Skip to main content
Top
Published in: international journal of stomatology & occlusion medicine 1/2016

01-09-2016 | original article

Disinfection of alginate and addition silicon rubber-based impression materials

Comparative analysis of 1 % sodium hypochlorite and 2 % glutaraldehyde

Authors: Talal Awayed Al-Enazi, Amit V Naik

Published in: international journal of stomatology & occlusion medicine | Special Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Summary

The efficacy of 1 % sodium hypochlorite and 2 % glutaraldehyde disinfectant sprays on impression materials (alginate and addition silicone rubber-based impression material) was tested qualitatively and quantitatively for the presence of microflora on untreated (control group) and disinfected impression surfaces after 48 h of incubation using nutrient agar culture medium. Impressions were made of 60 dentulous volunteers aged 20–50 years who were apparently free from medical problems. The colony-forming units (cfu) were counted and compared with the control group. The control group showed growth of viridians streptococci, Streptococcus pneumonia, diphtheroids, and Neisseria. The alginate control group showed more microflora compared with the silicone impression surface of both the control group and the study group. Use of 1 % sodium hypochlorite yielded better results than did 2 % glutaraldehyde.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Clare C. Cross contamination control in prosthodontic practice. Int J Prosthodont. 1991;4:337–44. Clare C. Cross contamination control in prosthodontic practice. Int J Prosthodont. 1991;4:337–44.
2.
go back to reference Runnells RR, Powell GL. Managing infection control, hazards communications, and infection waste disposal. Dent Clin North Am. 1991;35:299–308.PubMed Runnells RR, Powell GL. Managing infection control, hazards communications, and infection waste disposal. Dent Clin North Am. 1991;35:299–308.PubMed
3.
go back to reference McNeill MR, Coulter WA. Disinfection of irreversible hydrocolloid impressions – a comparative study. Int J Prosthodont. 1992;5(6):563–7.PubMed McNeill MR, Coulter WA. Disinfection of irreversible hydrocolloid impressions – a comparative study. Int J Prosthodont. 1992;5(6):563–7.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Council on Dental Therapeutics, Council on Prosthetic Services and Dental Laboratory Relations. Guidelines for infection control in dental office and commercial dental laboratory. J Am Dent Assoc. 1985;100:969–72. Council on Dental Therapeutics, Council on Prosthetic Services and Dental Laboratory Relations. Guidelines for infection control in dental office and commercial dental laboratory. J Am Dent Assoc. 1985;100:969–72.
5.
go back to reference Glenwright HD, Shovelton DS. The prevention of cross-infection. Progress in the West Midlands. Br Dent J. 1989 Feb 25;166(4):125–7. Glenwright HD, Shovelton DS. The prevention of cross-infection. Progress in the West Midlands. Br Dent J. 1989 Feb 25;166(4):125–7.
6.
go back to reference Bergman B. Disinfection of prosthodontic impression materials: a literature review. Int J Prosthodont. 1989;2:537–42.PubMed Bergman B. Disinfection of prosthodontic impression materials: a literature review. Int J Prosthodont. 1989;2:537–42.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Rowe AH, Forrest JO. Probabilty of contamination and a method of disinfection. Br Dent J. 1978;145:184–6.CrossRefPubMed Rowe AH, Forrest JO. Probabilty of contamination and a method of disinfection. Br Dent J. 1978;145:184–6.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Wakefield CW. Laboratory contamination of dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 1980;65:143–6.CrossRef Wakefield CW. Laboratory contamination of dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 1980;65:143–6.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Jennings KJ, Samranayake LP. The persistence of microorganism on impression materials following disinfection. Int J Prosthodont. 1991;4(4):382–7.PubMed Jennings KJ, Samranayake LP. The persistence of microorganism on impression materials following disinfection. Int J Prosthodont. 1991;4(4):382–7.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Leung RL, Schonfeld SC. Gypsum casts as a potential source of microbial cross contamination. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;49:210–1.CrossRefPubMed Leung RL, Schonfeld SC. Gypsum casts as a potential source of microbial cross contamination. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;49:210–1.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Gerhardt DE, Williams HN. Factors affecting the stability of sodium hypochlorite solutions used to disinfect dental impressions. Quintessence Int. 1991;22:587–91.PubMed Gerhardt DE, Williams HN. Factors affecting the stability of sodium hypochlorite solutions used to disinfect dental impressions. Quintessence Int. 1991;22:587–91.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Disinfection of alginate and addition silicon rubber-based impression materials
Comparative analysis of 1 % sodium hypochlorite and 2 % glutaraldehyde
Authors
Talal Awayed Al-Enazi
Amit V Naik
Publication date
01-09-2016
Publisher
Springer Vienna
Published in
international journal of stomatology & occlusion medicine / Issue Special Issue 1/2016
Print ISSN: 1867-2221
Electronic ISSN: 1867-223X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12548-016-0148-8

Other articles of this Special Issue 1/2016

international journal of stomatology & occlusion medicine 1/2016 Go to the issue