Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 2/2017

01-02-2017

Differences in midline fascial forces exist following laparoscopic and open transversus abdominis release in a porcine model

Authors: Joshua S. Winder, Jerome Lyn-Sue, Allen R. Kunselman, Eric M. Pauli

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 2/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Posterior component separation herniorrhaphy via transversus abdominis release (TAR) permits midline reapproximation of large fascial defects. To date, no report delineates the reduction in tensile force to reapproximate midline fascia following TAR. We hypothesized that open and laparoscopic TAR would provide similar reductions in midline reapproximation forces in a porcine model.

Methods

Under general anesthesia, a 20-cm midline laparotomy was created and bilateral lipocutaneous flaps were raised to expose the anterior rectus sheath. Five stainless steel hooks were placed at 1-cm intervals lateral to the midline at three locations: 5 cm above, at, and 5 cm below the umbilicus bilaterally. Baseline force measurements were taken by pulling each lateral point to midline. Laparoscopic TAR was performed unilaterally by incising the parietal peritoneum and transversus muscle lateral to the linea semilunaris. Open TAR was performed contralaterally, and force measurements were repeated. Comparisons were made to baseline and between the groups.

Results

Following laparoscopic TAR, 87 % (13/15) of points showed significant reduction compared to baseline forces, whereas only 20 % (3/15) of open TAR points had significant force reductions. Compared to open TAR, three locations favored the laparoscopic approach [1 cm lateral to midline, 5 cm above the umbilicus (p = 0.04; 95 % CI 0.78–1.00), 2 cm lateral to midline at the umbilicus (p = 0.04; 95 % CI 0.80–1.00), and 1 cm lateral to midline 5 cm below the umbilicus (p = 0.05; 95 % CI 0.79–1.00)]. The mean length of TAR was longer for laparoscopic than open at 27.29 versus 19.55 cm (p < 0.0001; 95 % CI 6.46–9.02).

Conclusions

Open TAR reduced midline tensile force at few locations, suggesting that the mechanism by which TAR facilitates herniorraphy may not solely be through reductions in linea alba tensile forces. At specific locations, laparoscopic TAR provides superior reduction in midline closure force compared to open TAR, likely as a result of a longer muscle release.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Burger JW, Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, Halm JA, Verdaasdonk EG, Jeekel J (2004) Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg 240 (4):578–583; discussion 583–575 Burger JW, Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, Halm JA, Verdaasdonk EG, Jeekel J (2004) Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg 240 (4):578–583; discussion 583–575
5.
go back to reference de Vries Reilingh TS, van Goor H, Charbon JA, Rosman C, Hesselink EJ, van der Wilt GJ, Bleichrodt RP (2007) Repair of giant midline abdominal wall hernias: “components separation technique” versus prosthetic repair: interim analysis of a randomized controlled trial. World J Surg 31(4):756–763. doi:10.1007/s00268-006-0502-x CrossRefPubMed de Vries Reilingh TS, van Goor H, Charbon JA, Rosman C, Hesselink EJ, van der Wilt GJ, Bleichrodt RP (2007) Repair of giant midline abdominal wall hernias: “components separation technique” versus prosthetic repair: interim analysis of a randomized controlled trial. World J Surg 31(4):756–763. doi:10.​1007/​s00268-006-0502-x CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Koller R, Miholic J, Jakl RJ (1997) Repair of incisional hernias with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene. Eur J Surg 163(4):261–266PubMed Koller R, Miholic J, Jakl RJ (1997) Repair of incisional hernias with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene. Eur J Surg 163(4):261–266PubMed
9.
go back to reference Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, van den Tol MP, de Lange DC, Braaksma MM, Boelhouwer RU, de Vries BC, Salu MK, Wereldsma JC, Bruijninckx CM, Jeekel J (2000) A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med 343(6):392–398. doi:10.1056/NEJM200008103430603 CrossRefPubMed Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, van den Tol MP, de Lange DC, Braaksma MM, Boelhouwer RU, de Vries BC, Salu MK, Wereldsma JC, Bruijninckx CM, Jeekel J (2000) A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med 343(6):392–398. doi:10.​1056/​NEJM200008103430​603 CrossRefPubMed
11.
12.
go back to reference Ramirez OM, Ruas E, Dellon AL (1990) “Components separation” method for closure of abdominal-wall defects: an anatomic and clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 86(3):519–526CrossRefPubMed Ramirez OM, Ruas E, Dellon AL (1990) “Components separation” method for closure of abdominal-wall defects: an anatomic and clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 86(3):519–526CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Hultman CS, Tong WM, Kittinger BJ, Cairns B, Overby DW, Rich PB (2011) Management of recurrent hernia after components separation: 10-year experience with abdominal wall reconstruction at an academic medical center. Ann Plast Surg 66(5):504–507. doi:10.1097/SAP.0b013e31820b3d06 CrossRefPubMed Hultman CS, Tong WM, Kittinger BJ, Cairns B, Overby DW, Rich PB (2011) Management of recurrent hernia after components separation: 10-year experience with abdominal wall reconstruction at an academic medical center. Ann Plast Surg 66(5):504–507. doi:10.​1097/​SAP.​0b013e31820b3d06​ CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Lowe JB, 3rd, Lowe JB, Baty JD, Garza JR (2003) Risks associated with “components separation” for closure of complex abdominal wall defects. Plastic and reconstructive surgery 111 (3):1276–1283; quiz 1284–1275; discussion 1286–1278. doi:10.1097/01.PRS.0000047021.36879.FD Lowe JB, 3rd, Lowe JB, Baty JD, Garza JR (2003) Risks associated with “components separation” for closure of complex abdominal wall defects. Plastic and reconstructive surgery 111 (3):1276–1283; quiz 1284–1275; discussion 1286–1278. doi:10.​1097/​01.​PRS.​0000047021.​36879.​FD
19.
go back to reference Garcia-Ruiz A, Naitoh T, Gagner M (1998) A porcine model for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Surg Laparosc Endosc 8(1):35–39CrossRefPubMed Garcia-Ruiz A, Naitoh T, Gagner M (1998) A porcine model for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Surg Laparosc Endosc 8(1):35–39CrossRefPubMed
20.
21.
go back to reference Fitzmaurice GML, Ware JH (2004) Applied longitunidnal analysis. Wiley, Hoboken Fitzmaurice GML, Ware JH (2004) Applied longitunidnal analysis. Wiley, Hoboken
22.
go back to reference Ventral Hernia Working G, Breuing K, Butler CE, Ferzoco S, Franz M, Hultman CS, Kilbridge JF, Rosen M, Silverman RP, Vargo D (2010) Incisional ventral hernias: review of the literature and recommendations regarding the grading and technique of repair. Surgery 148(3):544–558. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2010.01.008 CrossRef Ventral Hernia Working G, Breuing K, Butler CE, Ferzoco S, Franz M, Hultman CS, Kilbridge JF, Rosen M, Silverman RP, Vargo D (2010) Incisional ventral hernias: review of the literature and recommendations regarding the grading and technique of repair. Surgery 148(3):544–558. doi:10.​1016/​j.​surg.​2010.​01.​008 CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Orenstein SB, Dumeer JL, Monteagudo J, Poi MJ, Novitsky YW (2011) Outcomes of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with routine defect closure using “shoelacing” technique. Surg Endosc 25(5):1452–1457. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1413-3 CrossRefPubMed Orenstein SB, Dumeer JL, Monteagudo J, Poi MJ, Novitsky YW (2011) Outcomes of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with routine defect closure using “shoelacing” technique. Surg Endosc 25(5):1452–1457. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-010-1413-3 CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Wennergren JE, Askenasy EP, Greenberg JA, Holihan J, Keith J, Liang MK, Martindale RG, Trott S, Plymale M, Roth JS (2015) Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with primary fascial closure versus bridged repair: a risk-adjusted comparative study. Surg Endosc. doi:10.1007/s00464-015-4644-5 Wennergren JE, Askenasy EP, Greenberg JA, Holihan J, Keith J, Liang MK, Martindale RG, Trott S, Plymale M, Roth JS (2015) Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with primary fascial closure versus bridged repair: a risk-adjusted comparative study. Surg Endosc. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-015-4644-5
26.
go back to reference O’Mara MS, Papasavas PK, Newton ED, Caushaj PF (2004) Modified separation of parts as an intervention for intraabdominal hypertension and the abdominal compartment syndrome in a swine model. Plast Reconstr Surg 114(7):1842–1845CrossRefPubMed O’Mara MS, Papasavas PK, Newton ED, Caushaj PF (2004) Modified separation of parts as an intervention for intraabdominal hypertension and the abdominal compartment syndrome in a swine model. Plast Reconstr Surg 114(7):1842–1845CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Novitsky YW, Fayezizadeh M, Majumder A, Neupane R, Elliott HL, Orenstein SB (2016) Outcomes of posterior component separation with transversus abdominis muscle release and synthetic mesh sublay reinforcement. Ann Surg. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000001673 PubMed Novitsky YW, Fayezizadeh M, Majumder A, Neupane R, Elliott HL, Orenstein SB (2016) Outcomes of posterior component separation with transversus abdominis muscle release and synthetic mesh sublay reinforcement. Ann Surg. doi:10.​1097/​SLA.​0000000000001673​ PubMed
Metadata
Title
Differences in midline fascial forces exist following laparoscopic and open transversus abdominis release in a porcine model
Authors
Joshua S. Winder
Jerome Lyn-Sue
Allen R. Kunselman
Eric M. Pauli
Publication date
01-02-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5040-5

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

Surgical Endoscopy 2/2017 Go to the issue