Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 7/2009

01-07-2009 | Breast

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in MR mammography (MRM): clinical comparison of echo planar imaging (EPI) and half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE) diffusion techniques

Authors: P. A. T. Baltzer, D. M. Renz, K.-H. Herrmann, M. Dietzel, I. Krumbein, M. Gajda, O. Camara, J. R. Reichenbach, W. A. Kaiser

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 7/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) techniques have shown potential to differentiate between benign and malignant neoplasms. However, the diagnostic significance of using DWI under routine conditions remains unclear. This study investigated the use of echo planar imaging (EPI) and half-Fourier acquired single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE)-DWI with respect to the three parameters: lesion visibility, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements, and size estimation. Following MRM (1.5 T), EPI- and HASTE-DWI were applied in 65 patients. Lesion visibility on DWI was compared with lesion visibility on subtracted contrast-enhanced T1w images (CE-T1w). Statistical tests were applied to diameter, visibility, and ADC value measurements. Seventy-four lesions were identified. ADC value measurements did not differ significantly between the two DWI sequences. The sensitivity and specificity of routine diagnostics (97.4% and 85.7%) were superior to EPI-DWI (87.2% and 82.9%) and HASTE-DWI (76.9% and 88.6%). Selecting only nonmass lesions, DWI did not prove to be of diagnostic value. Lesion demarcation by DWI was significantly lower compared with that by CE-T1w, with EPI-DWI showing the better performance (p < 0.001). No significant differences were found for size measurements between CE-T1w and DWI. Although clearly inferior compared with CE-T1w imaging, both DWI techniques are applicable for lesion assessment and size measurements.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS et al (2004) Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 233:830–849PubMedCrossRef Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS et al (2004) Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 233:830–849PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Echevarria JJ, Martin M, Saiz A et al (2006) Overall breast density in MR mammography: diagnostic and therapeutic implications in breast cancer. J Comput Assist Tomogr 30:140–147PubMedCrossRef Echevarria JJ, Martin M, Saiz A et al (2006) Overall breast density in MR mammography: diagnostic and therapeutic implications in breast cancer. J Comput Assist Tomogr 30:140–147PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Sardanelli F, Giuseppetti GM, Panizza P et al (2004) Sensitivity of MRI versus mammography for detecting foci of multifocal, multicentric breast cancer in Fatty and dense breasts using the whole-breast pathologic examination as a gold standard. AJR 183:1149–1157PubMed Sardanelli F, Giuseppetti GM, Panizza P et al (2004) Sensitivity of MRI versus mammography for detecting foci of multifocal, multicentric breast cancer in Fatty and dense breasts using the whole-breast pathologic examination as a gold standard. AJR 183:1149–1157PubMed
4.
go back to reference Winnekendonk G, Krug B, Warm M et al (2004) Diagnostic value of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast. Rofo 176:688–693PubMed Winnekendonk G, Krug B, Warm M et al (2004) Diagnostic value of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast. Rofo 176:688–693PubMed
5.
go back to reference Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P et al (2008) Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:3248–3258PubMedCrossRef Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P et al (2008) Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:3248–3258PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kuhl CK (2007) Current status of breast MR imaging. Part 2. Clinical applications. Radiology 244:672–691PubMedCrossRef Kuhl CK (2007) Current status of breast MR imaging. Part 2. Clinical applications. Radiology 244:672–691PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kuhl CK (2007) The current status of breast MR imaging. Part I. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice. Radiology 244:356–378PubMedCrossRef Kuhl CK (2007) The current status of breast MR imaging. Part I. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice. Radiology 244:356–378PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Mann RM, Kuhl CK, Kinkel K et al (2008) Breast MRI: guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging. Eur radiol 18:1307–1318PubMedCrossRef Mann RM, Kuhl CK, Kinkel K et al (2008) Breast MRI: guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging. Eur radiol 18:1307–1318PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Baum F, Fischer U, Vosshenrich R et al (2002) Classification of hypervascularized lesions in CE MR imaging of the breast. Eur radiol 12:1087–1092PubMedCrossRef Baum F, Fischer U, Vosshenrich R et al (2002) Classification of hypervascularized lesions in CE MR imaging of the breast. Eur radiol 12:1087–1092PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ikeda DM, Hylton NM, Kuhl CK et al (2003) MRI breast imaging reporting and data system atlas, 1 edn. American College of Radiology, Reston Ikeda DM, Hylton NM, Kuhl CK et al (2003) MRI breast imaging reporting and data system atlas, 1 edn. American College of Radiology, Reston
11.
go back to reference Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S et al (1999) Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology 211:101–110PubMed Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S et al (1999) Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology 211:101–110PubMed
12.
go back to reference Malich A, Fischer DR, Wurdinger S et al (2005) Potential MRI interpretation model: differentiation of benign from malignant breast masses. Ajr 185:964–970PubMedCrossRef Malich A, Fischer DR, Wurdinger S et al (2005) Potential MRI interpretation model: differentiation of benign from malignant breast masses. Ajr 185:964–970PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kaiser WA, Zeitler E (1989) MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Preliminary observations. Radiology 170:681–686PubMed Kaiser WA, Zeitler E (1989) MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Preliminary observations. Radiology 170:681–686PubMed
14.
go back to reference Guo Y, Cai YQ, Cai ZL et al (2002) Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 16:172–178PubMedCrossRef Guo Y, Cai YQ, Cai ZL et al (2002) Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 16:172–178PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Hatakenaka M, Soeda H, Yabuuchi H et al (2008) Apparent diffusion coefficients of breast tumors: clinical application. Magn Reson Med Sci 7:23–29PubMedCrossRef Hatakenaka M, Soeda H, Yabuuchi H et al (2008) Apparent diffusion coefficients of breast tumors: clinical application. Magn Reson Med Sci 7:23–29PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kinoshita T, Yashiro N, Ihara N et al (2002) Diffusion-weighted half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin echo imaging in breast tumors: differentiation of invasive ductal carcinoma from fibroadenoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 26:1042–1046PubMedCrossRef Kinoshita T, Yashiro N, Ihara N et al (2002) Diffusion-weighted half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin echo imaging in breast tumors: differentiation of invasive ductal carcinoma from fibroadenoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 26:1042–1046PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Luo JD, Liu YY, Zhang XL et al (2007) Application of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging to differential diagnosis of breast diseases. Ai zheng 26:168–171PubMed Luo JD, Liu YY, Zhang XL et al (2007) Application of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging to differential diagnosis of breast diseases. Ai zheng 26:168–171PubMed
18.
go back to reference Matsuoka A, Minato M, Harada M et al (2008) Comparison of 3.0-and 1.5-tesla diffusion-weighted imaging in the visibility of breast cancer. Radiat Med 26:15–20PubMedCrossRef Matsuoka A, Minato M, Harada M et al (2008) Comparison of 3.0-and 1.5-tesla diffusion-weighted imaging in the visibility of breast cancer. Radiat Med 26:15–20PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Roth Y, Ocherashvilli A, Daniels D et al (2008) Quantification of water compartmentation in cell suspensions by diffusion-weighted and T(2)-weighted MRI. Magn Reson Imaging 26:88–102PubMedCrossRef Roth Y, Ocherashvilli A, Daniels D et al (2008) Quantification of water compartmentation in cell suspensions by diffusion-weighted and T(2)-weighted MRI. Magn Reson Imaging 26:88–102PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Rubesova E, Grell AS, De Maertelaer V et al (2006) Quantitative diffusion imaging in breast cancer: a clinical prospective study. J Magn Reson Imaging 24:319–324PubMedCrossRef Rubesova E, Grell AS, De Maertelaer V et al (2006) Quantitative diffusion imaging in breast cancer: a clinical prospective study. J Magn Reson Imaging 24:319–324PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Wenkel E, Geppert C, Schulz-Wendtland R et al (2007) Diffusion weighted imaging in breast MRI: comparison of two different pulse sequences. Acad Radiol 14:1077–1083PubMedCrossRef Wenkel E, Geppert C, Schulz-Wendtland R et al (2007) Diffusion weighted imaging in breast MRI: comparison of two different pulse sequences. Acad Radiol 14:1077–1083PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Woodhams R, Matsunaga K, Iwabuchi K et al (2005) Diffusion-weighted imaging of malignant breast tumors: the usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value and ADC map for the detection of malignant breast tumors and evaluation of cancer extension. J Comput Assist Tomogr 29:644–649PubMedCrossRef Woodhams R, Matsunaga K, Iwabuchi K et al (2005) Diffusion-weighted imaging of malignant breast tumors: the usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value and ADC map for the detection of malignant breast tumors and evaluation of cancer extension. J Comput Assist Tomogr 29:644–649PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Woodhams R, Matsunaga K, Kan S et al (2005) ADC mapping of benign and malignant breast tumors. Magn Reson Med Sci 4:35–42PubMedCrossRef Woodhams R, Matsunaga K, Kan S et al (2005) ADC mapping of benign and malignant breast tumors. Magn Reson Med Sci 4:35–42PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Marini C, Iacconi C, Giannelli M et al (2007) Quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesion. Eur radiol 17:2646–2655PubMedCrossRef Marini C, Iacconi C, Giannelli M et al (2007) Quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesion. Eur radiol 17:2646–2655PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Kaiser W (1985) MRI of the female breast. First clinical results. Arch Int Physiol Biochim 93:67–76PubMedCrossRef Kaiser W (1985) MRI of the female breast. First clinical results. Arch Int Physiol Biochim 93:67–76PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Kuroki-Suzuki S, Kuroki Y, Nasu K et al (2007) Detecting breast cancer with non-contrast MR imaging: combining diffusion-weighted and STIR imaging. Magn Reson Med Sci 6:21–27PubMedCrossRef Kuroki-Suzuki S, Kuroki Y, Nasu K et al (2007) Detecting breast cancer with non-contrast MR imaging: combining diffusion-weighted and STIR imaging. Magn Reson Med Sci 6:21–27PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Park MJ, Cha ES, Kang BJ et al (2007) The role of diffusion-weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for breast tumors. Korean J Radiol 8:390–396PubMedCrossRef Park MJ, Cha ES, Kang BJ et al (2007) The role of diffusion-weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for breast tumors. Korean J Radiol 8:390–396PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Fitzek C, Mentzel HJ, Fitzek S et al (2003) Echoplanar diffusion-weighted MRI with intravenous gadolinium-DTPA. Neuroradiology 45:592–597PubMedCrossRef Fitzek C, Mentzel HJ, Fitzek S et al (2003) Echoplanar diffusion-weighted MRI with intravenous gadolinium-DTPA. Neuroradiology 45:592–597PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Liberman L, Mason G, Morris EA et al (2006) Does size matter? Positive predictive value of MRI-detected breast lesions as a function of lesion size. AJR 186:426–430PubMedCrossRef Liberman L, Mason G, Morris EA et al (2006) Does size matter? Positive predictive value of MRI-detected breast lesions as a function of lesion size. AJR 186:426–430PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in MR mammography (MRM): clinical comparison of echo planar imaging (EPI) and half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE) diffusion techniques
Authors
P. A. T. Baltzer
D. M. Renz
K.-H. Herrmann
M. Dietzel
I. Krumbein
M. Gajda
O. Camara
J. R. Reichenbach
W. A. Kaiser
Publication date
01-07-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 7/2009
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1326-5

Other articles of this Issue 7/2009

European Radiology 7/2009 Go to the issue