Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Mental Health Systems 1/2012

Open Access 01-12-2012 | Research

Development of disaster mental health guidelines through the Delphi process in Japan

Authors: Yuriko Suzuki, Maiko Fukasawa, Satomi Nakajima, Tomomi Narisawa, Yoshiharu Kim

Published in: International Journal of Mental Health Systems | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The mental health community in Japan had started reviewing the country’s disaster mental health guidelines before the Great East Japan Earthquake, aiming to revise them based on evidence and experience accumulated in the last decade. Given the wealth of experience and knowledge acquired in the field by many Japanese mental health professionals, we decided to develop the guidelines through systematic consensus building and selected the Delphi method.

Methods

After a thorough literature review and focus group interviews, 96 items regarding disaster mental health were included in Delphi Round 1. Of 100 mental health professionals experienced in disaster response who were invited to participate, 97 agreed. The appropriateness of each statement was assessed by the participants using a Likert scale (1: extremely inappropriate, 9: very appropriate) and providing free comments in three rounds. Consensus by experts was defined as an average score of ≥7 for which ≥70% of participants assigned this score, and items reaching consensus were included in the final guidelines.

Results

Overall, of the 96 items (89 initially asked and 7 added items), 77 items were agreed on (46 items in Round 1, and 19 positive and 12 negative agreed on items in Round 2). In Round 2, three statements with which participants agreed most strongly were: 1) A protocol for emergency work structure and information flow should be prepared in normal times; 2) The mental health team should attend regular meetings on health and medicine to exchange information; and 3) Generally, it is recommended not to ask disaster survivors about psychological problems at the initial response but ask about their present worries and physical condition. Three statements with which the participants disagreed most strongly in this round were: 1) Individuals should be encouraged to provide detailed accounts of their experiences; 2) Individuals should be provided with education if they are interested in receiving it; and 3) Bad news should be withheld from distressed individuals for fear of causing more upset.

Conclusions

Most items which achieved agreement in Round 1 were statements described in previous guidelines or publications, or statements regarding the basic attitude of human service providers. The revised guidelines were thus developed based on the collective wisdom drawn from Japanese practitioners’ experience while also considering the similarities and differences from the international standards.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fukasawa M, Suzuki Y, Kim Y: Needs assessment of local governments for the disaster mental health services. Jpn Bull Soc Psychit. 2010, 19: 16-26. Japanese Fukasawa M, Suzuki Y, Kim Y: Needs assessment of local governments for the disaster mental health services. Jpn Bull Soc Psychit. 2010, 19: 16-26. Japanese
6.
go back to reference Kelly CM, Jorm AF, Kitchener BA: Development of mental health first aid guideline on how a member of the public can support a person affected by a traumatic event: a Delphi study. BMC Psychiatry. 2010, 10: 49-63. 10.1186/1471-244X-10-49.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Kelly CM, Jorm AF, Kitchener BA: Development of mental health first aid guideline on how a member of the public can support a person affected by a traumatic event: a Delphi study. BMC Psychiatry. 2010, 10: 49-63. 10.1186/1471-244X-10-49.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Bisson JI, Tavakoly B, Witteveen AB, Ajdukovi D, Jehel L, Johansen VJ, Nordanger D, Garcia FO, Punamaki RL, Schnyder U, Sezgin AU, Wittmann L, Olff M: TENTS guidelines: development of post-disaster psychosocial care guidelines through a Delphi process. Br J Psychiatry. 2010, 196: 69-74. 10.1192/bjp.bp.109.066266.CrossRefPubMed Bisson JI, Tavakoly B, Witteveen AB, Ajdukovi D, Jehel L, Johansen VJ, Nordanger D, Garcia FO, Punamaki RL, Schnyder U, Sezgin AU, Wittmann L, Olff M: TENTS guidelines: development of post-disaster psychosocial care guidelines through a Delphi process. Br J Psychiatry. 2010, 196: 69-74. 10.1192/bjp.bp.109.066266.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Suzuki Y: Role identification and coordination of care in disaster mental health. Journal of National Institute of Public Health. 2008, 57: 234-239. Japanese Suzuki Y: Role identification and coordination of care in disaster mental health. Journal of National Institute of Public Health. 2008, 57: 234-239. Japanese
9.
go back to reference Suzuki Y, Fukasawa M, Kim Y: Preparedness for disaster mental health among public health nurses in Japan. Japanese Journal of Traumatic Stress. 2010, 8: 45-53. Japanese Suzuki Y, Fukasawa M, Kim Y: Preparedness for disaster mental health among public health nurses in Japan. Japanese Journal of Traumatic Stress. 2010, 8: 45-53. Japanese
10.
go back to reference Linestone HA, Turoff M: The Delphi method: Techniques and Applications. 1975, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA Linestone HA, Turoff M: The Delphi method: Techniques and Applications. 1975, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
Metadata
Title
Development of disaster mental health guidelines through the Delphi process in Japan
Authors
Yuriko Suzuki
Maiko Fukasawa
Satomi Nakajima
Tomomi Narisawa
Yoshiharu Kim
Publication date
01-12-2012
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
International Journal of Mental Health Systems / Issue 1/2012
Electronic ISSN: 1752-4458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-4458-6-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

International Journal of Mental Health Systems 1/2012 Go to the issue