Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 3/2017

01-03-2017 | Original Article

Distal junctional kyphosis in patients with Scheuermann’s disease: a retrospective radiographic analysis

Authors: Amir Ghasemi, Timo Stubig, Luigi A. Nasto, Malik Ahmed, Hossein Mehdian

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the relationship between preoperative and postoperative spinopelvic alignment and occurrence of DJK/DJF.

Study design/setting

This was a retrospective observational cohort study.

Patient sample

The sample included 40 patients who underwent posterior correction of SK from January 2006 to December 2014.

Outcome measures

Correlation analysis between the preoperative and postoperative spinopelvic alignment parameters and development of DJK over the course of the study period were studied.

Methods

Whole spine X-rays obtained before surgery, 3 months after surgery and at the latest follow-up were analyzed. The following parameters were measured: maximum of thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) and LIV plumb line. Development of DJK was considered as the primary end point of the study. The patient population was split into a control and DJK group, with 34 patients and 6 patients, respectively. Statistic analysis was performed using unpaired t test for normal contribution and Mann–Whitney test for skew distributed values. The significance level was set to 0.05.

Results

DJK occurred in 15% (n = 6) over the study period. There was a significantly lower postoperative TK for the group with DJK (42.4 ± 5.3 vs 49.8 ± 6.7, p = 0.015). LIV plumb line showed higher negative values in the DJK group (−43.6 ± 25.1 vs −2.2 ± 17.8, p = 0.0435). Furthermore, postoperative LL changes were lower for the DJK group (33.84 ± 13.86% vs 31.77 ± 14.05, p < 0.0001.) The age of the patients who developed DJK was also significantly lower than that of the control group (16.8 ± 1.7 vs 19.6 ± 4.9, p = 0.0024.)

Conclusions

SK patients who developed DJK appeared to have a significantly higher degree of TK correction and more negative LIV plumb line. In addition, there may be a higher risk for DJK in patients undergoing corrective surgery at a younger age.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lowe TG, Line BG (2007) Evidence based medicine: analysis of Scheuermann kyphosis. Spine 32(19):S115–S119CrossRefPubMed Lowe TG, Line BG (2007) Evidence based medicine: analysis of Scheuermann kyphosis. Spine 32(19):S115–S119CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Wood KB, Melikian R, Villamil F (2012) Adult Scheuermann kyphosis: evaluation, management, and new developments. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 20(2):113–121PubMed Wood KB, Melikian R, Villamil F (2012) Adult Scheuermann kyphosis: evaluation, management, and new developments. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 20(2):113–121PubMed
3.
4.
go back to reference Hosman AJ, Langeloo DD, de Kleuver M, Anderson PG, Veth RP, Slot GH (2002) Analysis of the sagittal plane after surgical management for Scheuermann’s disease: a view on overcorrection and the use of an anterior release. Spine 27(2):167–175CrossRefPubMed Hosman AJ, Langeloo DD, de Kleuver M, Anderson PG, Veth RP, Slot GH (2002) Analysis of the sagittal plane after surgical management for Scheuermann’s disease: a view on overcorrection and the use of an anterior release. Spine 27(2):167–175CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Mehdian H, Khurana A, Stokes OM (2015) Posterior spinal fusion and correction of Scheuermann kyphosis. Eur Spine J 24(5):660–663CrossRef Mehdian H, Khurana A, Stokes OM (2015) Posterior spinal fusion and correction of Scheuermann kyphosis. Eur Spine J 24(5):660–663CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Coe JD, Smith JS, Berven S, Arlet V, Donaldson W, Hanson D, Mudiyam R, Perra J, Owen J, Marks MC (2010) Complications of spinal fusion for Scheuermann kyphosis: a report of the Scoliosis Research Society Morbidity and Mortality Committee. Spine 35(1):99–103CrossRefPubMed Coe JD, Smith JS, Berven S, Arlet V, Donaldson W, Hanson D, Mudiyam R, Perra J, Owen J, Marks MC (2010) Complications of spinal fusion for Scheuermann kyphosis: a report of the Scoliosis Research Society Morbidity and Mortality Committee. Spine 35(1):99–103CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Cho K-J, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Kamiya M, Sides B (2009) Selection of the optimal distal fusion level in posterior instrumentation and fusion for thoracic hyperkyphosis: the sagittal stable vertebra concept. Spine 34(8):765–770CrossRefPubMed Cho K-J, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Kamiya M, Sides B (2009) Selection of the optimal distal fusion level in posterior instrumentation and fusion for thoracic hyperkyphosis: the sagittal stable vertebra concept. Spine 34(8):765–770CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Denis F, Sun EC, Winter RB (2009) Incidence and risk factors for proximal and distal junctional kyphosis following surgical treatment for Scheuermann kyphosis: minimum five-year follow-up. Spine 34(20):E729–E734CrossRefPubMed Denis F, Sun EC, Winter RB (2009) Incidence and risk factors for proximal and distal junctional kyphosis following surgical treatment for Scheuermann kyphosis: minimum five-year follow-up. Spine 34(20):E729–E734CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Lowe TG, Kasten MD (1994) An analysis of sagittal curves and balance after Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation for kyphosis secondary to Scheuermann’s disease: a review of 32 patients. Spine 19(15):1680–1685CrossRefPubMed Lowe TG, Kasten MD (1994) An analysis of sagittal curves and balance after Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation for kyphosis secondary to Scheuermann’s disease: a review of 32 patients. Spine 19(15):1680–1685CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Yanik HS, Ketenci IE, Coskun T, Ulusoy A, Erdem S (2016) Selection of distal fusion level in posterior instrumentation and fusion of Scheuermann kyphosis: is fusion to sagittal stable vertebra necessary? Eur Spine J 25(2):583–589CrossRefPubMed Yanik HS, Ketenci IE, Coskun T, Ulusoy A, Erdem S (2016) Selection of distal fusion level in posterior instrumentation and fusion of Scheuermann kyphosis: is fusion to sagittal stable vertebra necessary? Eur Spine J 25(2):583–589CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Sørensen KH (1964) Scheuermann's juvenile kyphosis: clinical appearances, radiography, aetiology, and prognosis. Munksgaard Sørensen KH (1964) Scheuermann's juvenile kyphosis: clinical appearances, radiography, aetiology, and prognosis. Munksgaard
12.
go back to reference Bradford DS (1977) Juvenile kyphosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 128:45–55 Bradford DS (1977) Juvenile kyphosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 128:45–55
13.
go back to reference Nasto LA, Perez-Romera AB, Shalabi ST, Quraishi NA, Mehdian H (2016) Correlation between preoperative spinopelvic alignment and risk of proximal junctional kyphosis after posterior-only surgical correction of Scheuermann kyphosis. Spine J 16(4):S26–S33CrossRefPubMed Nasto LA, Perez-Romera AB, Shalabi ST, Quraishi NA, Mehdian H (2016) Correlation between preoperative spinopelvic alignment and risk of proximal junctional kyphosis after posterior-only surgical correction of Scheuermann kyphosis. Spine J 16(4):S26–S33CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Geck MJ, Macagno A, Ponte A, Shufflebarger HL (2007) The Ponte procedure: posterior only treatment of Scheuermann’s kyphosis using segmental posterior shortening and pedicle screw instrumentation. J Spinal Disord Tech 20(8):586–593CrossRefPubMed Geck MJ, Macagno A, Ponte A, Shufflebarger HL (2007) The Ponte procedure: posterior only treatment of Scheuermann’s kyphosis using segmental posterior shortening and pedicle screw instrumentation. J Spinal Disord Tech 20(8):586–593CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Lonner BS, Newton P, Betz R, Scharf C, O’Brien M, Sponseller P, Lenke L, Crawford A, Lowe T, Letko L (2007) Operative management of Scheuermann’s kyphosis in 78 patients: radiographic outcomes, complications, and technique. Spine 32(24):2644–2652CrossRefPubMed Lonner BS, Newton P, Betz R, Scharf C, O’Brien M, Sponseller P, Lenke L, Crawford A, Lowe T, Letko L (2007) Operative management of Scheuermann’s kyphosis in 78 patients: radiographic outcomes, complications, and technique. Spine 32(24):2644–2652CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Lowe TG, Lenke L, Betz R, Newton P, Clements D, Haher T, Crawford A, Letko L, Wilson LA (2006) Distal junctional kyphosis of adolescent idiopathic thoracic curves following anterior or posterior instrumented fusion: incidence, risk factors, and prevention. Spine 31(3):299–302CrossRefPubMed Lowe TG, Lenke L, Betz R, Newton P, Clements D, Haher T, Crawford A, Letko L, Wilson LA (2006) Distal junctional kyphosis of adolescent idiopathic thoracic curves following anterior or posterior instrumented fusion: incidence, risk factors, and prevention. Spine 31(3):299–302CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Sturm PF, Dobson JC, Armstrong GW (1993) The surgical management of Scheuermann’s disease. Spine 18(6):685–691CrossRefPubMed Sturm PF, Dobson JC, Armstrong GW (1993) The surgical management of Scheuermann’s disease. Spine 18(6):685–691CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Arlet V, Aebi M (2013) Junctional spinal disorders in operated adult spinal deformities: present understanding and future perspectives. Eur Spine J 22(2):276–295CrossRefPubMedCentral Arlet V, Aebi M (2013) Junctional spinal disorders in operated adult spinal deformities: present understanding and future perspectives. Eur Spine J 22(2):276–295CrossRefPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Yagi M, Akilah KB, Boachie-Adjei O (2011) Incidence, risk factors and classification of proximal junctional kyphosis: surgical outcomes review of adult idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 36(1):E60–E68CrossRefPubMed Yagi M, Akilah KB, Boachie-Adjei O (2011) Incidence, risk factors and classification of proximal junctional kyphosis: surgical outcomes review of adult idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 36(1):E60–E68CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Lonner BS, Toombs CS, Guss M, Braaksma B, Shah SA, Samdani A, Shufflebarger H, Sponseller P, Newton PO (2015) Complications in operative Scheuermann kyphosis: do the pitfalls differ from operative adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? Spine 40(5):305–311CrossRefPubMed Lonner BS, Toombs CS, Guss M, Braaksma B, Shah SA, Samdani A, Shufflebarger H, Sponseller P, Newton PO (2015) Complications in operative Scheuermann kyphosis: do the pitfalls differ from operative adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? Spine 40(5):305–311CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Lundine K, Turner P, Johnson M (2012) Thoracic hyperkyphosis: assessment of the distal fusion level. Glob Spine J 2(02):065–070CrossRef Lundine K, Turner P, Johnson M (2012) Thoracic hyperkyphosis: assessment of the distal fusion level. Glob Spine J 2(02):065–070CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Papagelopoulos PJ, Klassen RA, Peterson HA, Dekutoski MB (2001) Surgical treatment of Scheuermann’s disease with segmental compression instrumentation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 386:139–149CrossRef Papagelopoulos PJ, Klassen RA, Peterson HA, Dekutoski MB (2001) Surgical treatment of Scheuermann’s disease with segmental compression instrumentation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 386:139–149CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Schwab F, Lafage V, Boyce R, Skalli W, Farcy J-P (2006) Gravity line analysis in adult volunteers: age-related correlation with spinal parameters, pelvic parameters, and foot position. Spine 31(25):E959–E967CrossRefPubMed Schwab F, Lafage V, Boyce R, Skalli W, Farcy J-P (2006) Gravity line analysis in adult volunteers: age-related correlation with spinal parameters, pelvic parameters, and foot position. Spine 31(25):E959–E967CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Schwab F, Patel A, Ungar B, Farcy J-P, Lafage V (2010) Adult spinal deformity—postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery. Spine 35(25):2224–2231CrossRefPubMed Schwab F, Patel A, Ungar B, Farcy J-P, Lafage V (2010) Adult spinal deformity—postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery. Spine 35(25):2224–2231CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Boulay C, Tardieu C, Hecquet J, Benaim C, Mouilleseaux B, Marty C, Prat-Pradal D, Legaye J, Duval-Beaupère G, Pélissier J (2006) Sagittal alignment of spine and pelvis regulated by pelvic incidence: standard values and prediction of lordosis. Eur Spine J 15(4):415–422CrossRefPubMed Boulay C, Tardieu C, Hecquet J, Benaim C, Mouilleseaux B, Marty C, Prat-Pradal D, Legaye J, Duval-Beaupère G, Pélissier J (2006) Sagittal alignment of spine and pelvis regulated by pelvic incidence: standard values and prediction of lordosis. Eur Spine J 15(4):415–422CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J (2005) Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position. Spine 30(3):346–353CrossRefPubMed Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J (2005) Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position. Spine 30(3):346–353CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Duval-Beaupere G, Marty C, Barthel F, Boiseaubert B, Boulay C, Commard M, Coudert V, Cosson P, Descamps H, Hecquet J (2002) Sagittal profile of the spine prominent part of the pelvis. Stud Health Technol Inform 88:47PubMed Duval-Beaupere G, Marty C, Barthel F, Boiseaubert B, Boulay C, Commard M, Coudert V, Cosson P, Descamps H, Hecquet J (2002) Sagittal profile of the spine prominent part of the pelvis. Stud Health Technol Inform 88:47PubMed
28.
go back to reference Vialle R, Levassor N, Rillardon L, Templier A, Skalli W, Guigui P (2005) Radiographic analysis of the sagittal alignment and balance of the spine in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Jt Surg 87(2):260–267CrossRef Vialle R, Levassor N, Rillardon L, Templier A, Skalli W, Guigui P (2005) Radiographic analysis of the sagittal alignment and balance of the spine in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Jt Surg 87(2):260–267CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Legaye J, Duval-Beaupere G, Hecquet J, Marty C (1998) Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J 7(2):99–103CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Legaye J, Duval-Beaupere G, Hecquet J, Marty C (1998) Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J 7(2):99–103CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Noseda O, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J (2006) The vertical projection of the sum of the ground reactive forces of a standing patient is not the same as the C7 plumb line: a radiographic study of the sagittal alignment of 153 asymptomatic volunteers. Spine 31(11):E320–E325CrossRefPubMed Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Noseda O, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J (2006) The vertical projection of the sum of the ground reactive forces of a standing patient is not the same as the C7 plumb line: a radiographic study of the sagittal alignment of 153 asymptomatic volunteers. Spine 31(11):E320–E325CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Lafage R, Schwab F, Challier V, Henry JK, Gum J, Smith J, Hostin R, Shaffrey C, Kim HJ, Ames C (2016) Defining spino-pelvic alignment thresholds: should operative goals in adult spinal deformity surgery account for age? Spine 41(1):62–68CrossRefPubMed Lafage R, Schwab F, Challier V, Henry JK, Gum J, Smith J, Hostin R, Shaffrey C, Kim HJ, Ames C (2016) Defining spino-pelvic alignment thresholds: should operative goals in adult spinal deformity surgery account for age? Spine 41(1):62–68CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Distal junctional kyphosis in patients with Scheuermann’s disease: a retrospective radiographic analysis
Authors
Amir Ghasemi
Timo Stubig
Luigi A. Nasto
Malik Ahmed
Hossein Mehdian
Publication date
01-03-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4924-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

European Spine Journal 3/2017 Go to the issue