Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 8/2008

01-08-2008 | Original Article

Distinguishing Jones and Proximal Diaphyseal Fractures of the Fifth Metatarsal

Authors: Bavornrit Chuckpaiwong, MD, Robin M. Queen, PhD, Mark E. Easley, MD, James A. Nunley, MD

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 8/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Jones and proximal diaphyseal fractures of the fifth metatarsal are in close anatomic proximity and often are difficult to differentiate. We determined whether it is necessary to differentiate between these two diagnoses. Retrospectively, the two diagnoses were identified radiographically using an accepted classification scheme. Initial management is nonoperative; however, intramedullary screw fixation is performed for competitive athletes, or others with displaced fractures, or delayed union or nonunion. Outcomes were analyzed using Student’s t tests, whereas nominal data were analyzed using chi square tests. Thirty-two Jones fractures and 29 proximal diaphyseal fractures were identified. All fractures healed between 4.8 and 9.8 months with a 78% to 82% patient satisfaction rate. Regardless of treatment, the clinical outcomes were not different between the two fracture locations. Shorter return to sport time was observed in operatively treated patients. Operatively treated patients with fracture site sclerosis or medullary canal obliteration on radiographs had lower satisfaction and higher complication rates than patients without these changes. Based on our findings, we do not find a reason to distinguish between fractures of the fifth metatarsal in these two locations. We suggest referring to fifth metatarsal base fractures (excluding avulsions) as Jones fractures.
Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Buckwalter JA, Einhorn TA, Marsh JL. Bone and joint healing. In: Bucholz RW, Heckman JD, Court-Brown CM, eds. Rockwood and Green’s Fractures in Adults. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2005:50–98. Buckwalter JA, Einhorn TA, Marsh JL. Bone and joint healing. In: Bucholz RW, Heckman JD, Court-Brown CM, eds. Rockwood and Green’s Fractures in Adults. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2005:50–98.
2.
go back to reference Clapper MF, O’Brien TJ, Lyons PM. Fractures of the fifth metatarsal: analysis of a fracture registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;315:238–241.PubMed Clapper MF, O’Brien TJ, Lyons PM. Fractures of the fifth metatarsal: analysis of a fracture registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;315:238–241.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Dameron TB Jr. Fractures and anatomical variations of the proximal portion of the fifth metatarsal. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1975;57:788–792.PubMed Dameron TB Jr. Fractures and anatomical variations of the proximal portion of the fifth metatarsal. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1975;57:788–792.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Dameron TB Jr. Fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal: selecting the best treatment option. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1995;3:110–114.PubMed Dameron TB Jr. Fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal: selecting the best treatment option. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1995;3:110–114.PubMed
5.
go back to reference DeLee JC, Evans JP, Julian J. Stress fractures of the fifth metatarsal. Am J Sports Med. 1983;11:349–353.PubMedCrossRef DeLee JC, Evans JP, Julian J. Stress fractures of the fifth metatarsal. Am J Sports Med. 1983;11:349–353.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Fetzer GB, Wright RW. Metatarsal shaft fractures and fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal. Clin Sports Med. 2006;25:139–150, x.PubMedCrossRef Fetzer GB, Wright RW. Metatarsal shaft fractures and fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal. Clin Sports Med. 2006;25:139–150, x.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Jones R. Fracture of the base of the fifth metatarsal bone by indirect violence. Ann Surg. 1902;35:697–700.PubMed Jones R. Fracture of the base of the fifth metatarsal bone by indirect violence. Ann Surg. 1902;35:697–700.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Kavanaugh JH, Brower TD, Mann RV. The Jones fracture revisited. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60:776–782.PubMed Kavanaugh JH, Brower TD, Mann RV. The Jones fracture revisited. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60:776–782.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Konkel KF, Menger AG, Retzlaff SA. Nonoperative treatment of fifth metatarsal fractures in an orthopaedic suburban private multispeciality practice. Foot Ankle Int. 2005;26:704–707.PubMed Konkel KF, Menger AG, Retzlaff SA. Nonoperative treatment of fifth metatarsal fractures in an orthopaedic suburban private multispeciality practice. Foot Ankle Int. 2005;26:704–707.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Kuhlman JE, Fishman EK, Magid D, Scott WW Jr, Brooker AF, Siegelman SS. Fracture nonunion: CT assessment with multiplanar reconstruction. Radiology. 1988;167:483–488.PubMed Kuhlman JE, Fishman EK, Magid D, Scott WW Jr, Brooker AF, Siegelman SS. Fracture nonunion: CT assessment with multiplanar reconstruction. Radiology. 1988;167:483–488.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Lawrence SJ, Botte MJ. Jones’ fractures and related fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal. Foot Ankle. 1993;14:358–365.PubMed Lawrence SJ, Botte MJ. Jones’ fractures and related fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal. Foot Ankle. 1993;14:358–365.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Lehman RC, Torg JS, Pavlov H, De Lee JC. Fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal distal to the tuberosity: a review. Foot Ankle. 1987;7:245–252.PubMed Lehman RC, Torg JS, Pavlov H, De Lee JC. Fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal distal to the tuberosity: a review. Foot Ankle. 1987;7:245–252.PubMed
13.
go back to reference McClelland D, Thomas PB, Bancroft G, Moorcraft CI. Fracture healing assessment comparing stiffness measurements using radiographs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;457:214–219.PubMed McClelland D, Thomas PB, Bancroft G, Moorcraft CI. Fracture healing assessment comparing stiffness measurements using radiographs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;457:214–219.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Nunley JA. Fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal: The Jones fracture. Orthop Clin North Am. 2001;32:171–180.PubMedCrossRef Nunley JA. Fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal: The Jones fracture. Orthop Clin North Am. 2001;32:171–180.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Portland G, Kelikian A, Kodros S. Acute surgical management of Jones’ fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2003;24:829–833.PubMed Portland G, Kelikian A, Kodros S. Acute surgical management of Jones’ fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2003;24:829–833.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Quill GE Jr. Fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal. Orthop Clin North Am. 1995;26:353–361.PubMed Quill GE Jr. Fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal. Orthop Clin North Am. 1995;26:353–361.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Rosenberg GA, Sferra JJ. Treatment strategies for acute fractures and nonunions of the proximal fifth metatarsal. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2000;8:332–338.PubMed Rosenberg GA, Sferra JJ. Treatment strategies for acute fractures and nonunions of the proximal fifth metatarsal. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2000;8:332–338.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Smith JW, Arnoczky SP, Hersh A. The interosseous blood supply of the fifth metatarsal: implication for proximal fracture healing. Foot Ankle. 1992;13:143–152.PubMed Smith JW, Arnoczky SP, Hersh A. The interosseous blood supply of the fifth metatarsal: implication for proximal fracture healing. Foot Ankle. 1992;13:143–152.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Stewart IM. Jones fracture: fracture of the base of the fifth metatarsal. Clin Orthop Relat Res.1960;16:190–198. Stewart IM. Jones fracture: fracture of the base of the fifth metatarsal. Clin Orthop Relat Res.1960;16:190–198.
20.
go back to reference Torg JS, Balduini FC, Zelko RR, Pavlov H, Peff TC, Das M. Fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal distal to the tuberosity: classification and guidelines for non-surgical and surgical management. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66:209–214.PubMed Torg JS, Balduini FC, Zelko RR, Pavlov H, Peff TC, Das M. Fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal distal to the tuberosity: classification and guidelines for non-surgical and surgical management. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66:209–214.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Weinfeld SB, Haddad SL, Myerson MS. Metatarsal stress fractures. Clin Sports Med. 1997;16:319–338.PubMedCrossRef Weinfeld SB, Haddad SL, Myerson MS. Metatarsal stress fractures. Clin Sports Med. 1997;16:319–338.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Wright RW, Fischer DA, Shively RA, Heidt RS Jr, Nuber GW. Refracture of proximal fifth metatarsal (Jones) fracture after intramedullary screw fixation in athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28:732–736.PubMed Wright RW, Fischer DA, Shively RA, Heidt RS Jr, Nuber GW. Refracture of proximal fifth metatarsal (Jones) fracture after intramedullary screw fixation in athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28:732–736.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Zelko RR, Torg JS, Rachun A. Proximal diaphyseal fractures of the fifth metatarsal: treatment of the fractures and their complications in athletes. Am J Sports Med. 1979;7:95–101.PubMedCrossRef Zelko RR, Torg JS, Rachun A. Proximal diaphyseal fractures of the fifth metatarsal: treatment of the fractures and their complications in athletes. Am J Sports Med. 1979;7:95–101.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Distinguishing Jones and Proximal Diaphyseal Fractures of the Fifth Metatarsal
Authors
Bavornrit Chuckpaiwong, MD
Robin M. Queen, PhD
Mark E. Easley, MD
James A. Nunley, MD
Publication date
01-08-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 8/2008
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0222-7

Other articles of this Issue 8/2008

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 8/2008 Go to the issue

Symposium: New Approaches to Allograft Transplantation

Radioprotectant and Radiosensitizer Effects on Sterility of γ-irradiated Bone

Symposium: New Approaches to Allograft Transplantation

New Approaches to Allograft Transplantation: Editorial Comment