Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 8/2011

Open Access 01-08-2011 | Gastrointestinal

Diagnostic value of CT-colonography as compared to colonoscopy in an asymptomatic screening population: a meta-analysis

Authors: Margriet C. de Haan, Rogier E. van Gelder, Anno Graser, Shandra Bipat, Jaap Stoker

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 8/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

Previous meta-analyses on CT-colonography included both average and high risk individuals, which may overestimate the diagnostic value in screening. A meta-analysis was performed to obtain the value of CT-colonography for screening.

Methods

A search was performed using PubMed, Embase and Cochrane. Article selection and critical appraisal was done by two reviewers. Inclusion criteria: prospective, randomized trials or cohort studies comparing CT-colonography with colonoscopy (≥50 participants), ≥95% average risk participants ≥50 years. Study characteristics and 2 × 2 contingency Tables were recorded. Sensitivity and specificity estimates were calculated per patient and per polyp (≥6 mm, ≥10 mm), using univariate and bivariate analyses.

Results

Five of 1,021 studies identified were included, including 4,086 participants (<1% high risk). I2-values showed substantial heterogeneity, especially for 6–9 mm polyps and adenomas: 68.1% vs. 78.6% (sensitivity per patient). Estimated sensitivities for patients with polyps or adenomas ≥ 6 mm were 75.9% and 82.9%, corresponding specificities 94.6% and 91.4%. Estimated sensitivities for patients with polyps or adenomas ≥ 10 mm were 83.3% and 87.9%, corresponding specificities 98.7% and 97.6%. Estimated sensitivities per polyp for advanced adenomas ≥ 6 mm and ≥ 10 mm were 83.9% and 83.8%.

Conclusion

Compared to colonoscopy, CT-colonography has a high sensitivity for adenomas ≥ 10 mm. For (advanced) adenomas ≥ 6 mm sensitivity is somewhat lower.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference McFarland EG, Levin B, Lieberman DA, Pickhardt PH, Johson CD, Glick SN, Brooks D, Smith RA (2008) American Cancer Society; U.S. Multisociety Task Force on Colorectal Cancer; American College of Radiology. Revised colorectal screening guidelines: joint effort of the American Cancer Society, U.S. Multisociety Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and American College of Radiology. Radiology 248:717–720PubMedCrossRef McFarland EG, Levin B, Lieberman DA, Pickhardt PH, Johson CD, Glick SN, Brooks D, Smith RA (2008) American Cancer Society; U.S. Multisociety Task Force on Colorectal Cancer; American College of Radiology. Revised colorectal screening guidelines: joint effort of the American Cancer Society, U.S. Multisociety Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and American College of Radiology. Radiology 248:717–720PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, Andrews KS, Brooks D, Bond J, Dash C, Giardiello FM, Glick S, Johnson D, Johnson CD, Levin TR, Pickhardt PJ, Rex DK, Smith RA, Thorson A, Winawer SJ (2008) American Cancer Society Colorectal Cancer Advisory Group; US Multi-Society Task Force; American College of Radiology Colon Cancer Committee. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology 134:1570–1595PubMedCrossRef Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, Andrews KS, Brooks D, Bond J, Dash C, Giardiello FM, Glick S, Johnson D, Johnson CD, Levin TR, Pickhardt PJ, Rex DK, Smith RA, Thorson A, Winawer SJ (2008) American Cancer Society Colorectal Cancer Advisory Group; US Multi-Society Task Force; American College of Radiology Colon Cancer Committee. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology 134:1570–1595PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Allen JD, Barlow WE, Duncan RP, Egede LE, Friedman LS, Keating NL, Kim P, Lave JR, Laveist TA, Ness RB, Optican RJ, Steinwachs D, Virnig BA (2010) NIH state-of-the-science conference statement: enhancing use and quality of colorectal cancer screening. NIH Consens State Sci Statements 27 Allen JD, Barlow WE, Duncan RP, Egede LE, Friedman LS, Keating NL, Kim P, Lave JR, Laveist TA, Ness RB, Optican RJ, Steinwachs D, Virnig BA (2010) NIH state-of-the-science conference statement: enhancing use and quality of colorectal cancer screening. NIH Consens State Sci Statements 27
4.
go back to reference Sung JJ, Lau JY, Young GP, Sano Y, Chiu HM, Byeon JS, Yeoh KG, Goh KL, Sollano J, Rerknimitr R, Matsuda T, Wu KC, Ng S, Leung SY, Makharia G, Chong VH, Ho KY, Brooks D, Lieberman DA, Chan FK (2008) Asia Pacific Working Group on Colorectal Cancer. Asia Pacific consensus recommendations for colorectal cancer screening. Gut 57:1166–1176PubMedCrossRef Sung JJ, Lau JY, Young GP, Sano Y, Chiu HM, Byeon JS, Yeoh KG, Goh KL, Sollano J, Rerknimitr R, Matsuda T, Wu KC, Ng S, Leung SY, Makharia G, Chong VH, Ho KY, Brooks D, Lieberman DA, Chan FK (2008) Asia Pacific Working Group on Colorectal Cancer. Asia Pacific consensus recommendations for colorectal cancer screening. Gut 57:1166–1176PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Rex DK, Johnson DA, Anderson JC, Schoenfeld PS, Burke CA, Inadomi JM (2009) American College of Gastroenterology. American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening. Am J Gastroenterol 104:739–750PubMedCrossRef Rex DK, Johnson DA, Anderson JC, Schoenfeld PS, Burke CA, Inadomi JM (2009) American College of Gastroenterology. American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening. Am J Gastroenterol 104:739–750PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Sosna J, Morrin MM, Kruskal JB, Lavin PT, Rosen MP, Raptopoulos V (2003) CT colonography of colorectal polyps: a metaanalysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:1593–1598PubMed Sosna J, Morrin MM, Kruskal JB, Lavin PT, Rosen MP, Raptopoulos V (2003) CT colonography of colorectal polyps: a metaanalysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:1593–1598PubMed
7.
go back to reference Mulhall BP, Veerappan GR, Jackson JL (2005) Meta-analysis: computed tomographic colonography. Ann Intern Med 142:635–650PubMed Mulhall BP, Veerappan GR, Jackson JL (2005) Meta-analysis: computed tomographic colonography. Ann Intern Med 142:635–650PubMed
8.
go back to reference Halligan S, Altman DG, Taylor SA, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Bartram CI, Atkin W (2005) CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting. Radiology 237:893–904PubMedCrossRef Halligan S, Altman DG, Taylor SA, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Bartram CI, Atkin W (2005) CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting. Radiology 237:893–904PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Rosman AS, Korsten MA (2007) Meta-analysis comparing CT colonography, air contrast barium enema, and colonoscopy. Am J Med 120:203–210PubMedCrossRef Rosman AS, Korsten MA (2007) Meta-analysis comparing CT colonography, air contrast barium enema, and colonoscopy. Am J Med 120:203–210PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Chaparro M, Gisbert JP, Del Campo L, Cantero J, Maté J (2009) Accuracy of computed tomographic colonography for the detection of polyps and colorectal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Digestion 80:1–17PubMedCrossRef Chaparro M, Gisbert JP, Del Campo L, Cantero J, Maté J (2009) Accuracy of computed tomographic colonography for the detection of polyps and colorectal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Digestion 80:1–17PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Winawer SJ, Fletcher RH, Miller L, Godlee F, Stolar MH, Mulrow CD, Woolf SH, Glick SN, Ganiats TG, Bond JH, Rosen L, Zapka JG, Olsen SJ, Giardiello FM, Sisk JE, Van Antwerp R, Brown-Davis C, Marciniak DA, Mayer RJ (1997) Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale. Gastroenterology 112:594–642PubMedCrossRef Winawer SJ, Fletcher RH, Miller L, Godlee F, Stolar MH, Mulrow CD, Woolf SH, Glick SN, Ganiats TG, Bond JH, Rosen L, Zapka JG, Olsen SJ, Giardiello FM, Sisk JE, Van Antwerp R, Brown-Davis C, Marciniak DA, Mayer RJ (1997) Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale. Gastroenterology 112:594–642PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J (2003) The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 3:25PubMedCrossRef Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J (2003) The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 3:25PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Winawer SJ, Zauber AG (2002) The advanced adenoma as the primary target of screening. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 12:1–9PubMedCrossRef Winawer SJ, Zauber AG (2002) The advanced adenoma as the primary target of screening. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 12:1–9PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Iafrate F, Hassan C, Pickhardt PJ, Pichi A, Stagnitti A, Zullo A, Di Giulio E, Laghi A (2010) Portrait of a polyp: the CTC dilemma. Abdom Imaging 35:49–54PubMedCrossRef Iafrate F, Hassan C, Pickhardt PJ, Pichi A, Stagnitti A, Zullo A, Di Giulio E, Laghi A (2010) Portrait of a polyp: the CTC dilemma. Abdom Imaging 35:49–54PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Bond JH (1993) Polyp guideline: diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance for patients with nonfamilial colorectal polyps. The Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology Ann Intern Med 119:836–843 Bond JH (1993) Polyp guideline: diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance for patients with nonfamilial colorectal polyps. The Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology Ann Intern Med 119:836–843
16.
go back to reference Lieberman D, Moravec M, Holub J, Michaels L, Eisen G (2008) Polyp size and advanced histology in patients undergoing colonoscopy screening: implications for CT colonography. Gastroenterology 135:1100–1105PubMedCrossRef Lieberman D, Moravec M, Holub J, Michaels L, Eisen G (2008) Polyp size and advanced histology in patients undergoing colonoscopy screening: implications for CT colonography. Gastroenterology 135:1100–1105PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327:557–560PubMedCrossRef Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327:557–560PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Reitsma JB, Glas AS, Rutjes AW, Scholten RJ, Bossuyt PM, Zwinderman AH (2005) Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 58:982–990PubMedCrossRef Reitsma JB, Glas AS, Rutjes AW, Scholten RJ, Bossuyt PM, Zwinderman AH (2005) Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 58:982–990PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Arnesen RB, von Benzon E, Adamsen S, Svendsen LB, Raaschou HO, Hansen OH (2007) Diagnostic performance of computed tomography colonography and colonoscopy: a prospective and validated analysis of 231 paired examinations. Acta Radiol 48:831–837PubMedCrossRef Arnesen RB, von Benzon E, Adamsen S, Svendsen LB, Raaschou HO, Hansen OH (2007) Diagnostic performance of computed tomography colonography and colonoscopy: a prospective and validated analysis of 231 paired examinations. Acta Radiol 48:831–837PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Fidler JL, Johnson CD, MacCarty RL, Welch TJ, Hara AK, Harmsen WS (2002) Detection of flat lesions in the colon with CT colonography. Abdom Imaging 27:292–300PubMed Fidler JL, Johnson CD, MacCarty RL, Welch TJ, Hara AK, Harmsen WS (2002) Detection of flat lesions in the colon with CT colonography. Abdom Imaging 27:292–300PubMed
21.
go back to reference Wessling J, Domagk D, Lugering N, Schierhorn S, Heindel W, Domschke W, Fischbach R (2005) Virtual colonography: identification and differentiation of colorectal lesions using multi-detector computed tomography. Scand J Gastroenterol 40:468–476PubMedCrossRef Wessling J, Domagk D, Lugering N, Schierhorn S, Heindel W, Domschke W, Fischbach R (2005) Virtual colonography: identification and differentiation of colorectal lesions using multi-detector computed tomography. Scand J Gastroenterol 40:468–476PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Rex DK, Vining D, Kopecky KK (1999) An initial experience with screening for colon polyps using spiral CT with and without CT colography (virtual colonoscopy). Gastrointest Endosc 50:309–313PubMedCrossRef Rex DK, Vining D, Kopecky KK (1999) An initial experience with screening for colon polyps using spiral CT with and without CT colography (virtual colonoscopy). Gastrointest Endosc 50:309–313PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Pineau BC, Paskett E, Chen GJ, Espeland MA, Philips K, Han JP, Mikulaninec C, Vining DJ (2003) Virtual colonoscopy using oral contrast compared with colonoscopy for the detection of patients with colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 125:304–310PubMedCrossRef Pineau BC, Paskett E, Chen GJ, Espeland MA, Philips K, Han JP, Mikulaninec C, Vining DJ (2003) Virtual colonoscopy using oral contrast compared with colonoscopy for the detection of patients with colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 125:304–310PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C, Brink JA, Mangiapane F, Trenna S, Piacentini F, Passariello R (2003) Detection of colorectal lesions: lower-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy. Radiology 229:775–781PubMedCrossRef Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C, Brink JA, Mangiapane F, Trenna S, Piacentini F, Passariello R (2003) Detection of colorectal lesions: lower-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy. Radiology 229:775–781PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference An S, Lee KH, Kim YK, Park SH, Kim HY, Kim SH, Kim N (2008) Screening CT colonography in an asymptomatic average-risk Asian population: a 2-year experience in a single institution. Am J Roentgenol 191:W100–W106CrossRef An S, Lee KH, Kim YK, Park SH, Kim HY, Kim SH, Kim N (2008) Screening CT colonography in an asymptomatic average-risk Asian population: a 2-year experience in a single institution. Am J Roentgenol 191:W100–W106CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Graser A, Stieber P, Nagel D, Schäfer C, Horst D, Becker CR, Nikolaou K, Lottes A, Geisbüsch S, Kramer H, Wagner AC, Diepolder H, Schirra J, Roth HJ, Seidel D, Göke B, Reiser MF, Kolligs FT (2009) Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population. Gut 58:241–248PubMedCrossRef Graser A, Stieber P, Nagel D, Schäfer C, Horst D, Becker CR, Nikolaou K, Lottes A, Geisbüsch S, Kramer H, Wagner AC, Diepolder H, Schirra J, Roth HJ, Seidel D, Göke B, Reiser MF, Kolligs FT (2009) Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population. Gut 58:241–248PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Johnson CD, Chen MH, Toledano AY, Heiken JP, Dachman A, Kuo MD, Menias CO, Siewert B, Cheema JI, Obregon RG, Fidler JL, Zimmerman P, Horton KM, Coakley K, Iyer RB, Hara AK, Halvorsen RA Jr, Casola G, Yee J, Herman BA, Burgart LJ, Limburg PJ (2008) Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med 359:1207–1217PubMedCrossRef Johnson CD, Chen MH, Toledano AY, Heiken JP, Dachman A, Kuo MD, Menias CO, Siewert B, Cheema JI, Obregon RG, Fidler JL, Zimmerman P, Horton KM, Coakley K, Iyer RB, Hara AK, Halvorsen RA Jr, Casola G, Yee J, Herman BA, Burgart LJ, Limburg PJ (2008) Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med 359:1207–1217PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Kim YS, Kim N, Kim SH, Park MJ, Lim SH, Yim JY, Cho KR, Kim SS, Kim DH, Eun HW, Cho KS, Kim JH, Choi BI, Jung HC, Song IS, Shin CS, Cho SH, Oh BH (2008) The efficacy of intravenous contrast-enhanced 16-raw multidetector CT colonography for detecting patients with colorectal polyps in an asymptomatic population in Korea. J Clin Gastroenterol 42:791–798PubMedCrossRef Kim YS, Kim N, Kim SH, Park MJ, Lim SH, Yim JY, Cho KR, Kim SS, Kim DH, Eun HW, Cho KS, Kim JH, Choi BI, Jung HC, Song IS, Shin CS, Cho SH, Oh BH (2008) The efficacy of intravenous contrast-enhanced 16-raw multidetector CT colonography for detecting patients with colorectal polyps in an asymptomatic population in Korea. J Clin Gastroenterol 42:791–798PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Macari M, Bini EJ, Jacobs SL, Naik S, Lui YW, Milano A, Rajapaksa R, Megibow AJ, Babb J (2004) Colorectal polyps and cancers in asymptomatic average-risk patients: evaluation with CT colonography. Radiology 230:629–636PubMedCrossRef Macari M, Bini EJ, Jacobs SL, Naik S, Lui YW, Milano A, Rajapaksa R, Megibow AJ, Babb J (2004) Colorectal polyps and cancers in asymptomatic average-risk patients: evaluation with CT colonography. Radiology 230:629–636PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, Butler JA, Puckett ML, Hildebrandt HA, Wong RK, Nugent PA, Mysliwiec PA, Schindler WR (2003) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349:2191–2200PubMedCrossRef Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, Butler JA, Puckett ML, Hildebrandt HA, Wong RK, Nugent PA, Mysliwiec PA, Schindler WR (2003) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349:2191–2200PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, Schindler WR (2004) Nonadenomatous polyps at CT colonography: prevalence, size distribution, and detection rates. Radiology 232:784–790PubMedCrossRef Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, Schindler WR (2004) Nonadenomatous polyps at CT colonography: prevalence, size distribution, and detection rates. Radiology 232:784–790PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Pickhardt PJ, Lee AD, Taylor AJ, Michel SJ, Winter TC, Shadid A, Meiners RJ, Chase PJ, Hinshaw JL, Williams JG, Prout TM, Husain SH, Kim DH (2007) Primary 2D versus primary 3D polyp detection at screening CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:1451–1456PubMedCrossRef Pickhardt PJ, Lee AD, Taylor AJ, Michel SJ, Winter TC, Shadid A, Meiners RJ, Chase PJ, Hinshaw JL, Williams JG, Prout TM, Husain SH, Kim DH (2007) Primary 2D versus primary 3D polyp detection at screening CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:1451–1456PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference De Vries AH, Liedenbaum MH, Bipat S, Truyen R, Serlie IW, Cohen RH, van Elderen SG, Heutinck A, Kesselring O, de Monyé W, te Strake L, Wiersma T, Stoker J (2009) Primary uncleansed 2D versus primary electronically cleansed 3D in limited bowel preparation CT-colonography. Is there a difference for novices and experienced readers? Eur Radiol 19:1939–1950PubMedCrossRef De Vries AH, Liedenbaum MH, Bipat S, Truyen R, Serlie IW, Cohen RH, van Elderen SG, Heutinck A, Kesselring O, de Monyé W, te Strake L, Wiersma T, Stoker J (2009) Primary uncleansed 2D versus primary electronically cleansed 3D in limited bowel preparation CT-colonography. Is there a difference for novices and experienced readers? Eur Radiol 19:1939–1950PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Howson, Colin, Peter Urbach (1993) Scientific reasoning: The Bayesian approach. Open Court Howson, Colin, Peter Urbach (1993) Scientific reasoning: The Bayesian approach. Open Court
35.
go back to reference Van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J, Bossuyt PM, van Deventer SJ, Dekker E (2006) Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 101:343–350PubMedCrossRef Van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J, Bossuyt PM, van Deventer SJ, Dekker E (2006) Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 101:343–350PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Diagnostic value of CT-colonography as compared to colonoscopy in an asymptomatic screening population: a meta-analysis
Authors
Margriet C. de Haan
Rogier E. van Gelder
Anno Graser
Shandra Bipat
Jaap Stoker
Publication date
01-08-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 8/2011
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2104-8

Other articles of this Issue 8/2011

European Radiology 8/2011 Go to the issue