Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Patient Safety in Surgery 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research

Digital mobile technology facilitates HIPAA-sensitive perioperative messaging, improves physician-patient communication, and streamlines patient care

Authors: Chad R. Gordon, Kameron S. Rezzadeh, Andrew Li, Andrew Vardanian, Jonathan Zelken, Jamie T. Shores, Justin M. Sacks, Andres L. Segovia, Reza Jarrahy

Published in: Patient Safety in Surgery | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Mobile device technology has revolutionized interpersonal communication, but the application of this technology to the physician-patient relationship remains limited due to concerns over patient confidentiality and the security of digital information. Nevertheless, there is a continued focus on improving communication between doctors and patients in all fields of medicine as a means of improving patient care. In this study, we implement a novel communications platform to demonstrate that instantaneously sharing perioperative information with surgical patients and members of their support networks can improve patient care and strengthen the physician-patient relationship.

Methods

423 consecutive patients scheduled to undergo elective surgical procedures were offered complimentary registration to a secure, web-based service designed to distribute perioperative updates to a group of recipients designated by each patient via Short Message Service (SMS) and/or email. Messages were created by attending surgeons and delivered instantaneously through the web-based platform. In the postoperative period, patients and their designated message recipients, as well as participating healthcare providers, were asked to complete a survey designed to assess their experience with the messaging system. Survey results were statistically analyzed to determine satisfaction rates.

Results

Of the qualifying 423 patients, 313 opted to enroll in the study. On average, patients selected a total of 3.5 recipients to receive perioperative updates. A total of 1,195 electronic messages were generated for distribution to designated recipients during the study period and delivered to recipients located around the world. There were no documented errors or failures in message delivery. Satisfaction surveys were completed by 190 users of the service (73 %). Respondents identified themselves as either patients (n = 48, 25.5 %), family/friends (n = 120, 63.8 %), or healthcare providers (n = 15, 12 %). Satisfaction with the service was high: 94.2 % of users “enjoyed this software” and and 94.2 % of family/friends “felt more connected to their loved ones during surgery.” 92.5 % would “recommend their loved ones sign up for this service". Ninety percent of patients who completed the survey reported “an improved hospital experience

Conclusion

Digital communications platforms can facilitate the immediate transfer of HIPAA-compliant data to patients and their designees. Such systems can greatly improve the level of communication between physicians, patients, and patients’ families and caregivers. All types of users, including healthcare professionals, patients, and their loved ones, recorded high levels of satisfaction. Based on these observations, we conclude that mobile digital communications platforms represent a way to harness the power of social media to enhance patient care.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Merchant RM, Elmer S, Lurie N. Integrating social media into emergency preparedness efforts. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:289–91.CrossRefPubMed Merchant RM, Elmer S, Lurie N. Integrating social media into emergency preparedness efforts. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:289–91.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Vardanian AJ, Kusnezov N, Im D, et al. Social media use and impact on plastic surgery practice. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:1184–93.CrossRefPubMed Vardanian AJ, Kusnezov N, Im D, et al. Social media use and impact on plastic surgery practice. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:1184–93.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Whitten PS et al. Systematic review of cost effectiveness studies of telemedicine interventions. BMJ. 2002;354:1434–7.CrossRef Whitten PS et al. Systematic review of cost effectiveness studies of telemedicine interventions. BMJ. 2002;354:1434–7.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference AC Powell, Landman AB, Bates DW. In search of a few good apps. JAMA. 2014. AC Powell, Landman AB, Bates DW. In search of a few good apps. JAMA. 2014.
6.
go back to reference McLafferty RB, Williams RG, Lambert AD, et al. Surgeon communication behaviors that lead patients to not recommend the surgeon to family or friends: analysis and impact. Surgery. 2006;140:616–24.CrossRefPubMed McLafferty RB, Williams RG, Lambert AD, et al. Surgeon communication behaviors that lead patients to not recommend the surgeon to family or friends: analysis and impact. Surgery. 2006;140:616–24.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Travaline JM, Ruchinskas R, D'Alonzo Jr GE. Patient-physician communication: why and how. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2005;105(1):13–8.PubMed Travaline JM, Ruchinskas R, D'Alonzo Jr GE. Patient-physician communication: why and how. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2005;105(1):13–8.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Levinson W, Roter DL, Mullooly JP, Dull VT, Frankel RM. Physician-patient communication. The relationship with malpractice claims among primary care physicians and surgeons. JAMA. 1997;277:553–9.CrossRefPubMed Levinson W, Roter DL, Mullooly JP, Dull VT, Frankel RM. Physician-patient communication. The relationship with malpractice claims among primary care physicians and surgeons. JAMA. 1997;277:553–9.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Adamson TE, Tschann JM, Gullion DS, et al. Physician communication skills and malpractice claims: a complex relationship. West J Med. 1989;150:356–60.PubMedCentralPubMed Adamson TE, Tschann JM, Gullion DS, et al. Physician communication skills and malpractice claims: a complex relationship. West J Med. 1989;150:356–60.PubMedCentralPubMed
10.
go back to reference McLafferty RB, Williams RG, Lambert AD, et al. Surgeon communication behaviors that lead patients to not recommend the surgeon to family or friends: analysis and impact. Surgery. 2006;140:616–24.CrossRefPubMed McLafferty RB, Williams RG, Lambert AD, et al. Surgeon communication behaviors that lead patients to not recommend the surgeon to family or friends: analysis and impact. Surgery. 2006;140:616–24.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Bishop TF et al. Electronic communication improves access, but barriers to its widespread adoption remain. Health Aff. 2013;32(8):1361–7.CrossRef Bishop TF et al. Electronic communication improves access, but barriers to its widespread adoption remain. Health Aff. 2013;32(8):1361–7.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Trummer UF et al. Does physician–patient communication that aims at empowering patients improve clinical outcome? A case study. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;61(2):299–306.CrossRefPubMed Trummer UF et al. Does physician–patient communication that aims at empowering patients improve clinical outcome? A case study. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;61(2):299–306.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Digital mobile technology facilitates HIPAA-sensitive perioperative messaging, improves physician-patient communication, and streamlines patient care
Authors
Chad R. Gordon
Kameron S. Rezzadeh
Andrew Li
Andrew Vardanian
Jonathan Zelken
Jamie T. Shores
Justin M. Sacks
Andres L. Segovia
Reza Jarrahy
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Patient Safety in Surgery / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1754-9493
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-015-0070-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Patient Safety in Surgery 1/2015 Go to the issue