Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 5/2010

01-10-2010

Diagnostic accuracy of CT colonography and optical colonoscopy evaluated using surgically resected specimens

Authors: Yutaka J. Kawamura, Shinichiro Okada, Junichi Sasaki, Naoshi Tajima, Osamu Tanaka, Fumio Konishi

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 5/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to clarify the diagnostic ability of CT colonography (CTC) using surgically resected specimens to avoid inaccuracy associated with optical colonoscopy (OC).

Subjects and methods

CTC and OC were performed in 152 consecutive patients with colorectal cancer. Forty patients had simultaneous lesions other than the ones for which the surgery was intended, and these lesions were used as the gold standard. In 24 patients without stenosis, the sensitivity and positive predictive values (PPV) of CTC and OC were evaluated. In 16 patients with stenosis, the diagnostic ability of CTC for lesions located proximal to the stenosis was assessed.

Results

Sensitivity of CTC and OC was 81% and 66% (P = 0.16), and PPV was 90% and 100% (P = 0.13), respectively. For 22 lesions larger than 5 mm, the sensitivity of CTC and OCS was 96% and 91% (P > 0.50), and PPV was 100% and 100%, respectively. In patients with stenosis, sensitivity and PPV were 89% and 80%, respectively. These results were not significantly different from those in patients without stenosis.

Conclusions

CTC is a reliable modality for the diagnosis of colorectal polyps. It is also useful to evaluate the colon proximal to severe stenosis which could not be observed by OC.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kawamura YJ, Sasaki J, Okamaoto H, et al. Clinical significance of virtual colonoscopy (CT colonography) with special reference to polyp morphology. Hepatogastroenterology. 2004;51:1686-8.PubMed Kawamura YJ, Sasaki J, Okamaoto H, et al. Clinical significance of virtual colonoscopy (CT colonography) with special reference to polyp morphology. Hepatogastroenterology. 2004;51:1686-8.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Utano K, Endo K, Togashi K, et al. (2008) Preoperative T staging of colorectal cancer by CT colonography. Dis Colon Rectum [Epub ahead of print] Utano K, Endo K, Togashi K, et al. (2008) Preoperative T staging of colorectal cancer by CT colonography. Dis Colon Rectum [Epub ahead of print]
3.
go back to reference Kim JH, Kim WH, Kim TI, et al. Incomplete colonoscopy in patients with occlusive colorectal cancer: usefulness of CT colonography according to tumor location. Yonsei Med J. 2007;48:934-41.CrossRefPubMed Kim JH, Kim WH, Kim TI, et al. Incomplete colonoscopy in patients with occlusive colorectal cancer: usefulness of CT colonography according to tumor location. Yonsei Med J. 2007;48:934-41.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Yucel C, Lev-Toaff AS, Moussa N, Durrani H. CT colonography for incomplete or contraindicated optical colonoscopy in older patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:145-50.CrossRefPubMed Yucel C, Lev-Toaff AS, Moussa N, Durrani H. CT colonography for incomplete or contraindicated optical colonoscopy in older patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:145-50.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Copel L, Sosna J, Kruskal JB, et al. CT colonography in 546 patients with incomplete colonoscopy. Radiology. 2007;244:471-8.CrossRefPubMed Copel L, Sosna J, Kruskal JB, et al. CT colonography in 546 patients with incomplete colonoscopy. Radiology. 2007;244:471-8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Sosna J, Sella T, Sy O, et al. Critical analysis of the performance of double-contrast barium enema for detecting colorectal polyps > or = 6 mm in the era of CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:374-85.CrossRefPubMed Sosna J, Sella T, Sy O, et al. Critical analysis of the performance of double-contrast barium enema for detecting colorectal polyps > or = 6 mm in the era of CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:374-85.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Rockey DC, Paulson E, Niedzwiecki D, et al. Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet. 2005;365:305-11.PubMed Rockey DC, Paulson E, Niedzwiecki D, et al. Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet. 2005;365:305-11.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, et al. CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1403-12.CrossRefPubMed Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, et al. CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1403-12.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Chaparro Sánchez M, del Campo Val L, Maté Jiménez J, et al. Computed tomography colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;30:375-80.CrossRefPubMed Chaparro Sánchez M, del Campo Val L, Maté Jiménez J, et al. Computed tomography colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;30:375-80.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Bensen S, Mott LA, Dain B, Rothstein R, Baron J. The colonoscopic miss rate and true one-year recurrence of colorectal neoplastic polyps. Polyp Prevention Study Group. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:194-9.CrossRefPubMed Bensen S, Mott LA, Dain B, Rothstein R, Baron J. The colonoscopic miss rate and true one-year recurrence of colorectal neoplastic polyps. Polyp Prevention Study Group. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:194-9.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Heresbach D, Barrioz T, Lapalus MG, et al. Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps: a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies. Endoscopy. 2008;40:284-90.CrossRefPubMed Heresbach D, Barrioz T, Lapalus MG, et al. Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps: a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies. Endoscopy. 2008;40:284-90.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT, et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology. 1997;112:24-8.CrossRefPubMed Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT, et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology. 1997;112:24-8.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J, et al. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:343-50.CrossRefPubMed van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J, et al. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:343-50.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Roberts-Thomson IC, Tucker GR, Hewett PJ, et al. Single-center study comparing computed tomography colonography with conventional colonoscopy. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:469-73.CrossRefPubMed Roberts-Thomson IC, Tucker GR, Hewett PJ, et al. Single-center study comparing computed tomography colonography with conventional colonoscopy. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:469-73.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Arnesen RB, von Benzon E, Adamsen S, et al. Diagnostic performance of computed tomography colonography and colonoscopy: a prospective and validated analysis of 231 paired examinations. Acta Radiol. 2007;48:831-7.CrossRefPubMed Arnesen RB, von Benzon E, Adamsen S, et al. Diagnostic performance of computed tomography colonography and colonoscopy: a prospective and validated analysis of 231 paired examinations. Acta Radiol. 2007;48:831-7.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Cotton PB, Durkalski VL, Pineau BC, et al. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA. 2004;291:1713-9.CrossRefPubMed Cotton PB, Durkalski VL, Pineau BC, et al. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA. 2004;291:1713-9.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Pickhardt PJ, Nugent PA, Mysliwiec PA, Choi JR, Schindler WR. Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:352-9.PubMed Pickhardt PJ, Nugent PA, Mysliwiec PA, Choi JR, Schindler WR. Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:352-9.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Postic G, Lewin D, Bickerstaff C, Wallace MB. Colonoscopic miss rates determined by direct comparison of colonoscopy with colon resection specimens. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:3182-5.CrossRefPubMed Postic G, Lewin D, Bickerstaff C, Wallace MB. Colonoscopic miss rates determined by direct comparison of colonoscopy with colon resection specimens. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:3182-5.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Diagnostic accuracy of CT colonography and optical colonoscopy evaluated using surgically resected specimens
Authors
Yutaka J. Kawamura
Shinichiro Okada
Junichi Sasaki
Naoshi Tajima
Osamu Tanaka
Fumio Konishi
Publication date
01-10-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 5/2010
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-009-9558-z

Other articles of this Issue 5/2010

Abdominal Radiology 5/2010 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine