Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Insights into Imaging 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Original Article

Diagnostic reference level quantities for adult chest and abdomen-pelvis CT examinations: correlation with organ doses

Authors: Paulo Roberto Costa, Alessandra Tomal, Jullianna Cristina de Oliveira Castro, Isabella Paziam Fernandes Nunes, Denise Yanikian Nersissian, Márcio Valente Yamada Sawamura, Hilton Leão Filho, Choonsik Lee

Published in: Insights into Imaging | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate correlations between DRL quantities (DRLq) stratified into patient size groups for non-contrast chest and abdomen-pelvis CT examinations in adult patients and the corresponding organ doses.

Methods

This study presents correlations between DRLq  (CTDIvol, DLP and SSDE) stratified into patient size ranges and corresponding organ doses shared in four groups: inside, peripheral, distributed and outside. The demographic, technical and dosimetric parameters were used to identify the influence of these quantities in organ doses. A robust statistical method was implemented in order to establish these correlations and its statistical significance.

Results

Median values of the grouped organ doses are presented according to the effective diameter ranges. Organ doses in the regions inside the imaged area are higher than the organ doses in peripheral, distributed and outside regions, excepted to the peripheral doses associated with chest examinations. Different levels of statistical significance between organ doses and the DRLq were presented.

Conclusions

Correlations between DRLq and target-organ doses associated with clinical practice can support guidance’s to the establishment of optimization criteria. SSDE demonstrated to be significant in the evaluation of organ doses is also highlighted. The proposed model allows the design of optimization actions with specific risk-reduction results.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
Ethics Committee approval CAAE 27,912,619.6.0000.0068.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Samei E, Järvinen H, Kortesniemi M et al (2018) Medical imaging dose optimisation from ground up: expert opinion of an international summit. J Radiol Prot 38:967–989CrossRefPubMed Samei E, Järvinen H, Kortesniemi M et al (2018) Medical imaging dose optimisation from ground up: expert opinion of an international summit. J Radiol Prot 38:967–989CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Kanal KM, Butler PF, Sengupta D, Bhargavan-Chatfield M, Coombs LP, Morin RLUS (2017) Diagnostic reference levels and achievable doses for 10 adult CT examinations. Radiology 284:120–133CrossRefPubMed Kanal KM, Butler PF, Sengupta D, Bhargavan-Chatfield M, Coombs LP, Morin RLUS (2017) Diagnostic reference levels and achievable doses for 10 adult CT examinations. Radiology 284:120–133CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Shrimpton PC, Wall BF, Hillier MC (1989) Suggested guideline doses for medical x-ray examinations. United Kingdom: Inst Phys Shrimpton PC, Wall BF, Hillier MC (1989) Suggested guideline doses for medical x-ray examinations. United Kingdom: Inst Phys
4.
go back to reference ICRP (1996) Radiological protection and safety in medicine. In: ICRP publication 73: international radiological protection commission ICRP (1996) Radiological protection and safety in medicine. In: ICRP publication 73: international radiological protection commission
5.
go back to reference ICRP (2017) Diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging. In: ICRP publication 135 international radiation protection commission ICRP (2017) Diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging. In: ICRP publication 135 international radiation protection commission
6.
go back to reference Paulo G, Damilakis J, Tsapaki V et al (2020) Diagnostic reference levels based on clinical indications in computed tomography: a literature review. Insights Imaging 11:96CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Paulo G, Damilakis J, Tsapaki V et al (2020) Diagnostic reference levels based on clinical indications in computed tomography: a literature review. Insights Imaging 11:96CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Bos D, Yu S, Luong J et al (2022) Diagnostic reference levels and median doses for common clinical indications of CT: findings from an international registry. Eur Radiol 32:1971–1982CrossRefPubMed Bos D, Yu S, Luong J et al (2022) Diagnostic reference levels and median doses for common clinical indications of CT: findings from an international registry. Eur Radiol 32:1971–1982CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Ria F, D’Ercole L, Origgi D et al (2022) Statement of the Italian association of medical physics (AIFM) task group on radiation dose monitoring systems. Insights Imaging 13:23CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ria F, D’Ercole L, Origgi D et al (2022) Statement of the Italian association of medical physics (AIFM) task group on radiation dose monitoring systems. Insights Imaging 13:23CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference ICRP (2021) Use of Dose quantities in radiological protection. In: ICRP publication 147: Internationsl radiation protection commission ICRP (2021) Use of Dose quantities in radiological protection. In: ICRP publication 147: Internationsl radiation protection commission
10.
go back to reference AAPM (2021) American association of physicists in medicine issues position on medical imaging radiation limits AAPM (2021) American association of physicists in medicine issues position on medical imaging radiation limits
11.
go back to reference Andersson J, Pavlicek W, Al-Senan R, et al. Estimating patient organ dose with computed tomography: a review of present methodology and required DICOM information. In: one physics ellipse, College Park, AAPM-EFOMP., 2019 Andersson J, Pavlicek W, Al-Senan R, et al. Estimating patient organ dose with computed tomography: a review of present methodology and required DICOM information. In: one physics ellipse, College Park, AAPM-EFOMP., 2019
12.
go back to reference Franck C, Vandevoorde C, Goethals I et al (2016) The role of Size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) in patient-specific organ dose and cancer risk estimation in paediatric chest and abdominopelvic CT examinations. Eur Radiol 26:2646–2655CrossRefPubMed Franck C, Vandevoorde C, Goethals I et al (2016) The role of Size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) in patient-specific organ dose and cancer risk estimation in paediatric chest and abdominopelvic CT examinations. Eur Radiol 26:2646–2655CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Long DJ, Lee C, Tien C et al (2013) Monte Carlo simulations of adult and pediatric computed tomography exams: validation studies of organ doses with physical phantoms. Med Phys 40(1):1391 Long DJ, Lee C, Tien C et al (2013) Monte Carlo simulations of adult and pediatric computed tomography exams: validation studies of organ doses with physical phantoms. Med Phys 40(1):1391
14.
go back to reference Lee C, Kim KP, Bolch WE, Moroz BE, Folio L (2015) NCICT: a computational solution to estimate organ doses for pediatric and adult patients undergoing CT scans. J Radiol Prot 35:891–909CrossRefPubMed Lee C, Kim KP, Bolch WE, Moroz BE, Folio L (2015) NCICT: a computational solution to estimate organ doses for pediatric and adult patients undergoing CT scans. J Radiol Prot 35:891–909CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Giansante L, Martins JC, Nersissian DY et al (2019) Organ doses evaluation for chest computed tomography procedures with TL dosimeters: comparison with Monte Carlo simulations. J Appl Clin Med Phys 20:308–320CrossRefPubMed Giansante L, Martins JC, Nersissian DY et al (2019) Organ doses evaluation for chest computed tomography procedures with TL dosimeters: comparison with Monte Carlo simulations. J Appl Clin Med Phys 20:308–320CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Geyer AM, O’Reilly S, Lee C, Long DJ, Bolch WE (2014) The UF/NCI family of hybrid computational phantoms representing the current US population of male and female children, adolescents, and adults—application to CT dosimetry. Phys Med Biol 59:5225–5242CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Geyer AM, O’Reilly S, Lee C, Long DJ, Bolch WE (2014) The UF/NCI family of hybrid computational phantoms representing the current US population of male and female children, adolescents, and adults—application to CT dosimetry. Phys Med Biol 59:5225–5242CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Lee C, Lodwick D, Hurtado J, Pafundi D, Williams JL, Bolch WE (2009) The UF family of reference hybrid phantoms for computational radiation dosimetry. Phys Med Biol 55:339–363CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lee C, Lodwick D, Hurtado J, Pafundi D, Williams JL, Bolch WE (2009) The UF family of reference hybrid phantoms for computational radiation dosimetry. Phys Med Biol 55:339–363CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Li X, Segars WP, Samei E (2014) The impact on CT dose of the variability in tube current modulation technology: a theoretical investigation. Phys Med Biol 59:4525–4548CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Li X, Segars WP, Samei E (2014) The impact on CT dose of the variability in tube current modulation technology: a theoretical investigation. Phys Med Biol 59:4525–4548CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference The ICRP (2007) Recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. In ICRP 103:2007 The ICRP (2007) Recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. In ICRP 103:2007
20.
go back to reference Arnold TB, Emerson JW (2011) Nonparametric goodness-of-fit tests for discrete null distributions. R J 3:34–39CrossRef Arnold TB, Emerson JW (2011) Nonparametric goodness-of-fit tests for discrete null distributions. R J 3:34–39CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Taylor S, Van Muylem A, Howarth N, Gevenois PA, Tack D (2017) CT dose survey in adults: what sample size for what precision? Eur Radiol 27:365–373CrossRefPubMed Taylor S, Van Muylem A, Howarth N, Gevenois PA, Tack D (2017) CT dose survey in adults: what sample size for what precision? Eur Radiol 27:365–373CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Stasinopoulos DM, Rigby RA (2007) Generalized additive models for location scale and shape (GAMLSS) in R. J Stat Softw 23:1–46CrossRef Stasinopoulos DM, Rigby RA (2007) Generalized additive models for location scale and shape (GAMLSS) in R. J Stat Softw 23:1–46CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Wood SN (2017) Generalized additive models: an introduction with R. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca RatonCrossRef Wood SN (2017) Generalized additive models: an introduction with R. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca RatonCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Mundo AI, Tipton JR, Muldoon TJ. Using generalized additive models to analyze biomedical non-linear longitudinal data. bioRxiv 2021:2021.2006.2010.447970 Mundo AI, Tipton JR, Muldoon TJ. Using generalized additive models to analyze biomedical non-linear longitudinal data. bioRxiv 2021:2021.2006.2010.447970
25.
go back to reference Muncy NM, Kimbler A, Hedges-Muncy AM, McMakin DL, Mattfeld AT (2022) General additive models address statistical issues in diffusion MRI: an example with clinically anxious adolescents. NeuroImage: Clinic 33:102937 Muncy NM, Kimbler A, Hedges-Muncy AM, McMakin DL, Mattfeld AT (2022) General additive models address statistical issues in diffusion MRI: an example with clinically anxious adolescents. NeuroImage: Clinic 33:102937
26.
go back to reference Murase H, Nagashima H, Yonezaki S, Matsukura R, Kitakado T (2009) Application of a generalized additive model (GAM) to reveal relationships between environmental factors and distributions of pelagic fish and krill: a case study in Sendai Bay. Japan ICES J Marine Sci 66:1417–1424CrossRef Murase H, Nagashima H, Yonezaki S, Matsukura R, Kitakado T (2009) Application of a generalized additive model (GAM) to reveal relationships between environmental factors and distributions of pelagic fish and krill: a case study in Sendai Bay. Japan ICES J Marine Sci 66:1417–1424CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Barreto I, Quails N, Carranza C, Correa N, Rill L, Arreola M (2018) Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) for patients examined with loss-dose lung cancer screening using different CT manufacturers. Med Phys 45:E600–E600 Barreto I, Quails N, Carranza C, Correa N, Rill L, Arreola M (2018) Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) for patients examined with loss-dose lung cancer screening using different CT manufacturers. Med Phys 45:E600–E600
28.
go back to reference Hardy AJ, Bostani M, Kim GHJ, Cagnon CH, Zankl MA, McNitt-Gray M (2021) Evaluating size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) as an estimate of organ doses from routine CT exams derived from Monte Carlo simulations. Med Phys 48:6160–6173CrossRefPubMed Hardy AJ, Bostani M, Kim GHJ, Cagnon CH, Zankl MA, McNitt-Gray M (2021) Evaluating size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) as an estimate of organ doses from routine CT exams derived from Monte Carlo simulations. Med Phys 48:6160–6173CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Yang K, Ganguli S, DeLorenzo MC, Zheng H, Li X, Liu B (2018) Procedure-specific CT dose and utilization factors for CT-guided interventional procedures. Radiology 289:150–157CrossRefPubMed Yang K, Ganguli S, DeLorenzo MC, Zheng H, Li X, Liu B (2018) Procedure-specific CT dose and utilization factors for CT-guided interventional procedures. Radiology 289:150–157CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Parakh A, Kortesniemi M, Schindera ST (2016) CT radiation dose management: a comprehensive optimization process for improving patient safety. Radiology 280:663–673CrossRefPubMed Parakh A, Kortesniemi M, Schindera ST (2016) CT radiation dose management: a comprehensive optimization process for improving patient safety. Radiology 280:663–673CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Strauss KJ, Somasundaram E, Sengupta D, Marin JR, Brady SL (2019) Radiation dose for pediatric CT: comparison of pediatric versus adult imaging facilities. Radiology 291:158–167CrossRefPubMed Strauss KJ, Somasundaram E, Sengupta D, Marin JR, Brady SL (2019) Radiation dose for pediatric CT: comparison of pediatric versus adult imaging facilities. Radiology 291:158–167CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Strauss KJ, Goske MJ, Towbin AJ et al (2017) Pediatric chest CT diagnostic reference ranges: development and application. Radiology 284:219–227CrossRefPubMed Strauss KJ, Goske MJ, Towbin AJ et al (2017) Pediatric chest CT diagnostic reference ranges: development and application. Radiology 284:219–227CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Gottumukkala RV, Kalra MK, Tabari A, Otrakji A, Gee MS (2019) Advanced CT techniques for decreasing radiation dose, reducing sedation requirements, and optimizing image quality in children. Radiographics 39:709–726CrossRefPubMed Gottumukkala RV, Kalra MK, Tabari A, Otrakji A, Gee MS (2019) Advanced CT techniques for decreasing radiation dose, reducing sedation requirements, and optimizing image quality in children. Radiographics 39:709–726CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Kalra MK, Sodickson AD, Mayo-Smith WW (2015) CT radiation: key concepts for gentle and wise use. Radiographics 35:1706–1721CrossRefPubMed Kalra MK, Sodickson AD, Mayo-Smith WW (2015) CT radiation: key concepts for gentle and wise use. Radiographics 35:1706–1721CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Ria F, Fu W, Hoye J, Segars WP, Kapadia AJ, Samei E (2021) Comparison of 12 surrogates to characterize CT radiation risk across a clinical population. Eur Radiol 31:7022–7030CrossRefPubMed Ria F, Fu W, Hoye J, Segars WP, Kapadia AJ, Samei E (2021) Comparison of 12 surrogates to characterize CT radiation risk across a clinical population. Eur Radiol 31:7022–7030CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Zewde N, Ria F, Rehani MM (2022) Organ doses and cancer risk assessment in patients exposed to high doses from recurrent CT exams. Eur J Radiol 149:110224CrossRefPubMed Zewde N, Ria F, Rehani MM (2022) Organ doses and cancer risk assessment in patients exposed to high doses from recurrent CT exams. Eur J Radiol 149:110224CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Diagnostic reference level quantities for adult chest and abdomen-pelvis CT examinations: correlation with organ doses
Authors
Paulo Roberto Costa
Alessandra Tomal
Jullianna Cristina de Oliveira Castro
Isabella Paziam Fernandes Nunes
Denise Yanikian Nersissian
Márcio Valente Yamada Sawamura
Hilton Leão Filho
Choonsik Lee
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
Springer Vienna
Published in
Insights into Imaging / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1869-4101
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01403-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

Insights into Imaging 1/2023 Go to the issue