Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 10/2017

Open Access 01-10-2017 | Gastrointestinal

Diagnostic performance of a CT-based scoring system for diagnosis of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy: comparison with subjective CT assessment

Authors: Lucas Goense, Pauline M. C. Stassen, Frank J. Wessels, Peter S. N. van Rossum, Jelle P. Ruurda, Maarten S. van Leeuwen, Richard van Hillegersberg

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 10/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To develop a CT-based prediction score for anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy and compare it to subjective CT interpretation.

Methods

Consecutive patients who underwent a CT scan for a clinical suspicion of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis between 2003 and 2014 were analyzed. The CT scans were systematically re-evaluated by two radiologists for the presence of specific CT findings and presence of an anastomotic leak. Also, the original CT interpretations were acquired. These results were compared to patients with and without a clinical confirmed leak.

Results

Out of 122 patients that underwent CT for a clinical suspicion of anastomotic leakage; 54 had a confirmed leak. In multivariable analysis, anastomotic leakage was associated with mediastinal fluid (OR = 3.4), esophagogastric wall discontinuity (OR = 4.9), mediastinal air (OR = 6.6), and a fistula (OR = 7.2). Based on these criteria, a prediction score was developed resulting in an area-under-the-curve (AUC) of 0.86, sensitivity of 80%, and specificity of 84%. The original interpretation and the systematic subjective CT assessment by two radiologists resulted in AUCs of 0.68 and 0.75 with sensitivities of 52% and 69%, and specificities of 84% and 82%, respectively.

Conclusion

This CT-based score may provide improved diagnostic performance for diagnosis of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy.

Key Points

A CT-based score provides improved diagnostic performance for diagnosis of anastomotic leakage.
Leakage associations include mediastinal fluid, mediastinal air, wall discontinuity, and fistula.
A scoring system yields superior diagnostic accuracy compared to subjective CT assessment.
Radiologists may suggest presence of anastomotic leakage based on a prediction score.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A (2015) Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 65:87–108CrossRefPubMed Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A (2015) Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 65:87–108CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ et al (2012) Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med 366:2074–2084CrossRefPubMed van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ et al (2012) Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med 366:2074–2084CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Shapiro J, van Lanschot JJ, Hulshof MC et al (2015) Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 16:1090–1098CrossRefPubMed Shapiro J, van Lanschot JJ, Hulshof MC et al (2015) Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 16:1090–1098CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Sjoquist KM, Burmeister BH, Smithers BM et al (2011) Survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for resectable oesophageal carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 12:681–692CrossRefPubMed Sjoquist KM, Burmeister BH, Smithers BM et al (2011) Survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for resectable oesophageal carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 12:681–692CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kim RH, Takabe K (2010) Methods of esophagogastric anastomoses following esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review. J Surg Oncol 101:527–533CrossRefPubMed Kim RH, Takabe K (2010) Methods of esophagogastric anastomoses following esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review. J Surg Oncol 101:527–533CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Saluja SS, Ray S, Pal S et al (2012) Randomized trial comparing side-to-side stapled and hand-sewn esophagogastric anastomosis in neck. J Gastrointest Surg 16:1287–1295CrossRefPubMed Saluja SS, Ray S, Pal S et al (2012) Randomized trial comparing side-to-side stapled and hand-sewn esophagogastric anastomosis in neck. J Gastrointest Surg 16:1287–1295CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Urschel JD (1995) Esophagogastrostomy anastomotic leaks complicating esophagectomy: a review. Am J Surg 169:634–640CrossRefPubMed Urschel JD (1995) Esophagogastrostomy anastomotic leaks complicating esophagectomy: a review. Am J Surg 169:634–640CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Iannettoni MD, Whyte RI, Orringer MB (1995) Catastrophic complications of the cervical esophagogastric anastomosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 110:1493–1500, discussion 1500-1CrossRefPubMed Iannettoni MD, Whyte RI, Orringer MB (1995) Catastrophic complications of the cervical esophagogastric anastomosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 110:1493–1500, discussion 1500-1CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kassis ES, Kosinski AS, Ross P Jr, Koppes KE, Donahue JM, Daniel VC (2013) Predictors of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: an analysis of the society of thoracic surgeons general thoracic database. Ann Thorac Surg 96:1919–1926CrossRefPubMed Kassis ES, Kosinski AS, Ross P Jr, Koppes KE, Donahue JM, Daniel VC (2013) Predictors of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: an analysis of the society of thoracic surgeons general thoracic database. Ann Thorac Surg 96:1919–1926CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Boone J, Rinkes IB, van Leeuwen M, van Hillegersberg R (2008) Diagnostic value of routine aqueous contrast swallow examination after oesophagectomy for detecting leakage of the cervical oesophagogastric anastomosis. ANZ J Surg 78:784–790CrossRefPubMed Boone J, Rinkes IB, van Leeuwen M, van Hillegersberg R (2008) Diagnostic value of routine aqueous contrast swallow examination after oesophagectomy for detecting leakage of the cervical oesophagogastric anastomosis. ANZ J Surg 78:784–790CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Cools-Lartigue J, Andalib A, Abo-Alsaud A et al (2014) Routine contrast esophagram has minimal impact on the postoperative management of patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 21:2573–2579CrossRefPubMed Cools-Lartigue J, Andalib A, Abo-Alsaud A et al (2014) Routine contrast esophagram has minimal impact on the postoperative management of patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 21:2573–2579CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Tirnaksiz MB, Deschamps C, Allen MS, Johnson DC, Pairolero PC (2005) Effectiveness of screening aqueous contrast swallow in detecting clinically significant anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy. Eur Surg Res 37:123–128CrossRefPubMed Tirnaksiz MB, Deschamps C, Allen MS, Johnson DC, Pairolero PC (2005) Effectiveness of screening aqueous contrast swallow in detecting clinically significant anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy. Eur Surg Res 37:123–128CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Strauss C, Mal F, Perniceni T et al (2010) Computed tomography versus water-soluble contrast swallow in the detection of intrathoracic anastomotic leak complicating esophagogastrectomy (ivor lewis): a prospective study in 97 patients. Ann Surg 251:647–651CrossRefPubMed Strauss C, Mal F, Perniceni T et al (2010) Computed tomography versus water-soluble contrast swallow in the detection of intrathoracic anastomotic leak complicating esophagogastrectomy (ivor lewis): a prospective study in 97 patients. Ann Surg 251:647–651CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Maish MS, DeMeester SR, Choustoulakis E et al (2005) The safety and usefulness of endoscopy for evaluation of the graft and anastomosis early after esophagectomy and reconstruction. Surg Endosc 19:1093–1102CrossRefPubMed Maish MS, DeMeester SR, Choustoulakis E et al (2005) The safety and usefulness of endoscopy for evaluation of the graft and anastomosis early after esophagectomy and reconstruction. Surg Endosc 19:1093–1102CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Page RD, Asmat A, McShane J, Russell GN, Pennefather SH (2013) Routine endoscopy to detect anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 95:292–298CrossRefPubMed Page RD, Asmat A, McShane J, Russell GN, Pennefather SH (2013) Routine endoscopy to detect anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 95:292–298CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Hogan BA, Winter DC, Broe D, Broe P, Lee MJ (2008) Prospective trial comparing contrast swallow, computed tomography and endoscopy to identify anastomotic leak following oesophagogastric surgery. Surg Endosc 22:767–771CrossRefPubMed Hogan BA, Winter DC, Broe D, Broe P, Lee MJ (2008) Prospective trial comparing contrast swallow, computed tomography and endoscopy to identify anastomotic leak following oesophagogastric surgery. Surg Endosc 22:767–771CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Lantos JE, Levine MS, Rubesin SE, Lau CT, Torigian DA (2013) Comparison between esophagography and chest computed tomography for evaluation of leaks after esophagectomy and gastric pull-through. J Thorac Imaging 28:121–128CrossRefPubMed Lantos JE, Levine MS, Rubesin SE, Lau CT, Torigian DA (2013) Comparison between esophagography and chest computed tomography for evaluation of leaks after esophagectomy and gastric pull-through. J Thorac Imaging 28:121–128CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Upponi S, Ganeshan A, D'Costa H et al (2008) Radiological detection of post-oesophagectomy anastomotic leak - a comparison between multidetector CT and fluoroscopy. Br J Radiol 81:545–548CrossRefPubMed Upponi S, Ganeshan A, D'Costa H et al (2008) Radiological detection of post-oesophagectomy anastomotic leak - a comparison between multidetector CT and fluoroscopy. Br J Radiol 81:545–548CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Kauv P, Benadjaoud S, Curis E, Boulay-Coletta I, Loriau J, Zins M (2015) Anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery: diagnostic accuracy of CT. Eur Radiol 25:3543–3551CrossRefPubMed Kauv P, Benadjaoud S, Curis E, Boulay-Coletta I, Loriau J, Zins M (2015) Anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery: diagnostic accuracy of CT. Eur Radiol 25:3543–3551CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Kim TH, Kim JH, Shin CI, Kim SH, Han JK, Choi BI (2015) CT findings suggesting anastomotic leak and predicting the recovery period following gastric surgery. Eur Radiol 25:1958–1966CrossRefPubMed Kim TH, Kim JH, Shin CI, Kim SH, Han JK, Choi BI (2015) CT findings suggesting anastomotic leak and predicting the recovery period following gastric surgery. Eur Radiol 25:1958–1966CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE et al (2015) STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. Radiology 277:826–832CrossRefPubMed Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE et al (2015) STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. Radiology 277:826–832CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Haverkamp L, van der Sluis PC, Verhage RJ, Siersema PD, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R (2013) End-to-end cervical esophagogastric anastomoses are associated with a higher number of strictures compared with end-to-side anastomoses. J Gastrointest Surg 17:872–876CrossRefPubMed Haverkamp L, van der Sluis PC, Verhage RJ, Siersema PD, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R (2013) End-to-end cervical esophagogastric anastomoses are associated with a higher number of strictures compared with end-to-side anastomoses. J Gastrointest Surg 17:872–876CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Steyerberg EW, Vickers AJ, Cook NR et al (2010) Assessing the performance of prediction models: a framework for traditional and novel measures. Epidemiology 21:128–138CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Steyerberg EW, Vickers AJ, Cook NR et al (2010) Assessing the performance of prediction models: a framework for traditional and novel measures. Epidemiology 21:128–138CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Diagnostic performance of a CT-based scoring system for diagnosis of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy: comparison with subjective CT assessment
Authors
Lucas Goense
Pauline M. C. Stassen
Frank J. Wessels
Peter S. N. van Rossum
Jelle P. Ruurda
Maarten S. van Leeuwen
Richard van Hillegersberg
Publication date
01-10-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 10/2017
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-4802-3

Other articles of this Issue 10/2017

European Radiology 10/2017 Go to the issue