Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Research article

Differential diffusion of pharmaceutical innovations in a mixed market middle - income economy

Authors: Nurhafiza Md Hamzah, Kok Fong See

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Policymakers are faced with the challenge of balancing patient’s access for effective and affordable medicines to sustain the rising healthcare costs. In a mixed healthcare market such as Malaysia, coverage decisions of new medicines are different: public funded health system has a formulary listing process whereas for private sector, which is a market-based economy, depends on patient’s willingness to pay and insurance coverage. There is little overlap between public and private healthcare service delivery with access to new innovative medicines, as differentiated by sources of funding. The objectives of this study were to examine the diffusion of New Chemical Entities (NCEs) into the public and private healthcare market between 2010 and 2014, and determine the factors explaining the diffusion.

Methods

We matched medicines from the product registration database by medicine formulation to medicines in IQVIA National Pharmaceutical Audit database for each year. The price per Defined Daily Dose (DDD), market concentration and generic utilization share variables were calculated. A panel fixed effect model was performed to measure diffusion of NCEs for each year and test possible determinants of diffusion of NCEs for overall market and sector specifics.

Results

The utilization of NCEs was larger in the private sector compared to the public sector but the speed of diffusion over time was higher in the public sector. Price per DDD was negatively associated with diffusion of NCEs, while generic utilization share was significantly regressive in the public sector. Market concentration was negatively associated with utilization of NCEs, however result tends to be mixed according to sector and Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) category.

Conclusions

Understanding key aspects of sectoral variation in diffusion of NCEs are crucial to reduce the differences of access to new medicines within a country and ensure resources are used on cost effective treatments.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
The DDD is calculated as the average maintenance dose per day for a drug used for its main indication in adults.
 
2
MYR = Malaysian Ringgit; equivalent to approximately USD 0.23.
 
3
ATC4 is one level below the therapeutic class and is specific to a therapeutic class functioning in a similar manner.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rannan-Eliya RP, Anuranga C, Manual A, Sararaks S, Jailani AS, Hamid AJ, Razif IM, Tan EH, Darzi A. Improving health care coverage, equity, and financial protection through a hybrid system: Malaysia’s experience. Health Aff. 2016;35(5):838–46.CrossRef Rannan-Eliya RP, Anuranga C, Manual A, Sararaks S, Jailani AS, Hamid AJ, Razif IM, Tan EH, Darzi A. Improving health care coverage, equity, and financial protection through a hybrid system: Malaysia’s experience. Health Aff. 2016;35(5):838–46.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Malaysia National Health Accounts Unit. Health Expenditure Report 1997–2018. Ministry of Health Malaysia; 2020. Malaysia National Health Accounts Unit. Health Expenditure Report 1997–2018. Ministry of Health Malaysia; 2020.
3.
go back to reference Malaysia M. Health Fact 2019. Ministry of Health Malaysia; 2019. Malaysia M. Health Fact 2019. Ministry of Health Malaysia; 2019.
4.
go back to reference Malaysia National Audit. Malaysia Pharmaceutical Audit & Malaysia Government Report 2007–2016. IQVIA Malaysia. Malaysia National Audit. Malaysia Pharmaceutical Audit & Malaysia Government Report 2007–2016. IQVIA Malaysia.
7.
go back to reference Rogers EM: Diffusion of Innovations. 5 edition. New York: Simon & Schuster;2003. Rogers EM: Diffusion of Innovations. 5 edition. New York: Simon & Schuster;2003.
8.
go back to reference Ruof J, Mittendorf T, Pirk O, von der Schulenburg JM. Diffusion of innovations: treatment of Alzheimer’s disease in Germany. Health Pol. 2002;60(1):59–66.CrossRef Ruof J, Mittendorf T, Pirk O, von der Schulenburg JM. Diffusion of innovations: treatment of Alzheimer’s disease in Germany. Health Pol. 2002;60(1):59–66.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bonair A, Persson J. ‘Innovation and Diffusion of Healthcare Technologies’. In: Szczepura A, Kankaanpää J, editors. Assessment of Healthcare Technologies: Case Studies, Key Concepts and Strategic Issues. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons; 1996. Bonair A, Persson J. ‘Innovation and Diffusion of Healthcare Technologies’. In: Szczepura A, Kankaanpää J, editors. Assessment of Healthcare Technologies: Case Studies, Key Concepts and Strategic Issues. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons; 1996.
10.
go back to reference Mason A. New medicines in primary care: a review of influences on general practitioner prescribing. J Clin Pharmacy Ther. 2008;33(1):1.CrossRef Mason A. New medicines in primary care: a review of influences on general practitioner prescribing. J Clin Pharmacy Ther. 2008;33(1):1.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Silva HP, Viana AL. Health technology diffusion in developing countries: a case study of CT scanners in Brazil. Health Pol Planning. 2011;26(5):385–94.CrossRef Silva HP, Viana AL. Health technology diffusion in developing countries: a case study of CT scanners in Brazil. Health Pol Planning. 2011;26(5):385–94.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Atun R, de Jongh T, Secci F, Ohiri K, Adeyi O. A systematic review of the evidence on integration of targeted health interventions into health systems. Health Policy Plann. 2010a;25:1–14.CrossRef Atun R, de Jongh T, Secci F, Ohiri K, Adeyi O. A systematic review of the evidence on integration of targeted health interventions into health systems. Health Policy Plann. 2010a;25:1–14.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Atun R, de Jongh T, Secci F, Ohiri K, Adeyi O. Integration of targeted health interventions into health systems: a conceptual framework for analysis. Health Policy Plann. 2010b;25:104–11.CrossRef Atun R, de Jongh T, Secci F, Ohiri K, Adeyi O. Integration of targeted health interventions into health systems: a conceptual framework for analysis. Health Policy Plann. 2010b;25:104–11.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Stremersch S, Lemmens A. Sales growth of new pharmaceuticals across the globe: The role of regulatory regimes. Mark Sci. 2009;28(4):690–708.CrossRef Stremersch S, Lemmens A. Sales growth of new pharmaceuticals across the globe: The role of regulatory regimes. Mark Sci. 2009;28(4):690–708.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Atun R, Gurol-Urganci I. Impact of regulation on the uptake and diffusion of pharmaceutical innovations! Systematic review. Monograph: Tanaka Business School, Imperial College, London.; 2006. Atun R, Gurol-Urganci I. Impact of regulation on the uptake and diffusion of pharmaceutical innovations! Systematic review. Monograph: Tanaka Business School, Imperial College, London.; 2006.
16.
go back to reference Berndt ER, Danzon PM, Kruse GB. Dynamic competition in pharmaceuticals: Cross-national evidence from new drug diffusion. Managerial Decision Econom. 2007;28(4–5):231–50.CrossRef Berndt ER, Danzon PM, Kruse GB. Dynamic competition in pharmaceuticals: Cross-national evidence from new drug diffusion. Managerial Decision Econom. 2007;28(4–5):231–50.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Chintagunta P, Desiraju R. Strategic pricing and detailing behavior in international markets. Marketing Sci. 2005;24(1):67–80.CrossRef Chintagunta P, Desiraju R. Strategic pricing and detailing behavior in international markets. Marketing Sci. 2005;24(1):67–80.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Danzon PM, Ketcham JD. Reference pricing of pharmaceuticals for medicare: Evidence from Germany, The Netherlands and New Zealand. In: Cutler DM, Garber AM, editors. Frontiers in Health Policy Research. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2004. pp. 1–54. Danzon PM, Ketcham JD. Reference pricing of pharmaceuticals for medicare: Evidence from Germany, The Netherlands and New Zealand. In: Cutler DM, Garber AM, editors. Frontiers in Health Policy Research. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2004. pp. 1–54.
19.
go back to reference Danzon PM, Wang YR, Wang L. The impact of price regulation on the launch delay of new drugs. Health Econom. 2005;14(3):269–92.CrossRef Danzon PM, Wang YR, Wang L. The impact of price regulation on the launch delay of new drugs. Health Econom. 2005;14(3):269–92.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Danzon PM, Chao L. 2000. Cross-national price differences for pharmaceuticals: How large, and why? J. Health Econom. 2000;19 159–195. Danzon PM, Chao L. 2000. Cross-national price differences for pharmaceuticals: How large, and why? J. Health Econom. 2000;19 159–195.
21.
go back to reference Kyle MK. Pharmaceutical price controls and entry strategies. Rev Econom Statist. 2007;89(1):88–99.CrossRef Kyle MK. Pharmaceutical price controls and entry strategies. Rev Econom Statist. 2007;89(1):88–99.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Lanjouw JO Patents, price controls and access to new drugs: How policy affects global market entry. Working Paper 61, Center for Global; 2005. Lanjouw JO Patents, price controls and access to new drugs: How policy affects global market entry. Working Paper 61, Center for Global; 2005.
23.
go back to reference Kolsarici C, Vakratsas D. Dynamic market-level effects of highly regulated advertising messages. Working paper, McGill University, Montreal; 2008. Kolsarici C, Vakratsas D. Dynamic market-level effects of highly regulated advertising messages. Working paper, McGill University, Montreal; 2008.
24.
go back to reference Cockburn IM, Lanjouw JO, Schankerman M. Patents and the global diffusion of new drugs. Am Econ Rev. 2016;106(1):136–64.CrossRef Cockburn IM, Lanjouw JO, Schankerman M. Patents and the global diffusion of new drugs. Am Econ Rev. 2016;106(1):136–64.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Desiraju R, Nair H, Chintagunta P. Diffusion of new pharmaceutical drugs in developing and developed nations. Int J Res Marketing. 2004;21(4):341–57.CrossRef Desiraju R, Nair H, Chintagunta P. Diffusion of new pharmaceutical drugs in developing and developed nations. Int J Res Marketing. 2004;21(4):341–57.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Greving JP, Denig P, Van Der Veen WJ, Beltman FW, Sturkenboom MCJM, Haaijer-Ruskamp FM. Determinants for the adoption of angiotensin II receptor blockers by general practitioners. Soc Sci Med. 2006;63:2890–8.CrossRef Greving JP, Denig P, Van Der Veen WJ, Beltman FW, Sturkenboom MCJM, Haaijer-Ruskamp FM. Determinants for the adoption of angiotensin II receptor blockers by general practitioners. Soc Sci Med. 2006;63:2890–8.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Bourke J, Roper S. In with the new: the determinants of prescribing innovation by general practitioners in Ireland. Eur J Health Econ. 2012;13:393–407.CrossRef Bourke J, Roper S. In with the new: the determinants of prescribing innovation by general practitioners in Ireland. Eur J Health Econ. 2012;13:393–407.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference García LM, Cabeza BJ, Rodríguez EM, Alegre DRE, Rabadán AA. Adoption of new medications by prescribing physicians: the innovator physician. Aten Prim. 2000;25:22–8.CrossRef García LM, Cabeza BJ, Rodríguez EM, Alegre DRE, Rabadán AA. Adoption of new medications by prescribing physicians: the innovator physician. Aten Prim. 2000;25:22–8.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Bate P, Macfarlane F. and O Kyriakidou Diffusion of Innovations in Health Service Organisations. A Systematic Literature Review.Oxford:Blackwell; 2005. Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Bate P, Macfarlane F. and O Kyriakidou Diffusion of Innovations in Health Service Organisations. A Systematic Literature Review.Oxford:Blackwell; 2005.
30.
go back to reference Wen YW, Huang WF, Lee YC, Kuo KN, Tsai CR, Tsai YW. Diffusion patterns of new anti-diabetic drugs into hospitals in Taiwan: the case of Thiazolidinediones for diabetes. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Jan;31(1):21. 11(. Wen YW, Huang WF, Lee YC, Kuo KN, Tsai CR, Tsai YW. Diffusion patterns of new anti-diabetic drugs into hospitals in Taiwan: the case of Thiazolidinediones for diabetes. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Jan;31(1):21. 11(.
31.
go back to reference Tsai YW, Wen YW, Huang WF, Kuo KN, Chen PF, Shih HW, Lee YC. Pharmaceutical penetration of new drug and pharmaceutical market structure: Hospital-level prescription of Thiazolidinediones for Diabetes. European Journal of Health Economics. 2010;11(3):279–90.CrossRef Tsai YW, Wen YW, Huang WF, Kuo KN, Chen PF, Shih HW, Lee YC. Pharmaceutical penetration of new drug and pharmaceutical market structure: Hospital-level prescription of Thiazolidinediones for Diabetes. European Journal of Health Economics. 2010;11(3):279–90.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference McGuire A, Raikou M, Windmeijer F, Serra-Sastre V, Technology diffusion and health care productivity: Angioplasty in the UK. Working paper No: 17/2010. LSE Health. 2010. McGuire A, Raikou M, Windmeijer F, Serra-Sastre V, Technology diffusion and health care productivity: Angioplasty in the UK. Working paper No: 17/2010. LSE Health. 2010.
33.
go back to reference Brekke KR, Dalen DM, Holmås TH. Diffusion of pharmaceuticals: cross-country evidence of anti-TNF drugs. Eur J Health Econ. 2014;15(9):937–51.CrossRef Brekke KR, Dalen DM, Holmås TH. Diffusion of pharmaceuticals: cross-country evidence of anti-TNF drugs. Eur J Health Econ. 2014;15(9):937–51.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Costa-Font J, McGuire A, Varol N. Regulation effects on the adoption of new medicines. Empirical Economics. 2015;49(3):1101–21.CrossRef Costa-Font J, McGuire A, Varol N. Regulation effects on the adoption of new medicines. Empirical Economics. 2015;49(3):1101–21.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Loureiro S, Mota F, Freitas L, Leão C, Aragão E. Project no. 513396 WP3. 9/Deliverable D391 Diffusion of new drugs: a review on the available empirical evidence focused on developing countries. Loureiro S, Mota F, Freitas L, Leão C, Aragão E. Project no. 513396 WP3. 9/Deliverable D391 Diffusion of new drugs: a review on the available empirical evidence focused on developing countries.
37.
go back to reference Varol N, McGuire A, Costa-Font J, Explaining Early Adoption on New Medicines: Regulation, Innovation and Scale. CESifo Working Paper No. 3459. 2011. Varol N, McGuire A, Costa-Font J, Explaining Early Adoption on New Medicines: Regulation, Innovation and Scale. CESifo Working Paper No. 3459. 2011.
38.
go back to reference StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 15. College Station. TX: StatCorp LLC; 2015. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 15. College Station. TX: StatCorp LLC; 2015.
39.
go back to reference Ferrario A. Determinants of utilisation differences for cancer medicines in Belgium, Scotland and Sweden. Eur J Health Econ. 2017;18(9):1095–105.CrossRef Ferrario A. Determinants of utilisation differences for cancer medicines in Belgium, Scotland and Sweden. Eur J Health Econ. 2017;18(9):1095–105.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Pharmaceutical Services Division, Ministry of Health. Guidelines for submission of dossier for listing into the Ministry of Health medicines formulary. Ministry of Health Malaysia; 2015. Pharmaceutical Services Division, Ministry of Health. Guidelines for submission of dossier for listing into the Ministry of Health medicines formulary. Ministry of Health Malaysia; 2015.
42.
go back to reference Pereno A, Eriksson D. A multi-stakeholder perspective on sustainable healthcare: From 2030 onwards. Futures. 2020;122:102605.CrossRef Pereno A, Eriksson D. A multi-stakeholder perspective on sustainable healthcare: From 2030 onwards. Futures. 2020;122:102605.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Differential diffusion of pharmaceutical innovations in a mixed market middle - income economy
Authors
Nurhafiza Md Hamzah
Kok Fong See
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06786-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Health Services Research 1/2021 Go to the issue