Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 9/2013

01-09-2013 | Musculoskeletal

Diagnostic performance of MRI measurements to assess hindfoot malalignment. An assessment of four measurement techniques

Authors: Florian M. Buck, Adrienne Hoffmann, Nadja Mamisch-Saupe, Mazda Farshad, Donald Resnick, Norman Espinosa, Juerg Hodler

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 9/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the ability of coronal non-weight-bearing MR images to discriminate between normal and abnormal hindfoot alignment.

Methods

Three different measurement techniques (calcaneal axis, medial/lateral calcaneal contour) based on weight-bearing hindfoot alignment radiographs were applied in 49 patients (mean, 48 years; range 21–76 years). Three groups of subjects were enrolled: (1) normal hindfoot alignment (0°–10° valgus); (2) abnormal valgus (>10°); (3) any degree of varus hindfoot alignment. Hindfoot alignment was then measured on coronal MR images using four different measurement techniques (calcaneal axis, medial/lateral calcaneal contour, sustentaculum tangent). ROC analysis was performed to find the MR measurement with the greatest sensitivity and specificity for discrimination between normal and abnormal hindfoot alignment.

Results

The most accurate measurement on MR images to detect abnormal hindfoot valgus was the one using the medial calcaneal contour, reaching a sensitivity/specificity of 86 %/75 % using a cutoff value of >11° valgus.
The most accurate measurement on MR images to detect abnormal hindfoot varus was the sustentaculum tangent, reaching a sensitivity/specificity of 91 %/71 % using a cutoff value of <12° valgus.

Conclusion

It is possible to suspect abnormal hindfoot alignment on coronal non-weight-bearing MR images.

Key Points

• Abnormal hindfoot alignment can be identified on coronal non-weight-bearing MR images.
• The sustentaculum tangent was the best predictor of an abnormally varus hindfoot.
• The medial calcaneal contour was the best predictor of a valgus hindfoot.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Mendicino RW, Catanzariti AR, Reeves CL, King GL (2005) A systematic approach to evaluation of the rearfoot, ankle, and leg in reconstructive surgery. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 95:2–12PubMed Mendicino RW, Catanzariti AR, Reeves CL, King GL (2005) A systematic approach to evaluation of the rearfoot, ankle, and leg in reconstructive surgery. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 95:2–12PubMed
3.
go back to reference Menz HB (1995) Clinical hindfoot measurement: a critical review of the literature. Foot 5:57–64CrossRef Menz HB (1995) Clinical hindfoot measurement: a critical review of the literature. Foot 5:57–64CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Strash WW, Berardo P (2004) Radiographic assessment of the hindfoot and ankle. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 21:295–304PubMedCrossRef Strash WW, Berardo P (2004) Radiographic assessment of the hindfoot and ankle. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 21:295–304PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Coughlin MJ, Mann RA, Saltzman CL (2007) Surgery of the foot and ankle. Mosby, Philadelphia Coughlin MJ, Mann RA, Saltzman CL (2007) Surgery of the foot and ankle. Mosby, Philadelphia
6.
go back to reference Van Bergeyk AB, Younger A, Carson B (2002) CT analysis of hindfoot alignment in chronic lateral ankle instability. Foot Ankle Int 23:37–42PubMed Van Bergeyk AB, Younger A, Carson B (2002) CT analysis of hindfoot alignment in chronic lateral ankle instability. Foot Ankle Int 23:37–42PubMed
7.
go back to reference Cobey JC (1976) Posterior roentgenogram of the foot. Clin Orthop Relat Res 118:202–207PubMed Cobey JC (1976) Posterior roentgenogram of the foot. Clin Orthop Relat Res 118:202–207PubMed
8.
go back to reference Reilingh ML, Beimers L, Tuijthof GJ, Stufkens SA, Maas M, van Dijk CN (2010) Measuring hindfoot alignment radiographically: the long axial view is more reliable than the hindfoot alignment view. Skeletal Radiol 39:1103–1108PubMedCrossRef Reilingh ML, Beimers L, Tuijthof GJ, Stufkens SA, Maas M, van Dijk CN (2010) Measuring hindfoot alignment radiographically: the long axial view is more reliable than the hindfoot alignment view. Skeletal Radiol 39:1103–1108PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Buck FM, Hoffmann A, Mamisch N, Espinosa N, Resnick D, Hodler J (2011) Hindfoot alignment measurements: rotation-stability of measurement techniques on hindfoot alignment view and long axial view radiographs. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:578–582PubMedCrossRef Buck FM, Hoffmann A, Mamisch N, Espinosa N, Resnick D, Hodler J (2011) Hindfoot alignment measurements: rotation-stability of measurement techniques on hindfoot alignment view and long axial view radiographs. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:578–582PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Donovan A, Rosenberg ZS (2009) Extraarticular lateral hindfoot impingement with posterior tibial tendon tear: MRI correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:672–678PubMedCrossRef Donovan A, Rosenberg ZS (2009) Extraarticular lateral hindfoot impingement with posterior tibial tendon tear: MRI correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:672–678PubMedCrossRef
11.
12.
go back to reference Seltzer SE, Weissman BN, Braunstein EM, Adams DF, Thomas WH (1984) Computed tomography of the hindfoot. J Comput Assist Tomogr 8:488–497PubMedCrossRef Seltzer SE, Weissman BN, Braunstein EM, Adams DF, Thomas WH (1984) Computed tomography of the hindfoot. J Comput Assist Tomogr 8:488–497PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Tanaka Y, Takakura Y, Hayashi K, Taniguchi A, Kumai T, Sugimoto K (2006) Low tibial osteotomy for varus-type osteoarthritis of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:909–913PubMedCrossRef Tanaka Y, Takakura Y, Hayashi K, Taniguchi A, Kumai T, Sugimoto K (2006) Low tibial osteotomy for varus-type osteoarthritis of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:909–913PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Takakura Y, Tanaka Y, Kumai T, Tamai S (1995) Low tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the ankle. Results of a new operation in 18 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77:50–54PubMed Takakura Y, Tanaka Y, Kumai T, Tamai S (1995) Low tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the ankle. Results of a new operation in 18 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77:50–54PubMed
15.
go back to reference Pagenstert GI, Hintermann B, Barg A, Leumann A, Valderrabano V (2007) Realignment surgery as alternative treatment of varus and valgus ankle osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 462:156–168PubMedCrossRef Pagenstert GI, Hintermann B, Barg A, Leumann A, Valderrabano V (2007) Realignment surgery as alternative treatment of varus and valgus ankle osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 462:156–168PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Knupp M, Stufkens SA, Bolliger L, Barg A, Hintermann B (2011) Classification and treatment of supramalleolar deformities. Foot Ankle Int 32:1023–1031PubMedCrossRef Knupp M, Stufkens SA, Bolliger L, Barg A, Hintermann B (2011) Classification and treatment of supramalleolar deformities. Foot Ankle Int 32:1023–1031PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Sutter R, Pfirrmann CW, Espinosa N, Buck FM (2012) Three-dimensional hindfoot alignment measurements based on biplanar radiographs: comparison with standard radiographic measurements. Skeletal Radiol Nov 20. [Epub ahead of print] Sutter R, Pfirrmann CW, Espinosa N, Buck FM (2012) Three-dimensional hindfoot alignment measurements based on biplanar radiographs: comparison with standard radiographic measurements. Skeletal Radiol Nov 20. [Epub ahead of print]
18.
go back to reference Robinson I, Dyson R, Halson-Brown S (2001) Reliability of clinical and radiographic measurement of rearfoot alignment in a patient population. Foot 11:2–9CrossRef Robinson I, Dyson R, Halson-Brown S (2001) Reliability of clinical and radiographic measurement of rearfoot alignment in a patient population. Foot 11:2–9CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Diagnostic performance of MRI measurements to assess hindfoot malalignment. An assessment of four measurement techniques
Authors
Florian M. Buck
Adrienne Hoffmann
Nadja Mamisch-Saupe
Mazda Farshad
Donald Resnick
Norman Espinosa
Juerg Hodler
Publication date
01-09-2013
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 9/2013
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-013-2839-5

Other articles of this Issue 9/2013

European Radiology 9/2013 Go to the issue