartz, M. D. (2005). The past and the future of violence against women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 7–11.PubMedCrossRef
Shurman, L. A., & Rodriguez, C. M. (2006). Cognitive-affective predictors of women’s readiness to end domestic violence relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21, 1417–1439.PubMedCrossRef
Stolzenberg, L., & D’Alessio, S. J. (2007). The effect of divorce on domestic crime. Crime & Delinquency, 53, 281–302.CrossRef
Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: the Conflict Tactic Scales. Journal of Marriage and Family, 41, 75–88.CrossRef
Straus, M. A., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugerman, D. (1996). The revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS-2): development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283–316.CrossRef
Vatnar, S. K. B., & Bjørkly, S. (2008). An interactional perspective of intimate partner violence: an in-depth semi-structured interview of a representative sample of help-seeking women. Journal of Family Violence, 23, 265–279.CrossRef
Vatnar, S. K. B., & Bjørkly, S. (2009a). Does it make any difference if she is a mother? An interactional perspective on intimate partner violence with focus on motherhood and pregnancy. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 94–110.PubMedCrossRef
Vatnar, S. K. B., & Bjørkly, S. (2009b). Interactional aspects of intimate partner violence result in different help-seeking behaviors in a representative sample of women. Journal of Family Violence, 24, 231–241.CrossRef
Wilkinson, D. L., & Hamerschlag, S. J. (2005). Situational determinants in intimate partner violence. Aggression & Violent Behavior, 10, 333–361.CrossRef
Winstok, Z. (2007a). Toward an interactional perspective on intimate partner violence. Aggression & Violent Behavior, 12, 348–363.CrossRef
Wooldredge, J., & Thistlethwaute, A. (2006). Changing marital status and desistance from intimate assault. Public Health Reports, 21, 428–434.
Metadata
Title
Does Separation or Divorce Make any Difference? An Interactional Perspective on Intimate Partner Violence with Focus on Marital Status
Authors
Solveig Karin Bø Vatnar
Stål Bjørkly
Publication date
01-01-2012
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Family Violence / Issue 1/2012
Print ISSN: 0885-7482
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2851
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-011-9400-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

Journal of Family Violence 1/2012 Go to the issue

Original Article

Risk for Partner Victimization and Marital Dissatisfaction Among Chronically Depressed Patients

Original Article

Mothers’ Motivations for Intimate Partner Violence Help-Seeking

Original Article

Risk of Revictimization of Intimate Partner Violence: The Role of Attachment, Anger and Violent Behavior of the Victim

Original Article

Intimate Partner Violence and Psychological Distress among Young Couples: Analysis of the Moderating Effect of Social Support

Original Article

Personality Disorders in a Sample of Parents Accused of Physical Abuse or Neglect

Original Article

Comparison of Parent and Child Reports on Child Maltreatment in a Representative Household Sample in Hong Kong