Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 1/2023

20-10-2022 | Distal Radius Fracture | Original Paper

Methods of assessment of the level of surgeons for minimally invasive fixation of distal radius fractures: “expertise” versus “performance”

Authors: François Ducournau, Laela El Amiri, Paul Vernet, Marie-Cécile Sapa, Philippe Liverneaux

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

The results of surgical techniques vary depending on the level of the surgeon’s experience. The level of expertise can be evaluated quantitatively or qualitatively. In this study, we evaluated the duration of the procedure and the size of the incision of minimally invasive fixation of distal radius fractures as a means of grading expertise and surgical performance. The null hypothesis of our study was that the level of expertise did not match the level of performance.

Material and methods

The study included 52 surgeons split in five levels of expertise who had performed 467 minimally invasive fixations of distal radius fractures. The performance of the surgeons in terms of duration of the procedure and size of the incision were scored according to the five levels of surgical experience using four different methodologies: clinical (setting limits compared to data found in literature), statistical (setting statistical limits of comparison in percentiles (20th, 40th, 60th, 80th) for each of the two parameters measured), arithmetical (setting limits compared to equal intervals for each of the 2 variables), and success rate (setting a threshold for each of the 2 variables).

Results

Our results showed a great disparity between levels of experience depending on the method used. The scores for levels 1 and 2 were 72% for expertise, 13% for performance according to the clinical method, 75% for the statistical method, 0% for the arithmetical method, and 57% according the success rate. The rate of level 3 was 23% for expertise, 41% for performance by the clinical method, 17% by the statistical method, 17% by the arithmetical method, and 15% by the success rate. The rates of levels 4 and 5 were 5% for expertise, 46% for performance clinical method, 8% by the statistical method, 83% by the arithmetical method, and 28% by the success rate.

Discussion

The null hypothesis of our study was confirmed by the results which show that there was no correlation between levels of expertise and performance. The clinical method of assessment appears to reflect best the true level of performance of the surgeon.

Conclusion

Publications reporting the results of a surgical technique for a given pathology should always mention the level of performance as measured on a clinical scale.
Literature
5.
go back to reference Ericsson KA (2018) The differential influence of experience, practice, and deliberate practice on the development of superior individual performance of experts. In: Ericsson KA, Hoffman RR, Kozbelt A, Williams AM (eds) Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (2nd, Revised. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 745–769CrossRef Ericsson KA (2018) The differential influence of experience, practice, and deliberate practice on the development of superior individual performance of experts. In: Ericsson KA, Hoffman RR, Kozbelt A, Williams AM (eds) Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (2nd, Revised. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 745–769CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Marsh JL, Slongo TF, Agel J, Broderick JS, Creevey W, DeCoster TA, Prokuski L, Sirkin MS, Ziran B, Henley B, Audigé L (2007) Fracture and dislocation classification compendium — 2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee. J Orthop Trauma 21(10 Suppl):S1-133. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200711101-00001CrossRef Marsh JL, Slongo TF, Agel J, Broderick JS, Creevey W, DeCoster TA, Prokuski L, Sirkin MS, Ziran B, Henley B, Audigé L (2007) Fracture and dislocation classification compendium — 2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee. J Orthop Trauma 21(10 Suppl):S1-133. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1097/​00005131-200711101-00001CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Agarwalla A, Gowd AK, Yao K, Bohl DD, Amin NH, Verma NN, Forsythe B, Liu JN (2019) A 15-minute incremental increase in operative duration is associated with an additional risk of complications within 30 days after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Cuff Repair Orthop J Sports Med 31 7(7):2325967119860752. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967119860752CrossRef Agarwalla A, Gowd AK, Yao K, Bohl DD, Amin NH, Verma NN, Forsythe B, Liu JN (2019) A 15-minute incremental increase in operative duration is associated with an additional risk of complications within 30 days after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Cuff Repair Orthop J Sports Med 31 7(7):2325967119860752. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1177/​2325967119860752​CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Methods of assessment of the level of surgeons for minimally invasive fixation of distal radius fractures: “expertise” versus “performance”
Authors
François Ducournau
Laela El Amiri
Paul Vernet
Marie-Cécile Sapa
Philippe Liverneaux
Publication date
20-10-2022
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 1/2023
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05609-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

International Orthopaedics 1/2023 Go to the issue