Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 3/2015

01-12-2015 | Translational Research and Biomarkers

DNA Hypermethylation of SHISA3 in Colorectal Cancer: An Independent Predictor of Poor Prognosis

Authors: Ming-Hong Tsai, MD, Wen-Chi Chen, MS, Sung-Liang Yu, PhD, Chun-Chieh Chen, PhD, Tzu-Ming Jao, PhD, Chi-Yen Huang, MS, Sheng-Tai Tzeng, PhD, Sou-Jhy Yen, MD, Ya-Chien Yang, PhD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Special Issue 3/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Shisa3 is a novel tumor suppressor identified in lung cancer. However, its antitumor activity in other human cancers and the mechanism of gene inactivation remain unknown.

Methods

SHISA3 expression was measured by reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and quantitative RT-PCR (RT-qPCR). DNA methylation was determined by bisulfite sequencing and pyrosequencing.

Results

Down-regulation of SHISA3 expression was observed in all of 11 colorectal cancer (CRC) cell lines and was further confirmed in 34 (65.4 %) of 52 colorectal carcinomas by RT-qPCR. Four of six CRC cell lines could restore SHISA3 expression after treatment with 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine. Tumor-specific methylation of five CpG sites in the first intron of SHISA3 was identified by bisulfite sequencing, and their methylation levels were quantified in 127 pairs of primary CRC tissues by bisulfite pyrosequencing. The methylation levels of SHISA3 in tumors were noticeably higher than that in their matched normal mucosae. In addition, SHISA3 hypermethylation was significantly associated with an increased risk of disease recurrence in patients with stage II and III disease (P = 0.007) and was an independent predictor of poor overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) 2.9, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.5–5.8; P = 0.002] and disease-free survival (HR 4.0, 95 % CI 1.6–10.2; P = 0.003) of CRC patients.

Conclusions

SHISA3 gene is epigenetically inactivated in a substantial fraction of CRC, and its hypermethylation is of prognostic significance in predicting clinical outcome. The quantitative bisulfite pyrosequencing assay established could be a cost-effective tool for providing a potential biomarker of adverse prognosis in CRC.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
3.
go back to reference van Engeland M, Derks S, Smits KM, Meijer GA, Herman JG. Colorectal cancer epigenetics: complex simplicity. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1382–91.PubMedCrossRef van Engeland M, Derks S, Smits KM, Meijer GA, Herman JG. Colorectal cancer epigenetics: complex simplicity. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1382–91.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Perea J, Lomas M, Hidalgo M. Molecular basis of colorrectal cancer: towards an individualized management? Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2011;103:29–35.PubMedCrossRef Perea J, Lomas M, Hidalgo M. Molecular basis of colorrectal cancer: towards an individualized management? Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2011;103:29–35.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Duffy MJ, O’Donovan N, Crown J. Use of molecular markers for predicting therapy response in cancer patients. Cancer Treat Rev. 2011;37:151–9.PubMedCrossRef Duffy MJ, O’Donovan N, Crown J. Use of molecular markers for predicting therapy response in cancer patients. Cancer Treat Rev. 2011;37:151–9.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Furushima K, Yamamoto A, Nagano T, et al. Mouse homologues of Shisa antagonistic to Wnt and Fgf signalings. Dev Biol. 2007;306:480–92.PubMedCrossRef Furushima K, Yamamoto A, Nagano T, et al. Mouse homologues of Shisa antagonistic to Wnt and Fgf signalings. Dev Biol. 2007;306:480–92.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Pei J, Grishin NV. Unexpected diversity in Shisa-like proteins suggests the importance of their roles as transmembrane adaptors. Cell Signal. 2012;24:758–69.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Pei J, Grishin NV. Unexpected diversity in Shisa-like proteins suggests the importance of their roles as transmembrane adaptors. Cell Signal. 2012;24:758–69.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Yamamoto A, Nagano T, Takehara S, Hibi M, Aizawa S. Shisa promotes head formation through the inhibition of receptor protein maturation for the caudalizing factors, Wnt and FGF. Cell. 2005;120:223–35.PubMedCrossRef Yamamoto A, Nagano T, Takehara S, Hibi M, Aizawa S. Shisa promotes head formation through the inhibition of receptor protein maturation for the caudalizing factors, Wnt and FGF. Cell. 2005;120:223–35.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Katoh Y, Katoh M. Comparative genomics on Shisa orthologs. Int J Mol Med. 2005;16:181–5.PubMed Katoh Y, Katoh M. Comparative genomics on Shisa orthologs. Int J Mol Med. 2005;16:181–5.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Silva AC, Filipe M, Vitorino M, Steinbeisser H, Belo JA. Developmental expression of Shisa-2 in Xenopus laevis. Int J Dev Biol. 2006;50:575–9.PubMedCrossRef Silva AC, Filipe M, Vitorino M, Steinbeisser H, Belo JA. Developmental expression of Shisa-2 in Xenopus laevis. Int J Dev Biol. 2006;50:575–9.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Filipe M, Goncalves L, Bento M, Silva AC, Belo JA. Comparative expression of mouse and chicken Shisa homologues during early development. Dev Dyn. 2006;235:2567–73.PubMedCrossRef Filipe M, Goncalves L, Bento M, Silva AC, Belo JA. Comparative expression of mouse and chicken Shisa homologues during early development. Dev Dyn. 2006;235:2567–73.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hedge TA, Mason I. Expression of Shisa2, a modulator of both Wnt and Fgf signaling, in the chick embryo. Int J Dev Biol. 2008;52:81–5.PubMedCrossRef Hedge TA, Mason I. Expression of Shisa2, a modulator of both Wnt and Fgf signaling, in the chick embryo. Int J Dev Biol. 2008;52:81–5.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Zhu Y, Tsuchida A, Yamamoto A, et al. Expression and roles of a xenopus head-forming gene homologue in human cancer cell lines. Nagoya J Med Sci. 2008;70:73–82.PubMed Zhu Y, Tsuchida A, Yamamoto A, et al. Expression and roles of a xenopus head-forming gene homologue in human cancer cell lines. Nagoya J Med Sci. 2008;70:73–82.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Chen CC, Chen HY, Su KY, et al. SHISA3 Is Associated with Prolonged Survival through Promoting beta-Catenin Degradation in Lung Cancer. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;190:433–44.PubMedCrossRef Chen CC, Chen HY, Su KY, et al. SHISA3 Is Associated with Prolonged Survival through Promoting beta-Catenin Degradation in Lung Cancer. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;190:433–44.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Tsai MH, Fang WH, Lin SW, Yen SJ, Chou SJ, Yang YC. Mitochondrial genomic instability in colorectal cancer: no correlation to nuclear microsatellite instability and allelic deletion of hMSH2, hMLH1, and p53 genes, but prediction of better survival for Dukes’ stage C disease. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:2918–25.PubMedCrossRef Tsai MH, Fang WH, Lin SW, Yen SJ, Chou SJ, Yang YC. Mitochondrial genomic instability in colorectal cancer: no correlation to nuclear microsatellite instability and allelic deletion of hMSH2, hMLH1, and p53 genes, but prediction of better survival for Dukes’ stage C disease. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:2918–25.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Tzeng ST, Tsai MH, Chen CL, et al. NDST4 is a novel candidate tumor suppressor gene at chromosome 4q26 and its genetic loss predicts adverse prognosis in colorectal cancer. Plos One. 2013;8:e67040.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Tzeng ST, Tsai MH, Chen CL, et al. NDST4 is a novel candidate tumor suppressor gene at chromosome 4q26 and its genetic loss predicts adverse prognosis in colorectal cancer. Plos One. 2013;8:e67040.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25:402–8.PubMedCrossRef Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25:402–8.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Li LC, Dahiya R. MethPrimer: designing primers for methylation PCRs. Bioinformatics. 2002;18:1427–31.PubMedCrossRef Li LC, Dahiya R. MethPrimer: designing primers for methylation PCRs. Bioinformatics. 2002;18:1427–31.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Fevr T, Robine S, Louvard D, Huelsken J. Wnt/beta-catenin is essential for intestinal homeostasis and maintenance of intestinal stem cells. Mol Cell Biol. 2007;27:7551–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Fevr T, Robine S, Louvard D, Huelsken J. Wnt/beta-catenin is essential for intestinal homeostasis and maintenance of intestinal stem cells. Mol Cell Biol. 2007;27:7551–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Kim BM, Mao J, Taketo MM, Shivdasani RA. Phases of canonical Wnt signaling during the development of mouse intestinal epithelium. Gastroenterology. 2007;133:529–38.PubMedCrossRef Kim BM, Mao J, Taketo MM, Shivdasani RA. Phases of canonical Wnt signaling during the development of mouse intestinal epithelium. Gastroenterology. 2007;133:529–38.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Humphries A, Wright NA. Colonic crypt organization and tumorigenesis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:415–24.PubMedCrossRef Humphries A, Wright NA. Colonic crypt organization and tumorigenesis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:415–24.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Jones PA. DNA methylation errors and cancer. Cancer Res. 1996;56:2463–7.PubMed Jones PA. DNA methylation errors and cancer. Cancer Res. 1996;56:2463–7.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Jones PA, Baylin SB. The fundamental role of epigenetic events in cancer. Nat Rev Genet. 2002;3:415–28.PubMedCrossRef Jones PA, Baylin SB. The fundamental role of epigenetic events in cancer. Nat Rev Genet. 2002;3:415–28.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Luo Y, Wong CJ, Kaz AM, et al. Differences in DNA methylation signatures reveal multiple pathways of progression from adenoma to colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2014;147:418–29 e8.PubMed Luo Y, Wong CJ, Kaz AM, et al. Differences in DNA methylation signatures reveal multiple pathways of progression from adenoma to colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2014;147:418–29 e8.PubMed
27.
go back to reference Toyota M, Issa JP. CpG island methylator phenotypes in aging and cancer. Semin Cancer Biol. 1999;9:349–57.PubMedCrossRef Toyota M, Issa JP. CpG island methylator phenotypes in aging and cancer. Semin Cancer Biol. 1999;9:349–57.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Toyota M, Ahuja N, Ohe-Toyota M, Herman JG, Baylin SB, Issa JP. CpG island methylator phenotype in colorectal cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:8681–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Toyota M, Ahuja N, Ohe-Toyota M, Herman JG, Baylin SB, Issa JP. CpG island methylator phenotype in colorectal cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:8681–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
29.
31.
go back to reference Harrison S, Benziger H. The molecular biology of colorectal carcinoma and its implications: a review. Surgeon. 2011;9:200–10.PubMedCrossRef Harrison S, Benziger H. The molecular biology of colorectal carcinoma and its implications: a review. Surgeon. 2011;9:200–10.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Walther A, Johnstone E, Swanton C, Midgley R, Tomlinson I, Kerr D. Genetic prognostic and predictive markers in colorectal cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009;9:489–99.PubMedCrossRef Walther A, Johnstone E, Swanton C, Midgley R, Tomlinson I, Kerr D. Genetic prognostic and predictive markers in colorectal cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009;9:489–99.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Jao TM, Tsai MH, Lio HY, et al. Protocadherin 10 suppresses tumorigenesis and metastasis in colorectal cancer and its genetic loss predicts adverse prognosis. Int J Cancer. 2014; 135:2593–603.PubMedCrossRef Jao TM, Tsai MH, Lio HY, et al. Protocadherin 10 suppresses tumorigenesis and metastasis in colorectal cancer and its genetic loss predicts adverse prognosis. Int J Cancer. 2014; 135:2593–603.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
DNA Hypermethylation of SHISA3 in Colorectal Cancer: An Independent Predictor of Poor Prognosis
Authors
Ming-Hong Tsai, MD
Wen-Chi Chen, MS
Sung-Liang Yu, PhD
Chun-Chieh Chen, PhD
Tzu-Ming Jao, PhD
Chi-Yen Huang, MS
Sheng-Tai Tzeng, PhD
Sou-Jhy Yen, MD
Ya-Chien Yang, PhD
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue Special Issue 3/2015
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4593-1

Other articles of this Special Issue 3/2015

Annals of Surgical Oncology 3/2015 Go to the issue