Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Osteoporosis International 12/2014

01-12-2014 | Original Article

Does diabetes modify the effect of FRAX risk factors for predicting major osteoporotic and hip fracture?

Authors: W. D. Leslie, S. N. Morin, L. M. Lix, S. R. Majumdar

Published in: Osteoporosis International | Issue 12/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Summary

In an observational study population of 62,413 individuals (6,455 [10 %] with diabetes), diabetes was independently associated with major osteoporotic fractures (MOFs) but did not significantly modify the effect of FRAXTM risk factors or prior fracture site. However, the presence of diabetes exerted a much stronger effect on hip fracture risk in younger versus older individuals.

Introduction

Diabetes mellitus increases fracture risk independent of risk factors that comprise the WHO FRAXTM tool. We explored whether diabetes modifies the effect of FRAX clinical risk factors on MOF and hip fracture risk.

Methods

Using a registry of clinical dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) results for Manitoba, Canada, we identified women and men aged 40 years and older undergoing baseline DXA in 1996–2011. Health services data were used to identify diabetes diagnosis, FRAX risk factors and incident fractures using previously validated algorithms. Prior fracture was stratified as clinical vertebral, hip, humerus, forearm, pelvis and ‘other’. Cox proportional hazards models were used to test for statistical interactions of diabetes with FRAX clinical risk factors and prior fracture site.

Results

During a mean follow-up of 6 years, there were 4,218 MOF and 1,108 hip fractures. Diabetes was a significant independent risk factor for MOF adjusted for FRAX risk factors including bone mineral density (BMD) (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.32 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.20–1.46]). No significant interactions of FRAX risk factors or prior fracture site with diabetes were identified in analyses of MOF. For predicting hip fractures, age significantly modified the effect of diabetes (aHR age <60, 4.67 [95 % CI 2.76–7.89], age 60–69, 2.68 [1.77–4.04], age 70–79, 1.57 [1.20–2.04], age >80, 1.42 [1. 10–1.99]; pinteraction <0.001).

Conclusions

Diabetes is an independent risk factor for MOFs and does not significantly modify the effect of FRAX risk factors or prior fracture site. However, diabetes exerts a much stronger effect on hip fracture risk in younger than older individuals which needs to be considered in hip fracture prediction.
Literature
1.
go back to reference van Staa TP, Dennison EM, Leufkens HG et al (2001) Epidemiology of fractures in England and Wales. Bone 29:517–522PubMedCrossRef van Staa TP, Dennison EM, Leufkens HG et al (2001) Epidemiology of fractures in England and Wales. Bone 29:517–522PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Blanchard JF, Ludwig S, Wajda A et al (1996) Incidence and prevalence of diabetes in Manitoba, 1986-1991. Diabetes Care 19:807–811PubMedCrossRef Blanchard JF, Ludwig S, Wajda A et al (1996) Incidence and prevalence of diabetes in Manitoba, 1986-1991. Diabetes Care 19:807–811PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Wild S, Roglic G, Green A et al (2004) Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care 27:1047–1053PubMedCrossRef Wild S, Roglic G, Green A et al (2004) Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care 27:1047–1053PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Strotmeyer ES, Cauley JA, Schwartz AV et al (2005) Nontraumatic fracture risk with diabetes mellitus and impaired fasting glucose in older white and black adults: the health, aging, and body composition study. Arch Intern Med 165:1612–1617PubMedCrossRef Strotmeyer ES, Cauley JA, Schwartz AV et al (2005) Nontraumatic fracture risk with diabetes mellitus and impaired fasting glucose in older white and black adults: the health, aging, and body composition study. Arch Intern Med 165:1612–1617PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Janghorbani M, Feskanich D, Willett WC et al (2006) Prospective study of diabetes and risk of hip fracture: the Nurses’ Health Study. Diabetes Care 29:1573–1578PubMedCrossRef Janghorbani M, Feskanich D, Willett WC et al (2006) Prospective study of diabetes and risk of hip fracture: the Nurses’ Health Study. Diabetes Care 29:1573–1578PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Janghorbani M, Van Dam RM, Willett WC et al (2007) Systematic review of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus and risk of fracture. Am J Epidemiol 166:495–505PubMedCrossRef Janghorbani M, Van Dam RM, Willett WC et al (2007) Systematic review of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus and risk of fracture. Am J Epidemiol 166:495–505PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference De Liefde II, Van Der KM, de Laet CE et al (2005) Bone mineral density and fracture risk in type-2 diabetes mellitus: the Rotterdam Study. Osteoporos Int 16:1713–1720PubMedCrossRef De Liefde II, Van Der KM, de Laet CE et al (2005) Bone mineral density and fracture risk in type-2 diabetes mellitus: the Rotterdam Study. Osteoporos Int 16:1713–1720PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hanley DA, Brown JP, Tenenhouse A et al (2003) Associations among disease conditions, bone mineral density, and prevalent vertebral deformities in men and women 50 years of age and older: cross-sectional results from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study. J Bone Miner Res 18:784–790PubMedCrossRef Hanley DA, Brown JP, Tenenhouse A et al (2003) Associations among disease conditions, bone mineral density, and prevalent vertebral deformities in men and women 50 years of age and older: cross-sectional results from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study. J Bone Miner Res 18:784–790PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bonds DE, Larson JC, Schwartz AV et al (2006) Risk of fracture in women with type 2 diabetes: the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91:3404–3410PubMedCrossRef Bonds DE, Larson JC, Schwartz AV et al (2006) Risk of fracture in women with type 2 diabetes: the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91:3404–3410PubMedCrossRef
10.
11.
go back to reference Giangregorio LM, Leslie WD, Lix LM et al (2012) FRAX underestimates fracture risk in patients with diabetes. J Bone Miner Res 27:301–308PubMedCrossRef Giangregorio LM, Leslie WD, Lix LM et al (2012) FRAX underestimates fracture risk in patients with diabetes. J Bone Miner Res 27:301–308PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Schwartz AV, Vittinghoff E, Bauer DC et al (2011) Association of BMD and FRAX score with risk of fracture in older adults with type 2 diabetes. JAMA 305:2184–2192PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Schwartz AV, Vittinghoff E, Bauer DC et al (2011) Association of BMD and FRAX score with risk of fracture in older adults with type 2 diabetes. JAMA 305:2184–2192PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Oden A, Johansson H et al (2009) FRAX and its applications to clinical practice. Bone 44:734–743PubMedCrossRef Kanis JA, Oden A, Johansson H et al (2009) FRAX and its applications to clinical practice. Bone 44:734–743PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Leslie WD, Rubin MR, Schwartz AV et al (2012) Type 2 diabetes and bone. J Bone Miner Res 27:2231–2237PubMedCrossRef Leslie WD, Rubin MR, Schwartz AV et al (2012) Type 2 diabetes and bone. J Bone Miner Res 27:2231–2237PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Leslie WD, Metge C (2003) Establishing a regional bone density program: lessons from the Manitoba experience. J Clin Densitom 6:275–282PubMedCrossRef Leslie WD, Metge C (2003) Establishing a regional bone density program: lessons from the Manitoba experience. J Clin Densitom 6:275–282PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Leslie WD, Caetano PA, MacWilliam LR et al (2005) Construction and validation of a population-based bone densitometry database. J Clin Densitom 8:25–30PubMedCrossRef Leslie WD, Caetano PA, MacWilliam LR et al (2005) Construction and validation of a population-based bone densitometry database. J Clin Densitom 8:25–30PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Leslie WD (2006) The importance of spectrum bias on bone density monitoring in clinical practice. Bone 39:361–368PubMedCrossRef Leslie WD (2006) The importance of spectrum bias on bone density monitoring in clinical practice. Bone 39:361–368PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Looker AC, Wahner HW, Dunn WL et al (1998) Updated data on proximal femur bone mineral levels of US adults. Osteoporos Int 8:468–489PubMedCrossRef Looker AC, Wahner HW, Dunn WL et al (1998) Updated data on proximal femur bone mineral levels of US adults. Osteoporos Int 8:468–489PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Leslie WD, Lix LM, Johansson H et al (2010) Independent clinical validation of a Canadian FRAX tool: fracture prediction and model calibration. J Bone Miner Res 25:2350–2358PubMedCrossRef Leslie WD, Lix LM, Johansson H et al (2010) Independent clinical validation of a Canadian FRAX tool: fracture prediction and model calibration. J Bone Miner Res 25:2350–2358PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Klotzbuecher CM, Ross PD, Landsman PB et al (2000) Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: a summary of the literature and statistical synthesis. J Bone Miner Res 15:721–739PubMedCrossRef Klotzbuecher CM, Ross PD, Landsman PB et al (2000) Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: a summary of the literature and statistical synthesis. J Bone Miner Res 15:721–739PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Morin SN, Lix LM, Leslie WD (2014) The importance of previous fracture site on osteoporosis diagnosis and incident fractures in women. J Bone Miner Res [Epub head of print] Morin SN, Lix LM, Leslie WD (2014) The importance of previous fracture site on osteoporosis diagnosis and incident fractures in women. J Bone Miner Res [Epub head of print]
22.
go back to reference WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology. (eds) (2005) Guidelines for ATC classification and DDD assignment. Oslo WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology. (eds) (2005) Guidelines for ATC classification and DDD assignment. Oslo
23.
go back to reference Roos NP, Shapiro E (1999) Revisiting the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy and Evaluation and its population-based health information system. Med Care 37:JS10–JS14PubMed Roos NP, Shapiro E (1999) Revisiting the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy and Evaluation and its population-based health information system. Med Care 37:JS10–JS14PubMed
24.
go back to reference Leslie WD, Tsang JF, Caetano PA et al (2007) Effectiveness of bone density measurement for predicting osteoporotic fractures in clinical practice. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:77–81PubMedCrossRef Leslie WD, Tsang JF, Caetano PA et al (2007) Effectiveness of bone density measurement for predicting osteoporotic fractures in clinical practice. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:77–81PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Kleinbaum DG, Klein M. (eds) (2010) Logistic regression: a self-learning text (3rd edition). Springer (New York) Kleinbaum DG, Klein M. (eds) (2010) Logistic regression: a self-learning text (3rd edition). Springer (New York)
26.
go back to reference Leslie WD, Lix LM, Wu X (2013) Competing mortality and fracture risk assessment. Osteoporos Int 24:681–688PubMedCrossRef Leslie WD, Lix LM, Wu X (2013) Competing mortality and fracture risk assessment. Osteoporos Int 24:681–688PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Fraser LA, Pritchard J, Ioannidis G et al (2011) Clinical risk factors for fracture in diabetes: a matched cohort analysis. J Clin Densitom 14:416–421PubMedCrossRef Fraser LA, Pritchard J, Ioannidis G et al (2011) Clinical risk factors for fracture in diabetes: a matched cohort analysis. J Clin Densitom 14:416–421PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Does diabetes modify the effect of FRAX risk factors for predicting major osteoporotic and hip fracture?
Authors
W. D. Leslie
S. N. Morin
L. M. Lix
S. R. Majumdar
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Osteoporosis International / Issue 12/2014
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Electronic ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-014-2822-2

Other articles of this Issue 12/2014

Osteoporosis International 12/2014 Go to the issue