Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology 5/2017

01-09-2017 | Clinical Investigation

Distant stereoacuity in children with anisometropic amblyopia

Authors: Yeon Woong Chung, Shin Hae Park, Sun Young Shin

Published in: Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology | Issue 5/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To characterize changes in distant stereoacuity using Frisby–Davis Distance test (FD2) and Distant Randot test (DR) during treatment for anisometropic amblyopia, to determine factors that influence posttreatment stereoacuity and to compare the two distant stereotests.

Methods

Fifty-eight anisometropic amblyopic patients with an interocular difference of ≥1.00 diopter who achieved the visual acuity 20/20 following amblyopia treatment were retrospectively included. Stereoacuity using FD2 and DR for distant and Titmus test for near measurement were assessed and compared at the initial, intermediate, and final visit. Multivariate regression models were used to identify factors associated with initial and final stereoacuity.

Results

The two distant stereotests revealed a significant improvement in distant stereoacuity after successful amblyopia treatment. Distant stereoacuity using FD2 showed the greatest improvement during the follow up period. The number of nil scores was higher in DR than FD2 at each period. In multivariate analysis, better final stereoacuity was associated with better initial amblyopic eye acuity in both distant stereotests, but not in the Titmus test. Comparing the two distant stereotests, final stereoacuity using FD2 was associated with initial stereoacuity and was moderately related with the Titmus test at each period, but final stereoacuity using DR was not.

Conclusions

Distant stereoacuity measured with both FD2 and DR showed significant improvement when the visual acuity of the amblyopic eye achieved 20/20. Changes in distant stereoacuity by FD2 and DR during the amblyopia treatment were somewhat different.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Rahi J, Logan S, Timms C, Russell-Eggitt I, Taylor D. Risk, causes, and outcomes of visual impairment after loss of vision in the non-amblyopic eye: a population-based study. Lancet. 2002;360:597–602.CrossRefPubMed Rahi J, Logan S, Timms C, Russell-Eggitt I, Taylor D. Risk, causes, and outcomes of visual impairment after loss of vision in the non-amblyopic eye: a population-based study. Lancet. 2002;360:597–602.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Simons K. Amblyopia characterization, treatment, and prophylaxis. Surv Ophthalmol. 2005;50:123–66.CrossRefPubMed Simons K. Amblyopia characterization, treatment, and prophylaxis. Surv Ophthalmol. 2005;50:123–66.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Multi-ethnic Pediatric Eye Disease Study Group. Prevalence of amblyopia and strabismus in African American and Hispanic children ages 6 to 72 months the multi-ethnic pediatric eye disease study. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(1229–36):e1. Multi-ethnic Pediatric Eye Disease Study Group. Prevalence of amblyopia and strabismus in African American and Hispanic children ages 6 to 72 months the multi-ethnic pediatric eye disease study. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(1229–36):e1.
5.
go back to reference Friedman DS, Repka MX, Katz J, Giordano L, Ibironke J, Hawse P, et al. Prevalence of amblyopia and strabismus in white and African American children aged 6 through 71 months the Baltimore Pediatric Eye Disease Study. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(2128–34):e1–2. Friedman DS, Repka MX, Katz J, Giordano L, Ibironke J, Hawse P, et al. Prevalence of amblyopia and strabismus in white and African American children aged 6 through 71 months the Baltimore Pediatric Eye Disease Study. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(2128–34):e1–2.
6.
go back to reference Schmidt P, Maguire M, Dobson V, Quinn G, Ciner E, Cyert L, et al. Comparison of preschool vision screening tests as administered by licensed eye care professionals in the Vision In Preschoolers Study. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:637–50.CrossRefPubMed Schmidt P, Maguire M, Dobson V, Quinn G, Ciner E, Cyert L, et al. Comparison of preschool vision screening tests as administered by licensed eye care professionals in the Vision In Preschoolers Study. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:637–50.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Von Noorden GK. Factors involved in the production of amblyopia. Br J Ophthalmol. 1974;58:158–64.CrossRef Von Noorden GK. Factors involved in the production of amblyopia. Br J Ophthalmol. 1974;58:158–64.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Weakley DR Jr. The association between nonstrabismic anisometropia, amblyopia, and subnormal binocularity. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:163–71.CrossRefPubMed Weakley DR Jr. The association between nonstrabismic anisometropia, amblyopia, and subnormal binocularity. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:163–71.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. The clinical profile of moderate amblyopia in children younger than 7 years. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:281–7.CrossRef Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. The clinical profile of moderate amblyopia in children younger than 7 years. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:281–7.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Weakley DR. The association between anisometropia, amblyopia, and binocularity in the absence of strabismus. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1999;97:987–1021.PubMedPubMedCentral Weakley DR. The association between anisometropia, amblyopia, and binocularity in the absence of strabismus. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1999;97:987–1021.PubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Shroff AP, Billore OP, Dubey AK, Antani PR. A combined approach by spectacle correction, occlusion and active pleoptic treatment in management of amblyopia. Indian J Ophthalmol. 1983;31:568–9.PubMed Shroff AP, Billore OP, Dubey AK, Antani PR. A combined approach by spectacle correction, occlusion and active pleoptic treatment in management of amblyopia. Indian J Ophthalmol. 1983;31:568–9.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Cotter SA, Edwards AR, Wallace DK, Beck RW, Arnold RW, Astle WF, et al. Treatment of anisometropic amblyopia in children with refractive correction. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:895–903.CrossRefPubMed Cotter SA, Edwards AR, Wallace DK, Beck RW, Arnold RW, Astle WF, et al. Treatment of anisometropic amblyopia in children with refractive correction. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:895–903.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Beardsell R, Clarke S, Hill M. Outcome of occlusion treatment for amblyopia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1999;36:19–24.PubMed Beardsell R, Clarke S, Hill M. Outcome of occlusion treatment for amblyopia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1999;36:19–24.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Wallace DK, Lazar EL, Melia M, Birch EE, Holmes JM, Hopkins KB, et al. Stereoacuity in children with anisometropic amblyopia. J AAPOS. 2011;15:455–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wallace DK, Lazar EL, Melia M, Birch EE, Holmes JM, Hopkins KB, et al. Stereoacuity in children with anisometropic amblyopia. J AAPOS. 2011;15:455–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Caputo R, Frosini R, De Libero C, Campa L, Magro EF, Secci J. Factors influencing severity of and recovery from anisometropic amblyopia. Strabismus. 2007;15:209–14.CrossRefPubMed Caputo R, Frosini R, De Libero C, Campa L, Magro EF, Secci J. Factors influencing severity of and recovery from anisometropic amblyopia. Strabismus. 2007;15:209–14.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Lee SY, Isenberg SJ. The relationship between stereopsis and visual acuity after occlusion therapy for amblyopia. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:2088–92.CrossRefPubMed Lee SY, Isenberg SJ. The relationship between stereopsis and visual acuity after occlusion therapy for amblyopia. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:2088–92.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Holmes JM, Fawcett SL. Testing distance stereoacuity with the Frisby–Davis 2 (FD2) test. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139:193–5.CrossRefPubMed Holmes JM, Fawcett SL. Testing distance stereoacuity with the Frisby–Davis 2 (FD2) test. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139:193–5.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Holmes JM, Birch EE, Leske DA, Fu VL, Mohney BG. New tests of distance stereoacuity and their role in evaluating intermittent exotropia. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:1215–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Holmes JM, Birch EE, Leske DA, Fu VL, Mohney BG. New tests of distance stereoacuity and their role in evaluating intermittent exotropia. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:1215–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Adams WE, Leske DA, Hatt SR, Holmes JM. Defining real change in measures of stereoacuity. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:281–5.CrossRefPubMed Adams WE, Leske DA, Hatt SR, Holmes JM. Defining real change in measures of stereoacuity. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:281–5.CrossRefPubMed
22.
23.
go back to reference von Gunter K, Noorden MD, Emilio C, Campos MD. Binocular vision and ocular motility theory and management of Strabismus. Mosby Inc., sixth edition 2002; 631 pages, 315 illustrations. Am Orthopt J. 2002;2001(51):161–2. von Gunter K, Noorden MD, Emilio C, Campos MD. Binocular vision and ocular motility theory and management of Strabismus. Mosby Inc., sixth edition 2002; 631 pages, 315 illustrations. Am Orthopt J. 2002;2001(51):161–2.
24.
go back to reference Lam AK, Chau AS, Lam WY, Leung GY, Man BS. Effect of naturally occurring visual acuity differences between two eyes in stereoacuity. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1996;16:189–95.CrossRefPubMed Lam AK, Chau AS, Lam WY, Leung GY, Man BS. Effect of naturally occurring visual acuity differences between two eyes in stereoacuity. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1996;16:189–95.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Distant stereoacuity in children with anisometropic amblyopia
Authors
Yeon Woong Chung
Shin Hae Park
Sun Young Shin
Publication date
01-09-2017
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology / Issue 5/2017
Print ISSN: 0021-5155
Electronic ISSN: 1613-2246
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-017-0518-9

Other articles of this Issue 5/2017

Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology 5/2017 Go to the issue