Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics 4/2020

01-10-2020 | Original Article

Digital zoom is a useful, simple, and cost-effective method of reducing radiation exposure in percutaneous coronary intervention

Authors: Kenji Hasegawa, Norio Umemoto, Sho Inoue, Yuri Iio, Naoki Shibata, Takashi Mizutani, Akinori Sawamura, Tsuyoshi Sugiura, Toshio Taniguchi, Toru Asai, Michiharu Yamada, Hideki Ishii, Toyoaki Murohara, Kiyokazu Shimizu

Published in: Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics | Issue 4/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Reducing radiation exposure is a very important issue in interventional cardiology techniques such as percutaneous coronary intervention. Although novel techniques to reduce radiation exposure are valuable, we should also reconsider older techniques. Digital zoom has been available in Japan from 2005. Digital zoom enlarges an 8-inch field of view (FOV) by 1.2 times, allowing visualization of a 6.7-inch FOV without FOV switching. We identified 2101 suitable cases of percutaneous intervention (PCI) and divided them into two groups according to the use of digital zoom; 1195 patients were included in the digital zoom group and 906 patients in the conventional group. We collected data regarding the reference air kerma (RAK) and dose-area product (DAP). We calculated RAK and DAP per minute fluoroscope time (RAK/min, DAP/min, respectively). There were intergroup differences in RAK, DAP, RAK/min, and DAP/min (digital zoom group vs conventional group; RAK, 1590 mGy [990–2410] vs 1850 [1220–2720], p < 0.01, RAK/min; 54.7 mGy/min [38.5–73.2] vs 71.2 [51.5–93.0], p < 0.01; DAP, 16,000 cGy × cm2 [10,300–24,400] vs 20,700 [13,400–29,500], p < 0.001; DAP/min, 557 cGy × cm2/min [392–737] vs 782 [571–1010], p < 0.01, respectively). Because of baseline differences between the two groups, we performed propensity score matching. Even after score matching, there were intergroup differences in DAP, DAP/min, RAK, and RAK/min. Furthermore, the least squares method showed that digital zoom is a significant predictor of RAK (β = 0.14, p < 0.01) and DAP (β = 0.20, p < 0.01). Digital zoom is an older cost-effective technique that can significantly reduce radiation exposure in PCI.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chida K, Inaba Y, Saito H, et al. Radiation dose of interventional radiology system using a flat-panel detector. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193(6):1680–5.CrossRef Chida K, Inaba Y, Saito H, et al. Radiation dose of interventional radiology system using a flat-panel detector. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193(6):1680–5.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Cousins C, Miller DL, Bernardi G, et al. ICRP PUBLICATION 120: radiological protection in cardiology. Ann ICRP. 2013;42(1):1–125.CrossRef Cousins C, Miller DL, Bernardi G, et al. ICRP PUBLICATION 120: radiological protection in cardiology. Ann ICRP. 2013;42(1):1–125.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Delewi R, Hoebers LP, Ramunddal T, et al. Clinical and procedural characteristics associated with higher radiation exposure during percutaneous coronary interventions and coronary angiography. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6(5):501–6.CrossRef Delewi R, Hoebers LP, Ramunddal T, et al. Clinical and procedural characteristics associated with higher radiation exposure during percutaneous coronary interventions and coronary angiography. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6(5):501–6.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Didier R, Magalhaes MA, Koifman E, et al. The utilisation of the cardiovascular automated radiation reduction X-ray system (CARS) in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory aids in the reduction of the patient radiation dose. EuroIntervention. 2016;12(8):e948–56.CrossRef Didier R, Magalhaes MA, Koifman E, et al. The utilisation of the cardiovascular automated radiation reduction X-ray system (CARS) in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory aids in the reduction of the patient radiation dose. EuroIntervention. 2016;12(8):e948–56.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ector J, Dragusin O, Adriaenssens B, et al. Obesity is a major determinant of radiation dose in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50(3):234–42.CrossRef Ector J, Dragusin O, Adriaenssens B, et al. Obesity is a major determinant of radiation dose in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50(3):234–42.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Faroux L, Blanpain T, Nazeyrollas P, et al. Trends in patient exposure to radiation in percutaneous coronary interventions over a 10-year period. Am J Cardiol. 2017;120(6):927–30.CrossRef Faroux L, Blanpain T, Nazeyrollas P, et al. Trends in patient exposure to radiation in percutaneous coronary interventions over a 10-year period. Am J Cardiol. 2017;120(6):927–30.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Geijer H, Beckman KW, Andersson T, Persliden J. Radiation dose optimization in coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). II. Clinical evaluation. Eur Radiol. 2002;12(11):2813–9.CrossRef Geijer H, Beckman KW, Andersson T, Persliden J. Radiation dose optimization in coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). II. Clinical evaluation. Eur Radiol. 2002;12(11):2813–9.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hansen JW, Foy A, Schmidt T, Ghahramani M, Chambers CE. Fluoroscopy pulse rate reduction during diagnostic and therapeutic imaging in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: an evaluation of radiation dose, procedure complications and outcomes. Catheteriz Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;89(4):665–70.CrossRef Hansen JW, Foy A, Schmidt T, Ghahramani M, Chambers CE. Fluoroscopy pulse rate reduction during diagnostic and therapeutic imaging in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: an evaluation of radiation dose, procedure complications and outcomes. Catheteriz Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;89(4):665–70.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference JCS Joint Working Group. Guideline for radiation safety in interventional cardiology (JCS2011)—digest version. Circ J. 2013;77(2):519–49.CrossRef JCS Joint Working Group. Guideline for radiation safety in interventional cardiology (JCS2011)—digest version. Circ J. 2013;77(2):519–49.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kato M, Chida K, Yoshida K, et al. Reduction method of patients’ radiation dose considering the size of field of view with a digital cine X-ray system loading a flat-panel detector. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2011;67(11):1443–7.CrossRef Kato M, Chida K, Yoshida K, et al. Reduction method of patients’ radiation dose considering the size of field of view with a digital cine X-ray system loading a flat-panel detector. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2011;67(11):1443–7.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Mercuri M, Mehta S, Xie C, Valettas N, Velianou JL, Natarajan MK. Radial artery access as a predictor of increased radiation exposure during a diagnostic cardiac catheterization procedure. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4(3):347–52.CrossRef Mercuri M, Mehta S, Xie C, Valettas N, Velianou JL, Natarajan MK. Radial artery access as a predictor of increased radiation exposure during a diagnostic cardiac catheterization procedure. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4(3):347–52.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ross RD, Joshi V, Carravallah DJ, Morrow WR. Reduced radiation during cardiac catheterization of infants using acquisition zoom technology. Am J Cardiol. 1997;79(5):691–3.CrossRef Ross RD, Joshi V, Carravallah DJ, Morrow WR. Reduced radiation during cardiac catheterization of infants using acquisition zoom technology. Am J Cardiol. 1997;79(5):691–3.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Togni M, Balmer F, Pfiffner D, Maier W, Zeiher AM, Meier B. Percutaneous coronary interventions in Europe 1992–2001. Eur Heart J. 2004;25(14):1208–13.CrossRef Togni M, Balmer F, Pfiffner D, Maier W, Zeiher AM, Meier B. Percutaneous coronary interventions in Europe 1992–2001. Eur Heart J. 2004;25(14):1208–13.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Tsapaki V, Magginas A, Vano E, et al. Factors that influence radiation dose in percutaneous coronary intervention. J Interv Cardiol. 2006;19(3):237–44.CrossRef Tsapaki V, Magginas A, Vano E, et al. Factors that influence radiation dose in percutaneous coronary intervention. J Interv Cardiol. 2006;19(3):237–44.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Al-Lamee R, Thompson D, Dehbi HM, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention in stable angina (ORBITA): a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet (Lond Engl). 2018;391(10115):31–40.CrossRef Al-Lamee R, Thompson D, Dehbi HM, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention in stable angina (ORBITA): a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet (Lond Engl). 2018;391(10115):31–40.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Digital zoom is a useful, simple, and cost-effective method of reducing radiation exposure in percutaneous coronary intervention
Authors
Kenji Hasegawa
Norio Umemoto
Sho Inoue
Yuri Iio
Naoki Shibata
Takashi Mizutani
Akinori Sawamura
Tsuyoshi Sugiura
Toshio Taniguchi
Toru Asai
Michiharu Yamada
Hideki Ishii
Toyoaki Murohara
Kiyokazu Shimizu
Publication date
01-10-2020
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics / Issue 4/2020
Print ISSN: 1868-4300
Electronic ISSN: 1868-4297
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-020-00639-5

Other articles of this Issue 4/2020

Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics 4/2020 Go to the issue