Skip to main content
Top

Open Access 19-04-2024 | Diabetic Retinopathy | Miscellaneous

Search engine optimization and its association with readability and accessibility of diabetic retinopathy websites

Authors: Matthew R. Lam, Garrett N. Manion, Benjamin K. Young

Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

This study investigated whether websites regarding diabetic retinopathy are readable for patients, and adequately designed to be found by search engines.

Methods

The term “diabetic retinopathy” was queried in the Google search engine. Patient-oriented websites from the first 10 pages were categorized by search result page number and website organization type. Metrics of search engine optimization (SEO) and readability were then calculated.

Results

Among the 71 sites meeting inclusion criteria, informational and organizational sites were best optimized for search engines, and informational sites were the most visited. Better optimization as measured by authority score was correlated with lower Flesch Kincaid Grade Level (r = 0.267, P = 0.024). There was a significant increase in Flesch Kincaid Grade Level with successive search result pages (r = 0.275, P = 0.020). Only 2 sites met the 6th grade reading level AMA recommendation by Flesch Kincaid Grade Level; the average reading level was 10.5. There was no significant difference in readability between website categories.

Conclusion

While the readability of diabetic retinopathy patient information was poor, better readability was correlated to better SEO metrics. While we cannot assess causality, we recommend websites improve their readability, which may increase uptake of their resources.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
3.
go back to reference Finney Rutten LJ et al (2019) Online health information seeking among US adults: measuring progress toward a healthy people 2020 objective. Public Health Rep 134(6):617–625CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Finney Rutten LJ et al (2019) Online health information seeking among US adults: measuring progress toward a healthy people 2020 objective. Public Health Rep 134(6):617–625CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Weiss BD (2007) Health literacy and patient safety: help patients understand. Manual for clinicians. American Medical Association Foundation Weiss BD (2007) Health literacy and patient safety: help patients understand. Manual for clinicians. American Medical Association Foundation
6.
go back to reference Williams MV et al (1998) Inadequate literacy is a barrier to asthma knowledge and self-care. Chest 114(4):1008–1015CrossRefPubMed Williams MV et al (1998) Inadequate literacy is a barrier to asthma knowledge and self-care. Chest 114(4):1008–1015CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Williams MV et al (1998) Relationship of functional health literacy to patients’ knowledge of their chronic disease. A study of patients with hypertension and diabetes. Arch Intern Med 158(2):166–72CrossRefPubMed Williams MV et al (1998) Relationship of functional health literacy to patients’ knowledge of their chronic disease. A study of patients with hypertension and diabetes. Arch Intern Med 158(2):166–72CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Baker DW et al (2007) Health literacy and mortality among elderly persons. Arch Intern Med 167(14):1503–1509CrossRefPubMed Baker DW et al (2007) Health literacy and mortality among elderly persons. Arch Intern Med 167(14):1503–1509CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Schillinger D et al (2002) Association of health literacy with diabetes outcomes. JAMA 288(4):475–482CrossRefPubMed Schillinger D et al (2002) Association of health literacy with diabetes outcomes. JAMA 288(4):475–482CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Ayoub S et al (2019) Readability assessment of online uveitis patient education materials. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 27(3):399–403CrossRefPubMed Ayoub S et al (2019) Readability assessment of online uveitis patient education materials. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 27(3):399–403CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Jindal P, MacDermid JC (2017) Assessing reading levels of health information: uses and limitations of flesch formula. Educ Health (Abingdon) 30(1):84–88CrossRefPubMed Jindal P, MacDermid JC (2017) Assessing reading levels of health information: uses and limitations of flesch formula. Educ Health (Abingdon) 30(1):84–88CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Fortuna J et al (2020) Assessment of online patient education materials designed for people with age-related macular degeneration. BMC Ophthalmol 20(1):391 Fortuna J et al (2020) Assessment of online patient education materials designed for people with age-related macular degeneration. BMC Ophthalmol 20(1):391
17.
go back to reference Miles RC et al (2019) Readability of online patient educational materials related to breast lesions requiring surgery. Radiology 291(1):112–118CrossRefPubMed Miles RC et al (2019) Readability of online patient educational materials related to breast lesions requiring surgery. Radiology 291(1):112–118CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Rodriguez F et al (2020) Readability of online patient educational materials for coronary artery calcium scans and implications for health disparities. J Am Heart Assoc 9(18):e017372 Rodriguez F et al (2020) Readability of online patient educational materials for coronary artery calcium scans and implications for health disparities. J Am Heart Assoc 9(18):e017372
19.
go back to reference Rubel KE et al (2020) Understandability and actionability of audiovisual patient education materials on sinusitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 10(4):564–571CrossRefPubMed Rubel KE et al (2020) Understandability and actionability of audiovisual patient education materials on sinusitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 10(4):564–571CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Ratzan SC, Parker RM (2000) Introduction. In: Zorn M, Selden CR, Ratzan SC, Parker RM (eds) National library of medicine current bibliographies in medicine: health literacy. National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. NLM Pub. No. CBM 2000–1 Ratzan SC, Parker RM (2000) Introduction. In: Zorn M, Selden CR, Ratzan SC, Parker RM (eds) National library of medicine current bibliographies in medicine: health literacy. National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. NLM Pub. No. CBM 2000–1
21.
go back to reference Rooney MK et al (2021) Readability of patient education materials from high-impact medical journals: a 20-year analysis. J Patient Exp 8:2374373521998847PubMedPubMedCentral Rooney MK et al (2021) Readability of patient education materials from high-impact medical journals: a 20-year analysis. J Patient Exp 8:2374373521998847PubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Teo ZL et al (2021) Global prevalence of diabetic retinopathy and projection of burden through 2045: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 128(11):1580–1591CrossRefPubMed Teo ZL et al (2021) Global prevalence of diabetic retinopathy and projection of burden through 2045: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 128(11):1580–1591CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Kloosterboer A et al (2019) Assessment of the quality, content, and readability of freely available online information for patients regarding diabetic retinopathy. JAMA Ophthalmol 137(11):1240–1245CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kloosterboer A et al (2019) Assessment of the quality, content, and readability of freely available online information for patients regarding diabetic retinopathy. JAMA Ophthalmol 137(11):1240–1245CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Momenaei B et al (2023) Appropriateness and readability of ChatGPT-4-generated responses for surgical treatment of retinal diseases. Ophthalmol Retina 7(10):862–868CrossRefPubMed Momenaei B et al (2023) Appropriateness and readability of ChatGPT-4-generated responses for surgical treatment of retinal diseases. Ophthalmol Retina 7(10):862–868CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Metze K et al (2024) Bibliographic research with ChatGPT may be misleading: the problem of hallucination. J Pediatr Surg 59(1):158CrossRefPubMed Metze K et al (2024) Bibliographic research with ChatGPT may be misleading: the problem of hallucination. J Pediatr Surg 59(1):158CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Search engine optimization and its association with readability and accessibility of diabetic retinopathy websites
Authors
Matthew R. Lam
Garrett N. Manion
Benjamin K. Young
Publication date
19-04-2024
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-024-06472-3