Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2020

01-12-2020 | Research article

Development of the prototype concise safe systems checklist tool for general practice

Authors: Ian Litchfield, Rachel Spencer, Brian G. Bell, Anthony Avery, Katherine Perryman, Kate Marsden, Sheila Greenfield, Stephen Campbell

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In the course of producing a patient safety toolkit for primary care, we identified the need for a concise safe-systems checklist designed to address areas of patient safety which are under-represented in mandatory requirements and existing tools. This paper describes the development of a prototype checklist designed to be used in busy general practice environments to provide an overview of key patient safety related processes and prompt practice wide-discussion.

Methods

An extensive narrative review and a survey of world-wide general practice organisations were used to identify existing primary care patient safety issues and tools. A RAND panel of international experts rated the results, summarising the findings for importance and relevance. The checklist was created to include areas that are not part of established patient safety tools or mandatory and legal requirements. Four main themes were identified: information flow, practice safety information, prescribing, and use of IT systems from which a 13 item checklist was trialled in 16 practices resulting in a nine item prototype checklist, which was tested in eight practices. Qualitative data on the utility and usability of the prototype was collected through a series of semi-structured interviews.

Results

In testing the prototype four of nine items on the checklist were achieved by all eight practices. Three items were achieved by seven of eight practices and two items by six of eight practices. Participants welcomed the brevity and ease of use of the prototype, that it might be used within time scales at their discretion and its ability to engage a range of practice staff in relevant discussions on the safety of existing processes. The items relating to prescribing safety were considered particularly useful.

Conclusions

As a result of this work the concise patient safety checklist tool, specifically designed for general practice, has now been made available as part of an online Patient Safety Toolkit hosted by the Royal College of General Practitioners. Senior practice staff such as practice managers and GP partners should find it a useful tool to understand the safety of less explored yet important safety processes within the practice.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kachalia A, et al. Legal and policy interventions to improve patient safety. Circulation. 2016;133(7):661–71..PubMedCrossRef Kachalia A, et al. Legal and policy interventions to improve patient safety. Circulation. 2016;133(7):661–71..PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Wachter RM. Patient safety at ten: unmistakable progress, troubling gaps. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(1):165–73.CrossRef Wachter RM. Patient safety at ten: unmistakable progress, troubling gaps. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(1):165–73.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Haynes AB, et al. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(5):491–9.PubMedCrossRef Haynes AB, et al. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(5):491–9.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lorincz CY, et al. Research in ambulatory patient safety 2000–2010: a 10-year review. Chicago: American Medical Association; 2011. Lorincz CY, et al. Research in ambulatory patient safety 2000–2010: a 10-year review. Chicago: American Medical Association; 2011.
10.
go back to reference Bell, B., et al., The Development and Testing of the NIHR-SPCR Patient Safety Toolkit for General Practices in England (Part 2). 2020. Bell, B., et al., The Development and Testing of the NIHR-SPCR Patient Safety Toolkit for General Practices in England (Part 2). 2020.
12.
15.
go back to reference Ricci-Cabello I, et al. Measuring experiences and outcomes of patient safety in primary care: a systematic review of available instruments. Fam Pract. 2015;32(1):106–19.PubMedCrossRef Ricci-Cabello I, et al. Measuring experiences and outcomes of patient safety in primary care: a systematic review of available instruments. Fam Pract. 2015;32(1):106–19.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Bell BG, et al. Safety climate in English general practices: workload pressures may compromise safety. J Eval Clin Pract. 2016;22(1):71–6.PubMedCrossRef Bell BG, et al. Safety climate in English general practices: workload pressures may compromise safety. J Eval Clin Pract. 2016;22(1):71–6.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Robinson OC. Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: a theoretical and practical guide. Qual Res Psychol. 2014;11(1):25–41.CrossRef Robinson OC. Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: a theoretical and practical guide. Qual Res Psychol. 2014;11(1):25–41.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Damschroder LJ, et al. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:50.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Damschroder LJ, et al. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:50.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Campbell SM, Chauhan U, Lester H. Primary medical care provider accreditation (PMCPA): pilot evaluation. Br J Gen Pract. 2010;60(576):295–304.PubMedCrossRef Campbell SM, Chauhan U, Lester H. Primary medical care provider accreditation (PMCPA): pilot evaluation. Br J Gen Pract. 2010;60(576):295–304.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Casalino LP, et al. Frequency of failure to inform patients of clinically significant outpatient test results. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(12):1123–9.PubMedCrossRef Casalino LP, et al. Frequency of failure to inform patients of clinically significant outpatient test results. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(12):1123–9.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Dumay AC, Haaker TI. The electronic locum record for general practitioners: outcome of an evaluation study in the Netherlands. Int J Med Inform. 2010;79(9):623–36.PubMedCrossRef Dumay AC, Haaker TI. The electronic locum record for general practitioners: outcome of an evaluation study in the Netherlands. Int J Med Inform. 2010;79(9):623–36.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Xyrichis A, Lowton K. What fosters or prevents interprofessional teamworking in primary and community care? A literature review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2008;45(1):140–53.PubMedCrossRef Xyrichis A, Lowton K. What fosters or prevents interprofessional teamworking in primary and community care? A literature review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2008;45(1):140–53.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Porcelli PJ, Waitman LR, Brown SH. A review of medication reconciliation issues and experiences with clinical staff and information systems. Appl Clin Inform. 2010;1(4):442–61.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Porcelli PJ, Waitman LR, Brown SH. A review of medication reconciliation issues and experiences with clinical staff and information systems. Appl Clin Inform. 2010;1(4):442–61.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Nassaralla CL, et al. Implementation of a medication reconciliation process in an ambulatory internal medicine clinic. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007;16(2):90–4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Nassaralla CL, et al. Implementation of a medication reconciliation process in an ambulatory internal medicine clinic. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007;16(2):90–4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Anthony D, et al. In: Henriksen K, et al., editors. Re-engineering the hospital discharge: an example of a multifaceted process evaluation, in advances in patient safety: from research to implementation (Concepts and Methodology), vol. 2. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2005. Anthony D, et al. In: Henriksen K, et al., editors. Re-engineering the hospital discharge: an example of a multifaceted process evaluation, in advances in patient safety: from research to implementation (Concepts and Methodology), vol. 2. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2005.
29.
go back to reference Mir C, et al. Impact of a computerized physician order entry system on compliance with prescription accuracy requirements. Pharm World Sci. 2009;31(5):596–602.PubMedCrossRef Mir C, et al. Impact of a computerized physician order entry system on compliance with prescription accuracy requirements. Pharm World Sci. 2009;31(5):596–602.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Eguale T, et al. Enhancing pharmacosurveillance with systematic collection of treatment indication in electronic prescribing: a validation study in Canada. Drug Saf. 2010;33(7):559–67.PubMedCrossRef Eguale T, et al. Enhancing pharmacosurveillance with systematic collection of treatment indication in electronic prescribing: a validation study in Canada. Drug Saf. 2010;33(7):559–67.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Avery AJ, et al. Identifying and establishing consensus on the most important safety features of GP computer systems: e-Delphi study. Inform Prim Care. 2005;13(1):3–12.PubMed Avery AJ, et al. Identifying and establishing consensus on the most important safety features of GP computer systems: e-Delphi study. Inform Prim Care. 2005;13(1):3–12.PubMed
34.
go back to reference Hood C. Gaming in targetworld: the targets approach to managing British public services. Public Adm Rev. 2006;66(4):515–21.CrossRef Hood C. Gaming in targetworld: the targets approach to managing British public services. Public Adm Rev. 2006;66(4):515–21.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Burian BK, et al. More than a tick box: medical checklist development, design, and use. Anesth Analg. 2018;126(1):223–32.PubMedCrossRef Burian BK, et al. More than a tick box: medical checklist development, design, and use. Anesth Analg. 2018;126(1):223–32.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Campbell SM, et al. In: Grol M, Dautzenberg P, editors. External accountability for primary care, in Quality Management in Primary Care, R. Gütersloh: Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung; 2004. Campbell SM, et al. In: Grol M, Dautzenberg P, editors. External accountability for primary care, in Quality Management in Primary Care, R. Gütersloh: Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung; 2004.
37.
go back to reference Chevalier JM, Buckles DJ. Participatory action research: theory and methods for engaged inquiry. U.K.: Routledge; 2013.CrossRef Chevalier JM, Buckles DJ. Participatory action research: theory and methods for engaged inquiry. U.K.: Routledge; 2013.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Stevenson K, et al. Features of primary health care teams associated with successful quality improvement of diabetes care: a qualitative study. Fam Pract. 2001;18(1):21–6.PubMedCrossRef Stevenson K, et al. Features of primary health care teams associated with successful quality improvement of diabetes care: a qualitative study. Fam Pract. 2001;18(1):21–6.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Berwick DM. Improvement, trust, and the healthcare workforce. BMJ Qual Safety. 2003;12(6):448–52.CrossRef Berwick DM. Improvement, trust, and the healthcare workforce. BMJ Qual Safety. 2003;12(6):448–52.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Ferlie EB, Shortell SM. Improving the quality of health care in the United Kingdom and the United States: a framework for change. Milbank Q. 2001;79(2):281–315.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Ferlie EB, Shortell SM. Improving the quality of health care in the United Kingdom and the United States: a framework for change. Milbank Q. 2001;79(2):281–315.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Campbell SM, et al. Implementing clinical governance in English primary care groups/trusts: reconciling quality improvement and quality assurance. Qual Safety Health Care. 2002;11(1):9–14.CrossRef Campbell SM, et al. Implementing clinical governance in English primary care groups/trusts: reconciling quality improvement and quality assurance. Qual Safety Health Care. 2002;11(1):9–14.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Pedros C, et al. Prevalence, risk factors and main features of adverse drug reactions leading to hospital admission. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2014;70(3):361–7.PubMedCrossRef Pedros C, et al. Prevalence, risk factors and main features of adverse drug reactions leading to hospital admission. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2014;70(3):361–7.PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Hales BM, Pronovost PJ. The checklist- a tool for error management and performance improvement. J Crit Care. 2006;21(3):231–5.PubMedCrossRef Hales BM, Pronovost PJ. The checklist- a tool for error management and performance improvement. J Crit Care. 2006;21(3):231–5.PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Litchfield I, et al. Influences on the adoption of patient safety innovation in primary care: a qualitative exploration of staff perspectives. BMC Fam Pract. 2018;19(1):72.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Litchfield I, et al. Influences on the adoption of patient safety innovation in primary care: a qualitative exploration of staff perspectives. BMC Fam Pract. 2018;19(1):72.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
49.
go back to reference BMA, BMA responds to data on NHS vacancies, GP workforce and GP appointments. 2019. BMA, BMA responds to data on NHS vacancies, GP workforce and GP appointments. 2019.
50.
go back to reference Greenhalgh T, Heath I. Measuring quality in the therapeutic relationship-part 1: objective approaches. Qual Safety Health Care. 2010;19(6):475–8. Greenhalgh T, Heath I. Measuring quality in the therapeutic relationship-part 1: objective approaches. Qual Safety Health Care. 2010;19(6):475–8.
51.
go back to reference Greenhalgh T, Heath I. Measuring quality in the therapeutic relationship-part 2: subjective approaches. Qual Safety Health Care. 2010;19(6):479–83. Greenhalgh T, Heath I. Measuring quality in the therapeutic relationship-part 2: subjective approaches. Qual Safety Health Care. 2010;19(6):479–83.
Metadata
Title
Development of the prototype concise safe systems checklist tool for general practice
Authors
Ian Litchfield
Rachel Spencer
Brian G. Bell
Anthony Avery
Katherine Perryman
Kate Marsden
Sheila Greenfield
Stephen Campbell
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05396-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Health Services Research 1/2020 Go to the issue