Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 12/2014

01-12-2014 | Original Article

Distress among caregivers of phase I trial participants: a cross-sectional study

Authors: Elizabeth R. Kessler, Angela Moss, S. Gail Eckhardt, Mark L. Laudenslager, Kristin Kilbourn, Iris B. Mauss, Daniel W. Bowles, Sharon Hecker, Diane L. Fairclough, Jean S. Kutner

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 12/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The number of patients with cancer enrolling in phase I trials is expected to increase as these trials incorporate patient selection and exhibit greater efficacy in the era of targeted therapies. Despite the fact that people with advanced cancer often require a caregiver, little is known about the experience of caregivers of people enrolling in oncology phase I clinical trials. We conducted a cross-sectional study assessing the distress and emotion regulation of caregivers of phase I trial participants to inform the design of future interventions targeting the unique needs of this population.

Methods

Caregivers of oncology patients were approached at the patient’s phase I clinical trial screening visit. Caregiver participants completed a one-time survey incorporating validated instruments to comprehensively assess distress and emotion regulation. Basic demographic information about both the caregiver and patient was collected.

Results

Caregivers exhibited greater distress than population norms. Emotion regulation was also moderately impaired. Respondents identified positive aspects of caregiving despite exhibiting moderate distress.

Conclusion

Enrollment of a patient in a phase I clinical trial is a time of stress for their caregivers. This pilot study demonstrates the feasibility of engaging caregivers of phase I trial participants and the need to better support them through this component of their caregiving experience.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Proot IM, Abu-Saad HH, ter Meulen RH, Goldsteen M, Spreeuwenberg C, Widdershoven GA (2004) The needs of terminally ill patients at home: directing one’s life, health and things related to beloved others. Palliat Med 18(1):53–61PubMedCrossRef Proot IM, Abu-Saad HH, ter Meulen RH, Goldsteen M, Spreeuwenberg C, Widdershoven GA (2004) The needs of terminally ill patients at home: directing one’s life, health and things related to beloved others. Palliat Med 18(1):53–61PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hudson P (2004) Positive aspects and challenges associated with caring for a dying relative at home. Int J Palliat Nurs 10(2):58–65, discussion 65PubMedCrossRef Hudson P (2004) Positive aspects and challenges associated with caring for a dying relative at home. Int J Palliat Nurs 10(2):58–65, discussion 65PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Sorensen S, Pinquart M, Duberstein P (2002) How effective are interventions with caregivers? An updated meta-analysis. Gerontologist 42(3):356–372PubMedCrossRef Sorensen S, Pinquart M, Duberstein P (2002) How effective are interventions with caregivers? An updated meta-analysis. Gerontologist 42(3):356–372PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Grunfeld E, Coyle D, Whelan T, Clinch J, Reyno L, Earle CC, Willan A, Viola R, Coristine M, Janz T, Glossop R (2004) Family caregiver burden: results of a longitudinal study of breast cancer patients and their principal caregivers. CMAJ 170(12):1795–1801PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Grunfeld E, Coyle D, Whelan T, Clinch J, Reyno L, Earle CC, Willan A, Viola R, Coristine M, Janz T, Glossop R (2004) Family caregiver burden: results of a longitudinal study of breast cancer patients and their principal caregivers. CMAJ 170(12):1795–1801PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Meropol NJ, Weinfurt KP, Burnett CB, Balshem A, Benson AB 3rd, Castel L, Corbett S, Diefenbach M, Gaskin D, Li Y, Manne S, Marshall J, Rowland JH, Slater E, Sulmasy DP, Van Echo D, Washington S, Schulman KA (2003) Perceptions of patients and physicians regarding phase I cancer clinical trials: implications for physician-patient communication. J Clin Oncol 21(13):2589–2596. doi:10.1200/JCO.2003.10.072 PubMedCrossRef Meropol NJ, Weinfurt KP, Burnett CB, Balshem A, Benson AB 3rd, Castel L, Corbett S, Diefenbach M, Gaskin D, Li Y, Manne S, Marshall J, Rowland JH, Slater E, Sulmasy DP, Van Echo D, Washington S, Schulman KA (2003) Perceptions of patients and physicians regarding phase I cancer clinical trials: implications for physician-patient communication. J Clin Oncol 21(13):2589–2596. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2003.​10.​072 PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Horstmann E, McCabe MS, Grochow L, Yamamoto S, Rubinstein L, Budd T, Shoemaker D, Emanuel EJ, Grady C (2005) Risks and benefits of phase 1 oncology trials, 1991 through 2002. N Engl J Med 352(9):895–904. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa042220 PubMedCrossRef Horstmann E, McCabe MS, Grochow L, Yamamoto S, Rubinstein L, Budd T, Shoemaker D, Emanuel EJ, Grady C (2005) Risks and benefits of phase 1 oncology trials, 1991 through 2002. N Engl J Med 352(9):895–904. doi:10.​1056/​NEJMsa042220 PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Daugherty C, Ratain MJ, Grochowski E, Stocking C, Kodish E, Mick R, Siegler M (1995) Perceptions of cancer patients and their physicians involved in phase I trials. J Clin Oncol 13(5):1062–1072PubMed Daugherty C, Ratain MJ, Grochowski E, Stocking C, Kodish E, Mick R, Siegler M (1995) Perceptions of cancer patients and their physicians involved in phase I trials. J Clin Oncol 13(5):1062–1072PubMed
19.
go back to reference Finlay E, Lu HL, Henderson H, O’Dwyer PJ, Casarett DJ (2009) Do phase 1 patients have greater needs for palliative care compared with other cancer patients? Cancer 115(2):446–453. doi:10.1002/cncr.24025 PubMedCrossRef Finlay E, Lu HL, Henderson H, O’Dwyer PJ, Casarett DJ (2009) Do phase 1 patients have greater needs for palliative care compared with other cancer patients? Cancer 115(2):446–453. doi:10.​1002/​cncr.​24025 PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Gross JJ, John OP (2003) Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol 85(2):348–362PubMedCrossRef Gross JJ, John OP (2003) Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol 85(2):348–362PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R (1983) A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav 24(4):385–396PubMedCrossRef Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R (1983) A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav 24(4):385–396PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Cohen S, Williamson G (1988) Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States. In: Spacapan S, Oskamp S (eds) The Social Psychology of Health. Sage Publishing, California, pp 31–67 Cohen S, Williamson G (1988) Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States. In: Spacapan S, Oskamp S (eds) The Social Psychology of Health. Sage Publishing, California, pp 31–67
24.
go back to reference Warson D, Clark L, Tellegen A (1988) Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol 54:1063–1070CrossRef Warson D, Clark L, Tellegen A (1988) Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol 54:1063–1070CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Spielberger C, Gorsuch R, Lushene R (1983) Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc, California Spielberger C, Gorsuch R, Lushene R (1983) Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc, California
26.
go back to reference Radloff L (1977) The CES-D Scale: a self report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psych Meas 1:385–401CrossRef Radloff L (1977) The CES-D Scale: a self report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psych Meas 1:385–401CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Given CW, Given B, Stommel M, Collins C, King S, Franklin S (1992) The caregiver reaction assessment (CRA) for caregivers to persons with chronic physical and mental impairments. J Res Nurs Health 15(4):271–283CrossRef Given CW, Given B, Stommel M, Collins C, King S, Franklin S (1992) The caregiver reaction assessment (CRA) for caregivers to persons with chronic physical and mental impairments. J Res Nurs Health 15(4):271–283CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Grov EK, Fossa SD, Tonnessen A, Dahl AA (2006) The caregiver reaction assessment: psychometrics, and temporal stability in primary caregivers of Norwegian cancer patients in late palliative phase. Psychooncology 15(6):517–527. doi:10.1002/pon.987 PubMedCrossRef Grov EK, Fossa SD, Tonnessen A, Dahl AA (2006) The caregiver reaction assessment: psychometrics, and temporal stability in primary caregivers of Norwegian cancer patients in late palliative phase. Psychooncology 15(6):517–527. doi:10.​1002/​pon.​987 PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Antoni MH, Lehman JM, Kilbourn KM, Boyers AE, Culver JL, Alferi SM, Yount SE, McGregor BA, Arena PL, Harris SD, Price AA, Carver CS (2001) Cognitive-behavioral stress management intervention decreases the prevalence of depression and enhances benefit finding among women under treatment for early-stage breast cancer. Health Psychol 20(1):20–32PubMedCrossRef Antoni MH, Lehman JM, Kilbourn KM, Boyers AE, Culver JL, Alferi SM, Yount SE, McGregor BA, Arena PL, Harris SD, Price AA, Carver CS (2001) Cognitive-behavioral stress management intervention decreases the prevalence of depression and enhances benefit finding among women under treatment for early-stage breast cancer. Health Psychol 20(1):20–32PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Gratz K, Roemer L (2004) Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 26(1):41–54CrossRef Gratz K, Roemer L (2004) Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 26(1):41–54CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Tarlow B, Wisniewski S, Belle S, Rubert M, Ory M, Gallagher-Thompson D (2004) Positive aspects of caregiving, contributions of the REACH project to the development of a new measure for Alzheimer’s caregiving. Res Aging 26:429–453CrossRef Tarlow B, Wisniewski S, Belle S, Rubert M, Ory M, Gallagher-Thompson D (2004) Positive aspects of caregiving, contributions of the REACH project to the development of a new measure for Alzheimer’s caregiving. Res Aging 26:429–453CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Mitchell PH, Powell L, Blumenthal J, Norten J, Ironson G, Pitula CR, Froelicher ES, Czajkowski S, Youngblood M, Huber M, Berkman LF (2003) A short social support measure for patients recovering from myocardial infarction: the ENRICHD social support inventory. J Cardpulm Rehabil 23(6):398–403CrossRef Mitchell PH, Powell L, Blumenthal J, Norten J, Ironson G, Pitula CR, Froelicher ES, Czajkowski S, Youngblood M, Huber M, Berkman LF (2003) A short social support measure for patients recovering from myocardial infarction: the ENRICHD social support inventory. J Cardpulm Rehabil 23(6):398–403CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30(6):473–483PubMedCrossRef Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30(6):473–483PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Beusterien KM, Steinwald B, Ware JE Jr (1996) Usefulness of the SF-36 health survey in measuring health outcomes in the depressed elderly. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 9(1):13–21PubMedCrossRef Beusterien KM, Steinwald B, Ware JE Jr (1996) Usefulness of the SF-36 health survey in measuring health outcomes in the depressed elderly. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 9(1):13–21PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Kim Y, Shaffer KM, Carver CS, Cannady RS (2014) Prevalence and predictors of depressive symptoms among cancer caregivers 5 years after the relative’s cancer diagnosis. J Consult Clin Psychol 82(1):1–8. doi:10.1037/a0035116 PubMedCrossRef Kim Y, Shaffer KM, Carver CS, Cannady RS (2014) Prevalence and predictors of depressive symptoms among cancer caregivers 5 years after the relative’s cancer diagnosis. J Consult Clin Psychol 82(1):1–8. doi:10.​1037/​a0035116 PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Mitchell AJ, Ferguson DW, Gill J, Paul J, Symonds P (2013) Depression and anxiety in long-term cancer survivors compared with spouses and healthy controls: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 14(8):721–732. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70244-4 PubMedCrossRef Mitchell AJ, Ferguson DW, Gill J, Paul J, Symonds P (2013) Depression and anxiety in long-term cancer survivors compared with spouses and healthy controls: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 14(8):721–732. doi:10.​1016/​S1470-2045(13)70244-4 PubMedCrossRef
44.
48.
go back to reference Wadhwa D, Burman D, Swami N, Rodin G, Lo C, Zimmermann C (2013) Quality of life and mental health in caregivers of outpatients with advanced cancer. Psychooncology 22(2):403–410. doi:10.1002/pon.2104 PubMed Wadhwa D, Burman D, Swami N, Rodin G, Lo C, Zimmermann C (2013) Quality of life and mental health in caregivers of outpatients with advanced cancer. Psychooncology 22(2):403–410. doi:10.​1002/​pon.​2104 PubMed
49.
go back to reference Covinsky KE, Goldman L, Cook EF, Oye R, Desbiens N, Reding D, Fulkerson W, Connors AF Jr, Lynn J, Phillips RS (1994) The impact of serious illness on patients’ families. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment. Jama 272(23):1839–1844PubMedCrossRef Covinsky KE, Goldman L, Cook EF, Oye R, Desbiens N, Reding D, Fulkerson W, Connors AF Jr, Lynn J, Phillips RS (1994) The impact of serious illness on patients’ families. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment. Jama 272(23):1839–1844PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Simoneau TL, Mikulich-Gilbertson SK, Natvig C, Kilbourn K, Spradley J, Grzywa-Cobb R, Philips S, McSweeney P, Laudenslager ML (2013) Elevated peri-transplant distress in caregivers of allogeneic blood or marrow transplant patients. Psychooncology. doi:10.1002/pon.3259 PubMedCentralPubMed Simoneau TL, Mikulich-Gilbertson SK, Natvig C, Kilbourn K, Spradley J, Grzywa-Cobb R, Philips S, McSweeney P, Laudenslager ML (2013) Elevated peri-transplant distress in caregivers of allogeneic blood or marrow transplant patients. Psychooncology. doi:10.​1002/​pon.​3259 PubMedCentralPubMed
51.
go back to reference Salmon P, Manzi F, Valori RM (1996) Measuring the meaning of life for patients with incurable cancer: the life evaluation questionnaire (LEQ). Eur J Cancer 32A(5):755–760PubMedCrossRef Salmon P, Manzi F, Valori RM (1996) Measuring the meaning of life for patients with incurable cancer: the life evaluation questionnaire (LEQ). Eur J Cancer 32A(5):755–760PubMedCrossRef
52.
go back to reference Hickey AM, Bury G, O’Boyle CA, Bradley F, O’Kelly FD, Shannon W (1996) A new short form individual quality of life measure (SEIQoL-DW): application in a cohort of individuals with HIV/AIDS. BMJ 313(7048):29–33PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Hickey AM, Bury G, O’Boyle CA, Bradley F, O’Kelly FD, Shannon W (1996) A new short form individual quality of life measure (SEIQoL-DW): application in a cohort of individuals with HIV/AIDS. BMJ 313(7048):29–33PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
55.
go back to reference Stoehlmacher-Williams J, Villanueva C, Foa P, Rottey S, Winquist E, Licitra L, Davidenko I, Skladowski K, Tahara M, Faivre S, Oliner K, Pan Z, Bach B, Vermorken J (2012) Safety and efficacy of panitumumab (pmab) in HPV-positive (+) and HPV-negative (−) recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN): analysis of the global phase III SPECTRUM trial. J Clin Oncol 30:abst 5504 Stoehlmacher-Williams J, Villanueva C, Foa P, Rottey S, Winquist E, Licitra L, Davidenko I, Skladowski K, Tahara M, Faivre S, Oliner K, Pan Z, Bach B, Vermorken J (2012) Safety and efficacy of panitumumab (pmab) in HPV-positive (+) and HPV-negative (−) recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN): analysis of the global phase III SPECTRUM trial. J Clin Oncol 30:abst 5504
57.
58.
go back to reference Kim Y, Carver CS, Rocha-Lima C, Shaffer KM (2013) Depressive symptoms among caregivers of colorectal cancer patients during the first year since diagnosis: a longitudinal investigation. Psychooncology 22(2):362–367. doi:10.1002/pon.2100 PubMed Kim Y, Carver CS, Rocha-Lima C, Shaffer KM (2013) Depressive symptoms among caregivers of colorectal cancer patients during the first year since diagnosis: a longitudinal investigation. Psychooncology 22(2):362–367. doi:10.​1002/​pon.​2100 PubMed
60.
go back to reference Hartmann M, Bazner E, Wild B, Eisler I, Herzog W (2010) Effects of interventions involving the family in the treatment of adult patients with chronic physical diseases: a meta-analysis. Psychother Psychosom 79(3):136–148. doi:10.1159/000286958 PubMedCrossRef Hartmann M, Bazner E, Wild B, Eisler I, Herzog W (2010) Effects of interventions involving the family in the treatment of adult patients with chronic physical diseases: a meta-analysis. Psychother Psychosom 79(3):136–148. doi:10.​1159/​000286958 PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Distress among caregivers of phase I trial participants: a cross-sectional study
Authors
Elizabeth R. Kessler
Angela Moss
S. Gail Eckhardt
Mark L. Laudenslager
Kristin Kilbourn
Iris B. Mauss
Daniel W. Bowles
Sharon Hecker
Diane L. Fairclough
Jean S. Kutner
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 12/2014
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2380-3

Other articles of this Issue 12/2014

Supportive Care in Cancer 12/2014 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine