Top

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

Published in:

01-11-2011 | Orthopaedic Surgery

Disc space distraction is a potent risk factor for adjacent disc disease after PLIF

Authors: Takashi Kaito, Noboru Hosono, Takeshi Fuji, Takahiro Makino, Kazuo Yonenobu

Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Issue 11/2011

Abstract

Summary of background data

We reported that excessive disc space distraction caused by insertion of large cages during posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) combined with pedicle screws (PS) induces adjacent segment disease (ASD). Spinous process plate (SPP) is known to allow cage subsidence when used in PLIF, since they cannot share vertical loads. We therefore hypothesize that the incidence of ASD after PLIF with SPP should be lower than that after PLIF with PS due to this loss of disc space distraction.

Materials and methods

Radiographic ASD is defined as development of spondylolisthesis >3 mm, decrease in disc height >3 mm, or intervertebral angle at flexion lesser than −5°. Symptomatic ASD is defined by a decrease of ≥4 points in Japanese Orthopedic Association score. One hundred and thirty patients with L4 spondylolisthesis were treated with either PLIF with SPP (n = 45) or PLIF with PS (n = 85) and followed up for a minimum of 2 years (mean, 39.0 months).

Results

L4–5 disc space distraction in the SPP group was significantly smaller (0.4 mm) as compared to the PS group (1.8 mm). The incidence of clinical ASD in the SPP group (2%, 1/45) was also significantly less than that in the PS group (15%, 13/85). Multivariate analysis showed that disc space distraction was the most significant risk factor.

Conclusions

Among various risk factors for ASD after PLIF, the excessive distraction of disc space proved to be a potent risk factor for ASD.

Cheh G, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG et al (2007) Adjacent segment disease following lumbar/thoracolumbar fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation. Spine 32:2253–2257PubMedCrossRef

Fuji T, Namekata M, Kaito T et al (2007) Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using BAK cage and the lumbar alligator spinal system for degenerative spondylolisthesis of the lumbar spine. Clin Orthop Surg 42(3):243–247 (Jpn)

Kumar MN, Jacquot F, Hall H (2001) Long term follow-up functional outcomes and radiographic changes at adjacent levels following lumbar spine fusion for degenerative disc disease. Eur Spine J 10:309–313PubMedCrossRef

Rohlmann A, Burra NK, Zander T, Bergmann G (2007) Comparison of the effects of bilateral posterior dynamic and rigid fixation devices on the loads in the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis. Eur Spine J 16:1223–1231PubMedCrossRef

Sudo H, Oda I, Abumi K et al (2006) Biomechanical study on the effect of five different lumbar reconstruction techniques on adjacent–level intradiscal pressure and lamina strain. J Neurosurg Spine 5:150–155PubMedCrossRef

Aota Y, Kumano K, Hirabayashi S (1995) Postfusion instability at the adjacent segments after rigid pedicle screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spinal disorders. J Spinal Diord 8:464–473

Cheh G, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG et al (2007) Adjacent segment disease following lumbar/thoracolumbar fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation. Spine 32:2253–2257PubMedCrossRef

Etebar S, Cahill DW (1999) Risk factors for adjacent-segment failure following lumbar fixation with rigid instrumentation for degenerative instability. J Neurosurg 90:163–169PubMed

Nakai S, Yoshizawa H, Kobayashi S (1999) Long-term follow-up study of posterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Spinal Disord 12:293–299PubMedCrossRef

10.

Okuda S, Oda T, Miyauchi A et al (2008) Lamina horizontalizaiton and facet tropism as the risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration after PLIF. Spine 33(25):2754–2758PubMedCrossRef

11.

Okuda S, Iwasaki M, Miyauchi A et al (2004) Risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration after PLIF. Spine 29(14):1535–1540PubMedCrossRef

12.

Kaito T, Hosono N, Mukai Y et al (2010) Excessive distraction of lumbar disc space inducesearly degeneration of the adjacent segment after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). J Neurosurg Spine 12:671–679PubMedCrossRef

13.

Leong YCJ, Chun SY, Grange WJ et al (1983) Long-term results of lumbar intervertebral disc prolapsed. Spine 8:797–799CrossRef

14.

Van Horn JR, Bohnen LMLJ (1992) The development of discopathy in lumbar discs adjacent to a lumbar anterior interbody spondylodesis. A retrospective matched-pair study with a postoperative follow-up of 16 years. Acta Orthop Belg 58:280–286PubMed

15.

Cheung KMC, Zhang YG, Lu DS et al (2003) Reduction of disc space distraction after anterior lumbar interbody fusion with autologous iliac crest graft. Spine 32:1385–1389

16.

Dennis S, Watkns R, Landaker S et al (1989) Comparison of disc space heights after anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 14:876–878PubMedCrossRef

17.

Kawamura M, Hosono N, Ohwada T et al (2007) Postoperative alignment change and cage subsidence after posterior lumbar interbody fusion with threaded cages and a spinous process plate. Clin Orthop Surg 42(1):63–67 (Jpn)

18.

Brantigan JW, Steffee AD (1993) A carbon fiber implant to aid interbody lumbar fusion. Two-year clinical result in the first 26 patients. Spine 18:2106–2107PubMedCrossRef

19.

Izumida S, Inoue S (1986) The criteria for evaluation of the results of operation for low back pain by the Japanese orthopaedic association. J Jpn Orthop Assoc 60:391–394 (Jpn)

20.

Ha KY, Shin JH, Kim KW et al (2007) The fate of anterior autogenous bone graft after anterior radical surgery with or without posterior instrumentation in the treatment of pyogenic lumbar spondylodiscitis. Spine 2:1856–1864CrossRef

21.

Nagaosa Y, Kikuchi S, Hasue M (1998) Pathoanatomic mechanisms of degenerative spondylolisthesis : a radiographic study. Spine 23:1447–1451PubMedCrossRef

22.

Vannaranta H, Floyd T, Ohnmeiss DD et al (1993) The relationship of facet tropism to degenerative disc disease. Spine 18:1000–1005CrossRef

23.

Wiltse LL, Radecki SE, Biel HM et al (1999) Comparative study of the incidence and severity of degenerative change in the transition zones after instrumented versus noninstrumented fusions of the lumbar spine. J Spinal Disord 12:27–33PubMedCrossRef

24.

Ohkohchi T, Ohwada T, Yamamoto T (2000) Long-term results of posterior lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disorders. Clin Orthop Surg 35(5):519–526 (Jpn)

25.

Nagata H, Schendel MJ, Transfeldt EE et al (1993) The effects of immobilization of long segments of the spine on the adjacent and distal fact force and lumbosacral motion. Spine 18:2471–2479PubMedCrossRef

26.

Yasukawa Y (1994) Age changes in the lumbar spine; radiological follow-up studies over more than ten years. J Jpn Orthop Assoc 68:854–863 (Jpn)

27.

Chosa E, Goto K, Totoribe K et al (2004) Analysis of the effect of lumbar spine fusion on the superior adjacent intervertebral disk in the presence of disk degeneration, using the three-dimensional finite element method. J Spinal Disord 17(2):134–139CrossRef

28.

Park P, Garton HJ, Gala VC et al (2004) Adjacent segment disease after lumbar and lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature. Spine 29:1938–1944PubMedCrossRef

29.

Hioki A, Miyamoto K, Kodama H et al (2005) Two-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative disc disease: improved clinical outcome with restroration of lumbar lordosis. Spine J 5:600–607PubMedCrossRef

30.

Schlegel JD, Smith JA, Schleusener RL (1996) Lumbar motion segment pathology adjacent to thoracolumbar, lumbar, and lumbosacral fusion. Spine 21:970–981PubMedCrossRef

31.

Umehara S, Zindrick MR, Patwardhan AG et al (2000) The biomechanical effect of postoperative hypolordosis in instrumented lumbar fusion on instrumented and adjacent spinal segments. Spine 25:1617–1624PubMedCrossRef

Title: Disc space distraction is a potent risk factor for adjacent disc disease after PLIF
Authors: Takashi Kaito
Noboru Hosono
Takeshi Fuji
Takahiro Makino
Kazuo Yonenobu
Publication date: 01-11-2011
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Issue 11/2011
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Electronic ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-011-1343-0

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Disc space distraction is a potent risk factor for adjacent disc disease after PLIF

Abstract

Summary of background data

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusions

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Summary of background data

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 11/2011

Intravertebral neotrabecularization as an expression of focal load transfer by a keel-design lumbar total disc arthroplasty

Painful lumbar spondylolysis among pediatric sports players: a pilot MRI study

Septic arthritis of the hip in patients with femoral head osteonecrosis

The influence of foot geometry on the calcaneal osteotomy angle based on two-dimensional static force analyses

rhBMP-2 not alendronate combined with HA-TCP biomaterial and distraction osteogenesis enhance bone formation

Metal-on-metal or metal-on-polyethylene for total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of prospective randomized studies