Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2014

Open Access 01-12-2014 | Research article

Do nurses reason ‘adaptively’ in time limited situations: the findings of a descriptive regression analysis

Authors: Huiqin Yang, Carl Thompson, Martin Bland

Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Time pressure is common in acute healthcare and significantly influences clinical judgement and decision making. Despite nurses’ judgements being studied since the 1960s, the empirical picture of how time pressure impacts on nurses’ judgement strategies and outcomes remain undeveloped. This paper aims to assess alterations in nurses’ judgement strategies and outcomes under time pressure in a simulated acute care setting.

Methods

In a simulated acute care environment, ninety-seven nurses were exposed to 25 clinical scenarios under time pressured and no time pressured conditions. Scenarios were randomly sampled from a large dataset of patient cases. A reference standard (judgement correctness) was generated from the same patient case records. In 12 of the scenarios only 20 seconds per judgement was allowed, in the other 13 scenarios no time pressure existed. Percentage of correct judgments in both conditions was calculated. Logistic regression modelling (of 2,425 observations) described the relationship between information cues used and judgments made. The degree of attention paid to particular cues was captured by calculating cue relative weights. The clustering effect of nurses was countered by estimating robust standard errors. The Chow test was used to test the null hypothesis that differences in regression coefficients in time pressure and no time pressure models were zero.

Results

Compared to no time pressure, no significant difference was observed in the proportion of correct judgments when nurses were put under time pressure. However, time pressure significantly impacted on the judgment strategies employed. Whilst nurses predominantly used respiration rate to make judgements, they used fewer cues to reach their clinical judgements under time pressure. The relative weighting afforded to heart rate was much smaller in the time pressure regression model, indicating that nurses paid significantly less attention to it when making judgements under time pressure.

Conclusions

Time pressure had a significant effect on nurses’ judgement strategies but not outcomes. Nurses tended to use less information to reach judgements under time pressure, but not at the expense of judgment accuracy. Findings imply that nurses are capable of using adaptive judgement strategies to cope with moderate time pressures when making clinical judgements in acute care.
Literature
1.
go back to reference MacGregor D: Time pressure and task adaptation: alternative perspectives on laboratory studies. Time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making. Edited by: Svenson O, Maule AJ. 1993, New York: Plenum Press, 73-82.CrossRef MacGregor D: Time pressure and task adaptation: alternative perspectives on laboratory studies. Time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making. Edited by: Svenson O, Maule AJ. 1993, New York: Plenum Press, 73-82.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Hyde J, Calnan M, Prior L, Lewis G, Kessler D, Sharp D: A qualitative study exploring how GPs decide to prescribe antidepressants. Br J Gen Pract. 2005, 55: 755-762.PubMedPubMedCentral Hyde J, Calnan M, Prior L, Lewis G, Kessler D, Sharp D: A qualitative study exploring how GPs decide to prescribe antidepressants. Br J Gen Pract. 2005, 55: 755-762.PubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Shye D, Freeborn DK, Romeo J, Eraker S: Understanding physicians’ imaging test use in low back pain care: the role of focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 1998, 10: 83-91. 10.1093/intqhc/10.2.83.CrossRefPubMed Shye D, Freeborn DK, Romeo J, Eraker S: Understanding physicians’ imaging test use in low back pain care: the role of focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 1998, 10: 83-91. 10.1093/intqhc/10.2.83.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Cohen LR, Runyan CW, Downs SM, Bowling JM: Pediatric injury prevention counseling priorities. Pediatrics. 1997, 99: 704-710. 10.1542/peds.99.5.704.CrossRefPubMed Cohen LR, Runyan CW, Downs SM, Bowling JM: Pediatric injury prevention counseling priorities. Pediatrics. 1997, 99: 704-710. 10.1542/peds.99.5.704.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Goldman GM, Ravindranath TM: The contextual nature of critical care judgment. J Intensive Care Med. 1994, 9: 58-63.CrossRef Goldman GM, Ravindranath TM: The contextual nature of critical care judgment. J Intensive Care Med. 1994, 9: 58-63.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Zimmerman O, Halpern P: Opinion survey of analgesia for abdominal pain in Israeli emergency. Israel Med Assoc J. 2004, 6: 681-685. Zimmerman O, Halpern P: Opinion survey of analgesia for abdominal pain in Israeli emergency. Israel Med Assoc J. 2004, 6: 681-685.
7.
go back to reference Willson H: Factors affecting the administration of analgesia to patients following repair of a fractured hip. J Adv Nurs. 2000, 31: 1145-1154. 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01425.x.CrossRefPubMed Willson H: Factors affecting the administration of analgesia to patients following repair of a fractured hip. J Adv Nurs. 2000, 31: 1145-1154. 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01425.x.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Bucknall T: The clinical landscape of critical care: nurses’ decision-making. J Adv Nurs. 2003, 43: 310-319. 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02714.x.CrossRefPubMed Bucknall T: The clinical landscape of critical care: nurses’ decision-making. J Adv Nurs. 2003, 43: 310-319. 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02714.x.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Currey J, Botti M, Browne J: Hemodynamic team decision making in the cardiac surgical intensive care context. Heart Lung J Acute Critical Care. 2003, 32: 181-189. 10.1016/S0147-9563(03)00041-4.CrossRef Currey J, Botti M, Browne J: Hemodynamic team decision making in the cardiac surgical intensive care context. Heart Lung J Acute Critical Care. 2003, 32: 181-189. 10.1016/S0147-9563(03)00041-4.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Bucknall T, Thomas S: Nurses’ reflections on problems associated with decision-making in critical care settings. J Adv Nurs. 1997, 25: 229-237. 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.1997025229.x.CrossRefPubMed Bucknall T, Thomas S: Nurses’ reflections on problems associated with decision-making in critical care settings. J Adv Nurs. 1997, 25: 229-237. 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.1997025229.x.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Bucknall TK: Critical care nurse’ decision-making activities in the natural clinical setting. J Clin Nurs. 2000, 9: 25-35. 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2000.00333.x.CrossRefPubMed Bucknall TK: Critical care nurse’ decision-making activities in the natural clinical setting. J Clin Nurs. 2000, 9: 25-35. 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2000.00333.x.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Bourbonnais F, Baumann A: Stress and rapid decision making in nursing: an administrative challenge. Nurs Adm Q. 1985, 9: 85-91. 10.1097/00006216-198500930-00012.CrossRefPubMed Bourbonnais F, Baumann A: Stress and rapid decision making in nursing: an administrative challenge. Nurs Adm Q. 1985, 9: 85-91. 10.1097/00006216-198500930-00012.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Gerdtz MF, Bucknall TK: Why we do the things we do: applying clinical decision-making frameworks to triage practice. Accid Emerg Nurs. 1999, 7: 50-57. 10.1016/S0965-2302(99)80103-9.CrossRefPubMed Gerdtz MF, Bucknall TK: Why we do the things we do: applying clinical decision-making frameworks to triage practice. Accid Emerg Nurs. 1999, 7: 50-57. 10.1016/S0965-2302(99)80103-9.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Aiken LH, Clarke SP, Cheung RB, Sloane DM, Silber JH: Educational levels of hospitals nurses and surgical patient mortality. J Am Med Assoc. 2003, 290: 1617-1623. 10.1001/jama.290.12.1617.CrossRef Aiken LH, Clarke SP, Cheung RB, Sloane DM, Silber JH: Educational levels of hospitals nurses and surgical patient mortality. J Am Med Assoc. 2003, 290: 1617-1623. 10.1001/jama.290.12.1617.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Aiken LH, Clarke SP, Sloane DM, International Hospital Outcomes Research Consortium: Hospital staffing, organisation, and quality of care: cross-national findings. Int J Qual Health Care. 2002, 14: 5-13.CrossRefPubMed Aiken LH, Clarke SP, Sloane DM, International Hospital Outcomes Research Consortium: Hospital staffing, organisation, and quality of care: cross-national findings. Int J Qual Health Care. 2002, 14: 5-13.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Gonzalez C: Learning to make decisions in dynamic environments: effects of time constraints and cognitive abilities. Hum Factors. 2004, 46: 449-460. 10.1518/hfes.46.3.449.50395.CrossRefPubMed Gonzalez C: Learning to make decisions in dynamic environments: effects of time constraints and cognitive abilities. Hum Factors. 2004, 46: 449-460. 10.1518/hfes.46.3.449.50395.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: Acutely ill patients in hospital: recognition of and response to acute illness in adults in hospital, Volume 50. 2007, London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE): clinical guideline, 1-107. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: Acutely ill patients in hospital: recognition of and response to acute illness in adults in hospital, Volume 50. 2007, London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE): clinical guideline, 1-107.
18.
go back to reference Independent Healthcare Association: Guidance on comprehensive critical care for adults in independent sector acute hospitals. 2002, London: Independent Healthcare Association, 1-47. Independent Healthcare Association: Guidance on comprehensive critical care for adults in independent sector acute hospitals. 2002, London: Independent Healthcare Association, 1-47.
19.
go back to reference Subbe CP, Kruger M, Rutherford P, Gemmel L: Validation of a modified Early Warning Score in medical admissions. QJM. 2001, 94: 521-526. 10.1093/qjmed/94.10.521.CrossRefPubMed Subbe CP, Kruger M, Rutherford P, Gemmel L: Validation of a modified Early Warning Score in medical admissions. QJM. 2001, 94: 521-526. 10.1093/qjmed/94.10.521.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Gould W: Computing the Chow statistics. 1999, http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/statistics/computing-chow-statistic/: Stata Corporation. Stata Gould W: Computing the Chow statistics. 1999, http://​www.​stata.​com/​support/​faqs/​statistics/​computing-chow-statistic/​: Stata Corporation. Stata
22.
go back to reference Bland M: Cluster randomised trials in the medical literature: two bibliometric surveys. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2004, 4: 1-6. 10.1186/1471-2288-4-1.CrossRef Bland M: Cluster randomised trials in the medical literature: two bibliometric surveys. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2004, 4: 1-6. 10.1186/1471-2288-4-1.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Kirkwood BR, Sterne J: Essential medical statistics. 2003, Oxford: Blackwell Sciences, 2 Kirkwood BR, Sterne J: Essential medical statistics. 2003, Oxford: Blackwell Sciences, 2
25.
go back to reference Cooksey RW: Judgment analysis: theory, methods, and applications. 1996, California: Academic Press Cooksey RW: Judgment analysis: theory, methods, and applications. 1996, California: Academic Press
26.
go back to reference Yang H, Thompson C, Bland M: The effect of clinical experience, judgment task difficulty and time pressure on nurses’ confidence calibration in a high fidelity clinical simulation. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012, 12: 113-10.1186/1472-6947-12-113.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yang H, Thompson C, Bland M: The effect of clinical experience, judgment task difficulty and time pressure on nurses’ confidence calibration in a high fidelity clinical simulation. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012, 12: 113-10.1186/1472-6947-12-113.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Payne JW, Bettman JR, Johnson EJ: The adaptive decision maker. 1993, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Payne JW, Bettman JR, Johnson EJ: The adaptive decision maker. 1993, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Payne JW, Bettman JR, Johnson EJ, Luce MF: An information processing perspective on choice. Decision making from a cognitive perspective. 1995, New York: Academic Press Payne JW, Bettman JR, Johnson EJ, Luce MF: An information processing perspective on choice. Decision making from a cognitive perspective. 1995, New York: Academic Press
29.
go back to reference Rothstein HG: The effects of time pressure on judgement on multiple cue probability learning. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1986, 37: 83-92. 10.1016/0749-5978(86)90045-2.CrossRef Rothstein HG: The effects of time pressure on judgement on multiple cue probability learning. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1986, 37: 83-92. 10.1016/0749-5978(86)90045-2.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Thompson C, Dalgleish L, Bucknall T, Estabrooks CA, Hutchinson A, Fraser K, de Vos R, Binnekade J, Barrett G, Saunders J: The effects of time pressure and experience on nurses’ risk assessment decisions: a signal detection analysis. Nurs Res. 2008, 57 (5): 302-311. 10.1097/01.NNR.0000313504.37970.f9.CrossRefPubMed Thompson C, Dalgleish L, Bucknall T, Estabrooks CA, Hutchinson A, Fraser K, de Vos R, Binnekade J, Barrett G, Saunders J: The effects of time pressure and experience on nurses’ risk assessment decisions: a signal detection analysis. Nurs Res. 2008, 57 (5): 302-311. 10.1097/01.NNR.0000313504.37970.f9.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Maule AJ, Edland AC: The effects of time pressure on human judgement and decision making. Decision making: cognitive models and explanations. 1997, London: Routledge, 189-204. Maule AJ, Edland AC: The effects of time pressure on human judgement and decision making. Decision making: cognitive models and explanations. 1997, London: Routledge, 189-204.
32.
go back to reference Maule JA, Hockey RJ, Bdzola L: Effects of time pressure on decision-making under uncertainty: changes in affective state and information processing strategy. Acta Psychol. 2000, 104: 283-301. 10.1016/S0001-6918(00)00033-0.CrossRef Maule JA, Hockey RJ, Bdzola L: Effects of time pressure on decision-making under uncertainty: changes in affective state and information processing strategy. Acta Psychol. 2000, 104: 283-301. 10.1016/S0001-6918(00)00033-0.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Benson L, Beach LR: The effects of time constranints on the prechoice screening of decision options. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1996, 67: 222-228. 10.1006/obhd.1996.0075.CrossRef Benson L, Beach LR: The effects of time constranints on the prechoice screening of decision options. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1996, 67: 222-228. 10.1006/obhd.1996.0075.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Svenson O, Edland A: Change of preferences under time pressure: choices and judgements. Scand J Psychol. 1987, 31: 262-270. Svenson O, Edland A: Change of preferences under time pressure: choices and judgements. Scand J Psychol. 1987, 31: 262-270.
35.
go back to reference Wright P: The harassed decision maker: time pressure, distraction, and the use of evidence. J Markeing Res. 1974, 44: 429-443. Wright P: The harassed decision maker: time pressure, distraction, and the use of evidence. J Markeing Res. 1974, 44: 429-443.
36.
go back to reference Hasida BZ, Shlomo JB: The effect of time pressure on risky choice behavior. Acta Psychol. 1981, 47 (2): 89-104. 10.1016/0001-6918(81)90001-9.CrossRef Hasida BZ, Shlomo JB: The effect of time pressure on risky choice behavior. Acta Psychol. 1981, 47 (2): 89-104. 10.1016/0001-6918(81)90001-9.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Huber O, Kunz U: Time pressure in risky decision-making: effect on risk defusing. Psychology Science. 2007, 49: 415-426. Huber O, Kunz U: Time pressure in risky decision-making: effect on risk defusing. Psychology Science. 2007, 49: 415-426.
38.
go back to reference Edland AC: The effects of time pressure on choices and judgements of candidates to a university programme. Time pressure and stress in human judgement and decision making. 1993, New York: Plenum Edland AC: The effects of time pressure on choices and judgements of candidates to a university programme. Time pressure and stress in human judgement and decision making. 1993, New York: Plenum
39.
go back to reference Edland A: Time pressure and the application of decision rules: choices and judgements among multiattribute alternatives. Scand J Psychol. 1994, 35: 281-291. 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1994.tb00952.x.CrossRefPubMed Edland A: Time pressure and the application of decision rules: choices and judgements among multiattribute alternatives. Scand J Psychol. 1994, 35: 281-291. 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1994.tb00952.x.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Laurence A, Bernadette D, Matthew L, Nicola P, Amy H: The effects of subjective time pressure and individual differences on hypotheses generation and action prioritization in police investigations. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2013, 19: 83-93.CrossRef Laurence A, Bernadette D, Matthew L, Nicola P, Amy H: The effects of subjective time pressure and individual differences on hypotheses generation and action prioritization in police investigations. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2013, 19: 83-93.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Simon HA: Models of bounded rationality. 1982, Cambridge: The MIT Press Simon HA: Models of bounded rationality. 1982, Cambridge: The MIT Press
42.
go back to reference Simon HA: Models of man. 1957, New York: Wiley Simon HA: Models of man. 1957, New York: Wiley
43.
go back to reference Gigerenzer G: Fast and frugal heuristics: the tools of bounded rationality. Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making. Edited by: Koehler DJ, Harvey N. 2004, 62-88.CrossRef Gigerenzer G: Fast and frugal heuristics: the tools of bounded rationality. Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making. Edited by: Koehler DJ, Harvey N. 2004, 62-88.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Gigerenzer G, Goldstein DG: Reasoning the fast and frugal way: models of bounded rationality. Psychol Rev. 1996, 103: 650-669.CrossRefPubMed Gigerenzer G, Goldstein DG: Reasoning the fast and frugal way: models of bounded rationality. Psychol Rev. 1996, 103: 650-669.CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Gigerenzer G, Goldstein DG: Betting on one good reason: the take the best heuristics. Simple heuristics that make us smart. Edited by: he ABC Research Group, Gigerenzer G, Todd PM. 1999, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 75-96. Gigerenzer G, Goldstein DG: Betting on one good reason: the take the best heuristics. Simple heuristics that make us smart. Edited by: he ABC Research Group, Gigerenzer G, Todd PM. 1999, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 75-96.
46.
go back to reference Gigerenzer G, Goldstein DG: Reasoning the fast and frugal way: models of bounded rationality. 2000, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 621-650. Gigerenzer G, Goldstein DG: Reasoning the fast and frugal way: models of bounded rationality. 2000, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 621-650.
47.
go back to reference Gigerenzer GJ, Czerlinski J, Martignon L: How good are fast and frugal heuristics?. Heuristics and biases: the psychology of intuitive judgment. Edited by: Gilovich T, Griffin D, Kahneman D. 2002, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Gigerenzer GJ, Czerlinski J, Martignon L: How good are fast and frugal heuristics?. Heuristics and biases: the psychology of intuitive judgment. Edited by: Gilovich T, Griffin D, Kahneman D. 2002, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
48.
go back to reference Gigerenzer G: Gut Feelings: The Intelligence of the Unconscious. 2008, New York: Viking Press Gigerenzer G: Gut Feelings: The Intelligence of the Unconscious. 2008, New York: Viking Press
50.
go back to reference Chisholm CD, Collison EK, Nelson DR, Cordell WH: Emergency department workpalce interruptions:are emergency physicians ‘ interrupt-driven’ and ‘ Multitasking’?. Acad Emerg Med. 2000, 7: 1239-1243. 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb00469.x.CrossRefPubMed Chisholm CD, Collison EK, Nelson DR, Cordell WH: Emergency department workpalce interruptions:are emergency physicians ‘ interrupt-driven’ and ‘ Multitasking’?. Acad Emerg Med. 2000, 7: 1239-1243. 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb00469.x.CrossRefPubMed
51.
go back to reference Sintchenko V, Coiera EW: Which clinical decisions benefit from automation? a task complexity approach. Int J Med Inform. 2003, 70: 309-316. 10.1016/S1386-5056(03)00040-6.CrossRefPubMed Sintchenko V, Coiera EW: Which clinical decisions benefit from automation? a task complexity approach. Int J Med Inform. 2003, 70: 309-316. 10.1016/S1386-5056(03)00040-6.CrossRefPubMed
52.
go back to reference Gerdtz MF, Bucknall TK: Triage nurses’ clinical decision making. An observational study of urgency assessment. J Adv Nurs. 2001, 35: 550-555. 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01871.x.CrossRefPubMed Gerdtz MF, Bucknall TK: Triage nurses’ clinical decision making. An observational study of urgency assessment. J Adv Nurs. 2001, 35: 550-555. 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01871.x.CrossRefPubMed
53.
go back to reference Estabrooks CA, Rutakumwa W, O’Leary KA, Profetto_McGrath J, Milner M, Levers MJ, Scott-Findlay S: Sources of practice knowledge among nurses. Qual Health Res. 2005, 15: 460-476. 10.1177/1049732304273702.CrossRefPubMed Estabrooks CA, Rutakumwa W, O’Leary KA, Profetto_McGrath J, Milner M, Levers MJ, Scott-Findlay S: Sources of practice knowledge among nurses. Qual Health Res. 2005, 15: 460-476. 10.1177/1049732304273702.CrossRefPubMed
54.
go back to reference Eddy DM: Variation in physician practice: the role of uncertainty. Professional judgement: a reader in clinical decision making. Edited by: Dowie EJ, Elstein A. 1988, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Eddy DM: Variation in physician practice: the role of uncertainty. Professional judgement: a reader in clinical decision making. Edited by: Dowie EJ, Elstein A. 1988, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Metadata
Title
Do nurses reason ‘adaptively’ in time limited situations: the findings of a descriptive regression analysis
Authors
Huiqin Yang
Carl Thompson
Martin Bland
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making / Issue 1/2014
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6947
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-14-96

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2014 Go to the issue