Top

Published in:

Open Access 01-01-2011 | Original Article

Does minimally invasive lumbar disc surgery result in less muscle injury than conventional surgery? A randomized controlled trial

Authors: Mark Arts, Ronald Brand, Bas van der Kallen, Geert Lycklama à Nijeholt, Wilco Peul

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 1/2011

Abstract

The concept of minimally invasive lumbar disc surgery comprises reduced muscle injury. The aim of this study was to evaluate creatine phosphokinase (CPK) in serum and the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the multifidus muscle on magnetic resonance imaging as indicators of muscle injury. We present the results of a double-blind randomized trial on patients with lumbar disc herniation, in which tubular discectomy and conventional microdiscectomy were compared. In 216 patients, CPK was measured before surgery and at day 1 after surgery. In 140 patients, the CSA of the multifidus muscle was measured at the affected disc level before surgery and at 1 year after surgery. The ratios (i.e. post surgery/pre surgery) of CPK and CSA were used as outcome measures. The multifidus atrophy was classified into three grades ranging from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe atrophy), and the difference between post and pre surgery was used as an outcome. Patients’ low-back pain scores on the visual analogue scale (VAS) were documented before surgery and at various moments during follow-up. Tubular discectomy compared with conventional microdiscectomy resulted in a nonsignificant difference in CPK ratio, although the CSA ratio was significantly lower in tubular discectomy. At 1 year, there was no difference in atrophy grade between both groups nor in the percentage of patients showing an increased atrophy grade (14% tubular vs. 18% conventional). The postoperative low-back pain scores on the VAS improved in both groups, although the 1-year between-group mean difference of improvement was 3.5 mm (95% CI; 1.4–5.7 mm) in favour of conventional microdiscectomy. In conclusion, tubular discectomy compared with conventional microdiscectomy did not result in reduced muscle injury. Postoperative evaluation of CPK and the multifidus muscle showed similar results in both groups, although patients who underwent tubular discectomy reported more low-back pain during the first year after surgery.

Arts MP, Brand R, van den Akker ME, Koes BW, Bartels RH, Peul WC (2009) Tubular diskectomy vs conventional microdiskectomy for sciatica: a randomized controlled trial. Jama 302:149–158CrossRefPubMed

Arts MP, Nieborg A, Brand R, Peul WC (2007) Serum creatine phosphokinase as an indicator of muscle injury after various spinal and nonspinal surgical procedures. J Neurosurg Spine 7:282–286CrossRefPubMed

Arts MP, Peul WC, Brand R, Koes BW, Thomeer RT (2006) Cost-effectiveness of microendoscopic discectomy versus conventional open discectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a prospective randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN 51857546]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 7:42CrossRefPubMed

Datta G, Gnanalingham KK, Peterson D, Mendoza N, O’Neill K, Van Dellen J, McGregor A, Hughes SP (2004) Back pain and disability after lumbar laminectomy: is there a relationship to muscle retraction? Neurosurgery 54:1413–1420 discussion 1420CrossRefPubMed

Farrar JT, Portenoy RK, Berlin JA, Kinman JL, Strom BL (2000) Defining the clinically important difference in pain outcome measures. Pain 88:287–294CrossRefPubMed

Foley KT, Smith MM (1997) Microendoscopic discectomy. Technol Neurosurg 3:301–307

Kader DF, Wardlaw D, Smith FW (2000) Correlation between the MRI changes in the lumbar multifidus muscles and leg pain. Clin Radiol 55:145–149CrossRefPubMed

Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H (1996) Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. A histologic and enzymatic analysis. Spine 21:941–944CrossRefPubMed

Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H (1997) Changes in serum creatine phosphokinase MM isoenzyme after lumbar spine surgery. Spine 22:1018–1023CrossRefPubMed

10.

Kotil K, Tunckale T, Tatar Z, Koldas M, Kural A, Bilge T (2007) Serum creatine phosphokinase activity and histological changes in the multifidus muscle: a prospective randomized controlled comparative study of discectomy with or without retraction. J Neurosurg Spine 6:121–125CrossRefPubMed

11.

Kotilainen E, Alanen A, Parkkola R, Helenius H, Valtonen S, Kormano M (1995) Cross-sectional areas of lumbar muscles after surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation. A study with magnetic resonance imaging after microdiscectomy or percutaneous nucleotomy. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 133:7–12CrossRef

12.

Laasonen EM (1984) Atrophy of sacrospinal muscle groups in patients with chronic, diffusely radiating lumbar back pain. Neuroradiology 26:9–13CrossRefPubMed

13.

Motosuneya T, Asazuma T, Tsuji T, Watanabe H, Nakayama Y, Nemoto K (2006) Postoperative change of the cross-sectional area of back musculature after 5 surgical procedures as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. J Spinal Disord Tech 19:318–322CrossRefPubMed

14.

Muramatsu K, Hachiya Y, Morita C (2001) Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging of lumbar disc herniation: comparison of microendoscopic discectomy and Love’s method. Spine 26:1599–1605CrossRefPubMed

15.

Nakagawa H, Kamimura M, Uchiyama S, Takahara K, Itsubo T, Miyasaka T (2003) Microendoscopic discectomy (MED) for lumbar disc prolapse. J Clin Neurosci 10:231–235CrossRefPubMed

16.

Ostelo RW, de Vet HC (2005) Clinically important outcomes in low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 19:593–607CrossRefPubMed

17.

Peul WC, van Houwelingen HC, van den Hout WB, Brand R, Eekhof JA, Tans JT, Thomeer RT, Koes BW (2007) Surgery versus prolonged conservative treatment for sciatica. N Engl J Med 356:2245–2256CrossRefPubMed

18.

Sasaoka R, Nakamura H, Konishi S, Nagayama R, Suzuki E, Terai H, Takaoka K (2006) Objective assessment of reduced invasiveness in MED. Compared with conventional one-level laminotomy. Eur Spine J 15:577–582CrossRefPubMed

19.

Shin DA, Kim KN, Shin HC, do Yoon H (2008) The efficacy of microendoscopic discectomy in reducing iatrogenic muscle injury. J Neurosurg Spine 8:39–43CrossRefPubMed

20.

Sihvonen T, Herno A, Paljarvi L, Airaksinen O, Partanen J, Tapaninaho A (1993) Local denervation atrophy of paraspinal muscles in postoperative failed back syndrome. Spine 18:575–581CrossRefPubMed

21.

Stevens KJS, David B, Griffiths KL, Kim KD, Zwienenberg-Lee M, Alamin T, Bammer R (2006) Comparison of minimally invasive and conventional open posterolateral lumbar fusion using magnetic resonance imaging and retraction pressure studies. J Spinal Disord Tech 19:77–86CrossRefPubMed

22.

Suwa H, Hanakita J, Ohshita N, Gotoh K, Matsuoka N, Morizane A (2000) Postoperative changes in paraspinal muscle thickness after various lumbar back surgery procedures. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 40:151–154 (discussion 154–5)CrossRef

Title: Does minimally invasive lumbar disc surgery result in less muscle injury than conventional surgery? A randomized controlled trial
Authors: Mark Arts
Ronald Brand
Bas van der Kallen
Geert Lycklama à Nijeholt
Wilco Peul
Publication date: 01-01-2011
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: European Spine Journal / Issue 1/2011
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1482-y

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Does minimally invasive lumbar disc surgery result in less muscle injury than conventional surgery? A randomized controlled trial

Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2011

Maximal aerobic power in patients with chronic low back pain: a comparison with healthy subjects

Horizontal body and trunk center of mass offset and standing balance in scoliotic girls

Posterior listhesis of a lumbar vertebra in spinal tuberculosis

A systematic review on the effectiveness of pharmacological interventions for chronic non-specific low-back pain

Dural tears in percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy

Expert’s comment concerning Grand Rounds case entitled “Posterior listhesis of a lumbar vertebra in spinal tuberculosis” (by Matthew A. Kirkman and Krishnamurthy Sridhar)