Published in:
01-12-2018 | Original Article
Does lung perfusion scintigraphy continue to have a role in the clinical management of patients suspected of pulmonary embolism in the CT pulmonary angiography era?
Published in: Annals of Nuclear Medicine | Issue 10/2018
Login to get accessAbstract
Objective
Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening disorder with high mortality. A prompt diagnosis and treatment is essential for reducing the mortality rate. The purpose of the study is to evaluate if lung perfusion scintigraphy (LPS) continues to have a role in the clinical management of patients suspected of pulmonary embolism in the CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) era.
Methods
For this study, 1183 patients who had been subjected to LPS were retrospectively evaluated and classified into the following groups: A (positive LPS), B (negative LPS) and C (indeterminate LPS). Patients were further classified into A1 (‘PE likely’ and LPS-negative), B1 (PE unlikely and LPS-positive) and C1 (PE likely and indeterminate LPS) by combining the LPS findings and the clinical pretest probability (cpp). Subgroups A1, B1 and C1 underwent additional CTPA.
Results
Groups A, B, and C included 1086/1183, 69/1183 and 28/1183 patients, respectively. The proportion of patients with inconsistent cpp LPS findings who underwent additional CTPA was 106/1183 patients: subgroup A1 (n = 73), B1 (n = 21), and C1 (n = 12). In subgroup A1, CTPA was negative in 61/73, non-diagnostic in 12/73 and positive in 0/73 patients. In subgroup B1, CTPA excluded PE in 2/21, non-diagnostic in 3/21 and positive in 16/21 patients. In group C1, CTPA was negative in 8/12, positive in 2/12 and non-diagnostic in 2/12 patients.
Conclusion
In the CTPA era, LPS continues to have a role in the clinical management of patients suspected of PE.