Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Maternal and Child Health Journal 5/2007

01-09-2007 | Original Paper

Disparities Rank High in Prioritized Research, Systems and Service Delivery Needs in Missouri

Authors: Pamela K. Xaverius, Sherri Homan, Paula F. Nickelson, Leigh E. Tenkku

Published in: Maternal and Child Health Journal | Issue 5/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives: An essential function of public health is to conduct research and in Missouri, a research agenda was initiated to promote the health and well being of women and children. In 2005, a survey was emailed to 180 maternal and child health (MCH) researchers throughout the state, with 130 responding for a 72.2% response rate. These individuals were asked to select research priorities out of a list of 130 research agenda items, identify personal areas of expertise, and to recommend new research topics. Results: Results focused on identifying research priorities and research experts. The first, of the five leading research priorities, was researching disparities in terms of age, race, ethnicity, and gender, regarding sexually transmitted diseases, chronic disease, birth outcomes, prenatal care, access to care, childhood exposure to lead, immunizations and vaccinations, mental health, substance abuse, and oral health. The four remaining, of the top five specific research priorities, in order of priority, included (2) reducing barriers to health care access, (3) constructing research ecologically, (4) increasing access to oral health care for children, and (5) reducing the prevalence of children who are at-risk for being overweight. Of the 130 respondents, 83.1% reported at least one area of expertise, with a mean of 7.4 areas of expertise per respondent (range 0–41). Forty percent of the respondents reported health care access as an area of expertise, followed by school health, community development, family support, and pre/post natal care (38.5%, 36.2%, 30.0%, 28.5%, and 26.9%) respectively. Interestingly, only 17.7% of the respondents reported disparities as their area of expertise. Conclusions: The goal of moving innovations towards changes in practice can only happen when resources are available to assess innovations and communities are ready to implement those innovations. The prioritization of this MCH research agenda, prioritized by a community of MCH researchers with expertise in conducting MCH related research, is the first step towards changes in practice, ultimately leading to improvements in the health of women and children in Missouri.
Literature
1.
go back to reference US Department of Health and Senior Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Maternal and Child Health Bureau. Maternal and Child Health Research Program Strategic Research Issues: FY 2004–2009. Retrieved on March 17, 2006 at www.mchb.hrsa.gov/programs/research/issues.htm#mchpopula- tions. US Department of Health and Senior Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Maternal and Child Health Bureau. Maternal and Child Health Research Program Strategic Research Issues: FY 2004–2009. Retrieved on March 17, 2006 at www.mchb.hrsa.gov/programs/research/issues.htm#mchpopula- tions.
2.
go back to reference MCHB Fact Sheet. Rockville, MD, Maternal and Child Health Bureau; 2003. p. 1–2. MCHB Fact Sheet. Rockville, MD, Maternal and Child Health Bureau; 2003. p. 1–2.
3.
go back to reference Rosenberg L, Palmer J, Wise L, Horton N, Corwin N. Perceptions of racial discrimination and the risk of preterm birth. Epidemiology 2002;13:646–52PubMedCrossRef Rosenberg L, Palmer J, Wise L, Horton N, Corwin N. Perceptions of racial discrimination and the risk of preterm birth. Epidemiology 2002;13:646–52PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Collins J, David R, Symons R, Handler A, Wall S, Dwyer L. Low-income African-American mothers’ perception of exposure to racial discrimination and infant birth weight. Epidemiology 2000;11:337–9PubMedCrossRef Collins J, David R, Symons R, Handler A, Wall S, Dwyer L. Low-income African-American mothers’ perception of exposure to racial discrimination and infant birth weight. Epidemiology 2000;11:337–9PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference James S. Racial and ethnic differences in infant mortality and low birth weight: A psychosocial critique. Ann Epidemiol 1993;3:130–6PubMedCrossRef James S. Racial and ethnic differences in infant mortality and low birth weight: A psychosocial critique. Ann Epidemiol 1993;3:130–6PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Mustillo S, Krieger N, Gunderson E, Sidney S, McCreath H, Kiefe C. Self reported experiences of racial discrimination and Black-White differences in preterm and low birth weight deliveries: the CARDIA study. Am J Public Health 2004;94:2125–31PubMedCrossRef Mustillo S, Krieger N, Gunderson E, Sidney S, McCreath H, Kiefe C. Self reported experiences of racial discrimination and Black-White differences in preterm and low birth weight deliveries: the CARDIA study. Am J Public Health 2004;94:2125–31PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Korenbrot C, Steinberg A, Bender C, Newberry S. Preconception care: A systematic review. Matern Child Health J 2002;6:75–88PubMedCrossRef Korenbrot C, Steinberg A, Bender C, Newberry S. Preconception care: A systematic review. Matern Child Health J 2002;6:75–88PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010. 2nd ed. With Understanding and Improving Health and Objectives for Improving Health. 2 vols. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, November 2000 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010. 2nd ed. With Understanding and Improving Health and Objectives for Improving Health. 2 vols. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, November 2000
9.
go back to reference Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. The Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research; 1979 Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. The Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research; 1979
10.
go back to reference Green L, Mercer S. Can public health researchers and agencies reconcile the push from funding bodies and the pull from communities? Am J Public Health 2001. pp. 1926–9 Green L, Mercer S. Can public health researchers and agencies reconcile the push from funding bodies and the pull from communities? Am J Public Health 2001. pp. 1926–9
11.
go back to reference U.S. Department of Health and Human Resources, U.S. Public Health Service. The public health workforce: An agenda for the 21st century, Full report of the Public Health Functions Project. Washington, D.C. 1997 U.S. Department of Health and Human Resources, U.S. Public Health Service. The public health workforce: An agenda for the 21st century, Full report of the Public Health Functions Project. Washington, D.C. 1997
12.
go back to reference Handler A, Issel M, Turnock B. A conceptual framework to measure performance of the public health system. Am J Public Health 2001;91:1235–9PubMed Handler A, Issel M, Turnock B. A conceptual framework to measure performance of the public health system. Am J Public Health 2001;91:1235–9PubMed
13.
go back to reference Kazdin A. Developing a research agenda for child and adolescent psychotherapy. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2000;57:829–35PubMedCrossRef Kazdin A. Developing a research agenda for child and adolescent psychotherapy. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2000;57:829–35PubMedCrossRef
14.
15.
go back to reference Rodin J, Ickovics J. Women's health: Review and research agenda as we approach the 21st century. Am Psychol 1990;45:1018–1034CrossRef Rodin J, Ickovics J. Women's health: Review and research agenda as we approach the 21st century. Am Psychol 1990;45:1018–1034CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Chattopadhyay S, Carande-Kulis V. Economics of prevention: The public health research agenda. J Public Health Manag Pract 2004;10:467–71PubMed Chattopadhyay S, Carande-Kulis V. Economics of prevention: The public health research agenda. J Public Health Manag Pract 2004;10:467–71PubMed
17.
go back to reference Koch T, Brown M, Selim P, Isam C. Towards the eradication of head lice: Literature review and research agenda. J Clin Nurs 2001;10:364–71PubMedCrossRef Koch T, Brown M, Selim P, Isam C. Towards the eradication of head lice: Literature review and research agenda. J Clin Nurs 2001;10:364–71PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Laflamme L, Diderichsen F. Social differences in traffic injury risks in childhood and youth: A literature review and research agenda. J Prev 2000;6:293–8 Laflamme L, Diderichsen F. Social differences in traffic injury risks in childhood and youth: A literature review and research agenda. J Prev 2000;6:293–8
19.
go back to reference Ozanne-Smith J, Ashby K, Stathakis V. Dog bite and injury prevention: Analysis, critical review, and research agenda. Inj Prev 2001;7:321–6PubMedCrossRef Ozanne-Smith J, Ashby K, Stathakis V. Dog bite and injury prevention: Analysis, critical review, and research agenda. Inj Prev 2001;7:321–6PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Carcillo J. Reducing the global burden of sepsis in infants and children: A clinical practice research agenda. Pediatric Crit Care Med 2005;6:S157–164CrossRef Carcillo J. Reducing the global burden of sepsis in infants and children: A clinical practice research agenda. Pediatric Crit Care Med 2005;6:S157–164CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Green N, Damus K, Simpson J, Iams J, Reece A, Jobel C, Merkatz I, Greene M, Schwarz R. Research agenda for preterm birth: Recommendations from the March of Dimes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193:626–35PubMedCrossRef Green N, Damus K, Simpson J, Iams J, Reece A, Jobel C, Merkatz I, Greene M, Schwarz R. Research agenda for preterm birth: Recommendations from the March of Dimes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193:626–35PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Fernandopulle R, Ferris T, Epstein A, McNeil B, Newhouse J, Pisano G, Blumenthal D. A research agenda for bridging the quality chasm: Bridging the quality chasm requires a marriage between research and action. Health Affairs; March/April 2003. p. 178–89 Fernandopulle R, Ferris T, Epstein A, McNeil B, Newhouse J, Pisano G, Blumenthal D. A research agenda for bridging the quality chasm: Bridging the quality chasm requires a marriage between research and action. Health Affairs; March/April 2003. p. 178–89
23.
24.
go back to reference Seidel J, Henderson D, Tittle S, Jaffe D, Spaite D, Dean M, Gausche M, Lewis R, Cooper A, Zaritsky A, Espisito T, Maederis D. Priorites for research in emergency medical services for children: Results of a consensus conference. Emerg Nurses Assoc 1999;25:12–6CrossRef Seidel J, Henderson D, Tittle S, Jaffe D, Spaite D, Dean M, Gausche M, Lewis R, Cooper A, Zaritsky A, Espisito T, Maederis D. Priorites for research in emergency medical services for children: Results of a consensus conference. Emerg Nurses Assoc 1999;25:12–6CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Koumans E, Kandrick J. Preventing adverse sequelae of bacterial vaginosis: A public health program and research agenda. Sex Transm Dis 2001;28:292–7PubMedCrossRef Koumans E, Kandrick J. Preventing adverse sequelae of bacterial vaginosis: A public health program and research agenda. Sex Transm Dis 2001;28:292–7PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Marin G, Amaro H, Eisenberg C, Opavastitzer S. The development of a relevant and comprehensive research agenda to improve Hispanic health. Public Health Rep 1993;108:546–50PubMed Marin G, Amaro H, Eisenberg C, Opavastitzer S. The development of a relevant and comprehensive research agenda to improve Hispanic health. Public Health Rep 1993;108:546–50PubMed
27.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine. Corssing the Quality Chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 2001 Institute of Medicine. Corssing the Quality Chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 2001
28.
go back to reference Balas E, Weingarten S, Garb C, Blumenthal D, Boren S, Brown G. Improving preventive care by prompting physicians. Arch Intern Med 2000;160:301–8PubMedCrossRef Balas E, Weingarten S, Garb C, Blumenthal D, Boren S, Brown G. Improving preventive care by prompting physicians. Arch Intern Med 2000;160:301–8PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Vilnius D, Dandoy S. A priority rating system for public health programs. Public Health Rep 1990;105:463–70PubMed Vilnius D, Dandoy S. A priority rating system for public health programs. Public Health Rep 1990;105:463–70PubMed
30.
go back to reference Lawrence C. Standing still: Medical advances are infused into a system that has changed little since the turn of the 20th century. Hosp Health Netw 2003;77:126PubMed Lawrence C. Standing still: Medical advances are infused into a system that has changed little since the turn of the 20th century. Hosp Health Netw 2003;77:126PubMed
31.
go back to reference Tallon D, Chard J, Dieppe P. Relations between agendas of the research community and the research consumer. Lancet 2000;355:2037–40PubMedCrossRef Tallon D, Chard J, Dieppe P. Relations between agendas of the research community and the research consumer. Lancet 2000;355:2037–40PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Klesges L, Dzewaltowski D, Christenson A. Are we creating relevant behavioral medicine research? Show me the evidence! Ann Behav Med 2006;31:3–4PubMedCrossRef Klesges L, Dzewaltowski D, Christenson A. Are we creating relevant behavioral medicine research? Show me the evidence! Ann Behav Med 2006;31:3–4PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Healthy People 2010: Understanding and Improving health. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 2000 Healthy People 2010: Understanding and Improving health. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 2000
34.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine. The Future of Public Health. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1988 Institute of Medicine. The Future of Public Health. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1988
35.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine. The Future of the Public's Health in the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2003 Institute of Medicine. The Future of the Public's Health in the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2003
Metadata
Title
Disparities Rank High in Prioritized Research, Systems and Service Delivery Needs in Missouri
Authors
Pamela K. Xaverius
Sherri Homan
Paula F. Nickelson
Leigh E. Tenkku
Publication date
01-09-2007
Published in
Maternal and Child Health Journal / Issue 5/2007
Print ISSN: 1092-7875
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6628
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-007-0187-2

Other articles of this Issue 5/2007

Maternal and Child Health Journal 5/2007 Go to the issue