Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Emergency Radiology 5/2014

01-10-2014 | Original Article

Diagnostic performance of CT esophagography in patients with suspected esophageal rupture

Authors: Tatiana Suarez-Poveda, Carlos H. Morales-Uribe, Alvaro Sanabria, Adriana Llano-Sánchez, Andrés Mauricio Valencia-Delgado, Luis Fernando Rivera-Velázquez, John Fernando Bedoya-Ospina

Published in: Emergency Radiology | Issue 5/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Esophageal rupture is a surgical catastrophe. The gold standard for diagnosing is iodine, water-soluble contrast medium esophagography. CT esophagography has shown promising results. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of CT esophagography in patients with a suspicion of esophageal rupture. This prospective study assessed the performance of a diagnostic test and was approved by local IRB committee. Patients who presented with a clinical suspicion of esophageal rupture were included. CT esophagography findings were described by the emergency radiologist. Clinical outcomes (presence or absence of esophageal rupture) were reported by surgeons. The operative characteristics were calculated. A final predictive scale for rupture was built. A total of 64 patients were recruited (age 26.5 years, 90 % male, 82 % trauma). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios (LRs) were 77.7 % (95 % confidence interval (CI) 45–100), 94.3 % (87.2–100), 14 (9.81–19.9), and 0.24 (0.05–1.22), respectively. The final model for predicting rupture included five variables: age (odds ratio (OR) 1.03; 95 % CI, 0.95–1.11; p = 0.04), leakage of contrast media into the mediastinum or pleural space (OR 10.0; 95 % CI, 0.64–156.9; p = 0.10), extraluminal air or fluid collections (OR 43.1; 95 % CI, 1.52–1217.3; p = 0.027), esophageal wall thickening (OR 10.1; 95 % CI, 0.50–202.8; p = 0.12), and left pneumothorax or pleural effusion (OR 6.5; 95 % CI, 0.31–132.7; p = 0.2). The overall agreement was 0.40 (95 % CI, 0.09–0.72) for the predictive model. The model sensitivity was 50.0 %, and the specificity was 98.4 %. CT esophagography shows a good diagnostic performance in patients with a suspected esophageal rupture.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Vogel SB, Rout WR, Martin TD et al (2005) Esophageal perforation in adults: aggressive, conservative treatment lowers morbidity and mortality. Ann Surg 241:1016–1021PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Vogel SB, Rout WR, Martin TD et al (2005) Esophageal perforation in adults: aggressive, conservative treatment lowers morbidity and mortality. Ann Surg 241:1016–1021PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Kiernan PD, Sheridan MJ, Elster E et al (2003) Thoracic esophageal perforations. South Med J 96:158–163PubMedCrossRef Kiernan PD, Sheridan MJ, Elster E et al (2003) Thoracic esophageal perforations. South Med J 96:158–163PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference de Lutio di Castelguidone E, Merola S, Pinto A et al (2006) Esophageal injuries: spectrum of multidetector row CT findings. Eur J Radiol 59:344–348PubMedCrossRef de Lutio di Castelguidone E, Merola S, Pinto A et al (2006) Esophageal injuries: spectrum of multidetector row CT findings. Eur J Radiol 59:344–348PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Backer CL, LoCicero J III, Hartz RS et al (1990) Computed tomography in patients with esophageal perforation. Chest 98:1078–1080PubMedCrossRef Backer CL, LoCicero J III, Hartz RS et al (1990) Computed tomography in patients with esophageal perforation. Chest 98:1078–1080PubMedCrossRef
5.
6.
go back to reference Rubesin SE, Levine MS (2003) Radiologic diagnosis of gastrointestinal perforation. Radiol Clin N Am 41:1095–1115, vPubMedCrossRef Rubesin SE, Levine MS (2003) Radiologic diagnosis of gastrointestinal perforation. Radiol Clin N Am 41:1095–1115, vPubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Fadoo F, Ruiz DE, Dawn SK et al (2004) Helical CT esophagography for the evaluation of suspected esophageal perforation or rupture. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:1177–1179PubMedCrossRef Fadoo F, Ruiz DE, Dawn SK et al (2004) Helical CT esophagography for the evaluation of suspected esophageal perforation or rupture. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:1177–1179PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference White CS, Templeton PA, Attar S (1993) Esophageal perforation: CT findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 160:767–770PubMedCrossRef White CS, Templeton PA, Attar S (1993) Esophageal perforation: CT findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 160:767–770PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference MACKLER SA (1952) Spontaneous rupture of the esophagus; an experimental and clinical study. Surg Gynecol Obstet 95:345–356PubMed MACKLER SA (1952) Spontaneous rupture of the esophagus; an experimental and clinical study. Surg Gynecol Obstet 95:345–356PubMed
10.
go back to reference Kim SH, Kim YJ, Lee JM et al (2007) Esophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis: multidetector CT esophagography—comparison with endoscopy. Radiology 242:759–768PubMedCrossRef Kim SH, Kim YJ, Lee JM et al (2007) Esophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis: multidetector CT esophagography—comparison with endoscopy. Radiology 242:759–768PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Brick SH, Caroline DF, Lev-Toaff AS et al (1988) Esophageal disruption: evaluation with iohexol esophagography. Radiology 169:141–1-43 Brick SH, Caroline DF, Lev-Toaff AS et al (1988) Esophageal disruption: evaluation with iohexol esophagography. Radiology 169:141–1-43
Metadata
Title
Diagnostic performance of CT esophagography in patients with suspected esophageal rupture
Authors
Tatiana Suarez-Poveda
Carlos H. Morales-Uribe
Alvaro Sanabria
Adriana Llano-Sánchez
Andrés Mauricio Valencia-Delgado
Luis Fernando Rivera-Velázquez
John Fernando Bedoya-Ospina
Publication date
01-10-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Emergency Radiology / Issue 5/2014
Print ISSN: 1070-3004
Electronic ISSN: 1438-1435
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-014-1222-4

Other articles of this Issue 5/2014

Emergency Radiology 5/2014 Go to the issue