Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Research

Development of the core of an ICF-based instrument for the assessment of work capacity and guidance in return to work of employees on sick leave: a multidisciplinary modified Delphi study

Authors: Astrid de Wind, Birgit H. P. M. Donker-Cools, Lyanne Jansen, Clare H. Luymes, Sylvia J. van der Burg-Vermeulen, Shirley Oomens, Johannes R. Anema, Frederieke G. Schaafsma

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Several occupational health disciplines are involved in return to work guidance, implying that good interdisciplinary collaboration is important. A shared conceptual framework and a common language for the assessment of work capacity and guidance in return to work is expected to be at the benefit of appropriate and sustainable employability of sick employees. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) can be considered a shared conceptual framework and is also promising in terms of a common language. The purpose of the current study is to reach multidisciplinary consensus among occupational health professionals on the content of an ICF-based instrument for the assessment of work capacity and guidance in return to work.

Methods

To obtain multidisciplinary consensus we conducted a modified Delphi study among twelve occupational health experts, including four occupational physicians, four insurance physicians and four labour experts. The study included two e-mail rounds and two virtual meetings. In the consecutive rounds the experts assessed ICF items as well as a list of non-ICF-based work-related environmental factors on their relevance for the assessment of the work capacity and guidance in return to work together with their interpretability.

Results

The four consecutive Delphi rounds resulted in 20 items that are minimally needed for the assessment of the work capacity and return to work possibilities of employees on sick leave. The final list included six items on personal functioning, seven items on social functioning and seven items on physical functioning.

Conclusions

This set of items forms the core of an ICF-based instrument, which is expected to facilitate interdisciplinary and intradisciplinary communication because of the use of a shared conceptual framework. As such, it should be of help in the guidance in return to work of employees on sick leave and contribute to appropriate and sustainable employability.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bickenbach J, Posarac A, Cieza A, et al. Assessing Disability in Working Age Population - A Paradigm Shift: from Impairment and Functional Limitation to the Disability Approach. Washington D.C.: The World Bank; 2015. Bickenbach J, Posarac A, Cieza A, et al. Assessing Disability in Working Age Population - A Paradigm Shift: from Impairment and Functional Limitation to the Disability Approach. Washington D.C.: The World Bank; 2015.
2.
go back to reference Sengers JH, Abma FI, Wilming L, et al. Content validation of a practice-based work capacity assessment instrument using ICF core sets. J Occup Rehabil. 2021;31(2):293–315.CrossRef Sengers JH, Abma FI, Wilming L, et al. Content validation of a practice-based work capacity assessment instrument using ICF core sets. J Occup Rehabil. 2021;31(2):293–315.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference OECD. Sickness, Disability and Work: Breaking the Barriers. 2010. OECD. Sickness, Disability and Work: Breaking the Barriers. 2010.
4.
go back to reference Weerdesteijn KHN, Schaafsma FG, van der Beek AJ, et al. Sick leave assessments of workers with subjective health complaints: a cross-sectional study on differences among physicians working in occupational health care. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(7):967–74.CrossRef Weerdesteijn KHN, Schaafsma FG, van der Beek AJ, et al. Sick leave assessments of workers with subjective health complaints: a cross-sectional study on differences among physicians working in occupational health care. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(7):967–74.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Heida RA, Anema JR, Mentink RHCJ. Gezamenlijk werken aan een betere afstemming. TBV – Tijdschrift voor Bedrijfs- en Verzekeringsgeneeskunde. 2005 2005/11/01;13(11):409–412. Heida RA, Anema JR, Mentink RHCJ. Gezamenlijk werken aan een betere afstemming. TBV – Tijdschrift voor Bedrijfs- en Verzekeringsgeneeskunde. 2005 2005/11/01;13(11):409–412.
6.
go back to reference World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health : ICF. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001. World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health : ICF. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
7.
go back to reference Ståhl C, Seing I, Gerdle B, et al. Fair or square? Experiences of introducing a new method for assessing general work ability in a sickness insurance context. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(6):656–65.CrossRef Ståhl C, Seing I, Gerdle B, et al. Fair or square? Experiences of introducing a new method for assessing general work ability in a sickness insurance context. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(6):656–65.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference de Rijk A. Work disability Prevention in the Netherlands: A Key Role for Employers. . In: MacEachen E, editor. The Science and Politics of Work Disability Prevention. 1 ed: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group; 2018. p. 223–241. de Rijk A. Work disability Prevention in the Netherlands: A Key Role for Employers. . In: MacEachen E, editor. The Science and Politics of Work Disability Prevention. 1 ed: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group; 2018. p. 223–241.
10.
go back to reference Jones J, Hunter D. Consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ. 1995;311(7001):376–80.CrossRef Jones J, Hunter D. Consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ. 1995;311(7001):376–80.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Fink A, Kosecoff J, Chassin M, et al. Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use. Am J Public Health. 1984;74(9):979–83.CrossRef Fink A, Kosecoff J, Chassin M, et al. Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use. Am J Public Health. 1984;74(9):979–83.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Amsterdam UMC. Beschrijving Arbeidsbelastbaarheid & Re-integratie - Hoofddocument [Description Work Capacity & Re-integration - Main document]. Amsterdam: Amsterdam UMC; 2021. Amsterdam UMC. Beschrijving Arbeidsbelastbaarheid & Re-integratie - Hoofddocument [Description Work Capacity & Re-integration - Main document]. Amsterdam: Amsterdam UMC; 2021.
13.
go back to reference Amsterdam UMC. Beschrijving Arbeidsbelastbaarheid & Re-integratie - Achtergronddocument [Description Work Capacity & Re-integration - Background document]. 2021. Amsterdam UMC. Beschrijving Arbeidsbelastbaarheid & Re-integratie - Achtergronddocument [Description Work Capacity & Re-integration - Background document]. 2021.
14.
go back to reference Selb M, Escorpizo R, Kostanjsek N, et al. A guide on how to develop an International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Core Set. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2015;51(1):105–17. Selb M, Escorpizo R, Kostanjsek N, et al. A guide on how to develop an International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Core Set. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2015;51(1):105–17.
15.
go back to reference Brage S, Donceel P, Falez F. Development of ICF core set for disability evaluation in social security. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(18):1392–6.CrossRef Brage S, Donceel P, Falez F. Development of ICF core set for disability evaluation in social security. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(18):1392–6.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Finger ME, Escorpizo R, Glässel A, et al. ICF Core Set for vocational rehabilitation: results of an international consensus conference. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(5):429–38.CrossRef Finger ME, Escorpizo R, Glässel A, et al. ICF Core Set for vocational rehabilitation: results of an international consensus conference. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(5):429–38.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Knudsen AK, Harvey SB, Mykletun A, et al. Common mental disorders and long-term sickness absence in a general working population. The Hordaland Health Study. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2013;127(4):287–97.CrossRef Knudsen AK, Harvey SB, Mykletun A, et al. Common mental disorders and long-term sickness absence in a general working population.  The Hordaland Health Study. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2013;127(4):287–97.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Spanjer J. Belastbaarheidgericht Beoordelingsgesprek (BGB). 2019. Spanjer J. Belastbaarheidgericht Beoordelingsgesprek (BGB). 2019.
19.
go back to reference Heerkens YF, de Brouwer CPM, Engels JA, et al. Elaboration of the contextual factors of the ICF for occupational health care. Work. 2017;57(2):187–204.CrossRef Heerkens YF, de Brouwer CPM, Engels JA, et al. Elaboration of the contextual factors of the ICF for occupational health care. Work. 2017;57(2):187–204.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Heerkens Y, Engels J, Kuiper C, et al. The use of the ICF to describe work related factors influencing the health of employees. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26(17):1060–6.CrossRef Heerkens Y, Engels J, Kuiper C, et al. The use of the ICF to describe work related factors influencing the health of employees. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26(17):1060–6.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Finger M, de Bie R, Selb M, et al. An examination of concepts in vocational rehabilitation that could not be linked to the ICF based on an analysis of secondary data. Work. 2016;53(4):775–92.CrossRef Finger M, de Bie R, Selb M, et al. An examination of concepts in vocational rehabilitation that could not be linked to the ICF based on an analysis of secondary data. Work. 2016;53(4):775–92.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference de Wit M, Wind H, Snippen NC, et al. Physicians’ perspectives on person-related factors associated with work participation and methods used to obtain information about these factors. J Occup Environ Med. 2019;61(6):499–504.CrossRef de Wit M, Wind H, Snippen NC, et al. Physicians’ perspectives on person-related factors associated with work participation and methods used to obtain information about these factors. J Occup Environ Med. 2019;61(6):499–504.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Anner J, Brage S, Donceel P, et al. Validation of the EUMASS Core Set for medical evaluation of work disability. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(25):2147–56.CrossRef Anner J, Brage S, Donceel P, et al. Validation of the EUMASS Core Set for medical evaluation of work disability. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(25):2147–56.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Murphy MK, Black NA, Lamping DL, et al. Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development. Health Technol Assess. 1998;2(3):i-iv, 1–88. Murphy MK, Black NA, Lamping DL, et al. Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development. Health Technol Assess. 1998;2(3):i-iv, 1–88.
Metadata
Title
Development of the core of an ICF-based instrument for the assessment of work capacity and guidance in return to work of employees on sick leave: a multidisciplinary modified Delphi study
Authors
Astrid de Wind
Birgit H. P. M. Donker-Cools
Lyanne Jansen
Clare H. Luymes
Sylvia J. van der Burg-Vermeulen
Shirley Oomens
Johannes R. Anema
Frederieke G. Schaafsma
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14653-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Public Health 1/2022 Go to the issue