Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery 2/2013

01-08-2013 | Original Article

Diced Cartilage: An Effective Graft for Post-Traumatic and Revision Rhinoplasty

Authors: Brajendra Baser, Shenal Kothari, Manya Thakur

Published in: Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery | Special Issue 2/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Rhinoplasty has grown and developed over so many years but the choice of the graft material in revision rhinoplasty and rhinoplasty for post-traumatic cases still remains debatable. In such patients, non-availability of adequate autogenous graft, multiple septal fractures and skin fibrosis are a challenge to the rhinologist. To deal with this problem authors have used diced cartilage pieces as a grafting material. Secondary rhinoplasty for correction of the nasal dorsum was done in 32 patients and evaluated. The study, highlights the distinct advantages of using diced cartilage wrapped in fascia for dorsal augmentation. Full length grafts were used in all patients and this was supported on a L-shaped cartilage fixed between the two upper lateral cartilage. Fascial tube was prepared from fascia lata and conchal, rib or septal cartilage was the source of diced cartilage (0.5–1 mm sized pieces). The L-shaped structural support was prepared from the remnant of septal cartilage if any or from the conchal or rib cartilage. Patients were followed for a period of 6 months–3 years. In 30 patients post-op course was uneventful with good reconstruction results. Step-deformity was encountered in one patient and in another patient the tube opened with extrusion of diced cartilage pieces. Both these patients were effectively managed. In conclusion, diced cartilage wrapped in fascial tube has distinct advantages like it is simpler procedure and graft material is adequate and autogenous. Grafts can be prepared as per the desired length, shape and size to fit the specific defect. These being highly malleable can be used without any tension on the already thickened and fibrosed skin and soft tissue. Complications like step deformity and extrusion rarely occur and can be easily managed. Over correction and graft visibility were not met with.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Breadon GE, Kern EB, Neel B III (1979) Autografts of uncrushed and crushed bone and cartilage: experimental observations and clinical observations. Arch Otolaryngol 105:75–80PubMedCrossRef Breadon GE, Kern EB, Neel B III (1979) Autografts of uncrushed and crushed bone and cartilage: experimental observations and clinical observations. Arch Otolaryngol 105:75–80PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Daniel RK (2008) Diced cartilage grafts in rhinoplasty: current techniques and applications. Plast Reconstr Surg 122(6):1883–1891PubMedCrossRef Daniel RK (2008) Diced cartilage grafts in rhinoplasty: current techniques and applications. Plast Reconstr Surg 122(6):1883–1891PubMedCrossRef
3.
4.
go back to reference Harma ST (1993) Diced cartilage grafts in rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 116(2):352–356 Harma ST (1993) Diced cartilage grafts in rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 116(2):352–356
5.
6.
go back to reference Erol OO (2000) The turkish delight: a pliable method for rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:2229–2241PubMedCrossRef Erol OO (2000) The turkish delight: a pliable method for rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:2229–2241PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Peer LA (1945) The neglected septal cartilage (with experimental observations on the growth of human cartilage grafts). Arch Otolaryngol 42:384–396PubMedCrossRef Peer LA (1945) The neglected septal cartilage (with experimental observations on the growth of human cartilage grafts). Arch Otolaryngol 42:384–396PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Parker Porter J (2000) Grafts in rhinoplasty: alloplastic versus autogenous. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 126:558–561PubMedCrossRef Parker Porter J (2000) Grafts in rhinoplasty: alloplastic versus autogenous. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 126:558–561PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Cakmak O, Ergin NT (2002) The versatile autogenous coastal cartilage graft in septorhinoplasty. Arch Fac Plast Surg 4:172–176CrossRef Cakmak O, Ergin NT (2002) The versatile autogenous coastal cartilage graft in septorhinoplasty. Arch Fac Plast Surg 4:172–176CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Baker TM, Cortiss EH (1994) Temporalis grafts in open secondary rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 93:802–810PubMedCrossRef Baker TM, Cortiss EH (1994) Temporalis grafts in open secondary rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 93:802–810PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Reich J (1983) The application of dermis grafts in deformities of the nose. Plast Reconstr Surg 71:772–782PubMedCrossRef Reich J (1983) The application of dermis grafts in deformities of the nose. Plast Reconstr Surg 71:772–782PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Stoksted P, Ladefoged C (1986) Crushed cartilage in nasal reconstruction. J Laryngol Otol 100:897–906PubMedCrossRef Stoksted P, Ladefoged C (1986) Crushed cartilage in nasal reconstruction. J Laryngol Otol 100:897–906PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Diced Cartilage: An Effective Graft for Post-Traumatic and Revision Rhinoplasty
Authors
Brajendra Baser
Shenal Kothari
Manya Thakur
Publication date
01-08-2013
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery / Issue Special Issue 2/2013
Print ISSN: 2231-3796
Electronic ISSN: 0973-7707
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-012-0525-6

Other articles of this Special Issue 2/2013

Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery 2/2013 Go to the issue