Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 2/2015

01-02-2015 | Special Article

Development of protocol for the management of cervical cancer symptoms in resource-constrained developing countries

Authors: Ramaiah Vinay Kumar, Suman Bhasker

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 2/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Cervical cancer is the commonest malignancy of women in economically emerging countries. Patients have distressing symptoms from presentation through follow-up or end of life. Cervical cancer imposes significant burden on health care system due to distressing symptoms and associated loss of quality-adjusted life years (QALY). Multitude of drugs and surgical measures in various combinations can relieve these distressing symptoms and various clinical conditions. The protocols and guidelines for alleviation or relief of symptoms by general pharmacological and surgical measures form an important policy subject in planning cervical cancer management program. These protocol and guidelines are based on the mechanism of action of drugs, extrapolation from management of similar symptoms, and clinical situations arising out of other non-cancerous conditions and experience of health care professionals. Therefore, rigorous evaluation of effectiveness of supportive health care services in developing countries is the need of hour. However, evaluation of such protocol and guidelines are not feasible in emerging economies due to resource constraint. Industrialized affluent nations are also not able to implement and further support care guidelines despite its recognition as an integral part of multidisciplinary management of cancer. Aforementioned factors have created blind spot zone of management purview of cervical cancer. Hence, we attempt to develop protocol for management of adverse events of cervical cancer. Symptoms’ and medical conditions’ management guidelines evolved on the basis of empirical clinical practice in community and premier oncology centers in resource-constrained developing countries has been presented in this short report. This report should not be an end in itself but has to attract attention of policy-makers, academicians, researchers, and practitioners toward advancing supportive care needs of cancer patients in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC).
Literature
1.
go back to reference Long HJ, Laack NN, Gostout BS (2007) Prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of cervical cancer. Mayo Clin Proc 82(12):1566–74PubMedCrossRef Long HJ, Laack NN, Gostout BS (2007) Prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of cervical cancer. Mayo Clin Proc 82(12):1566–74PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Pasek M, Suchocka L, Urbański K (2013) Quality of life in cervical cancer patients treated with radiation therapy. J Clin Nurs 22(5–6):690–7PubMed Pasek M, Suchocka L, Urbański K (2013) Quality of life in cervical cancer patients treated with radiation therapy. J Clin Nurs 22(5–6):690–7PubMed
3.
go back to reference Stone HB, Coleman CN, Anscher MS, McBride WH (2003) Effects of radiation on normal tissue: consequences and mechanisms. Lancet Oncol 4(9):529–36PubMedCrossRef Stone HB, Coleman CN, Anscher MS, McBride WH (2003) Effects of radiation on normal tissue: consequences and mechanisms. Lancet Oncol 4(9):529–36PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Baze C, Monk BJ, Herzog TJ (2008) The impact of cervical cancer on quality of life: a personal account. Gynecol Oncol 109(2 Suppl):S12–4PubMedCrossRef Baze C, Monk BJ, Herzog TJ (2008) The impact of cervical cancer on quality of life: a personal account. Gynecol Oncol 109(2 Suppl):S12–4PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program: NCI Common Terminology Criteria for AE(CTCAE v4.0). Book NCI Common Terminology Criteria for AE(CTCAE v4.0) 2006 Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program: NCI Common Terminology Criteria for AE(CTCAE v4.0). Book NCI Common Terminology Criteria for AE(CTCAE v4.0) 2006
6.
go back to reference Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61(2):69–90, Mar-AprPubMedCrossRef Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61(2):69–90, Mar-AprPubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Aapro M, Andre F, Blackwell K, Calvo E, Jahanzeb M, Papazisis K et al (2014) Adverse event management in patients with advanced cancer receiving oral everolimus: focus on breast cancer. Ann Oncol 25(4):763–73PubMedCrossRef Aapro M, Andre F, Blackwell K, Calvo E, Jahanzeb M, Papazisis K et al (2014) Adverse event management in patients with advanced cancer receiving oral everolimus: focus on breast cancer. Ann Oncol 25(4):763–73PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Peterson ME (2013) Management of adverse events in patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer treated with everolimus: observations from a phase III clinical trial. Support Care Cancer 21(8):2341–2349PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Peterson ME (2013) Management of adverse events in patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer treated with everolimus: observations from a phase III clinical trial. Support Care Cancer 21(8):2341–2349PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Scotté F (2012) The importance of supportive care in optimizing treatment outcomes of patients with advanced prostate cancer. Oncologist 17(Suppl 1):23–30PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Scotté F (2012) The importance of supportive care in optimizing treatment outcomes of patients with advanced prostate cancer. Oncologist 17(Suppl 1):23–30PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Urban C, Benesch M, Lackner H, Schwinger W, Kerbl R, Gadner H (1997) The influence of maximum supportive care on dose compliance and survival. Single-center analysis of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia and non-Hodgkin’s-lymphoma treated within 1984–1993. Klin Padiatr 209(4):235–42, Jul-AugPubMedCrossRef Urban C, Benesch M, Lackner H, Schwinger W, Kerbl R, Gadner H (1997) The influence of maximum supportive care on dose compliance and survival. Single-center analysis of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia and non-Hodgkin’s-lymphoma treated within 1984–1993. Klin Padiatr 209(4):235–42, Jul-AugPubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kreys ED, Kim TY, Delgado A, Koeller JM (2014) Impact of cancer supportive care pathways compliance on emergency department visits and hospitalizations. J Oncol Pract 10(3):168–73PubMedCrossRef Kreys ED, Kim TY, Delgado A, Koeller JM (2014) Impact of cancer supportive care pathways compliance on emergency department visits and hospitalizations. J Oncol Pract 10(3):168–73PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Murthy NS, Chaudhry K, Rath GK (2008) Burden of cancer and projections for 2016, Indian scenario: gaps in the availability of radiotherapy treatment facilities. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 9(4):671–7, Oct-DecPubMed Murthy NS, Chaudhry K, Rath GK (2008) Burden of cancer and projections for 2016, Indian scenario: gaps in the availability of radiotherapy treatment facilities. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 9(4):671–7, Oct-DecPubMed
16.
go back to reference Park K (2005) Parks’ textbook of preventive and social medicine, 21st edn. Banarsidas Bhanot, Jabalpur (India) Park K (2005) Parks’ textbook of preventive and social medicine, 21st edn. Banarsidas Bhanot, Jabalpur (India)
17.
go back to reference Clay RA (2010) More than one way to measure. Monit Psychol 41(8):52 Clay RA (2010) More than one way to measure. Monit Psychol 41(8):52
18.
go back to reference Wendler D, Emanuel EJ, Lie RK (2004) The standard of care debate: can research in developing countries be both ethical and responsive to those countries’ health needs? Am J Public Health 94(6):923–8PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Wendler D, Emanuel EJ, Lie RK (2004) The standard of care debate: can research in developing countries be both ethical and responsive to those countries’ health needs? Am J Public Health 94(6):923–8PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Hack TF, Carlson L, Butler L, Degner LF, Jakulj F, Pickles T et al (2011) Facilitating the implementation of empirically valid interventions in psychosocial oncology and supportive care. Support Care Cancer 19(8):1097–105PubMedCrossRef Hack TF, Carlson L, Butler L, Degner LF, Jakulj F, Pickles T et al (2011) Facilitating the implementation of empirically valid interventions in psychosocial oncology and supportive care. Support Care Cancer 19(8):1097–105PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Kane RL, Maciejewski M, Finch M (1997) The relationship of patient satisfaction with care and clinical outcomes. Med Care 35(7):714–30PubMedCrossRef Kane RL, Maciejewski M, Finch M (1997) The relationship of patient satisfaction with care and clinical outcomes. Med Care 35(7):714–30PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Zolnierek KB, Dimatteo MR (2009) Physician communication and patient adherence to treatment: a meta-analysis. Med Care 47:826–834PubMedCrossRef Zolnierek KB, Dimatteo MR (2009) Physician communication and patient adherence to treatment: a meta-analysis. Med Care 47:826–834PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Doyle C, Lennox L, Bell D (2013) A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness. BMJ Open 3:e001570PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Doyle C, Lennox L, Bell D (2013) A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness. BMJ Open 3:e001570PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Hojat M, Louis DZ, Markham FW et al (2011) Physicians’ empathy and clinical outcomes for diabetic patients. Acad Med 86:359–364PubMedCrossRef Hojat M, Louis DZ, Markham FW et al (2011) Physicians’ empathy and clinical outcomes for diabetic patients. Acad Med 86:359–364PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Ratanawongsa N, Karter AJ, Parker MM et al (2013) Communication and medication refill adherence: the diabetes study of Northern California. JAMA Intern Med 173:210–218PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Ratanawongsa N, Karter AJ, Parker MM et al (2013) Communication and medication refill adherence: the diabetes study of Northern California. JAMA Intern Med 173:210–218PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Bhojani U, Mishra A, Amruthavalli S, Devadasan N, Kolsteren P, De Henauw S et al (2013) Constraints faced by urban poor in managing diabetes care: patients’ perspectives from South India. Glob Health Action 6:22258PubMed Bhojani U, Mishra A, Amruthavalli S, Devadasan N, Kolsteren P, De Henauw S et al (2013) Constraints faced by urban poor in managing diabetes care: patients’ perspectives from South India. Glob Health Action 6:22258PubMed
27.
go back to reference Thompson C, Cullum N, McCaughan D, Sheldon T, Raynor P (2004) Nurses, information use, and clinical decision making—the real world potential for evidence-based decisions in nursing. Evid Based Nurs 7(3):68–72PubMedCrossRef Thompson C, Cullum N, McCaughan D, Sheldon T, Raynor P (2004) Nurses, information use, and clinical decision making—the real world potential for evidence-based decisions in nursing. Evid Based Nurs 7(3):68–72PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Tripathi KD (2008) Essentials of medical pharmacology, 6th edn. Jaypee Brothers, New Delhi (India)CrossRef Tripathi KD (2008) Essentials of medical pharmacology, 6th edn. Jaypee Brothers, New Delhi (India)CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Longo DL, Fauci AS, Kasper DL, Hauser SL, Jameson JL, Loscalzo J (2012) Harrison’s principles of internal medicine, 18th edn. McGraw-Hills, New York Longo DL, Fauci AS, Kasper DL, Hauser SL, Jameson JL, Loscalzo J (2012) Harrison’s principles of internal medicine, 18th edn. McGraw-Hills, New York
Metadata
Title
Development of protocol for the management of cervical cancer symptoms in resource-constrained developing countries
Authors
Ramaiah Vinay Kumar
Suman Bhasker
Publication date
01-02-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 2/2015
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2427-5

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

Supportive Care in Cancer 2/2015 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine