Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Primary Care
Published in: BMC Primary Care 1/2013

Open Access 01-12-2013 | Research article

Differences in the perceived role of the healthcare provider in delivering vascular health checks: a Q methodology study

Authors: Stephanie Honey, Louise D Bryant, Jenny Murray, Kate Hill, Allan House

Published in: BMC Primary Care | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The UK Department of Health introduced the National Health Service (NHS) Health Check Programme in April 2009 in an attempt to improve primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in the UK population and to reduce health inequalities. Healthcare professionals' attitudes towards giving lifestyle advice will influence how they interact with patients during consultations. We therefore sought to identify the attitudes of primary care healthcare professionals towards the delivery of lifestyle advice in the context of the NHS Health Check Programme.

Methods

Fifty-two primary care healthcare professionals undertook a Q sort with 36 statements that represented a range of viewpoints about the importance of lifestyle change, medication, giving lifestyle advice in the primary care setting, and the individual, social and material factors that might impact on lifestyle related behaviour change. Sorts were analysed by-person using principal components analysis and varimax rotation.

Results

Five statistically independent factors (accounts) reflected distinct views on the topic. Account 1 was supportive of initiatives like the NHS Health Check, and emphasised the importance of professionals working collaboratively with patients to facilitate lifestyle change. Account 2 expressed views on the potential overuse of statin medication and placed responsibility for lifestyle change with the patient. Account 3 viewed the healthcare professional role to be one of educator, emphasising the provision of information. Account 4 perceived lifestyle change to be difficult for patients and emphasised the need for healthcare professionals to be role models. Account 5 was inconsistent about the value of lifestyle change, or the role of healthcare professionals in promoting it, a finding that may be due to ambivalence about the health check or to lack of engagement with the Q sort task. We found no strong associations between any of the factors and, gender, role, age or ethnicity.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that healthcare professionals hold viewpoints that may influence how they interact with patients during health checks. When implementing programmes like the NHS Health Check, it would be useful to take healthcare professionals’ views into account. Attitudes and beliefs could be explored during training sessions, for example.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Gerber Y, Koton S, Goldbourt U, Myers V, Benyamini Y, Tanne D: Poor neighbourhood socioeconomic status and risk of ischaemic stroke after myocardial infarction. Epidemiology. 2011, 22: 162-169.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Department of Health: NHS Health Check: vascular risk assessment and management best practice guidance. 2009, London: Department of Health
3.
Department of Health: Putting prevention first - vascular checks: risk assessment and management. 2008, London: Department of Health
4.
Stampfer MD, Hu FB, Manson JE, Rimm EB, Willet WC: Primary prevention of coronary heart disease in women through diet and lifestyle. New Engl J Med. 2000, 343 (1): 16-22.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Buck D, Frosini F: Clustering of unhealthy behaviours over time. 2012, London: The Kings Fund
6.
House of Commons Health Committee: Health Inequalities. 2009, London: The Stationery Office
7.
Gudzune KA, Clark JM, Appel LJ, Bennett WL: Primary care providers’ communication with patients during weight counselling: a focus group study. Patient Educ Couns. 2012, 89 (1): 152-157.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Van der Leeuw HGA, van Dijk NV, Wieringa-de Warrd M: Attitudes to obesity treatment in GP training practices: a focus group study. Fam Pract. 2011, 28 (4): 422-429.CrossRef
9.
Hansson LM, Rasmussen F, Ahlstrom GI: General practitioners’ and district nurses’ conceptions of the encounter with obese patients in primary health care. BMC Fam Pract. 2011, 12: 7-CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Jansink R, Braspenning J, van der Weijden T, Elwyn G, Grol R: Primary care nurses struggle with lifestyle counselling in diabetes care: a qualitative analysis. BMC Fam Pract. 2010, 11: 41-CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Arber S, McKinlay J, Adams A, Marceau L, Link C, O’Donnell A: How patient characteristics influence doctors’ questioning and lifestyle advice: a UK/US video experiment. Brit J Gen Prac. 2004, 54: 673-678.
12.
Van Ryn M, Burke J: The effect of patient race and socio-economic status on physicians’ perceptions of patients. Soc Sci Med. 2000, 50: 351-357.CrossRef
13.
14.
15.
Smith S, Waterall J, Burden AC: An evaluation of the performance of the NHS Health Check programme in identifying people at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes. BMJ Open. 2013, 3: e002219-CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Cross R: Accident and emergency nurses’ attitudes towards health promotion. J Adv Nurs. 2005, 51 (5): 474-483.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Baker RM: Economic rationality and health and lifestyle choices for people with diabetes. Soc Sci Med. 2006, 63: 2341-2353.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Van Excel NJA: “Everyone dies so you might as well have fun!” Attitudes of Dutch youths about their health lifestyles. Soc Sci Med. 2006, 63 (10): 2628-2639.CrossRef
19.
Watts S, Stenner P: Doing Q Methodological Research. 2012, London: Sage
20.
Watts S, Stenner P: Q methodology, quantum theory, and psychology. Operant Subjectivity. 2003, 26 (4): 157-175.
21.
Stainton Rogers R: Q methodology. Rethinking Methods in Psychology. Edited by: Smith JA, Harre R, Van Longenhove I. 1995, London: Sage, 178-193.CrossRef
22.
Bryant LD, Ahmed S, Ahmed M, Jafri H, Raashid Y: ‘All is done by Allah’. Understandings of Down’s syndrome and prenatal testing in Pakistan. Soc Sci Med. 2011, 72 (8): 1393-1399.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Murray J, Craigs C, Hill K, Honey S, House AO: A systematic review of patient reported factors associated with uptake and completion of cardiovascular lifestyle behaviour change. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2012, 12: 120-CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Murray J, Hill K, Honey S, Craigs C, House AO: Qualitative synthesis: factors affecting lifestyle change to reduce cardiovascular risk. Br J Gen Pract. 2012, doi:10.3399/bjgp12X649089. abridged text, in print at Br J Gen Pract 2012, 61: 296–297
25.
26.
Willems S, De Maesschalck S, Deveugele M, Derese A, De Maeseneer J: Socio-economic status of the patient and doctor-patient communication: does it make a difference?. Patient Educ Couns. 2005, 56 (2): 139-146.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Hall JA, Roter NR, Katz NR: Meta-analysis of correlates of provider behavior in medical encounters. Med Care. 1988, 26: 657-675.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Street RL: Information giving in medical consultations: the influence of patients’ communicative styles and personal characteristics. Soc Sci Med. 1991, 32: 541-548.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Kaplan SH, Gandek B, Greenfield S, Roger W, Ware JE: Patient and visit characteristics related to physicians’ participatory decision-making style. Med Care. 1995, 33 (12): 1176-1187.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Fiscella K, Goodwin MA, Strange KC: Does patient education level affect office visits to family physicians. J Natl Med Assoc. 2002, 94 (3): 157-165.PubMedPubMedCentral
31.
32.
Taira DA, Safran DG, Seto TB, Rogers WH, Tarlov AR: The relationship between patient income and physician discussion of health risk behaviours. J Amer Med Assoc. 1997, 278: 1412-CrossRef
33.
Street RL: Communicative styles and adaptations in physician-parent communication. Soc Sci Med. 1992, 34: 1155-1163.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Johansson K, Bendtsen P, Akerlind I: Advice to patients in Swedish primary care regarding alcohol and other lifestyle habits: how patients report the actions of GPs in relation to their own expectations and satisfaction with the consultation. Eur J Public Health. 2005, 15 (6): 615-620.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Paulhus DL: Socially desirable responding: the evolution of a construct. The role of constructs in psychological and educational measurement. Edited by: Braun HI, Jackson DN, Wiley DE. 2002, New Jersey: Erlbaum, 67-88.
36.
Faculty of Public Health of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom: Food poverty and health. 2005, London: Faculty of Public health of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom
37.
Nutbeam D: Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promot Int. 2000, 15 (3): 259-267.CrossRef
38.
Steptoe A, Doherty S, Kendrick T, Rink E, Hilton S: Attitudes to cardiovascular health promotion among GPs and practice nurses. Fam Pract. 1999, 16 (2): 158-162.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Differences in the perceived role of the healthcare provider in delivering vascular health checks: a Q methodology study
Authors
Stephanie Honey
Louise D Bryant
Jenny Murray
Kate Hill
Allan House
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Primary Care / Issue 1/2013
Electronic ISSN: 2731-4553
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-14-172

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

BMC Primary Care 1/2013 Go to the issue

Research article

Designing a complex intervention for dementia case management in primary care

Research article

Assessment of weight-related factors of adolescents by private practitioners

Research article

How does gender influence the recognition of cardiovascular risk and adherence to self-care recommendations?: a study in polish primary care

Research article

Morbidity and doctor characteristics only partly explain the substantial healthcare expenditures of frequent attenders: a record linkage study between patient data and reimbursements data

Research article

Effectiveness of a multifaceted implementation strategy on physicians’ referral behavior to an evidence-based psychosocial intervention in dementia: a cluster randomized controlled trial

Research article

Factors influencing insulin acceptance among type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in a primary care clinic: a qualitative exploration