Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Debate

Dextromethorphan: a case study on addressing abuse of a safe and effective drug

Authors: David C. Spangler, Catherine M. Loyd, Emily E. Skor

Published in: Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Dextromethorphan is a safe, effective cough suppressant, available without a prescription in the United States since 1958. Due to a perceived prevalence of abuse of dextromethorphan by teens, in 2007 the Drug Enforcement Administration requested the Food and Drug Administration evaluate whether dextromethorphan should be recommended for scheduling under the Controlled Substances Act. The Food and Drug Administration held an Advisory Committee meeting in 2010 to provide a scientific and medical evaluation of dextromethorphan and its abuse potential.

Discussion

To address reports of abuse, particularly by teens in the United States, the Consumer Healthcare Products Association initiated an abuse mitigation plan in 2010 with specific goals related to awareness of the behavior, perception of risk, social disapproval, and access to the products. In identifying abuse interventions, experts acknowledge that substance abuse among teens is a highly complex behavior and indicate that the best course of action is to address prevention by focusing on the factors that impact teen behavior.

Conclusion

It is noteworthy that the annual prevalence of over-the-counter cough medicine abuse has sharply decreased since 2010. While a true cause-and-effect relationship cannot be assured, the Consumer Healthcare Products Association and its member companies believe that the increased awareness of the issue since the 2010 Food and Drug Administration Advisory Committee meeting, and the subsequent implementation of a well-delivered and targeted abuse mitigation plan that addressed the levers influencing teen decisions is contributing to the observed reduction in abuse. During the period of 2010–2015, reported abuse of dextromethorphan by 8th, 10th, and 12th graders decreased 35 %. The authors believe this reduction supports the view of the Consumer Healthcare Products Association at the outset of the abuse mitigation plan effort and today: Controlled substance scheduling or prescription requirements would result in a reduction in the legitimate use of this medicine that has benefits that far outweigh its risks. Instead, there are more targeted, more effective, and less disruptive interventions to address dextromethorphan abuse.
Literature
4.
go back to reference Bramley TJ et al. Productivity losses related to the common cold. J Occup Environ Med. 2002;44(9):822–9.CrossRefPubMed Bramley TJ et al. Productivity losses related to the common cold. J Occup Environ Med. 2002;44(9):822–9.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Fendrick AM et al. The economic burden of non-influenza-related viral respiratory tract infection in the United States. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(4):487–94.CrossRefPubMed Fendrick AM et al. The economic burden of non-influenza-related viral respiratory tract infection in the United States. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(4):487–94.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Rogawski MA. The NMDA receptor, NMDA antagonists and epilepsy therapy: a status report. Drugs. 1992;44(3):279–92.CrossRefPubMed Rogawski MA. The NMDA receptor, NMDA antagonists and epilepsy therapy: a status report. Drugs. 1992;44(3):279–92.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Jasinski DR. Abuse potential of morphine/dextromethorphan combinations. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2000;19(1 Suppl):S26–30.CrossRefPubMed Jasinski DR. Abuse potential of morphine/dextromethorphan combinations. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2000;19(1 Suppl):S26–30.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Zawertailo LA et al. Effect of metabolic blockade on the psychoactive effects of dextromethorphan. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2010;25(1):71–9.CrossRefPubMed Zawertailo LA et al. Effect of metabolic blockade on the psychoactive effects of dextromethorphan. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2010;25(1):71–9.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Jasinski DR. Progress report on the assessment of the antagonists nalbuphine and GBA-2087 for abuse potential and studies of the effects of dextromethorphan in man, Reported to the 33rd Annual Scientific Meeting, Committee on Problems of Drug Dependence. Washington: National Research Council; 1971. p. 143. Jasinski DR. Progress report on the assessment of the antagonists nalbuphine and GBA-2087 for abuse potential and studies of the effects of dextromethorphan in man, Reported to the 33rd Annual Scientific Meeting, Committee on Problems of Drug Dependence. Washington: National Research Council; 1971. p. 143.
17.
go back to reference Scheier L, Grenard J, Holtz K. An empirical assessment of the Above The Influence advertising campaign. J Drug Education. 2011;41(4):431–61.CrossRefPubMed Scheier L, Grenard J, Holtz K. An empirical assessment of the Above The Influence advertising campaign. J Drug Education. 2011;41(4):431–61.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Consumer Healthcare Products Association and Partnership for Drug-Free Kids presentation to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Presented 4 Dec 2015. Consumer Healthcare Products Association and Partnership for Drug-Free Kids presentation to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Presented 4 Dec 2015.
22.
go back to reference Wilson MD et al. Monitoring trends in dextromethorphan abuse using the National Poison Data System: 2000-2010. Clin Toxicol. 2011;49(5):409–15.CrossRef Wilson MD et al. Monitoring trends in dextromethorphan abuse using the National Poison Data System: 2000-2010. Clin Toxicol. 2011;49(5):409–15.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Dextromethorphan: a case study on addressing abuse of a safe and effective drug
Authors
David C. Spangler
Catherine M. Loyd
Emily E. Skor
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1747-597X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-016-0067-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 1/2016 Go to the issue