Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Primary Care 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Does an increase in visits to general practice indicate a malignancy?

Authors: Johannes Hauswaldt, Eva Hummers-Pradier, Wolfgang Himmel

Published in: BMC Primary Care | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

An increase in a patient’s visits to doctors usually raises concerns and may be a ‘red flag’ for a patient’s deterioration of health. The aim of this study was to analyze whether an increase of patient-physician contacts is a first sign of a malignancy in a patient’s near future.

Methods

This is a retrospective case-control study. From 153 German general practices’ electronic patient records (EPR), cases with at least one new malignancy diagnosis and no-malignancy controls were matched for gender and age. We calculated (1) the number of contacts in the first quarter up to the sixth quarter before a malignancy diagnosis was made and (2) the inter-contact interval (ICI), i.e. the time lag between two consecutive patient-physician contacts measured in days. Differences between cases and controls were investigated in several analyses of variance, with group and time as main factors.

Results

A total of 3,310 cases and 3,310 controls could be included. The number of contacts for cases in the six quarters before a malignancy diagnosis increased from 4.8 contacts (SD 4.3) to 5.5 contacts (SD 4.8). The number of contacts for controls increased only marginally from 4.3 contacts (SD 3.6) to 4.5 (SD 4.2). The factor ‘group’ (cases vs. controls) was highly significant in the analyses of variance, also ‘time’ and the interaction ‘group * time’. The effect size, however, was very small (R2 being less than 0.02), which is the equivalent for about one additional contact per quarter in cases directly before a newly made malignancy diagnosis.

Conclusion

An increase in contact frequency is a call for GPs to become more attentive towards these patients. It may raise the suspicion of an impending serious disease but the increase is not so dramatic and unique that it can be interpreted a reliable sign of a malignant diagnosis.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Moore PV, Bennett K, Normand C. The importance of proximity to death in modelling community medication expenditures for older people: evidence from New Zealand. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2014;12:623–33.CrossRefPubMed Moore PV, Bennett K, Normand C. The importance of proximity to death in modelling community medication expenditures for older people: evidence from New Zealand. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2014;12:623–33.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Obermeyer Z, Makar M, Abujaber S, Dominici F, Block S, Cutler DM. Association between the Medicare hospice benefit and health care utilization and costs for patients with poor-prognosis cancer. JAMA. 2014;312:1888–96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Obermeyer Z, Makar M, Abujaber S, Dominici F, Block S, Cutler DM. Association between the Medicare hospice benefit and health care utilization and costs for patients with poor-prognosis cancer. JAMA. 2014;312:1888–96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Yu M, Guerriere DN, Coyte PC. Societal costs of home and hospital end-of-life care for palliative care patients in Ontario. Canada: Health Soc Care Community; 2014. Yu M, Guerriere DN, Coyte PC. Societal costs of home and hospital end-of-life care for palliative care patients in Ontario. Canada: Health Soc Care Community; 2014.
5.
go back to reference Hamilton W, Round A, Sharp D, Peters TJ. Clinical features of colorectal cancer before diagnosis: a population-based case-control study. Br J Cancer. 2005;93:399–405.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hamilton W, Round A, Sharp D, Peters TJ. Clinical features of colorectal cancer before diagnosis: a population-based case-control study. Br J Cancer. 2005;93:399–405.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Ahrensberg JM, Fenger-Grøn M, Vedsted P. Use of primary care during the year before childhood cancer diagnosis: a nationwide population-based matched comparative study. PLoS One. 2013;8:e59098.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ahrensberg JM, Fenger-Grøn M, Vedsted P. Use of primary care during the year before childhood cancer diagnosis: a nationwide population-based matched comparative study. PLoS One. 2013;8:e59098.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Christensen KG, Fenger-Grøn M, Flarup KR, Vedsted P. Use of general practice, diagnostic investigations and hospital services before and after cancer diagnosis - a population-based nationwide registry study of 127,000 incident adult cancer patients. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:224.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Christensen KG, Fenger-Grøn M, Flarup KR, Vedsted P. Use of general practice, diagnostic investigations and hospital services before and after cancer diagnosis - a population-based nationwide registry study of 127,000 incident adult cancer patients. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:224.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Hjertholm P, Moth G, Ingeman ML, Vedsted P. Predictive values of GPs’ suspicion of serious disease: a population-based follow-up study. Br J Gen Pract. 2014;64:e346–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hjertholm P, Moth G, Ingeman ML, Vedsted P. Predictive values of GPs’ suspicion of serious disease: a population-based follow-up study. Br J Gen Pract. 2014;64:e346–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Ingeman ML, Christensen MB, Bro F, Knudsen ST, Vedsted P. The Danish cancer pathway for patients with serious non-specific symptoms and signs of cancer-a cross-sectional study of patient characteristics and cancer probability. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:421.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ingeman ML, Christensen MB, Bro F, Knudsen ST, Vedsted P. The Danish cancer pathway for patients with serious non-specific symptoms and signs of cancer-a cross-sectional study of patient characteristics and cancer probability. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:421.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Hauswaldt J, Himmel W, Hummers-Pradier E. The inter-contact interval: a new measure to define frequent attenders in primary care. BMC Fam Pract. 2013;14:162.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hauswaldt J, Himmel W, Hummers-Pradier E. The inter-contact interval: a new measure to define frequent attenders in primary care. BMC Fam Pract. 2013;14:162.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Fujikoshi Y. Two-way ANOVA models with unbalanced data. Discrete Math. 1993;116:315–34.CrossRef Fujikoshi Y. Two-way ANOVA models with unbalanced data. Discrete Math. 1993;116:315–34.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hauswaldt J, Hummers-Pradier E, Junius-Walker U. Health service use among patients with chronic or multiple illnesses, and frequent attenders: secondary analysis of routine primary care data from 1996 to 2006. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2012;109:814–20.PubMedPubMedCentral Hauswaldt J, Hummers-Pradier E, Junius-Walker U. Health service use among patients with chronic or multiple illnesses, and frequent attenders: secondary analysis of routine primary care data from 1996 to 2006. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2012;109:814–20.PubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Lynge E, Sandegaard JL, Rebolj M. The Danish National Patient Register. Scand J Public Health. 2011;39:30–3.CrossRefPubMed Lynge E, Sandegaard JL, Rebolj M. The Danish National Patient Register. Scand J Public Health. 2011;39:30–3.CrossRefPubMed
16.
17.
go back to reference Wilson A, Windak A, Oleszczyk M, et al. The delivery of primary care services. In: Dionne Kringos S, Boerma W, Hutchinson A, et al., editors. Building primary care in a changing Europe. Copenhagen: World Health Organization; 2015. p. 67–102. Wilson A, Windak A, Oleszczyk M, et al. The delivery of primary care services. In: Dionne Kringos S, Boerma W, Hutchinson A, et al., editors. Building primary care in a changing Europe. Copenhagen: World Health Organization; 2015. p. 67–102.
Metadata
Title
Does an increase in visits to general practice indicate a malignancy?
Authors
Johannes Hauswaldt
Eva Hummers-Pradier
Wolfgang Himmel
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Primary Care / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 2731-4553
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0477-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Primary Care 1/2016 Go to the issue