Published in:
Open Access
01-05-2010 | Commentary
Do not throw out the baby with the bath water: build on current approaches to realize conceptual clarity. Response to Ubel, Peeters, and Smith
Authors:
Mirjam A. G. Sprangers, Carolyn E. Schwartz
Published in:
Quality of Life Research
|
Issue 4/2010
Login to get access
Excerpt
We agree with Ubel, Peeters, and Smith [
1] that distinct and distinguishable phenomena are subsumed under the term “response shift” and that the field would benefit from conceptual clarity. Without acknowledging the literature of the past 5 years, they argue that researchers should replace the term “response shift” by “recalibration” and “adaptation.” In this counterpoint, we will argue that (1) our understanding of the components and implications of response shift refutes part of their criticism; (2) their suggestion will unfortunately not solve the identified problems; and (3) the recently published approaches to disentangling the different components of response shift are more promising to further the field. …