Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Rheumatology 4/2010

01-04-2010 | Original Article

Differences between the United States and the United Kingdom in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: analyses from a hand arthroplasty trial

Authors: Kevin C. Chung, Sandra V. Kotsis, David A. Fox, Marian Regan, Frank D. Burke, E. F. Shaw Wilgis, H. Myra Kim

Published in: Clinical Rheumatology | Issue 4/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Previous studies have found differences in rheumatoid hand surgical practice around the world. The specific aim of this study is to compare baseline characteristics of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in the United States (US) and the United Kingdom (UK) that may be influenced by the two different health-care systems. Patients were recruited from three sites (two in the US and one in England) as part of a National Institutes of Health funded study to examine outcomes of silicone metacarpophalangeal joint (MCPJ) arthroplasty in RA patients. Outcomes measurements included biomechanical assessments (grip strength, pinch strength, and mean ulnar drift and extensor lag at the MCPJs of all four fingers), a health-related quality of life questionnaire (the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire), and a medication assessment. American patients have a significantly higher income level (p < 0.001) and have completed higher levels of education (p < 0.001) than British patients. There were no significant differences in terms of self-reported disease severity or deformity at the MCPJs. RA patients in the US are more likely to take biologic medications (p < 0.001), steroids (p = 0.02), and Cox-2 inhibitors (p = 0.02). Patients in the UK are significantly more likely (p < 0.001) to take nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. There are differences in the demographic characteristics and medication use of RA patients with hand deformities in the US and UK. These differences may be influenced by the private versus socialized health-care systems. However, the perception of hand disease severity in participants in this study appears to be comparable between these countries.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Alderman AK, Chung KC, Kim HM, Fox DA, Ubel PA (2003) Effectiveness of rheumatoid hand surgery: contrasting perceptions of hand surgeons and rheumatologists. J Hand Surg 28A:3–11 Alderman AK, Chung KC, Kim HM, Fox DA, Ubel PA (2003) Effectiveness of rheumatoid hand surgery: contrasting perceptions of hand surgeons and rheumatologists. J Hand Surg 28A:3–11
2.
go back to reference Alderman AK, Ubel PA, Kim HM, Fox DA, Chung KC (2003) Surgical management of the rheumatoid hand: consensus and controversy among rheumatologists and hand surgeons. J Rheumatol 30:1464–1472PubMed Alderman AK, Ubel PA, Kim HM, Fox DA, Chung KC (2003) Surgical management of the rheumatoid hand: consensus and controversy among rheumatologists and hand surgeons. J Rheumatol 30:1464–1472PubMed
3.
go back to reference Alderman AK, Chung KC, DeMonner S, Spilson SV, Hayward RA (2001) Large area variations in the surgical management of the rheumatoid hand. Surg Forum LII:479–481 Alderman AK, Chung KC, DeMonner S, Spilson SV, Hayward RA (2001) Large area variations in the surgical management of the rheumatoid hand. Surg Forum LII:479–481
4.
go back to reference Alderman AK, Chung KC, Demonner S, Spilson SV, Hayward RA (2002) The rheumatoid hand: a predictable disease with unpredictable surgical practice patterns. Arthritis Rheum 47:537–542CrossRefPubMed Alderman AK, Chung KC, Demonner S, Spilson SV, Hayward RA (2002) The rheumatoid hand: a predictable disease with unpredictable surgical practice patterns. Arthritis Rheum 47:537–542CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kotsis SV, Chung KC (2005) A qualitative assessment of rheumatoid hand surgery in various regions of the world. J Hand Surg. 30A:649–657 Kotsis SV, Chung KC (2005) A qualitative assessment of rheumatoid hand surgery in various regions of the world. J Hand Surg. 30A:649–657
6.
go back to reference Jonsson B, Kobelt G, Smolen J (2008) The burden of rheumatoid arthritis and access to treatment: uptake of new therapies. Eur J Health Econ 8(Suppl 2):S61–S86CrossRefPubMed Jonsson B, Kobelt G, Smolen J (2008) The burden of rheumatoid arthritis and access to treatment: uptake of new therapies. Eur J Health Econ 8(Suppl 2):S61–S86CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Chung KC, Burns PB, Wilgis EF, Burke FD, Regan M, Kim HM, Fox DA (2009) A multicenter clinical trial in rheumatoid arthritis comparing silicone metacarpophalangeal joint arthroplasty with medical treatment. J Hand Surg 34A:815–823 Chung KC, Burns PB, Wilgis EF, Burke FD, Regan M, Kim HM, Fox DA (2009) A multicenter clinical trial in rheumatoid arthritis comparing silicone metacarpophalangeal joint arthroplasty with medical treatment. J Hand Surg 34A:815–823
9.
go back to reference Alderman AK, Arora AS, Kuhn L, Wei Y, Chung KC (2006) An analysis of women's and men's surgical priorities and willingness to have rheumatoid hand surgery. J Hand Surg 31A:1447–1453 Alderman AK, Arora AS, Kuhn L, Wei Y, Chung KC (2006) An analysis of women's and men's surgical priorities and willingness to have rheumatoid hand surgery. J Hand Surg 31A:1447–1453
10.
go back to reference Chung KC, Kotsis SV, Kim HM (2004) A prospective outcomes study of Swanson metacarpophalangeal joint arthroplasty for the rheumatoid hand. J Hand Surg 29A:646–653 Chung KC, Kotsis SV, Kim HM (2004) A prospective outcomes study of Swanson metacarpophalangeal joint arthroplasty for the rheumatoid hand. J Hand Surg 29A:646–653
11.
go back to reference Chung KC, Kotsis SV, Kim HM, Burke FD, Wilgis EF (2006) Reasons why rheumatoid arthritis patients seek surgical treatment for hand deformities. J Hand Surg 31A:289–294 Chung KC, Kotsis SV, Kim HM, Burke FD, Wilgis EF (2006) Reasons why rheumatoid arthritis patients seek surgical treatment for hand deformities. J Hand Surg 31A:289–294
12.
go back to reference Siemiatycki J (1979) A comparison of mail, telephone and home interview strategies for household health surveys. Am J Public Health 69:238–245CrossRefPubMed Siemiatycki J (1979) A comparison of mail, telephone and home interview strategies for household health surveys. Am J Public Health 69:238–245CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Guadagnoli E, Cleary PD (1992) Age-related item nonresponse in surveys of recently discharged patients. J Gerontol 47:206–212 Guadagnoli E, Cleary PD (1992) Age-related item nonresponse in surveys of recently discharged patients. J Gerontol 47:206–212
14.
go back to reference Lingard EA, Sledge CB, Learmonth ID (2006) Patient expectations regarding total knee arthroplasty: differences among the United States, United kingdom, and Australia. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:1201–1207CrossRefPubMed Lingard EA, Sledge CB, Learmonth ID (2006) Patient expectations regarding total knee arthroplasty: differences among the United States, United kingdom, and Australia. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:1201–1207CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Banks J, Marmot M, Oldfield Z, Smith JP (2006) Disease and disadvantage in the United States and in England. JAMA 295:2037–2045CrossRefPubMed Banks J, Marmot M, Oldfield Z, Smith JP (2006) Disease and disadvantage in the United States and in England. JAMA 295:2037–2045CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Lipton RB, Scher AI, Steiner TJ et al (2003) Patterns of health care utilization for migraine in England and in the United States. Neurology 60:441–448CrossRefPubMed Lipton RB, Scher AI, Steiner TJ et al (2003) Patterns of health care utilization for migraine in England and in the United States. Neurology 60:441–448CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Dixon J, Chantler C, Billings J (2007) Competition on outcomes and physician leadership are not enough to reform health care. JAMA 298:1445–1447CrossRefPubMed Dixon J, Chantler C, Billings J (2007) Competition on outcomes and physician leadership are not enough to reform health care. JAMA 298:1445–1447CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Jonsson B (2008) Patient access to rheumatoid arthritis treatments. Eur J Health Econ 8(Suppl 2):S35–S38CrossRefPubMed Jonsson B (2008) Patient access to rheumatoid arthritis treatments. Eur J Health Econ 8(Suppl 2):S35–S38CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Cooke J, Mason AR, Drummond MF, Towse AK (2005) Medication management in English National Health Service hospitals. Am J Health Syst Pharm 62:189–195PubMed Cooke J, Mason AR, Drummond MF, Towse AK (2005) Medication management in English National Health Service hospitals. Am J Health Syst Pharm 62:189–195PubMed
21.
go back to reference Rawlins M (1999) In pursuit of quality: the National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Lancet 353:1079–1082CrossRefPubMed Rawlins M (1999) In pursuit of quality: the National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Lancet 353:1079–1082CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Pearson SD, Rawlins MD (2005) Quality, innovation, and value for money: NICE and the British National Health Service. JAMA 294:2618–2622CrossRefPubMed Pearson SD, Rawlins MD (2005) Quality, innovation, and value for money: NICE and the British National Health Service. JAMA 294:2618–2622CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Commission A (1994) A prescription for improvement. HMSO, London Commission A (1994) A prescription for improvement. HMSO, London
24.
go back to reference McKinlay J, Link C, Marceau L et al (2006) How do doctors in different countries manage the same patient? Results of a factorial experiment. Health Serv Res 41:2182–2200CrossRefPubMed McKinlay J, Link C, Marceau L et al (2006) How do doctors in different countries manage the same patient? Results of a factorial experiment. Health Serv Res 41:2182–2200CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Wolf-Maier K, Cooper RS, Banegas JR et al (2003) Hypertension prevalence and blood pressure levels in 6 European countries, Canada, and the United States. JAMA 289:2363–2369CrossRefPubMed Wolf-Maier K, Cooper RS, Banegas JR et al (2003) Hypertension prevalence and blood pressure levels in 6 European countries, Canada, and the United States. JAMA 289:2363–2369CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Lundqvist J, Kastang F, Kobelt G, Jonsson B (2008) The burden of rheumatoid arthritis and access to treatment: determinants of access. Eur J Health Econ 8(Suppl 2):S87–S93CrossRefPubMed Lundqvist J, Kastang F, Kobelt G, Jonsson B (2008) The burden of rheumatoid arthritis and access to treatment: determinants of access. Eur J Health Econ 8(Suppl 2):S87–S93CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Coyle D, Judd M, Blumenauer B et al (2006) Infliximab and etanercept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment, Ottawa Coyle D, Judd M, Blumenauer B et al (2006) Infliximab and etanercept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment, Ottawa
Metadata
Title
Differences between the United States and the United Kingdom in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: analyses from a hand arthroplasty trial
Authors
Kevin C. Chung
Sandra V. Kotsis
David A. Fox
Marian Regan
Frank D. Burke
E. F. Shaw Wilgis
H. Myra Kim
Publication date
01-04-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology / Issue 4/2010
Print ISSN: 0770-3198
Electronic ISSN: 1434-9949
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-009-1314-9

Other articles of this Issue 4/2010

Clinical Rheumatology 4/2010 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine