Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 6/2011

01-06-2011

Does an Information Leaflet about Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Improve Recollection of Information and Satisfaction of Patients? A Randomized Trial in Patients Scheduled for Digestive Surgery

Authors: Véronique Merle, Hélène Marini, Julie Rongère, Marie-Pierre Tavolacci, Michel Scotté, Pierre Czernichow

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 6/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

A previous study suggested that most surgical patients do not remember having received information about surgical site infection (SSI). In other fields, written information has been suggested to improve patient satisfaction and recollection of information. Our objective was to assess if providing patients with written information about SSI, in addition to oral information, could influence patient satisfaction, recall of information, and opinion regarding SSI.

Methods

A total of 207 patients scheduled for digestive surgery at a university hospital were randomized between usual oral information about SSI, plus an information leaflet about SSI (group O/L), or usual oral information alone (group O). Patients were interviewed 5 weeks after surgery to assess their recall and satisfaction regarding information, opinion regarding SSI, and declared intention of seeking legal action in case of SSI. Surgeons and interviewer were blinded to patients’ group allocation. Recruitment occurred between October 2005 and August 2006.

Results

Of the original 207 patients, 161 patients (O/L = 87, O = 74) underwent operation and were interviewed as scheduled. Satisfaction was higher in group O/L (67% vs. O: 43%; P = 0.003). The recall of having received information (O/L: 39% vs. O: 31%; P = 0.29), was similar between the two groups. Judging SSI as always preventable was more frequent in group O/L (28% vs. O: 9%; P = 0.004) with a trend toward a more frequent intention of seeking legal action (O/L: 10% vs. O: 3%; P = 0.055).

Conclusions

The leaflet did not improve patient recall of information about SSI, but it was associated with an increased level of satisfaction. The association between the leaflet and judging SSI as always preventable was unexpected.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bruce J, Russell EM, Mollison J et al (2001) The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events. Health Technol Assess 5:1–194PubMed Bruce J, Russell EM, Mollison J et al (2001) The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events. Health Technol Assess 5:1–194PubMed
3.
go back to reference Markides GA, Subar D, Al-Khaffaf H (2008) Litigation claims in vascular surgery in the United Kingdom’s NHS. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 36:452–457PubMedCrossRef Markides GA, Subar D, Al-Khaffaf H (2008) Litigation claims in vascular surgery in the United Kingdom’s NHS. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 36:452–457PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Gould MT, Langworthy MJ, Santore R et al (2003) An analysis of orthopaedic liability in the acute care setting. Clin Orthop Relat Res 407:59–66PubMedCrossRef Gould MT, Langworthy MJ, Santore R et al (2003) An analysis of orthopaedic liability in the acute care setting. Clin Orthop Relat Res 407:59–66PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Krause HR, Bremerich A, Rustemeyer J (2001) Reasons for patients’ discontent and litigation. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 29:181–183PubMed Krause HR, Bremerich A, Rustemeyer J (2001) Reasons for patients’ discontent and litigation. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 29:181–183PubMed
7.
go back to reference The Senate of Surgery of Great Britain, Ireland (1997) The surgeon’s duty of care. The Senate of Surgery of Great Britain and Ireland, London The Senate of Surgery of Great Britain, Ireland (1997) The surgeon’s duty of care. The Senate of Surgery of Great Britain and Ireland, London
8.
go back to reference Astagneau P, Desplaces N, Vincent V et al (2001) Mycobacterium xenopi spinal infections after discovertebral surgery: investigation and screening of a large outbreak. Lancet 358:747–751PubMedCrossRef Astagneau P, Desplaces N, Vincent V et al (2001) Mycobacterium xenopi spinal infections after discovertebral surgery: investigation and screening of a large outbreak. Lancet 358:747–751PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Merle V, Van Rossem V, Tavolacci MP et al (2005) Knowledge and opinions of surgical patients regarding nosocomial infections. J Hosp Infect 60:169–171PubMedCrossRef Merle V, Van Rossem V, Tavolacci MP et al (2005) Knowledge and opinions of surgical patients regarding nosocomial infections. J Hosp Infect 60:169–171PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Levinson W, Chaumeton N (1999) Communication between surgeons and patients in routine office visits. Surgery 125:127–134PubMedCrossRef Levinson W, Chaumeton N (1999) Communication between surgeons and patients in routine office visits. Surgery 125:127–134PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Bellew M, Atkinson KR, Dixon GG et al (2002) The introduction of a paediatric anesthesia information leaflet: an audit of its impact on parental anxiety and satisfaction. Paediatr Anesth 12:124–130CrossRef Bellew M, Atkinson KR, Dixon GG et al (2002) The introduction of a paediatric anesthesia information leaflet: an audit of its impact on parental anxiety and satisfaction. Paediatr Anesth 12:124–130CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Roque I, Hochain P, Merle V et al (2003) Evaluation de la qualité et de l’impact de l’information transmise par les fiches d’endoscopie digestive élaborées par les sociétés savantes. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 27:17–21PubMed Roque I, Hochain P, Merle V et al (2003) Evaluation de la qualité et de l’impact de l’information transmise par les fiches d’endoscopie digestive élaborées par les sociétés savantes. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 27:17–21PubMed
14.
go back to reference Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ et al (1992) CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 13:606–608PubMedCrossRef Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ et al (1992) CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 13:606–608PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Hallowell N, Murton F, Statham H et al (1997) Women’s need for information before attending genetic counselling for familial breast or ovarian cancer: a questionnaire interview, and observational study. Br Med J 314:281–283 Hallowell N, Murton F, Statham H et al (1997) Women’s need for information before attending genetic counselling for familial breast or ovarian cancer: a questionnaire interview, and observational study. Br Med J 314:281–283
16.
go back to reference D’Angelica M, Hirsch K, Ross H et al (1998) Surgeon–patient communication in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Arch Surg 133:962–966PubMedCrossRef D’Angelica M, Hirsch K, Ross H et al (1998) Surgeon–patient communication in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Arch Surg 133:962–966PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Merle V, Tavolacci MP, Moreau A et al (2007) What are the factors influencing health care professionals’ opinion and attitude regarding patient information about hospital infection? J Hosp Infect 66:269–274PubMedCrossRef Merle V, Tavolacci MP, Moreau A et al (2007) What are the factors influencing health care professionals’ opinion and attitude regarding patient information about hospital infection? J Hosp Infect 66:269–274PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Krupp W, Spanehl O, Laubach W et al (2000) Informed consent in neurosurgery: patients recall of preoperative discussion. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 142:233–238CrossRef Krupp W, Spanehl O, Laubach W et al (2000) Informed consent in neurosurgery: patients recall of preoperative discussion. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 142:233–238CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Burns P, Keogh I, Timon C (2005) Informed consent: a patients’ perspective. J Laryngol Otol 119:19–22PubMedCrossRef Burns P, Keogh I, Timon C (2005) Informed consent: a patients’ perspective. J Laryngol Otol 119:19–22PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Sitzia J, Wood N (1997) Patient satisfaction: a review of issues and concepts. Soc Sci Med 45:1829–1843PubMedCrossRef Sitzia J, Wood N (1997) Patient satisfaction: a review of issues and concepts. Soc Sci Med 45:1829–1843PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Raffle AE (2001) Information about screening. Is it to achieve high uptake or to ensure informed choice ? Health Expect 4:92–98PubMedCrossRef Raffle AE (2001) Information about screening. Is it to achieve high uptake or to ensure informed choice ? Health Expect 4:92–98PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Fillion E (2003) How is medical decision-making shared? The case of haemophilia patients and doctors: the aftermath of the infected blood affair in France. Health Expect 6:228–241PubMedCrossRef Fillion E (2003) How is medical decision-making shared? The case of haemophilia patients and doctors: the aftermath of the infected blood affair in France. Health Expect 6:228–241PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Does an Information Leaflet about Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Improve Recollection of Information and Satisfaction of Patients? A Randomized Trial in Patients Scheduled for Digestive Surgery
Authors
Véronique Merle
Hélène Marini
Julie Rongère
Marie-Pierre Tavolacci
Michel Scotté
Pierre Czernichow
Publication date
01-06-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 6/2011
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-1054-2

Other articles of this Issue 6/2011

World Journal of Surgery 6/2011 Go to the issue