Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 12/2015

01-12-2015 | Original Scientific Report

Documentation of Pregnancy Status, Gynaecological History, Date of Last Menstrual Period and Contraception Use in Emergency Surgical Admissions: Time for a Change in Practice?

Authors: M. Powell-Bowns, M. S. J. Wilson, A. Mustafa

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 12/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To determine whether pregnancy status, gynaecological history, date of last menstrual period and contraceptive use are documented in emergency female admissions of reproductive age admitted to general surgery.

Design

This is a retrospective study.

Setting

This study was conducted in the United Kingdom.

Population

Females of reproductive age (12–50 years) admitted as an emergency to general surgery with abdominal pain were considered in this study.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of medical notes of emergency female admissions with abdominal pain between January and September 2012. We recorded whether a pregnancy test result was documented (cycle 1). Results were analysed and a prompt added to the medical clerk-in document. We re-audited (cycle 2) between January and June 2013 looking for improvement.

Main outcome measures

Documented pregnancy status within 24 h of admission and prior to any surgical intervention.

Results

100 case notes were reviewed in stage 1. 30 patients (30 %) had a documented pregnancy status. 32 (32 %), 25 (25 %) and 29 (29 %) had a documented gynaecology history, contraceptive use and date of last menstrual period (LMP), respectively. 24 patients underwent emergency surgery, 6 (25 %) had a documented pregnancy status prior to surgery. Of 50 patients reviewed in stage 2, 37 (75.0 %) had a documented pregnancy status (p < 0.001), with 41 (82 %) having both gynaecological history (p < 0.0001) and contraceptive use (p < 0.0001) documented. 40 patients (80 % had a documented LMP (p < 0.0001). 7 patients required surgery, of whom 6 (85.7 %) had a documented pregnancy test prior to surgery (p = 0.001). All pregnancy tests were negative.

Conclusions

A simple prompt in the surgical admission document has significantly improved the documentation of pregnancy status and gynaecological history in our female patients, particularly in those who require surgical intervention. A number of patient safety concerns were addressed locally, but require a coordinated, interdisciplinary discussion and a national guideline. A minimum standard of care, in females of reproductive age, should include mandatory objective documentation of pregnancy status, whether or not they require surgical intervention.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Irvin TT (1989) Abdominal pain: a surgical audit of 1190 emergency admissions. Br J Surg 76(11):1121–1125CrossRefPubMed Irvin TT (1989) Abdominal pain: a surgical audit of 1190 emergency admissions. Br J Surg 76(11):1121–1125CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Bjerkeset T, Havik S, Aune KE, Rosseland A (2006) Acute abdominal pain as cause of hospitalisation. Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke 126(12):1602–1604 Bjerkeset T, Havik S, Aune KE, Rosseland A (2006) Acute abdominal pain as cause of hospitalisation. Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke 126(12):1602–1604
3.
go back to reference Hawthorn IE (1992) Abdominal pain as a cause of acute admission to hospital. J R Coll Surg Edinb 37(6):389–393PubMed Hawthorn IE (1992) Abdominal pain as a cause of acute admission to hospital. J R Coll Surg Edinb 37(6):389–393PubMed
4.
go back to reference Bontis J, Grimbizis G, Tarlatzis BC, Miliaras D, Bili H (1997) Intrafollicular ovarian pregnancy after ovulation induction/intrauterine insemination: pathophysiological aspects and diagnostic problems. Hum Reprod 12(2):376–378CrossRefPubMed Bontis J, Grimbizis G, Tarlatzis BC, Miliaras D, Bili H (1997) Intrafollicular ovarian pregnancy after ovulation induction/intrauterine insemination: pathophysiological aspects and diagnostic problems. Hum Reprod 12(2):376–378CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Cantwell R, Clutton-Brock T, Cooper G, Dawson A, Drife J, Garrod D et al (2011) Saving Mothers’ Lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006–2008. The eighth report of the confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 118(Suppl 1):1–203 Cantwell R, Clutton-Brock T, Cooper G, Dawson A, Drife J, Garrod D et al (2011) Saving Mothers’ Lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006–2008. The eighth report of the confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 118(Suppl 1):1–203
6.
go back to reference Lewis G, Drife J (2004) Confidential enquiry into maternal and child health. Why Mothers Die 2000–2002: The sixth report of the confidential enquiries into maternal death in the United Kingdom. RCOG Press, London Lewis G, Drife J (2004) Confidential enquiry into maternal and child health. Why Mothers Die 2000–2002: The sixth report of the confidential enquiries into maternal death in the United Kingdom. RCOG Press, London
7.
go back to reference Wong E, Suat SO (2000) Ectopic pregnancy–a diagnostic challenge in the emergency department. Eur J Emerg Med 7(3):189–194CrossRefPubMed Wong E, Suat SO (2000) Ectopic pregnancy–a diagnostic challenge in the emergency department. Eur J Emerg Med 7(3):189–194CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Wilcox AJ, Baird DD, Dunson D, McChesney R, Weinberg CR (2001) Natural limits of pregnancy testing in relation to the expected menstrual period. JAMA 286(14):1759–1761CrossRefPubMed Wilcox AJ, Baird DD, Dunson D, McChesney R, Weinberg CR (2001) Natural limits of pregnancy testing in relation to the expected menstrual period. JAMA 286(14):1759–1761CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2003) Preoperative tests: the use of routine preoperative tests for elective surgery: NICE National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2003) Preoperative tests: the use of routine preoperative tests for elective surgery: NICE
10.
go back to reference Rapid response report NPSA/2010/RRR011 (2010) Checking pregnancy before surgery. National Patient Safety Agency, London Rapid response report NPSA/2010/RRR011 (2010) Checking pregnancy before surgery. National Patient Safety Agency, London
11.
go back to reference Caldicott Committee (2007) Report on the review of patient identifiable information. Department of Health, London Caldicott Committee (2007) Report on the review of patient identifiable information. Department of Health, London
12.
go back to reference General Medical Council (2013) Good Medical Practice. GMC, London General Medical Council (2013) Good Medical Practice. GMC, London
13.
14.
go back to reference Azzam FJ, Padda GS, DeBoard JW, Krock JL, Kolterman SM (1996) Preoperative pregnancy testing in adolescents. Anesth Analg 82(1):4–7PubMed Azzam FJ, Padda GS, DeBoard JW, Krock JL, Kolterman SM (1996) Preoperative pregnancy testing in adolescents. Anesth Analg 82(1):4–7PubMed
15.
go back to reference Hennrikus WL, Shaw BA, Gerardi JA (2001) Prevalence of positive preoperative pregnancy testing in teenagers scheduled for orthopedic surgery. J Pediatr Orthop 21(5):677–679PubMed Hennrikus WL, Shaw BA, Gerardi JA (2001) Prevalence of positive preoperative pregnancy testing in teenagers scheduled for orthopedic surgery. J Pediatr Orthop 21(5):677–679PubMed
16.
go back to reference Kahn RL, Stanton MA, Tong-Ngork S, Liguori GA, Edmonds CR, Levine DS (2008) One-year experience with day-of-surgery pregnancy testing before elective orthopedic procedures. Anesth Analgesia. 106(4):1127–1131 (table of contents) CrossRef Kahn RL, Stanton MA, Tong-Ngork S, Liguori GA, Edmonds CR, Levine DS (2008) One-year experience with day-of-surgery pregnancy testing before elective orthopedic procedures. Anesth Analgesia. 106(4):1127–1131 (table of contents) CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Malviya S, D’Errico C, Reynolds P, Huntington J, Voepel-Lewis T, Pandit UA (1996) Should pregnancy testing be routine in adolescent patients prior to surgery? Anesth Analg 83(4):854–858PubMed Malviya S, D’Errico C, Reynolds P, Huntington J, Voepel-Lewis T, Pandit UA (1996) Should pregnancy testing be routine in adolescent patients prior to surgery? Anesth Analg 83(4):854–858PubMed
Metadata
Title
Documentation of Pregnancy Status, Gynaecological History, Date of Last Menstrual Period and Contraception Use in Emergency Surgical Admissions: Time for a Change in Practice?
Authors
M. Powell-Bowns
M. S. J. Wilson
A. Mustafa
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 12/2015
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3204-4

Other articles of this Issue 12/2015

World Journal of Surgery 12/2015 Go to the issue