Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 5/2019

01-05-2019 | Diabetes | Original Article

30-Day unplanned surgery in cervical spondylotic myelopathy surgically treated: a single-center experience

Authors: Xavier Plano, Manuel Ramírez, Antonia Matamalas, Sleiman Haddad, Ana García de Frutos, J. M. Casamitjana, Ferran Pellisé

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 5/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Study design

Retrospective cohort study.

Objective

Analyze the rate and risk factors associated with Unplanned Surgeries (US) during the first 30 days in patients treated for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Background

US are often regarded as a potentially useful quality of care indicator.

Methods

We defined US as any, non-planned, surgical procedure as a complication after “index” surgery. Demographic data, comorbidities, ASA, smoking status, surgical details and postoperative complications were collected. We conducted a subjective outcome test using the Global Outcome Score (GOS). To assess risk factors, a bivariate analysis was performed using T Student or Chi-square. Risk is shown as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Multivariable logistic regression models with bootstrap resampling procedure were performed.


Results

The study included 303 patients (200 men) with mean age of 57.7 years (27–86) and mean follow-up of 75.35 months (16–126 m). 63.3% patients were ASA 1 or 2 and 41.9% were smokers. 77.9% of patients had some comorbidity. Anterior approach surgeries were 65.7%. Perioperative complications: 29% medical, 8.9% intraoperative and 3% implant related. US rate was 2.6%. Causes for revision were postoperative infection or deep hematomas. After bivariate analysis, the risk factors associated were diabetes mellitus (OR 2.6; 95% CI 1–5.5) and intraoperative complications (OR 6.5, 95% CI 1–40). The presence of US does not have influence in satisfaction using GOS score.

Conclusions

Our US rate was 2.6%, similar to the literature. Diabetics and patients suffering an intraoperative complication are more likely to need an early reinterventions (OR 2.2 and 6.5, respectively). US did not alter the patient’s outcomes.

Graphical abstract

These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Literature
1.
go back to reference New PW, Cripps RA, Bonne Lee B (2014) Global maps of non-traumatic spinal cord injury epidemiology: towards a living data repository. Spinal Cord 52:97–109CrossRefPubMed New PW, Cripps RA, Bonne Lee B (2014) Global maps of non-traumatic spinal cord injury epidemiology: towards a living data repository. Spinal Cord 52:97–109CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Matsunaga S, Komiya S, Toyama Y (2015) Risk factors for development of myelopathy in patients with cervical spondylotic cord compression. Eur Spine J 24(Suppl 2):142–149CrossRefPubMed Matsunaga S, Komiya S, Toyama Y (2015) Risk factors for development of myelopathy in patients with cervical spondylotic cord compression. Eur Spine J 24(Suppl 2):142–149CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Nouri A, Tetreault L, Singh A et al (2015) Degenerative cervical myelopathy: epidemiology, genetics and pathogenesis. Spine 40:E675–E693CrossRefPubMed Nouri A, Tetreault L, Singh A et al (2015) Degenerative cervical myelopathy: epidemiology, genetics and pathogenesis. Spine 40:E675–E693CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Lad SP, Patil CG, Berta S et al (2009) National trends in spinal fusion for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Surg Neurol 71:66–69 (discussion 9) CrossRefPubMed Lad SP, Patil CG, Berta S et al (2009) National trends in spinal fusion for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Surg Neurol 71:66–69 (discussion 9) CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Wang MC, Kreuter W, Wolfla CE et al (2009) Trends and variations in cervical spine surgery in the United States: medicare beneficiaries, 1992 to 2005. Spine 34:955–961 (discussion 62-63) CrossRefPubMed Wang MC, Kreuter W, Wolfla CE et al (2009) Trends and variations in cervical spine surgery in the United States: medicare beneficiaries, 1992 to 2005. Spine 34:955–961 (discussion 62-63) CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Wilson JR, Barry S, Fischer DJ et al (2013) Frequency, timing, and predictors of neurological dysfunction in the nonmyelopathic patient with cervical spinal cord compression, canal stenosis, and/or ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine 38:S37–S54CrossRefPubMed Wilson JR, Barry S, Fischer DJ et al (2013) Frequency, timing, and predictors of neurological dysfunction in the nonmyelopathic patient with cervical spinal cord compression, canal stenosis, and/or ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine 38:S37–S54CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Rampersaud YR, Moro ER, Neary MA et al (2006) Intraoperative adverse events and related postoperative complications in spine surgery: implications for enhancing patient safety founded on evidence-based protocols. Spine 31:1503–1510CrossRefPubMed Rampersaud YR, Moro ER, Neary MA et al (2006) Intraoperative adverse events and related postoperative complications in spine surgery: implications for enhancing patient safety founded on evidence-based protocols. Spine 31:1503–1510CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Birkmeyer JD, Hamby LS, Birkmeyer CM et al (2001) Is unplanned return to the operating room a useful quality indicator in general surgery? Arch Surg 136:405–411CrossRefPubMed Birkmeyer JD, Hamby LS, Birkmeyer CM et al (2001) Is unplanned return to the operating room a useful quality indicator in general surgery? Arch Surg 136:405–411CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Tsai YW, Hsiao FY, Wen YW et al (2013) Clinical outcomes of vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty for patients with vertebral compression fractures: a nationwide cohort study. J Am Med Dir Assoc 14:41–47CrossRefPubMed Tsai YW, Hsiao FY, Wen YW et al (2013) Clinical outcomes of vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty for patients with vertebral compression fractures: a nationwide cohort study. J Am Med Dir Assoc 14:41–47CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Kelly MP, Eliasberg CD, Riley MS, Ajiboye RM, SooHoo NF (2018) Reoperation and complications after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion and cervical disc arthroplasty: a study of 52,395 cases. Eur Spin J 6:1432–1439CrossRef Kelly MP, Eliasberg CD, Riley MS, Ajiboye RM, SooHoo NF (2018) Reoperation and complications after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion and cervical disc arthroplasty: a study of 52,395 cases. Eur Spin J 6:1432–1439CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Saklad M (1941) Grading of patients for surgical procedures. Anesthesiology 2:281–284CrossRef Saklad M (1941) Grading of patients for surgical procedures. Anesthesiology 2:281–284CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Eddy DM, Adler J, Morris M (2012) The ‘Global Outcomes Score’: a quality measure, based on health outcomes, that compares current care to a target level of care. Health Aff (Millwood) 31:2441–2450CrossRef Eddy DM, Adler J, Morris M (2012) The ‘Global Outcomes Score’: a quality measure, based on health outcomes, that compares current care to a target level of care. Health Aff (Millwood) 31:2441–2450CrossRef
13.
go back to reference SPSS [computer program] (2012) Version 20. South Melbourne, Victoria: Cengage Learning Australia. SPSS Inc SPSS [computer program] (2012) Version 20. South Melbourne, Victoria: Cengage Learning Australia. SPSS Inc
14.
go back to reference Patil PG, Turner DA, Pietrobon R (2005) National trends in surgical procedures for degenerative cervical spine disease: 1990–2000. Neurosurgery 57:753–758 (discussion 8) CrossRefPubMed Patil PG, Turner DA, Pietrobon R (2005) National trends in surgical procedures for degenerative cervical spine disease: 1990–2000. Neurosurgery 57:753–758 (discussion 8) CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Haddad S, Millhouse PW, Maltenfort M et al (2016) Diagnosis and neurologic status as predictors of surgical site infection in primary cervical spinal surgery. Spine J 16:632–642CrossRefPubMed Haddad S, Millhouse PW, Maltenfort M et al (2016) Diagnosis and neurologic status as predictors of surgical site infection in primary cervical spinal surgery. Spine J 16:632–642CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Jencks SF, Williams MV, Coleman EA (2009) Rehospitalizations among patients in the medicare fee-for-service program. New Eng J Med 360:1418–1428CrossRefPubMed Jencks SF, Williams MV, Coleman EA (2009) Rehospitalizations among patients in the medicare fee-for-service program. New Eng J Med 360:1418–1428CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Park MS, Ju YS, Moon SH et al (2016) Reoperation rates after surgery for degenerative cervical spine disease according to different surgical procedures: national population-based cohort study. Spine 41:1484–1492CrossRefPubMed Park MS, Ju YS, Moon SH et al (2016) Reoperation rates after surgery for degenerative cervical spine disease according to different surgical procedures: national population-based cohort study. Spine 41:1484–1492CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Tsai TT, Lee SH, Niu CC et al (2016) Unplanned revision spinal surgery within a week: a retrospective analysis of surgical causes. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 17:28CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tsai TT, Lee SH, Niu CC et al (2016) Unplanned revision spinal surgery within a week: a retrospective analysis of surgical causes. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 17:28CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference McCormack RA, Hunter T, Ramos N et al (2012) An analysis of causes of readmission after spine surgery. Spine 37:1260–1266CrossRefPubMed McCormack RA, Hunter T, Ramos N et al (2012) An analysis of causes of readmission after spine surgery. Spine 37:1260–1266CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Akamnonu C, Cheriyan T, Goldstein JA et al (2015) Ninety-day readmissions after degenerative cervical spine surgery: a single-center administrative database study. Int J Spine Surg 9:19CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Akamnonu C, Cheriyan T, Goldstein JA et al (2015) Ninety-day readmissions after degenerative cervical spine surgery: a single-center administrative database study. Int J Spine Surg 9:19CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference King JT Jr, Abbed KM, Gould GC et al (2009) Cervical spine reoperation rates and hospital resource utilization after initial surgery for degenerative cervical spine disease in 12,338 patients in Washington State. Neurosurgery 65:1011–1022 (discussion 22-3) CrossRefPubMed King JT Jr, Abbed KM, Gould GC et al (2009) Cervical spine reoperation rates and hospital resource utilization after initial surgery for degenerative cervical spine disease in 12,338 patients in Washington State. Neurosurgery 65:1011–1022 (discussion 22-3) CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Shamji MF, Cook C, Pietrobon R et al (2009) Impact of surgical approach on complications and resource utilization of cervical spine fusion: a nationwide perspective to the surgical treatment of diffuse cervical spondylosis. Spine J 9:31–38CrossRefPubMed Shamji MF, Cook C, Pietrobon R et al (2009) Impact of surgical approach on complications and resource utilization of cervical spine fusion: a nationwide perspective to the surgical treatment of diffuse cervical spondylosis. Spine J 9:31–38CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Radcliff KE, Limthongkul W, Kepler CK, Sidhu GD, Anderson DG, Rihn JA, Hilibrand AS, Vaccaro AR, Albert TJ (2014) Cervical laminectomy width and spinal cord drift are risk factors for postoperative C5 palsy. J Spinal Disord Tech 27(2):86–92CrossRefPubMed Radcliff KE, Limthongkul W, Kepler CK, Sidhu GD, Anderson DG, Rihn JA, Hilibrand AS, Vaccaro AR, Albert TJ (2014) Cervical laminectomy width and spinal cord drift are risk factors for postoperative C5 palsy. J Spinal Disord Tech 27(2):86–92CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Luo J, Cao K, Huang S et al (2015) Comparison of anterior approach versus posterior approach for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Spine J 24:1621–1630CrossRefPubMed Luo J, Cao K, Huang S et al (2015) Comparison of anterior approach versus posterior approach for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Spine J 24:1621–1630CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Patel MS, Newey M, Sell P (2015) A comparison of patient-reported outcome measures after spinal surgery. Bone Joint J 97-B(3):366–371CrossRefPubMed Patel MS, Newey M, Sell P (2015) A comparison of patient-reported outcome measures after spinal surgery. Bone Joint J 97-B(3):366–371CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Nuñez SPF, Vila A, Domingo M et al (2015) Risk factors and clinical impact of early unanticipated revision surgery in adult spinal deformity. Eur Spine J 24:770–771 Nuñez SPF, Vila A, Domingo M et al (2015) Risk factors and clinical impact of early unanticipated revision surgery in adult spinal deformity. Eur Spine J 24:770–771
Metadata
Title
30-Day unplanned surgery in cervical spondylotic myelopathy surgically treated: a single-center experience
Authors
Xavier Plano
Manuel Ramírez
Antonia Matamalas
Sleiman Haddad
Ana García de Frutos
J. M. Casamitjana
Ferran Pellisé
Publication date
01-05-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Keyword
Diabetes
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 5/2019
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-05892-8

Other articles of this Issue 5/2019

European Spine Journal 5/2019 Go to the issue